Intravitreal diclofenac versus intravitreal bevacizumab in naive diabetic macular edema: a randomized double-masked clinical trial

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema: a network meta-analysis

Background

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is a common complication of diabetic retinopathy. Antiangiogenic therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) can reduce oedema, improve vision, and prevent further visual loss. These drugs have replaced laser photocoagulation as the standard of care for people with DMO. In the previous update of this review, we found moderate-quality evidence that, at 12 months, aflibercept was slightly more effective than ranibizumab and bevacizumab for improving vision in people with DMO, although the difference may have been clinically insignificant (less than 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), or five Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, or one ETDRS line).

Objectives

The objective of this updated review was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the different anti-VEGF drugs in RCTs at longer followup (24 months).

Search methods

We searched various electronic databases on 8 July 2022.

Selection criteria

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any anti-angiogenic drug with an anti-VEGF mechanism of action versus another anti-VEGF drug, another treatment, sham, or no treatment in people with DMO.

Data collection and analysis

We used standard Cochrane methods for pairwise meta-analysis and we augmented this evidence using network meta-analysis (NMA) methods. We used the Stata 'network' meta-analysis package for all analyses. We used the CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) web application to grade the certainty of the evidence.

Main results

We included 23 studies (13 with industry funding) that enrolled 3513 people with DMO (median central retinal thickness (CRT) 460 microns, interquartile range (IQR) 424 to 482) and moderate vision loss (median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 0.48 logMAR, IQR 0.42 to 0.55. One study that investigated ranibizumab versus sham and one study that mainly enrolled people with subclinical DMO and normal BCVA were not suitable for inclusion in the efficacy NMA. Consistent with the previous update of this review, we used ranibizumab as the reference drug for efficacy, and control (including laser, observation, and sham) as the reference for systemic safety. Eight trials provided data on the primary outcome (change in BCVA at 24 months, in logMAR: lower is better). We found no evidence of a difference between the following interventions and ranibizumab alone: aflibercept (mean difference (MD) -0.05 logMAR, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.12 to 0.02; moderate certainty); bevacizumab (MD -0.01 logMAR, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.10; low certainty), brolucizumab (MD 0.00 logMAR, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.07; low certainty), ranibizumab plus deferred laser (MD 0.00 logMAR, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.10; low certainty), and ranibizumab plus prompt laser (MD 0.03 logMAR, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.09; very low certainty). We also analysed BCVA change at 12 months, finding moderate-certainty evidence of increased efficacy with brolucizumab (MD -0.07 logMAR, 95%CI -0.10 to -0.03 logMAR), faricimab (MD -0.08 logMAR, 95% CI -0.12 to -0.05), and aflibercept (MD -0.07 logMAR, 95 % CI -0.10 to -0.04) compared to ranibizumab alone, but the difference could be clinically insignificant. Compared to ranibizumab alone, NMA of six trials showed no evidence of a difference with aflibercept (moderate certainty), bevacizumab (low certainty), or ranibizumab with prompt (very low certainty) or deferred laser (low certainty) regarding improvement by three or more ETDRS lines at 24 months. There was moderate-certainty evidence of greater CRT reduction at 24 months with brolucizumab (MD -23 microns, 95% CI -65 to -1 9) and aflibercept (MD -26 microns, 95% CI -53 to 0.9) compared to ranibizumab. There was moderate-certainty evidence of lesser CRT reduction with bevacizumab (MD 28 microns, 95% CI 0 to 56), ranibizumab plus deferred laser (MD 63 microns, 95% CI 18 to 109), and ranibizumab plus prompt laser (MD 72 microns, 95% CI 25 to 119) compared with ranibizumab alone. Regarding all-cause mortality at the longest available follow-up (20 trials), we found no evidence of increased risk of death for any drug compared to control, although effects were in the direction of an increase, and clinically relevant increases could not be ruled out. The certainty of this evidence was low for bevacizumab (risk ratio (RR) 2.10, 95% CI 0.75 to 5.88), brolucizumab (RR 2.92, 95% CI 0.68 to 12.58), faricimab (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.45 to 8.00), ranibizumab (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.34), and very low for conbercept (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.81) and aflibercept (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.77). Estimates for Antiplatelet Trialists Collaboration arterial thromboembolic events at 24 months did not suggest an increase with any drug compared to control, but the NMA was overall incoherent and the evidence was of low or very low certainty. Ocular adverse events were rare and poorly reported and could not be assessed in NMAs.

Authors' conclusions

There is limited evidence of the comparative efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF drugs beyond one year of follow-up. We found no clinically important differences in visual outcomes at 24 months in people with DMO, although there were differences in CRT change. We found no evidence that any drug increases all-cause mortality compared to control, but estimates were very imprecise. Evidence from RCTs may not apply to real-world practice, where people in need of antiangiogenic treatment are often under-treated, and the individuals exposed to these drugs may be less healthy than trial participants.

Studies of the Anti-Diabetic Mechanism of Pueraria lobata Based on Metabolomics and Network Pharmacology

Diabetes mellitus (DM), as a chronic disease caused by insulin deficiency or using obstacles, is gradually becoming a principal worldwide health problem. Pueraria lobata is one of the traditional Chinese medicinal and edible plants, playing roles in improving the cardiovascular system, lowering blood sugar, anti-inflammation, anti-oxidation, and so on. Studies on the hypoglycemic effects of Pueraria lobata were also frequently reported. To determine the active ingredients and related targets of Pueraria lobata for DM, 256 metabolites were identified by LC/MS non targeted metabonomics, and 19 active ingredients interacting with 51 DM-related targets were screened. The results showed that puerarin, quercetin, genistein, daidzein, and other active ingredients in Pueraria lobata could participate in the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway, insulin resistance, HIF-1 signaling pathway, FoxO signaling pathway, and MAPK signaling pathway by acting on VEGFA, INS, INSR, IL-6, TNF and AKT1, and may regulate type 2 diabetes, inflammation, atherosis and diabetes complications, such as diabetic retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy, and diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for retinal neurodegenerative diseases

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most common prescription drugs for inflammation, and topical NSAIDs are often used in ophthalmology to reduce pain, photophobia, inflammation, and edema. In recent years, many published reports have found that NSAIDs play an important role in the treatment of retinal neurodegenerative diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), glaucoma, pathological myopia, and retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The aim of the current review is to provide an overview of the role of various NSAIDs in the treatment of retinal neurodegenerative diseases and the corresponding mechanisms of action. This review highlighted that the topical application of NSAIDs for the treatment of retinal degenerative diseases has been studied to a remarkable extent and that its beneficial effects in many diseases have been proven. In the future, prospective studies with large study populations are required to extend these effects to clinical settings.

Anti-VEGF-Resistant Retinal Diseases: A Review of the Latest Treatment Options

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy currently plays a central role in the treatment of numerous retinal diseases, most notably exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD), diabetic retinopathy and retinal vein occlusions. While offering significant functional and anatomic benefits in most patients, there exists a subset of 15–40% of eyes that fail to respond or only partially respond. For these cases, various treatment options have been explored with a range of outcomes. These options include steroid injections, laser treatment (both thermal therapy for retinal vascular diseases and photodynamic therapy for eAMD), abbreviated anti-VEGF treatment intervals, switching anti-VEGF agents and topical medications. In this article, we review the effectiveness of these treatment options along with a discussion of the current research into future directions for anti-VEGF-resistant eyes.

Topical ketorolac as an adjunctive treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab in the management of diabetic macular edema: A double-masked placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the additional effect of ketorolac eye drops on therapeutic effects of intravitreal Bevacizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) METHODS: In a randomized clinical trial, 50 patients with center involved DME (macular thickness ≥ 300 microns accompanied by decreased VA (24 < BCVA ≤ 70 ETDRS letters) were enrolled consecutively and randomized 1:1 to receive either bevacizumab plus topical ketorolac (25 patients) or bevacizumab plus artificial tears (25 patients). Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy, history of intraocular surgery, intravitreal injection in less than three months, macular photocoagulation less than 6 months and any other concomitant ocular pathologies were excluded from the study. All the patients received three consecutive monthly injections of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB). After that, patients were examined every 6 weeks and reinjection was administered based on the "as needed" protocol if macular thickness was 300 microns or more and VA was 70 ETDRS letters or less.. Patients also received either topical ketorolac or artificial tears three times a day over the study period (6 months). Changes in central subfield thickness (CST), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, ETDRS letters), and number of IVB injections were compared between the study groups.

RESULTS

Fifty eyes of 50 patients were included (25 eyes in each group). Mean CST was significantly decreased in both study groups at 14^th week (-87 ± 98 µm, P = 0.012 and -100 ± 147 µm, P = 0.006 in bevacizumab plus ketorolac and bevacizumab plus artificial tears groups, respectively). Nevertheless, the changes of mean CST remained significant only in bevacizumab plus ketorolac group up to 26^th week (-147 ± 124 µm, P < 0.001 and -51 ± 145 µm, P = 0.245, respectively). Comparing two groups, reduction of mean CST from baseline was significantly greater in bevacizumab plus ketorolac group compared with the control group at 26^th week. (difference = -97 µm, 95%CI = -182 to -11, P = 0.017). In the study group, mean BCVA significantly increased at both 20^th week (6.2 ± 10.1, P = 0.04) and 26^th week (8.2 ± 10.9, P = 0.03). In contrast, visual acuity did not significantly improve at any time points in bevacizumab plus artificial tears group, While insignificant, the 26-week mean change of visual acuity from baseline was greater in bevacizumab plus ketorolac group (difference = 6.5 ETDRS letter; 95%CI = -14.4 to 1.4) Two groups were comparable regarding number of IVB injections (P = 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Topical ketorolac 0.5% three times a day could enhance and sustain the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab in the treatment of DME.

Comparison of topical nepafenac 0.1% with intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of Irvine-Gass syndrome

AIM

To compare safety and efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) implant with topical nepafenac (TN) 0.1% in previously untreated Irvine-Gass syndrome (IGS) in clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 62 eyes with IGS after phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. None of the patients used treatment before IVD or TN. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart (ETDRS), slit-lamp, intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, fundus examination, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus florescein angiography were performed to all subjects at baseline, 1, 3 and 6mo.

RESULTS

The mean BCVA of the IVD group was 49.3±6.8, and the mean BCVA of the TN group was 32.9±7.3 ETDRS letters in post-treatment month 6. The mean central macular thickness (CRT) of IVD group was 266.6±53.5 µm and the mean CRT of TN group was 364.9±56.3 µm in post-treatment month 6. Baseline BCVA has correlation with final BCVA in TN group however there was no correlation between baseline BCVA and final BCVA in IVD group.

CONCLUSION

IVD is found to be better than TN in controlling pseudophakic macular edema and improving visual acuity. IVD group also has significantly lower CRT however IOP is not significantly different between two groups in post-treatment month 6.

The safety of intraocular usage of aspirin

PURPOSE

To determine the effects of intravitreally injected aspirin on normal ocular tissues.

METHODS

Six eyes of 3 rabbits as a control group, 18 eyes of 9 albino rabbits which were injected aspirin intravitreally were studied. In the control group, the same volume of balanced salt solution (BSS) as in drug groups were injected. Clinical examination methods including biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and Schiotz tonometry, electrophysiological test including ERG, and histopathological examination including light microscopy were used to evaluate the ocular effects after drug injections. All the study tests were performed before the injections and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after the injections as well.

RESULTS

No significant toxicity was determined after injection in terms of the clinical examination methods in all eyes. Cataracts were observed in 27.7% (5/18) of the eyes in the study group. All cataracts in 5 eyes disappeared at the end of three months. In tonometry, no value out of the normal range of rabbits (17.5 ± 3.1 mmHg) was observed. No toxicity sign was observed at electrophysiological and histopathological evaluations.

CONCLUSION

After intravitreal injection of aspirin, no significant toxicity sign was observed other than a reversible cataract. Thus, intravitreal aspirin injections may be an additional or alternative treatment option for several anterior or posterior segment ocular diseases in addition to their topical utilization.

Intravitreal diclofenac versus intravitreal bevacizumab in persistent diabetic macular edema: Anatomical and functional outcome

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of diclofenac versus bevacizumab following single intravitreal injection in eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema.

METHODS

Fifty eyes with persistent DME were randomly allocated to intravitreal injection of 500 µg/0.1 ml of diclofenac (N = 20) or 1.25 mg/0.05 mL of bevacizumab (N = 20) or to non-treatment (10 eyes). Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, central, paracentral macular thickness and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded and compared between the three groups up to 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Diclofenac and bevacizumab groups showed statistically significant reduction in central and paracentral macular thickness (diclofenac: p = 0.006, 0.02 and bevacizumab: p = 0.02, 0.01), without statistically significant difference between the two groups. The two groups showed no statistically significant difference in mean visual acuity or mean line improvement. Mean visual acuity improvement didn't reach statistical significance in either group. Diclofenac group showed statistically significant reduced IOP (P = 0.02). Control eyes did not show any change in mean visual acuity, macular thickness or IOP.

CONCLUSION

In persistent DME, diclofenac has a structural effect comparable to bevacizumab on central macular thickness. However, significant functional gain may not be accomplished by single injection. Unlike naïve DME, persistent cases may be confounded by systemic and local factors necessitating repeated injection of diclofenac.

Efficacy of systemic diclofenac sodium on intravitreal concentration

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as an alternative, are replacing corticosteroids in ocular inflammatory diseases. Diclofenac has been used mainly topically, and recent focus has been on intravitreal delivery. Both of these methods have been shown to have complications in long-term application.

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of slow release oral diclofenac sodium on intravitreal concentration in experimental model of chemically injured eyes.

METHODS

In an experimental double-masked clinical trial, right eyes of 24 albino rabbits were chemically injured by 1 N NaOH. One hour after chemical injury, 10 cc suspension gavage containing 100 mg slow release diclofenac sodium was administered in all cases. 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48 h after gavage, vitreous samples were obtained in all cases. Intravitreal concentration of diclofenac sodium was evaluated in all samples using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method.

RESULTS

Intravitreal diclofenac levels by oral intake were enhanced by the inflammation in all the measurements. In inflamed eyes, diclofenac concentration was ten times more than control eye (2.658 ± 0.344 vs. 0.242 ± 0.0279 and 1.617 ± 0.527 vs. 0.148 ± 0.095; in 2 and 4 h, respectively). After 6 h, diclofenac concentration was statistically different, although it reduced below 1 μg/ml.

CONCLUSION

Diclofenac is delivered to the inflamed eye more than healthy eye. It seems that by oral diclofenac consumption, it is possible to make a significant intravitreal concentration.

UNREPORTED SIDE EFFECT OF INTRAVITREAL DICLOFENAC IN CHRONIC DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal diclofenac sodium.

METHODS

A 61-year-old male with persistent diabetic macular edema was treated with 450 μg of intravitreal diclofenac sodium (systemic preparation).

RESULTS

Postinjection Day 1, the spectral domain optical coherence tomography showed irregular vitreoretinal interface with wrinkling and separation of the internal limiting membrane from the nerve fiber layer with homogeneity of the inner layers. At 1 month, the compactness of the retinal layers was restored. Complete resolution of the cystoid macular edema was seen. At 1 year, there was mild flattening of the foveal depression with epiretinal membrane.

CONCLUSION

Various studies have shown the safety and efficacy of intravitreal diclofenac without any reported side effect. We report the inner retinal toxicity in the form of cystic spaces and splitting of internal limiting membrane from nerve fiber layer on the first follow-up day, postinjection, which resolved over a period of 1 month. Further studies are needed to assess the safety of intravitreal diclofenac sodium.

Intravitreal Diclofenac in the Treatment of Macular Edema Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of a single dose of intravitreal diclofenac on macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, interventional case series, 15 eyes with BRVO and ME with central macular thickness (CMT) greater than 250 µm on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were enrolled. All patients were given 0.05 mg/0.1 mL of intravitreal diclofenac under aseptic conditions and followed up for 3 months with respect to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), fundus fluorescein angiography, and CMT measured on OCT.

RESULTS

The mean visual acuity improved from 0.115 ± 0.03 preoperatively to 0.356 ± 0.29 at 3 months (P = .002). Mean line improvement was 2.2 ± 1.6. Mean preoperative CMT decreased from 453.2 µm ± 55.3 µm to 340.47 µm ± 101 µm at 3 months postoperatively (P = .001). The mean preoperative IOP was 16.4 mm Hg ± 1.59 mm Hg, whereas the mean postoperative IOP was 16.6 mm Hg ± 1.58 mm Hg (P = .08). None of the 12 phakic eyes showed evidence of cataract progression.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal diclofenac is safe and effective in improving BCVA and decreasing CMT in patients with BRVO and ME.

Solid Lipid Nanoparticles Improve the Diclofenac Availability in Vitreous after Intraocular Injection

Purpose. In order to improve the drug availability after intravitreal administration, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) containing diclofenac were prepared. Methods. In this experimental study, 18 albino rabbits were included. In right and left eyes of all rabbits, SLNs containing diclofenac and commercial form of diclofenac (0.3 mg drug) were intravitreally injected, respectively. One, four, twelve, twenty-four, and forty-eight hours after injection, vitreous and aqueous humor samples were obtained in all cases. Then, the concentration of diclofenac sodium was evaluated in all samples. Results. Size of nanoparticles was around 170 nm after preparation. Drug concentration in eyes injected with SLNs was significantly higher than left eyes injected with commercial formulation up to 4 hours after intravitreal injection (p < 0.05). Diclofenac was quantified in samples up to 48 hours after intraocular injection. Four hours after intravitreal injection, the concentration of diclofenac in vitreous and aqueous humor of eyes receiving SLNs was, respectively, 2.5 and 6.5 times higher than eyes injected with commercial form of drug. Conclusions. Here, we demonstrate the potential of SLNs as a carrier of diclofenac for intraocular injection in order to prevent the systemic effects of the drug, increase the injection intervals, and improve the patient compliance.

Intravitreal Diclofenac plus Bevacizumab versus Bevacizumab alone in treatment-naive diabetic macular edema: a randomized double-blind clinical trial

The aim of this study is to evaluate the short-term effects of a single intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg Bevacizumab combined with 300 lg/0.1 mL Diclofenac (IVB/D) versus 1.25 mg intravitreal Bevacizumab (IVB) alone in the treatment of naive diabetic macular edema (DME). In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 80 eyes were included in the final analysis; 42 and 38 of which in the IVB and IVB/D groups, respectively. The primary outcome measure was a change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR at week 4. The secondary outcomes included changes in central macular thickness (CMT), macular volume, and potential injection-related complications. Significant improvement of BCVA was demonstrated in both study arms (mean reductions in LogMAR: -0.088 ± 0.278, -0.228 ± 0.330 for IVB and IVB/D, respectively). The difference in BCVA changes was in favor of IVB/D; however, not to a statistically significant level (P = 0.160). Significant reduction of CMT was documented in both study arms (mean reductions: 82.43 ± 160.09 and 153.26 ± 163.85 for IVB and IVB + IVD, respectively). Comparison of CMT changes between groups showed that IVB/D reduced CMT more than that of IVB (P = 0.04). Effects on macular volume corresponded to those of CMT. No injection-related complications or significant alterations in intraocular pressure were observed in any of the study arms. In treatment-naive DME, superiority of IVB/D combination therapy over IVB monotherapy may exist; especially as regards anatomical features. In our therapeutic arsenal for DME, IVD can be added as an adjunct to Bevacizumab.

Neuroinflammatory responses in diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common complication of diabetes and has been recognized as a vascular dysfunction leading to blindness in working-age adults. It becomes increasingly clear that neural cells in retina play an important role in the pathogenesis of DR. Neural retina located at the back of the eye is part of the brain and a representative of the central nervous system. The neurosensory deficits seen in DR are related to inflammation and occur prior to the clinically identifiable vascular complications. The neural deficits are associated with abnormal reactions of retina glial cells and neurons in response to hyperglycemia. Improper activation of the innate immune system may also be an important contributor to the pathophysiology of DR. Therefore, DR manifests characteristics of both vasculopathy and chronic neuroinflammatory diseases. In this article, we attempt to provide an overview of the current understanding of inflammation in neural retina abnormalities in diabetes. Inhibition of neuroinflammation may represent a novel therapeutic strategy to the prevention of the progression of DR.