A novel Hartman Shack-based topography system: repeatability and agreement for corneal power with Scheimpflug+Placido topographer and rotating prism auto-keratorefractor

Interchangeability of corneal curvature and asphericity measurements provided by three different devices

AIM

To evaluate the interchangeability of keratometric and asphericity measurements provided by three measurement systems based on different optical principles.

METHODS

A total of 40 eyes of 40 patients with a mean age of 34.1y were included. In all cases, a corneal curvature analysis was performed with IOL-Master (IOLM), iDesign 2 (ID2), and Sirius systems (SIR). Differences between instruments for flattest (K1) and steepest (K2) keratometric readings, as well as for magnitude and axis of corneal astigmatism were analyzed. Likewise, differences in asphericity (Q) between SIR and ID2 were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean differences between devices for K1 were 0.20±0.21 (P<0.001), -0.12±0.36 (P=0.046) and -0.32±0.36 D (P<0.001) for the comparisons IOLM-SIR, IOLM-ID2 and SIR-ID2, respectively. The ranges of agreement for these comparisons between instruments were 0.41, 0.70, and 0.70 D. For K2, mean differences were 0.31±0.33 (P<0.001), -0.08±0.43 (P=0.265) and -0.39±0.38 D (P<0.001), with ranges of agreement of 0.65, 0.84, and 0.74 D. Concerning magnitude of astigmatism, ranges of agreement were in the limit of clinical relevance (0.49 D, P=0.011; 0.55 D, P=0.386; 0.43 D, P=0.05). In contrast, ranges of agreement were clinically relevant for astigmatic axis (26.68°, 33.83° and 18.37°, P≥0.121) and for Q between SIR and ID2 (0.16, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The keratometric corneal power, astigmatic axis and asphericity measurements provide by the three systems evaluated cannot be considered as interchangeable, whereas measurements of corneal astigmatism obtained with SIR and ID2 can be considered as interchangeable for clinical purposes.

Validation of keratometric measurements obtained with an intraoperative image-guided system: intra-session repeatability and interchangeability with an optical biometer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the intra-session repeatability of keratometric measurements obtained in healthy eyes with the Verion image-guided system (Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) as well as the interchangeability of such measurements with those obtained with an optical biometer (Aladdin, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan).

METHODS

A total of 53 eyes of 53 patients (age 31-67 years) were enrolled in the study. All eyes received a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination including an analysis with the Verion image-guided and Aladdin systems. Three consecutive measurements of keratometry were obtained with the Verion system to assess the intra-session repeatability. Within-subject standard deviation (S_w ) and intraobserver precision (± 1.96 × S_w ) were calculated. Bland-Altman analysis was used for the interchangeability analysis.

RESULTS

Mean S_w was 0.26, 0.24 and 0.10 D for the keratometric power in the flattest meridian (K1), keratometric power in the steepest meridian (K2) and astigmatism, respectively. Mean S_w was 4.29° for the axis of the flattest corneal meridian (AX1). Statistically significant but clinically acceptable differences were found in K1, K2 and keratometric astigmatism among systems (p < 0.01). In contrast, differences among systems in AX1 were not statistically significant (p = 0.385) but clinically relevant (mean difference: 15.74°; limits of agreement: -30.93 to 62.41°).

CONCLUSIONS

The Verion system provides consistent measurements of keratometric parameters, with measurements of AX1 that are not interchangeable with that provided by the optical biometer Aladdin, especially in cases of low and oblique astigmatism.

Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices

Background. To estimate repeatability and comparability of central corneal thickness (CCT) and keratometry measurements obtained by four different devices in healthy eyes. Methods. Fifty-five healthy eyes from 55 volunteers were enrolled in this study. CCT (IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and Cirrus HD-OCT) and keratometry readings (IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign) were measured. For statistical analysis, the corneal spherocylinder was converted into power vectors (J0, J45). Repeatability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement of measurements between the devices was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method. Results. The analysis of repeatability of CCT data of IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and Cirrus HD-OCT showed high ICCs (range 0.995 to 0.999). The comparison of CCT measurements revealed statistically significant differences between Pentacam HR versus IOLMaster 700 (p < 0.0001) and Pentacam HR versus Cirrus HD-OCT (p < 0.0001), respectively. There was no difference in CCT measurements between IOLMaster 700 and Cirrus HD-OCT (p = 0.519). The repeatability of keratometry readings (J0 and J45) of IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign was also high with ICCs ranging from 0.974 to 0.999. The Pentacam HR revealed significantly higher J0 in comparison to IOLMaster 700 (p = 0.009) and iDesign (p = 0.041); however, no significant difference was between IOLMaster 700 and iDesign (p = 0.426). Comparison of J45 showed no significant difference between IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign. These results were in accordance with Bland-Altman plots. Conclusion. In clinical practice, the devices analyzed should not be used interchangeably due to low agreement regarding CCT as well as keratometry readings.

Comparison of Ocular Monochromatic Higher-order Aberrations in Normal Refractive Surgery Candidates of Arab and South Asian Origin

PURPOSE

To compare the ocular monochromatic higher-order aberration. (HOA) profile in normal refractive surgery candidates of Arab and South Asian origin.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, observational, comparative study was performed in the cornea department of a specialty hospital. Normal refractive surgery candidates with no ocular morbidity except refractive error were recruited. Refractive surgery candidates underwent a preoperative evaluation, including wavefront aberrometry with the iDesign aberrometer (AMO, Inc., Santa Ana, California, United States). The HOA from right eyes were analyzed for HOA signed, absolute, and polar Zernike coefficients.

RESULTS

Two hundred Arab participants (group 1) and 200 participants of South-Asian origin (group 2) comprised the study sample. The age and refractive status were comparable between groups. The mean of the HOA root mean square (RMS) was 0.36 ± 17 μ and 0.38 ± 18 μ for Arab and South-Asian eyes, respectively (P < 0.05, rank sum test [RST]). Of the 22 higher order signed Zernike modes, only Z3 (-3), Z3 (-1),3 (1), Z4 (-4), Z4 (-2), Z4 (0), Z4 (4), and Z5 (-5) were significantly different from zero (one sample t-test, P < 0.002, with a Bonferroni correction of 0.05/22). All the signed and absolute Zernike terms were comparable between groups (RST, P > 0.002 [0.05/22]). The polar coefficients for coma, trefoil, spherical aberration, and tetrafoil were comparable between groups (P > 0.05, RST). Combined RMS values of third, fourth, fifth, and sixth order also were comparable between groups (P > 0.05, RST).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative whole eye HOA were similar for refractive surgery candidates of Arab and South-Asian origin. The values were comparable to historical data for Caucasian eyes and were lower than Asian (Chinese) eyes. These findings may aid in refining refractive nomograms for wavefront ablations.

Intra-session repeatability of iridocorneal angle measurements provided by a Scheimpflug photography-based system in healthy eyes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate intra-session repeatability of measurements of the iridocorneal angle at different meridians in the nasal and temporal areas in healthy eyes using the Sirius Scheimpflug photography-based system in glaucoma analysis mode.

METHODS

A total of 43 eyes of 43 patients ranging in age from 36 to 79 years were enrolled in the study. All eyes received a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination including a complete anterior segment analysis with the Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici [CSO] Sirius system. Three consecutive measurements of nasal and temporal angles at 0°, ±10°, ±20°, and ±30° meridians were obtained in order to assess the intra-session repeatability of iridocorneal angle measurements provided by the device using the glaucoma analysis mode. Within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean Sw was 1.07 ± 1.09°, 1.22 ± 1.53°, 0.66 ± 0.51°, 0.86 ± 0.57°, 0.68 ± 0.65°, 0.84 ± 0.68°, and 0.91 ± 0.70° at the temporal 30°, 20°, 10°, 0°, -10°, -20°, and -30° positions, respectively. Mean Sw was 3.13 ± 3.15°, 3.43 ± 3.63°, 2.75 ± 2.29°, 2.19 ± 1.55°, 1.90 ± 1.49°, 2.14 ± 1.74°, and 2.24 ± 2.06° at the temporal -30°, -20°, -10°, 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30° positions, respectively. Mean CV ranged from 1.36 ± 1.05 % (nasal 0° position) to 10.92 ± 13.95 % (nasal -20° position). ICC values ranged from 0.778 to 0.972.

CONCLUSIONS

The glaucoma analysis mode of the Sirius system provides consistent measurements of the iridocorneal angle at different meridians in healthy eyes, with slightly less consistency for nasal measurements. It may be considered a clinically useful non-invasive technique for the detection of potentially occludable angles.