Conjunctival and corneal sensitivity in patients under topical antiglaucoma treatment

Detection of Subclinical Neurotrophic Keratopathy by Noncontact Esthesiometry

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to analyze corneal sensitivity with a new noncontact and handheld esthesiometer (Brill Engines, Spain) in patients with dry eye disease (DED) and patients on hypotensive drops, and to compare it with healthy subjects.

METHODS

A total of 31 patients (57 eyes) with DED, 23 patients (46 eyes) with glaucoma, and 21 healthy patients (33 eyes) were recruited. In all patients, corneal sensitivity was measured. Subsequently, a keratography test (Keratograph 5M, Oculus) was carried out to measure tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive breakup time (NIBUT), bulbar redness (Jenvis scale), and corneal staining (CS, Oxford scale). Both corneal sensitivity and ocular surface parameters were compared between DED, glaucoma, and healthy subjects. Linear mixed models were constructed to utilize data from both eyes of patients. An alpha level of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean age was 56.1 ± 16.1 years in the DED group, 69.5 ± 11.7 years in the glaucoma group, and 37.190 ± 11.677 years in the control group. After adjustment for age and sex, corneal sensitivity was significantly reduced in DED and glaucoma vs control group (P = 0.02 and P = 0.009, respectively). NIBUT was lower in DED and glaucoma groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Redness and CS values were higher in the DED group (P = 0.04 and P = 0.001, respectively). TMH was lower in the glaucoma group (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal sensitivity measured with a novel noncontact esthesiometer was reduced in DED and glaucoma groups compared to controls. In clinical practice, this esthesiometer could be an easy-to-use device to screen for patients with subclinical neurotrophic keratopathy.

Pharmacokinetic and Ocular Toxicity Evaluation of Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution, 0.005%, with Preservative Level Reduced to Below the Limit of Quantitation

Purpose: The systemic and ocular pharmacokinetics (PK), and ocular toxicity of benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-free TearClear latanoprost ophthalmic solution, 0.005% formulation (TC-002) were evaluated. TC-002 is designed to selectively capture BAK at the time of drug administration; therefore, the dose delivered to the eye contains no quantifiable level of preservative. Methods: The systemic and ocular PK of TC-002 were compared to a BAK containing reference listed drug (RLD, Xalatan™) over a 24-h period, after a single topical ocular dose to 1 eye of male Dutch Belted (DB) rabbits (n = 3/timepoint). Latanoprost acid concentrations were measured in plasma and ocular tissues. The ocular toxicity was evaluated in a separate study and included toxicokinetic evaluation of TC-002 after once daily topical ocular dosing into each eye of DB rabbits (n = 8/group) for at least 28 days. Toxicity endpoints included ophthalmic and clinical evaluations, necropsy, and microscopic evaluation of ocular tissues. Results: Average ratios of Cmax values for TC-002/RLD ranged from 0.6 to 1.6, and Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve of last observed concentration (AUClast) exposures to latanoprost acid were similar (<2-fold) between the 2 treatments. In the 28-day study, the Tmax was achieved in both groups in <0.5 h. There were no abnormal ocular findings. Conclusions: TC-002 with no quantifiable preservative or BAK-containing RLD exhibited similar ocular and systemic PK profiles. TC-002 was well tolerated and comparable to RLD. TC-002 retains the safety and PK characteristics of RLD without the added concern of long-term exposure of the eye to preservatives.

Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157-Possible Novel Therapy of Glaucoma and Other Ocular Conditions

Recently, stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 therapy by activation of collateral pathways counteracted various occlusion/occlusion-like syndromes, vascular, and multiorgan failure, and blood pressure disturbances in rats with permanent major vessel occlusion and similar procedures disabling endothelium function. Thereby, we revealed BPC 157 cytoprotective therapy with strong vascular rescuing capabilities in glaucoma therapy. With these capabilities, BPC 157 therapy can recover glaucomatous rats, normalize intraocular pressure, maintain retinal integrity, recover pupil function, recover retinal ischemia, and corneal injuries (i.e., maintained transparency after complete corneal abrasion, corneal ulceration, and counteracted dry eye after lacrimal gland removal or corneal insensitivity). The most important point is that in glaucomatous rats (three of four episcleral veins cauterized) with high intraocular pressure, all BPC 157 regimens immediately normalized intraocular pressure. BPC 157-treated rats exhibited normal pupil diameter, microscopically well-preserved ganglion cells and optic nerve presentation, normal fundus presentation, nor- mal retinal and choroidal blood vessel presentation, and normal optic nerve presentation. The one episcleral vein rapidly upgraded to accomplish all functions in glaucomatous rats may correspond with occlusion/occlusion-like syndromes of the activated rescuing collateral pathway (azygos vein direct blood flow delivery). Normalized intraocular pressure in glaucomatous rats corresponded to the counteracted intra-cranial (superior sagittal sinus), portal, and caval hypertension, and aortal hypotension in occlusion/occlusion-like syndromes, were all attenuated/eliminated by BPC 157 therapy. Furthermore, given in other eye disturbances (i.e., retinal ischemia), BPC 157 instantly breaks a noxious chain of events, both at an early stage and an already advanced stage. Thus, we further advocate BPC 157 as a therapeutic agent in ocular disease.

Detection of Subclinical Neurotrophic Keratopathy by Non-Contact Esthesiometry

Objectives

To analyze corneal sensitivity with a new noncontact and hand-held esthesiometer (Brill Engines, Spain) in patients with dry eye disease (DED) and patients on hypotensive drops, and to compare it with healthy subjects.

Methods

31 patients (57 eyes) with DED, 23 patients (46 eyes) with glaucoma and 21 healthy patients (33 eyes) were recruited. In all patients, corneal sensitivity was measured. Subsequently, a keratography test (Keratograph 5M, Oculus) was carried out to measure tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive break up time (NIBUT), bulbar redness (Jenvis scale) and corneal staining (CS, Oxford scale). Both corneal sensitivity and ocular surface parameters were compared between DED, glaucoma, and healthy subjects. Linear mixed models were constructed to utilize data from both eyes of patients. A 95% confidence level was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean age was 56.1±16.1 years in DED group, 69.5±11.7 years in the glaucoma group and 36.3±10.5 years in the control group. Adjusting for age and sex, esthesiometry was significantly worse in DED and glaucoma vs control group (p = 0.02 and p = 0.009, respectively). NIBUT was lower in DED and glaucoma patients (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Redness and CS values were higher in DED group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.001, respectively). TMH was lower in the glaucoma patients (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Corneal sensitivity measured with a novel noncontact esthesiometer was reduced in DED and glaucoma patients compared to controls. In clinical practice, this esthesiometer could be an easy-to-use device to evaluate for patients with subclinical neurotrophic keratopathy.

Prevalence and Determinants of Dry Eye Disease among 40 Years and Older Population of Riyadh (Except Capital), Saudi Arabia

PURPOSE:

The prevalence and determinants of dry eye disease (DED) among 40 years and older population of Riyadh (except capital), Saudi Arabia.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS:

A population-based survey was conducted in Riyadh district between 2013 and 2017. All Saudi aged >40 years attended at the Primary Health Center were the study population. McCarty Symptom Questionnaire was adopted. A representative sample was examined. The best-corrected visual acuity and anterior and posterior segment assessment were performed. DED was graded as absent, mild, moderate, and severe.

RESULTS:

We examined 890 participants. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence of DED was 45.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 44.8–45.4). One-third of the participants had DED. However, two-third of DED cases were of mild grade. The prevalence of DED among females was significantly higher. The variation of DED by age group was not statistically significant (χ²= 2.6, Degree of freedom = 3, and P = 0.1). Presence of glaucoma was significantly associated to DED (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6, [95% CI = 1.2–5.6], and P = 0.01). Use of topical glaucoma medication was significantly associated to DED (OR = 4.6 [95% CI = 1.8–11.8], and P = 0.001). However, severity of DED was not found to be associated with glaucoma medication (χ²= 2.6, P = 0.1). Associations of diabetes and hypertension to DED were not statistically significant (OR = 0.97 [95% CI = 0.73–1.3], and P = 0.84) (OR = 1.1 [95% CI = 0.8–1.4], and P = 0.6). The severe visual impairment was not associated to the grade of DED (P = 0.55).

CONCLUSION:

The prevalence of DED among Saudi is high, but severe DED is found to be less. Association with female gender, glaucoma, and topical glaucoma medications was reported. Association with diabetes, hypertension, and age group variation was not significant.

Glaucoma therapy: preservative-free for all?

Preservatives used in topical glaucoma medications have a plethora of well-described toxic effects on the ocular surface. Such ocular toxicity is manifest clinically as ocular surface disease (OSD) and has been confirmed in epidemiologic, prospective clinical trials and studies in which patients are switched from preservative-added to preservative-free topical therapy. Such toxicity has implications not only for tolerability, but also for adherence and persistence with therapy that is known to be poor in glaucoma. Glaucoma medication is now widely available in preservative-free formulations, and the question arises as to which patients should receive preservative-free glaucoma therapy in preference to preservative-added medication. A case can be made for several subpopulations of patients who might particularly benefit from preservative-free medication: patients with existing OSD, older patients, younger adult patients, female patients, pediatric and juvenile patients, patients who work in air-conditioned environments or who use electronic screens frequently, patients with medical risk factors for OSD, patients in whom trabecular surgery may become indicated in the future, contact lens users, perhaps patients with Asian ethnicity and patients with severe or treatment-refractory glaucoma. Whilst arguments could be made for selecting patients for preservative-free medication on the basis of their existing risk of OSD, collectively, these patients form a significant proportion of the glaucoma patient population as a whole and, in the absence of any cost premium or positive indication for preservative-added medication, preservative-free glaucoma medication for all patients seems an appropriate strategy.