Clinical evaluation of two types of intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) for keratoconus

The efficacy of 2 different phakic intraocular lens implant in keratoconus as an isolated procedure or combined with collagen crosslinking and intra-stromal corneal ring segments: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of phakic intra-ocular lenses in isolation or in combination with corneal crosslinking (CXL) and/or intra-stromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in keratoconus.

METHODS

Data extracted from the publications meeting the selection. The outcome parameters included mean pre- and post-operative uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), sphere and cylinder of refraction and complications. Available data analyzed with Cochrane Review Manager.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies including 464 eyes were included. All the parameters showed significant improvement in all subgroups other than CDVA in ACPIOL + CXL subgroup and cylinder in PIOL + CXL subgroups. There was not a significant difference between PCPIOL and ACPIOL in the outcomes, exception was more improvement of CDVA in "ACPIOL only" than" PCPIOL only" subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Both PCPIOLs and ACPIOLs are comparably safe and efficient options in management of KCN and their efficacy significantly improves when combined with CXL/ICRS.

Localized Refractive Changes Induced by Symmetric and Progressive Asymmetric Intracorneal Ring Segments Assessed with a 3D Finite-Element Model

To build a representative 3D finite element model (FEM) for intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation and to investigate localized optical changes induced by different ICRS geometries, a hyperelastic shell FEM was developed to compare the effect of symmetric and progressive asymmetric ICRS designs in a generic healthy and asymmetric keratoconic (KC) cornea. The resulting deformed geometry was assessed in terms of average curvature via a biconic fit, sagittal curvature (K), and optical aberrations via Zernike polynomials. The sagittal curvature map showed a locally restricted flattening interior to the ring (Kmax -11 to -25 dpt) and, in the KC cornea, an additional local steepening on the opposite half of the cornea (Kmax up to +1.9 dpt). Considering the optical aberrations present in the model of the KC cornea, the progressive ICRS corrected vertical coma (-3.42 vs. -3.13 µm); horizontal coma (-0.67 vs. 0.36 µm); and defocus (2.90 vs. 2.75 µm), oblique trefoil (-0.54 vs. -0.08 µm), and oblique secondary astigmatism (0.48 vs. -0.09 µm) aberrations stronger than the symmetric ICRS. Customized ICRS designs inspired by the underlying KC phenotype have the potential to achieve more tailored refractive corrections, particularly in asymmetric keratoconus patterns.

Femtosecond Laser and Mechanical Dissection for ICRS and MyoRing Implantation: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The aims of this meta-analysis were to evaluate the results of intracorneal ring segments (ICRSs) and MyoRing in the management of corneal ectasia and to compare the clinical outcomes and complication rates between mechanical and femtosecond (FS) laser-assisted surgery.

METHODS

An online electronic search was performed for pre-post studies published until April 2020. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent, steep, flat, and mean keratometry values were considered as outcomes. Weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval was used as a pooled estimation of intervention efficacy.

RESULTS

Of 1484 potentially related studies, 115 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. Findings of this meta-analysis demonstrated considerable improvement in visual, refractive, and keratometric outcomes in all ICRS models and MyoRing. Intrastromal tunnel creation with both methods yielded similar results. Complication rates were without exception higher when mechanical dissection was used.

CONCLUSIONS

ICRS and MyoRing are appropriate treatment options for patients with corneal ectasia. Both techniques for tunnel creation are efficacious in achieving good visual, keratometric, and refractive results. Mechanical intrastromal tunnel creation is associated with much higher complication rates when compared with FS laser-assisted technique.

Clinical Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Implantation of Asymmetric ICRS in Keratoconus With No Coincidence of Topographic and Comatic Axes

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical outcomes obtained with asymmetric intracorneal corneal ring segments (ICRS) of variable thickness and width in patients with keratoconus, identifying predictive parameters of the final visual outcome.

METHODS

This prospective, longitudinal, non-comparative clinical trial enrolled 35 eyes of 27 patients with keratoconus with a significant difference among corneal topographic and comatic axes. All eyes underwent implantation of AJL-pro+ ICRS (AJL Ophthalmic). Visual, refractive, corneal topographic and aberrometric, and pachymetric changes were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Significant changes were detected at 3 months after surgery in manifest sphere and cylinder, spherical equivalent, overall blur strength, and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (P < .001). No losses of two or more lines of CDVA were observed, whereas 94.3% (33) of eyes gained one or more lines of CDVA. Keratometric readings and the magnitude of anterior corneal astigmatism were significantly reduced with surgery (P < .001), as well as the levels of corneal coma (P < .001) and spherical aberration (P = .007). Likewise, a significant change toward less prolateness was observed (P < .001). Significant correlations were found among the change in CDVA and preoperative CDVA (r = -0.532, P = .001), and between the change in primary coma root mean square and the preoperative level of spherical aberration (r = -0.542, P = .001) and coma root mean square (r = -0.719, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of the ICRS evaluated in keratoconus with no coincidence between topographic and comatic axes regularizes the corneal shape and reduces the level of higher order aberrations, inducing a significant visual improvement. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(10):693-699.].

Refractive changes of a new asymmetric intracorneal ring segment with variable thickness and base width: A 2D finite-element model

PURPOSE

To evaluate the local geometric effects of a unilateral intrastromal ring segment with a combined variation of ring thickness and base width in a finite element simulation, and to compare it against the isolated effect of thickness or base width variation alone.

METHODS

A two-dimensional finite-element model of a transversely isotropic cornea was created assuming either axisymmetric stress or plane strain condition. The model geometry was composed of a three-layered corneal tissue (epithelium, anterior and posterior stroma) fixed at the limbus. The implantation of a triangular-shape asymmetric ring segment with varying ring thickness (150 to 300 μm) and base width (600 to 800 μm) was simulated. Also, changes induced by thickness or base width alone were studied and compared their combined effect in the asymmetric ring segment. Geometrical deformation of the simulated cornea and sagittal curvature were the main parameters of study.

RESULTS

Increasing ring thickness and base width along the arc of the asymmetric ring segment produced a more pronounced flattening in this part of the ring. The asymmetric design did find a good balance between maximizing corneal flattening at one end and minimizing it at the other end, compared to the isolated effect of ring thickness and width. Ring thickness was the most robust parameter in flattening both, the central and peripheral cornea.

CONCLUSION

The finite-element model permitted a theoretical study of corneal deformation undergoing implantation of realistic and hypothetical ring geometries. Intracorneal asymmetric ring segments with varying thickness and base width can be a good alternative in corneas with asymmetric keratoconus phenotypes.

Clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of asymmetric intracorneal ring with variable thickness and width for the management of keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes obtained with a new model of asymmetric intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) with variable thickness and base width in keratoconus.

SETTING

Four ophthalmologic centers in Spain.

DESIGN

Prospective multicenter longitudinal noncomparative clinical trial.

METHODS

Thirty-one keratoconus eyes of 25 patients (aged 15 to 50 years) that underwent implantation of ICRS of variable thickness and base (AJL-pro+) in 4 Spanish centers were enrolled. Visual, refractive, topographic, aberrometric, and pachymetric changes were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. Complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

Statistically significant changes after surgery were observed in uncorrected distance visual acuity (P = .002) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (P = .005), as well as in spherical equivalent (P = .006). At 3 months postoperatively, no loss of 2 or more lines of CDVA was observed, whereas 48.4% (15) of eyes gained ≥1 line. Statistically significant changes were observed in the steepest and mean keratometric values (P ≤ .047) and in the magnitude of astigmatism (P < .001) of both anterior and posterior corneal surfaces. Likewise, a change to a less prolate shape of the anterior surface was found (P = .011). Primary coma was also reduced significantly at 1 month postoperatively (P = .001, mean reduction 40.1%). No serious implant-related complications occurred during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of intrastromal asymmetric ring segments of variable thickness and base width in keratoconus corneas induces a significant anterior corneal flattening, leading to refractive changes, a significant reduction of its prolate shape and irregularity, and improvement in patient CDVA.

Clinical Outcomes of a New Type of Continuous Intrastromal Corneal Ring for Treatment of Keratoconus

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of implantation of a new continuous corneal ring in keratoconic corneas of an Iranian population.

METHODS

This study was conducted on 95 contact lens-intolerant keratoconic eyes with clear central corneas. A continuous corneal ring, annular intrastromal corneal inlay (AICI), was inserted using femtosecond laser in all cases. Patients were followed up for 1, 3, and 12 months postsurgery. Visual and subjective refractive outcomes were evaluated in each examination. Besides, keratometry and aberrometric values were recorded before and 12 months after surgery. Finally, vector analysis of refractive astigmatism was performed using the Alpins method.

RESULTS

The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved significantly 12 months after surgery from 0.91 ± 0.39 to 0.38 ± 0.22 (P < 0 0.001) and 0.33 ± 0.21 to 0.13 ± 0.11 logMAR (P < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, spherical and cylindrical refractive components reduced from -2.52 ± 2.62 to -0.76 ± 1.78 D (P < 0.001) and -4.14 ± 1.64 to -1.91 ± 1.18 D (P < 0.001), respectively. The mean anterior keratometry had a significant reduction 12 months after AICI insertion (P< 0.001). Primary coma and spherical aberration values showed a significant increase (both, P < 0.05). Our results showed 100% safety (safety index: 1.8) and 45% efficacy (efficacy index: 1).

CONCLUSIONS

AICI implantation seemed to be a safe and effective procedure for improving visual acuity and refractive outcomes in subjects with keratoconus.

A novel Q-value-based nomogram for single intracorneal ring segment implantation versus standard manufacturer's nomogram combined with accelerated cross-linking for treatment of keratoconus: a randomized controlled trial

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of implanting a single Keraring segment according to a novel Q‐value‐based nomogram (QN) to that of segment implantation according to the manufacturer's standard nomogram (SN), for keratoconus treatment.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 104 patients (104 eyes) with Amsler‐Krumeich grade 1 or 2 keratoconus, and type 1 or 2 cone asymmetry determined according to manufacturer's classification. They were randomly distributed into two groups: group A patients (n = 52) underwent Keraring implantation according to the SN, and group B patients (n = 52) underwent implantation of a single (210° arc‐length) Keraring segment according to the QN. Both treatments were combined with accelerated transepithelial cross‐linking, and follow‐up was 6 months. Main outcome measures were preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, subjective refraction and corneal topography.

Results

At postoperative month 6, group B exhibited statistically significantly higher values of mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), sphere, K2, K‐average, K‐max and Q‐anterior (p = 0.02, 0.01, 0.002, 0.001, 0.0001 and 0.03, respectively) compared to that of group A. However, group A exhibited better refractive cylindrical improvements (p = 0.04). In group A, we documented spontaneous extrusion of one Keraring segment.

Conclusion

Single 210° arc‐length segment implantation using our objective QN was more efficacious for keratoconus treatment than using the subjective SN. The nomograms were comparable when the Q‐anterior value was >−1.00; however, the QN was superior to the SN when the Q‐anterior value was ≤−1.00. The QN yielded greater postoperative UDVA and smoother corneal remodelling than did the SN for treatment of grade 1 and 2 keratoconic eyes.

[Intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus management]

Intracorneal ring segments (ICRS), used in the management of keratoconus since the 2000s, have enjoyed significant technological development. Various types of ICRS exist, whose arc length, thickness, and diameter can be chosen according to the desired effect on the spherical equivalent, keratometry and asphericity. Individualized implantation strategies, based on each patient's topographic and tomographic pattern, are constantly evolving. The surgical procedure is standardized, and complications remain very rare. Combined procedures (corneal collagen cross-linking and refractive photokeratectomy±topo-guided, phakic and pseudophakic intraocular lenses) are increasingly used and require a good knowledge of the effect of ICRS alone on the keratoconic cornea. The objective of this review is to summarize clinical practices used in the visual rehabilitation of keratoconic patients using the ICRS+- combined procedures.

Comparative analysis of two different types of intracorneal implants in keratoconus: A corneal tomographic study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes in visual acuity and corneal tomographic outcomes at 6 months after femtosecond-laser assisted implantation of two different types of intracorneal implants in keratoconus.

METHODS

A total of 39 keratoconus eyes implanted with two segments KeraRing (n = 22 eyes) or MyoRing (n = 17 eyes) were enrolled. Tomographic data (Pentacam system, Oculus) were analyzed and correlated with enhancement in uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). The tomographic indices were front maximum keratometry (Kmax), corneal asphericity (Q-value) on both surfaces, average pachymetric progression indices (PPI), maximum Ambrosio relational thickness (ARTmax), Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia total deviation index (BAD-D), index of surface variance (ISV), vertical asymmetry (IVA), height asymmetry (IHA) and height decentration (IHD).

RESULTS

LogMAR UDVA and CDVA improved 2.1 (p = 0.003) and 0.7 (p = 0.074) lines with KeraRing, and 8 and 2.5 lines with MyoRing (p = 0.001). The highest and lowest mean differences in the tomographic indices between both groups were related to ISV and IHD, respectively. Changes in all indices differed significantly between two groups except for changes in front corneal astigmatism, ARTmax, ISV, IVA, IHD and IHA (p > 0.05). Correlation of changes in CDVA with changes in other parameters was statistically significant only for IHD in the KeraRing group, while changes in in UDVA were significantly correlated with changes in spherical equivalent, back Q-value, ISV, IVA, and IHA only in the MyoRing group.

CONCLUSION

Both implants promote corneal shape regularization and an enhancement in UDVA in keratoconus. A considerable flattening effect and reduction in prolateness in the front corneal surface were observed with MyoRing.

Intracorneal Stromal Ring Can Affect the Biomechanics of Ectatic Cornea

Purpose

The biomechanical properties of ecstatic cornea undergo changes. This study evaluates the biomechanical changes of ecstatic cornea after implantation of two types of intracorneal stromal ring (ICR).

Methods

For doing this prospective cross-sectional study, 32 patients with keratoconus (KCN) were randomly divided into two 16-member groups (group I: MyoRing, group II: KeraRing). The main inclusion criteria were transparent cornea with no scar in the central part, corneal thickness >450 µ in the incision region, keratometry within 48–52 diopters, and progressive course of corneal thinning. Biomechanics of the cornea was evaluated by “ORA” and “Corvis” devices. All of the data were recorded and analyzed before implantation of the rings and 6 months thereafter.

Results

The mean ages of patients of groups I and II were 26 ± 6.55 and 33.86 ± 8.5, respectively. The postoperative change of sphere refraction was significant in both groups. However, reduction in the astigmatism was significant only in group I. In addition, the change of flat meridian keratometry (Kf) was significant before and after ring implantation in group I, unlike group II. The changes in CH and CRF parameters (ORA) were not significant in either group before and after the operation. Besides, only HRC parameter (Corvis) decreased significantly in both groups before and after the operation.

Conclusion

Both MyoRing and KeraRings have positive effects on the biomechanics of cornea at least during the first year after implantation. Comparison of these two types of ICR did not show significant differences in Corvis and ORA parameters.

Efficacy of Different Procedures of Intra-Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in Keratoconus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of the functional, keratometric, and refractive postoperative parameters of intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in keratoconus and its association with collagen cross-linking (CXL), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), and intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on case series published between 2007 and 2017.

Results

We included 95 case series with a total of 4560 patients. We included 64 studies of the ICRS procedure, 20 studies of ICRS+CXL, 9 studies of ICRS+CXL+PRK, and 5 studies of ICRS+IOL. We demonstrated an overall improvement of all parameters in all procedures. Cylinder was decreased with an overall effect size (ES) of −1.15 (−1.36 to −0.95; I² = 93.7%). Corrected distance visual acuity was improved with an overall ES of 0.89 (0.78 to 1.00; I² = 81.9%). Maximal keratometry was decreased with an overall ES of 0.98 (0.85 to 1.11; I² = 78.9%). ICRS+IOL is the best procedure to improve spherical equivalent and uncorrected distance visual acuity (P < 0.05) compared with other procedures. ICRSs versus ICRS+CXL are similar in all parameters except for corrected distance visual acuity. ICRS+CXL+PRK is better than ICRS alone in all parameters except for the correction of spherical equivalent.

Conclusions

Although the quality and strength of the data are questionable, ICRS implantation is an effective strategy to preserve visual function in keratoconic patients. Particularly, ICRS+CXL+PRK could be a low invasive procedure to propose to young keratoconic patients.

Translational Relevance

To propose an overview of postoperative parameters on each ICRS procedure on keratoconus.

Intrastromal corneal ring segments for treating keratoconus

BACKGROUND

Keratoconus is a degenerative condition of the cornea that profoundly affects vision and vision-specific quality of life. The axial cornea thins and protrudes, resulting in irregularity and, eventually, scarring of the cornea. There are multiple options available for treating keratoconus. Intrastromal corneal ring segments are small, crescent-shaped plastic rings that are placed in the deep, peripheral corneal stroma in order to flatten the cornea. They are made of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). The procedure does not involve corneal tissue nor does it invade the central optical zone. Intrastromal corneal ring segments are approved for use when contact lenses or spectacles are no longer adequate.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intrastromal corneal ring segments as a treatment for keratoconus.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2018, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not implement any date or language restrictions in the electronic search for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 25 January 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently assessed records from the electronic searches to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Disagreements were resolved by discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We planned for two authors to independently review full-text reports, using standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no RCTs comparing intrastromal corneal ring segments with spectacles or contact lenses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of eligible RCTs to review, no conclusions can be drawn.

Template-based methodology for the simulation of intracorneal segment ring implantation in human corneas

Keratoconus is an idiopathic, non-inflammatory and degenerative corneal disease characterised by a loss of the organisation in the corneal collagen fibrils. As a result, keratoconic corneas present a localised thinning and conical protrusion with irregular astigmatism and high myopia that worsen visual acuity. Intracorneal ring segments (ICRSs) are used in clinic to regularise the corneal surface and to prevent the disease from progressing. Unfortunately, the post-surgical effect of the ICRS is not explicitly accounted beforehand. Traditional treatments rely on population-based nomograms and the experience of the surgeon. In this vein, in silico models could be a clinical aid tool for clinicians to plan the intervention, or to test the post-surgical impact of different clinical scenarios. A semi-automatic computational methodology is presented in order to simulate the ICRS surgical operation and to predict the post-surgical optical outcomes. For the sake of simplicity, circular cross section rings, average corneas and an isotropic hyperelastic material are used. To determine whether the model behaves physiologically and to carry out a sensitivity analysis, a [Formula: see text] full-factorial analysis is carried out. In particular, how the stromal depth insertion, horizontal distance of ring insertion (hDRI) and diameter of the ring's cross section ([Formula: see text]) are impacting in the spherical and cylindrical power of the cornea is analysed. Afterwards, the kinematics, mechanics and optics of keratoconic corneas after the ICRS insertion are analysed. Based on the parametric study, we can conclude that our model follows clinical trends previously reported. In particular and although there is an improvement in defocus, all corneas presented a change in their optical aberrations. The stromal depth insertion is the parameter that affects the corneal optics the most, whereas hDRI and [Formula: see text] are less important. Not only that, but it is almost impossible to achieve an optimal trade-off between spherical and cylindrical correction. Regarding the mechanical behaviour, inserting the rings at 65% depth or above will cause the cornea to slightly bend. This abnormal stress distribution greatly distorts the corneal optics and, more importantly, could be the cause of clinical problems such as corneal extrusion. Not only that, but our model also supports that rings are acting as restraint elements which relax the stresses of the corneal stroma in the cone of the disease. However, depending on the exact spatial location of the keratoconus, the insertion of rings could promote its evolution instead of preventing it. ICRS inserted deeper will prevent keratoconus in the posterior stroma from growing (relaxation of posterior surface), but will promote its growing if they are located in the anterior surface (increment of stress). In conclusion, the methodology proposed is suitable for simulating long-term mechanical and optical effects of ICRS insertion.