Safety analysis and results of a borosilicate glass cartridge for no-touch graft loading and injection in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

Novel Trephine for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Surgery Improves Surgical Preparation Time and Graft Quality: Pilot Data From the "Number 7" Endothelial Keratoplasty Trephine

PURPOSE

To report the safety and efficacy of a novel asymmetric marking trephine for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue preparation. The trephine design incorporates optimized curves to distribute mechanical forces and minimize the risk of tears without loss of total endothelial cell volume transplanted compared with a standard 8.00 mm circular transplant.

METHODS

A retrospective case series of 40 consecutive DMEK operations comparing 20 cases using the "Number 7" trephine against 20 using a modified shark fin technique as standard. Patient and donor characteristics, tissue preparation time and complications, total surgical time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and endothelial cell counts at 3 months postsurgery are reported.

RESULTS

DMEK tissue preparation was significantly faster using the "Number 7" trephine (5.4 vs. 7.6 minutes, P = 0.008). Further, fewer complications arose during tissue preparation (0 vs. 2 complications) despite the faster preparation time. Total surgical time was similar between techniques; however, time spent manipulating the graft was reduced (5.1 vs. 6.8 minutes, P = 0.007) primarily because of the lower tissue preparation complications. Fewer postoperative complications were observed (1 vs. 3, of which 1 in the standard technique group requiring a redo-DMEK), again due to the reduced tissue preparation complications. The 3-month endothelial cell count was comparable between techniques (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the "Number 7" trephine led to faster and safer DMEK tissue preparation, which in turn reduced graft manipulation times and postoperative complications without compromising total endothelial cell volume transplanted. This novel device is ideal for use by surgeons who prepare their own DMEK tissue and within tissue banks who provide prestripped and preloaded DMEK tissue.

Comparison of rebubbling rate between preloaded endothelium-in and preloaded no-touch endothelium-out Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty transplantation

BACKGROUND

To compare the difference in rebubbling rates between patients undergoing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with endothelium-in using a standard IOL cartridge and those with endothelium-out DMEK utilizing a no-touch technique with borosilicate glass cartridge transplantation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all eyes that underwent preloaded endothelium-in or endothelium-out DMEK transplantation from June 2019 to December 2023 at the Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria. All DMEKs were harvested, prepared and preloaded at the European Eye Bank of Venice, Italy. DMEK surgeries were done by one experienced surgeon and the procedure was completed by air tamponade of the anterior chamber.

RESULTS

Overall, 32 eyes each of 31 endothelium-out patients and of 29 endothelium-in patients were included. 32 preloaded endothelium-in procedures were followed by 32 preloaded endothelium-out procedures. Rebubbling rate for endothelium-in was 15/32 (47%) and for endothelium-out was 7/25 (28%) (p = 0.035, Pearson's chi-squared test). Donor age was the most important variable for rebubbling in a random forest algorithm model (ROC: 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Rebubbling rate in endothelium-out DMEK was less than two-thirds compared to endothelium-in DMEK favoring no-touch endothelium-out DMEK as the preferred technique of DMEK transplantation.

DMEK graft: One size does not fit all

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a popular procedure for the treatment of corneal endothelial diseases mainly targeting Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK). Although DMEK has multiple advantages, it is challenging in terms of graft preparation and delivery. One of the crucial factors of DMEK graft preparation is determining the size of the graft. Evaluating risks and benefits of transplanting larger or smaller grafts compared with the descemetorhexis performed following a standard DMEK procedure thus becomes important. Advanced techniques like pre-loaded DMEK requires pre-selection of graft diameter without physical examination of the eye making it more challenging. Therefore, recognizing the benefits of graft size and the number of transplanted endothelial cells becomes essential. Smaller DMEK grafts have been preferred and accepted for grafting. Larger diameter grafts have advantages but can be challenging due to higher detachment rates. We thus aim to review the challenges of preparing and delivering DMEK tissues with small or large diameter based on selected descemetorhexis area, discuss the outcomes based on different graft sizes, highlight related complications and suggest which cases may benefit from adopting smaller or larger graft size.

“Endothelium-Out” and “Endothelium-In” Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Background

We evaluated the visual outcomes and complications of “endothelium-out” and “endothelium-in” Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft insertion techniques.

Materials and Methods

Electronic searches were conducted in CENTRAL, Cochrane databases, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov. Study designs included clinical trials, comparative observational studies, and large case series (≥25 eyes). PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and synthesis. Random-effects models were employed for meta-analyses.

Results

21,323 eyes (95 studies) were included. Eighty-six studies reported on “endothelium-out” techniques; eight studies reported on “endothelium-in” techniques. One study compared “endothelium-out” to “endothelium-in” techniques. Eighteen “endothelium-out” studies reported that 42.5–85% of eyes achieved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/25 at 6 months; pooled proportion of eyes achieving BCVA ≥20/25 at 6 months was 58.7% (95% CI 49.4–67.7%,15 studies). Three “endothelium-in” studies reported that 44.7–87.5% of eyes achieved BCVA of ≥20/25 at 6 months; pooled proportion of eyes achieving BCVA ≥20/25 at 6 months was 62.4% (95% CI 33.9–86.9%). Pooled mean endothelial cell loss was lower in the “endothelium-in” studies (28.1 ± 1.3%, 7 studies) compared to “endothelium-out” studies (36.3 ± 6.9%,10 studies) at 6 months (p = 0.018). Graft re-bubbling rates were higher in the “endothelium-out” studies (26.2%, 95% CI 21.9–30.9%, 74 studies) compared to “endothelium-in” studies (16.5%, 95% CI 8.5–26.4%, 6 studies), although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.440). Primary graft failure rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.552). Quality of evidence was considered low and significant heterogeneity existed amongst the studies.

Conclusion

Reported rates of endothelial cell loss were lower in “endothelium-in” DMEK studies at 6 months compared to “endothelium-out” studies. Outcomes of “endothelium-in” techniques were otherwise comparable to those reported in “endothelium-out” studies. Given the technical challenges encountered in “endothelium-out” procedures, surgeons may consider “endothelium-in” techniques designed for easier intra-operative DMEK graft unfolding. “Endothelium-in” studies evaluating outcomes at longer time points are required before conclusive comparisons between the two techniques can be drawn.

Delivering Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts: Modern Day Transplant Devices

PURPOSE

To summarize the graft loading, transporting and delivery devices used for endothelial keratoplasty (EK).

METHODS

A literature search of electronic databases was performed.

RESULTS

New techniques and devices have been introduced and implemented to prepare, load, transport and transplant the grafts for EK. The advantages are not only limited to the surgical theatre but also widely spread across the eye banking field. Investigation of advanced materials and designs have been rapidly growing with continuous evolution in the field of eye banking and corneal transplantation. Innovative techniques and modern devices have been evaluated to reduce the endothelial cell loss and increase the precision of the transplant in order to benefit both surgeons and the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

It is extremely important to reduce any potential wastage and optimize the use of every available donor cornea due to the limited availability of healthy cadaveric donor corneas required for transplants. As a result, the use of pre-cut and pre-loaded grafts supplied by the eye banks in calibrated devices have been gaining momentum. Innovation in the field of bioengineering for the development of new devices that facilitate excellent clinical outcomes along with reduction in learning curve has shown promising results.

Clinical results after single asymmetrical shark fin for graft orientation in DMEK

PURPOSE

Evaluating the effect of a single peripheral triangular mark to ensure the correct anterior-posterior graft orientation in DMEK.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients scheduled for DMEK due to Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and divided into 2 study groups: Group -M (n = 184) had no mark of the EDM (Endothelial Descemet membrane) and group + M (n = 193) had a triangular peripheral mark. Follow-up time was 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

The postoperative graft turning and Re-DMEK rate could be significantly reduced by the use of a peripheral mark (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, respectively). Re-DMEK due to primary graft failure was significantly associated with prior graft turning (p < 0.001). Both groups showed comparable values for visual acuity, central corneal thickness and endothelial cell count after a follow-up of 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Single peripheral triangular marking is a simple and cost-saving addition to EDM preparation to ensure the correct orientation of the graft intraoperatively and could lead to a significant reduction in graft turning and re-DMEK rate in this study.

Comparison of clinical outcomes after precut DMEK with or without dextran-containing medium compared to standard DMEK: a prospective pilot study

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical outcome and complication rate of precut Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in two different culture conditions, dextran-containing and dextran-free medium, and compare the results with the current standard DMEK procedure.

METHODS

A prospective study of 32 eyes suffering from Fuchs endothelial dystrophy were scheduled for DMEK with a follow-up of one year. The eyes were divided into four subgroups. Group + D (n = 7) received a precut DMEK stored in dextran-containing transport medium, and Group - D (n = 9) received a precut DMEK without dextran-containing medium. The respective fellow eyes received a standard DMEK (S) (preparation directly prior to surgery) stored in dextran-containing medium (S-D + ; n = 7) or without (S-D-; n = 9).

RESULTS

Clinical outcome (visual acuity, endothelial cell count, central corneal thickness) and rebubbling rate were comparable for all four groups. None of the patients had a graft failure.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary data of the pilot study show that precut liquid-bubble DMEK leads to comparable clinical results regardless of dextran-containing or dextran-free organ culture medium and is further comparable to the standard DMEK procedure.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Outcomes between Young and Old Graft Recipients

Purpose: To evaluated Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) outcomes in young and old graft recipients.Materials and Methods: Data of 164 surgeries with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range 14 years) undergoing DMEK surgery between 2016 and 2018 was reviewed. Complications, graft survival, and visual acuity gain were compared between subjects in the 25th percentile (young recipients; aged 70 years and less, n = 21) and 75th percentile (old recipients; aged 85 years and over, n = 27) over the 2-year follow-up.Results: Young recipients had a lower rate of pre-operative glaucoma (14.3% vs. 51.9%, p = .014) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (9.5% vs. 59.3%, p < .001), and a higher rate of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (57.1% vs. 14.8%, p = .002) and combined cataract extraction at the time of DMEK surgery (52.4% vs. 7.4%, p = .001) when compared to old recipients. Complications (primary graft failure, pupillary block, cystoid macular edema or infectious keratitis) were independent of graft recipient age. Descemet's membrane detachment requiring re-bubbling was observed more often in young compared to the old recipients (42.9% vs. 14.8%, p = .049). Visual acuity gain between the groups remained comparable up to 1-year, whereas at 2-years old recipients showed significantly declined visual acuity gains compared to the young recipients (0.14 ± 0.68 vs. 0.74 ± 0.49, p = .012). Graft recipients aged over 85 years had a considerably higher graft failure rate over the 24-months (40.7% vs. 4.8%, p = .006) and shorter graft survival time (p = .002; log-rank) when compared to the recipients aged under 70 years. After adjusting for potential confounders such as Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy and glaucoma, the recipients aged over 85 remained at higher risk for graft failure (HR = 17.278, 95% CI = 1.787-167.1, p = .014).Conclusions: In aged DMEK recipients, regardless of the low incidence of early postoperative complications, the rate of postoperative graft failure was significantly higher and graft survival shorter than in younger recipients.

Comparison of preloaded grafts for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in a novel preloaded transport cartridge compared to conventional precut grafts

To determine the safety and graft quality of eye bank precut and preloaded grafts for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) after storage and shipping in a novel preloaded transport cartridge compared to precut grafts in a conventional viewing chamber. In this laboratory proof-of-concept study, 29 human donor corneas that were unsuitable for transplantation with a mean endothelial cell density of 1948 ± 260 cells/mm2 were prepared using liquid bubble technique for producing precut lamellar grafts. The grafts were either preloaded into novel transport cartridge (n = 16) or transferred into conventional Krolman viewing chamber (control, n = 13). Grafts were stored for 24 or 48 h in dextran-containing medium at room temperature and subjected to a shipping simulation. Endothelial cell loss (ECL) and morphology were determined at different steps. Endothelial cell viability staining was performed with calcein dye. Mean ECL in the preloaded transport cartridge was 0.7% ± 1.2% after 24 h and 3.4% ± 1.2% (p = 0.006) after 48 h storage and injection. In the control group the ECL was mean 1.6% ± 2.7% after 24 h compared to 3.7% ± 0.9% (p = 0.042) after 48 h. The slightly higher endothelial cell loss in the viewing chamber group after 48 h was not statistically significant compared to the preloaded transport cartridge (p = 0.8). Calcein staining was comparably low in all groups and correlated with the low ECL in both groups. DMEK grafts can be preloaded into a novel transport cartridge using a "no touch" technique, stored and shipped for up to 2 days in dextran-containing medium without significant ECL.