Repeatability of non-invasive break-up time measures with a new automated dry eye platform in healthy eyes

Metal-Organic Framework-Based Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Sensing Platform for Trace Malondialdehyde Detection in Tears

Disease biomarkers in tears are crucial for clinical diagnosis and health monitoring. However, the limited volume of tear samples, low concentration of tear biomarkers, and complex tear composition present challenges for precise testing. We introduce a spot-on testing platform of metal-organic framework (MOF)-based surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) capillary column, which is capable of target molecules selective separation and enrichment for tear biomarkers in situ detection. It consists of Au nanostars for effective SERS signal and a porous MOF shell for separating impurities through molecular sieving effect. This platform allows for simultaneous collection and detection of tear, capturing the disease biomarker malondialdehyde in tears with a 9.38 × 10-9 mol/L limit of detection. Moreover, we designed a hand-held device based on this tubular SERS sensor, successfully diagnosing patients with dry eye disease. This functional capillary column enables noninvasive and rapid diagnosis of biomarkers in biofluids, providing potential for disease diagnosis and healthcare monitoring.

Comparing automated and manual assessments of tear break-up time using different non-invasive devices and a fluorescein procedure

To evaluate the agreement and repeatability of an automated topography-based method for non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT) analyses in comparison with two other NIBUT procedures, the fluorescein procedure (fBUT), and with the manual assessment with the same device. In the first experiment, a semi-randomised crossover study was performed on forty-three participants (23.1 ± 2.1 years). NIBUT measurements were collected in a randomised order, in both eyes of participants with EasyTear View + (Easytear, Rovereto), Polaris, and Sirius + (CSO, Firenze). Then a fBUT was collected. The overall measurement procedure was repeated in a further session (retest) on the same day. In a second experiment, a retrospective randomised crossover study was performed on eighty-five NIBUT videos previously recorded by the Sirius+. Two observers assessed manually the videos and the NIBUTs were compared with the automatic ones. In the first experiment, ANOVA showed a significant difference between the four measures in both eyes (p < 0.001). Significant differences were found in the paired comparisons between each NIBUT procedure and fBUT (Wicoxon; p < 0.05). Sirius+ resulted in agreement only with Polaris in the left eye. Correlations between all NIBUT procedures resulted in statistical significance in both eyes. All procedures showed very good test-rest reliability. In the second experiment, a significant correlation between automated and manual NIBUT was found, but also a significant statistical difference between the two measurements, although clinically negligible (0.3 s). The investigated NIBUT devices perform differently from each other (and from fBUT), so they cannot be considered interchangeable. The automated measure of NIBUT with Sirius+ has a negligible clinical difference compared to manual assessment on the same device.

Intraobserver Repeatability Assessment of the S390L Firefly WDR Slitlamp in Patients With Dry Eye Disease: Objective, Automated, and Noninvasive Measures

OBJECTIVES

To assess the intraobserver repeatability of automated, objective, and noninvasive measures obtained with the S390L Firefly WDR slitlamp.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 50 eyes of patients with dry eye disease with a mean age of 55.06±12.96 years. Three consecutively repeated measures of the following variables were obtained: first noninvasive break-up time (F-NIBUT), average noninvasive break-up time (A-NIBUT), tear meniscus height, tear meniscus area (TMA), nasal ciliary hyperemia (NCIH), temporal ciliary hyperemia (TCIH), nasal conjunctival hyperemia (NCOH), temporal conjunctival hyperemia (TCOH), upper loss area meibomian gland (U-LAMG), lower loss area meibomian gland (L-LAMG), upper meibomian gland dysfunction grade (U-MGD grade), and lower meibomian gland dysfunction grade (L-MGD grade). Intraobserver repeatability was estimated with coefficient of variation (CoV), intrasubject standard deviation (SD) (S w ), and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

All variables showed no statistically significant differences in the repeated-measures analysis except for L-MGD grade ( P =0.045). F-NIBUT and A-NIBUT obtained the highest CoV with an average value of 0.48±0.41 [0.02-1.00] and 0.34±0.25 [0.02-1.00], respectively. The remaining variables showed CoVs between 0.04±0.11 [0.00-0.43] and 0.18±0.16 [0.00-0.75]. A-NIBUT, TMA, NCOH, and L-LAMG obtained an S w of 2.78s, 0.21 mm 2 , <0.001, and 4.11%, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed a high level of agreement between pairs of repeated measures.

CONCLUSION

The S390L Firefly WDR slitlamp has moderate intraobserver repeatability for F-NIBUT and A-NIBUT, which suggests that F-NIBUT and A-NIBUT are tests with high variability. The remaining variables show satisfactory intraobserver repeatability.

Changes in Noncontact Meibography and Noninvasive Tear Break-Up Time Test with Contact Lenses Usage

Purpose

The study aimed to determine changes detected by noncontact meibography and noninvasive break-up time test (NIBUT) in individuals with regular use of soft contact lenses and compare these findings with irregular soft contact lenses wearers who not compliant with them and non-wearers control group.

Patients and Methods

A prospective nonrandomized case-control study in which individuals were recruited and distributed into three groups: Group A (regular contact lens wearers), group B (irregular contact lens wearers), and group C (non-wearers). Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) was obtained. Noncontact meibography and noninvasive tear break-up time were measured without lenses on using Sirius® Scheimpflug Camera.

Results

One hundred sixty-six eyes of 83 individuals were included; 36 eyes in group A, 50 eyes in group B, and 80 eyes in group C. The mean total meiboscore was 1.99, 1.61, and 1.28, respectively. The mean meibograde was 3.03, 2.86, and 1.99, respectively. Noninvasive break-up time (NIF-BUT) was 8.42, 11.76, and 13.57 seconds, respectively.

Conclusion

There is a difference in OSDI score, meibomian score, and break-up time between different study groups. The study results show that there are trends in lens wearers and non-lens wearers. This is useful for the field to understand the differences between lens wearers and non-lens wearers.

Agreement of Tear Break-up Time and Meniscus Height between Medmont E300 and Visionix VX120+

The goal of this study was to analyze the agreement between the Medmont E300 and the Visionix VX120+ systems in terms of non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) and tear meniscus height (TMH) measurements. A total of 60 eyes (30 healthy subjects) were enrolled. NIBUT and TMH were evaluated with Medmont E300; first NIBUT, NIBUT50%, and TMH were evaluated with Visionix VX120+. Both evaluations were performed in a random order by the same clinician for right, left, and both eyes. The Medmont E300 provided significantly higher NIBUT than Visionix VX120+ for first NIBUT in right, left, and both eyes (p ≤ 0.003) and NIBUT50% in left and both eyes (p ≤ 0.042). The TMH measured with VX120+ was significantly higher than with Medmont E300 considering both eyes (p = 0.037). No significant correlations were found between both devices for either NIBUT (p ≥ 0.11) or TMH (p ≥ 0.09). Passing–Bablok regression analyses revealed poor agreement between devices for NIBUT and TMH outcomes. VX120+ is expected to provide substantial lower first NIBUT values than the NIBUT measured by Medmont E300. Clinicians should consider not using both instruments as interchangeable for dry eye diagnosis.

Repeatability and Reproducibility of SMTube Measurement in Dry Eye Disease Patients

Purpose

To evaluate the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of Strip Meniscometry Tube (SMTube) and determine the correlations among the SMTube measurements and other ocular examinations in dry eye disease (DED) patients.

Methods

The study recruited 73 eyes of 49 DED patients. Every subject was subjected to the following five measurements sequentially: the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, Tear Meniscus Height (TMH) assessment, SMTube measurements, tear film breakup time (BUT) examination, and Schirmer I test (SIT). The repeatability and reproducibility of the measurements were assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland–Altman analysis, and the correlations were evaluated by the Spearman rank-order correlation.

Results

The repeatability and reproducibility of the SMTube measurements were good in DED patients. The ICCs between the repeatability and reproducibility of the SMTube measurements were 0.789 and 0.741, respectively, and the Bland–Altman 95% limits of the repeatability and the reproducibility were −1.726 to 1.658 and −0.967 to 1.474, respectively (all P < 0.01). The SMTube measurements had correlations with TMH, BUT, and SIT. The Spearman rank correlation coefficients between SMTube and TMH; SMTube and Schirmer I test; and SMTube and BUT were 0.632, 0.617, and 0.653, respectively (all P < 0.01).

Conclusions

The measurements of the SMTube may provide a novel, swift, noninvasive, and convenient approach to screen and diagnose DED with acceptable repeatability and reproducibility and specific correlations with TMH, BUT, and SIT.