Could the percent tissue altered (PTA) index be considered as a unique factor in ectasia risk assessment?

Tomographic Predictors of Ectasia Development After Keratorefractive Surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for postkeratorefractive surgery ectasia in unsuspicious tomographies and to report a new index coined diameter of peak locations (DPLs).

METHODS

All patients who underwent keratorefractive surgery between 2011 and 2018 at Care-Vision Laser Centers, Israel, and later developed ectasia were included. For each ectasia case, 3 matched controls were selected. Demographic and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the interdependence of the variables.

RESULTS

The retrospective study included 19 ectasia and 58 control eyes. There were no significant differences between the groups in ablation depth ( P = 0.73), preoperative spherical equivalent ( P = 0.12), percent tissue altered ( P = 0.71), residual stromal bed ( P = 0.73), and Ectasia Risk Score System ( P = 0.60). The anterior and the posterior symmetry index were significantly higher ( P < 0.001), and DPL was significantly tighter in the ectasia group ( P = 0.01). Binary multiple logistic regression found the symmetry index of the posterior cornea and DPL to be better predictors than age, percent tissue altered, Ectasia Risk Score System, residual stromal bed, and ablation depth.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher posterior symmetry index and a tighter DPL are predictors of ectasia in patients with otherwise normal tomographies. A tight DPL implies a weak area in the cornea, which is thin and slightly bulging, increasing the risk of this area becoming ectatic.

Update on contraindications in laser corneal refractive surgery

More than 25 years of experience with refractive surgery techniques (since the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] of the United States approved the use of the excimer laser in the remodeling of the cornea in 1995), added to the technological advances in ophthalmology (femtosecond laser, topography-guided ablation, anterior segment imaging systems) and increased understanding of refractive errors, higher order aberrations, and corneal biomechanics make corneal laser refractive surgery a safe method and effective for the correction of these defects. However, to date, there are still certain circumstances that represent a contraindication for its application, in addition to others that could be associated with complications, and that must be carefully analyzed. This review analyzes the current contraindications for laser corneal refractive surgery listed in the Preferred Practice Protocols (PPPs) of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and the Spanish Ophthalmology Society. These protocols are based on the best scientific evidence currently available and allow clear recommendations to be drawn, improving the safety profile of these techniques. Contraindications can be differentiated into relative or absolute; among the latter are: age less than 18 years, the absence of refractive stability and the existence of certain ocular pathologies (including certain corneal dystrophies, keratoconus, poorly controlled dry eye) or systemic pathologies (active autoimmune processes or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus). Other circumstances such as the use of certain drugs (amiodarone, isotretinoin), extreme values of mean central keratometry and pachymetry, history of previous uveitis or glaucoma, pregnancy and lactation, are considered relative contraindications according to the PPPs. However, there are studies that demonstrate the safety of refractive surgery in some of these cases.