Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure are altered in silicone-hydrogel soft contact lenses wearers

Corneal retardation time as an ocular hypertension disease indicator

Objective.A detailed analysis of the corneal retardation timeτas a highly related parameter to the intraocular pressure (IOP), and its plausible role as an indicator of ocular hypertension disease.Approach.A simple theoretical expression forτis derived within the corneal viscoelastic model of Kelvin-Voigt with 3 elements. This retardation time can be easily calculated from the well-known signal and pressure amplitudes of non-contact tonometers like the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Then, a population-based study was performed where 100 subjects aged from 18 to 30 were analyzed (within this group, about 10% had an elevated IOP with more than 21 mmHg).Main results.A clear relationship between the corneal retardation time and the corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) was found, underlying the risk for ocular hypertensive (OHT) subjects with lowerτvalues to develop hypertension illnesses (due to the inability of poorly viscoelastic corneas to absorb IOP fluctuations, resulting in probable optic nerve damage).Significance.Our results might provide an useful tool to systematically discern which OHT patients (and even those with normal IOP values) are more likely to suffer glaucoma progression and, consequently, ensure an early diagnosis.

A Corneal Biomechanical Study Measured with a Scheimpflug Dynamic Analyser in Soft Contact Lens Wearers

The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical changes in the cornea after wearing soft contact lenses (CLs) in healthy myopic patients measured with a Corvis ST® (CST, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) analyser. This prospective, cross-sectional, single-centre study was performed on twenty-two Caucasian patients aged between 19 and 24 years (20.64 ± 1.21 years) range. Five device-specific biomechanical parameters, the central corneal thickness (CCT), and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) were measured prior to fitting and one month after CL wear. Differences between the means of the deflection amplitude ratio (DA Ratio) and the standard deviation of the DA Ratio (SD DA Ratio) pre- and post-CL wear were found to be significant (p value = 0.002 in both cases). Significant differences were found between pre- and post-CL wear values in CCT (p value = 0.013). For all other biomechanical measures, no significant differences were observed before and after treatment. A significant association was found between changes in bIOP and classification according to changes in Int. Radius (p value = 0.047) and SSI (p value = 0.026) standard deviations. The corneal biomechanical indices provided by CST demonstrate that the fitting of soft CLs is a safe optical compensation method for the stability of corneal stiffness. No significant differences were found pre- and post-CL wear in the assessment of bIOP.