A prospective, randomized and blinded comparison between 10,000 IU urinary and 250 microg recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin for oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization cycles

Does Double Dose of Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin for Final Follicular Maturation in In vitro Fertilization Cycles Improve Oocyte Quality: A Prospective Randomized Study

Context

In in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, the recommended dose of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (r-hCG), for triggering final follicular maturation is 250 μg, although there is some disagreement.

Aims

The aim of our study was to assess the effect on the number of mature oocytes retrieved after triggering ovulation in IVF cycles using 250 μg or 500 μg of r-hCG.

Settings and Design

Prospective, single-center, randomized study.

Subjects and Methods

100 women undergoing IVF with embryo transfer. The primary outcome measure was the total number of oocytes retrieved per follicle, number of mature oocytes, and number of embryos generated. The secondary outcomes included clinical and biochemical pregnancy rates and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Results

Mean number of oocytes retrieved (6.5 ± 4.0 vs. 6.4 ± 3.9, P = 0.3) and mean number of mature oocytes (4.0 ± 2.3 vs. 3.2 ± 2.3, P = 0.09) were similar in the two groups; however, mean number of oocytes retrieved per follicle was found to be higher with 500 μg r-hCG (67.4 ± 23.9 vs. 77.5 ± 23.3, P = 0.04). In the subgroup of poor responder women, there was a significant increase in the number of mature oocytes retrieved with double dose of r-hCG (2.2 ± 1.8 vs. 3.7 ± 1.9, P = 0.06), leading to improvement in fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates.

Conclusions

Double dose of r-hCG for final follicular maturation in IVF cycles resulted in improvement in mean number of oocytes per follicle but did not result in improved pregnancy rates in the women. In the subset of poor responders, 500 μg r-hCG seems to be more advantageous than the lower dose, although larger randomized trials are needed to generalize this strategy.

hCG: Biological Functions and Clinical Applications

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is produced primarily by differentiated syncytiotrophoblasts, and represents a key embryonic signal that is essential for the maintenance of pregnancy. hCG can activate various signaling cascades including mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2 (Smad2), protein kinase C (PKC), and/or protein kinase A (PKA) in several cells types by binding to luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor (LHCGR) or potentially by direct/indirect interaction with transforming growth factor beta receptor (TGFβR). The molecule displays specialized roles in promoting angiogenesis in the uterine endothelium, maintaining myometrial quiescence, as well as fostering immunomodulation at the maternal-fetal interface. It is a member of the glycoprotein hormone family that includes luteinizing hormone (LH), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). The α-subunit of hCG displays homologies with TSH, LH, and FSH, whereas the β subunit is 80–85% homologous to LH. The hCG molecule is produced by a variety of organs, exists in various forms, exerts vital biological functions, and has various clinical roles ranging from diagnosis and monitoring of pregnancy and pregnancy-related disorders to cancer surveillance. This review presents a detailed examination of hCG and its various clinical applications.

Phase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of recombinant- or urine-derived human chorionic gonadotropin for ovulation triggering in Japanese women diagnosed with anovulation or oligo-ovulation and undergoing ovulation induction with follitropin-alfa

Aim

Outside of Japan, recombinant-human chorionic gonadotropin (r-hCG) is widely used for the induction of final follicular maturation and early luteinization in women undergoing ovulation induction; whereas in Japan, urine-derived hCG (u-hCG) is predominantly used. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of r-hCG to u-hCG for ovulation induction, as assessed by the ovulation rate.

Methods

This was an open-label, parallel-group, randomized, multicenter, phase III trial in Japanese women with anovulation or oligo-ovulation secondary to hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction or polycystic ovary syndrome, undergoing ovulation induction with recombinant-human follicle-stimulating hormone. The women were randomized (2:1) to receive either a single 250 μg s.c. dose of r-hCG or a single 5000 IU i.m. dose of u-hCG for ovulation triggering.

Results

Eighty-one women were randomized to either r-hCG (n=54) or u-hCG (n=27). Ovulation occurred in 100% of the participants and treatment with r-hCG was observed to be non-inferior to u-hCG for ovulation induction. Overall, the type and severity of adverse events were as expected for women receiving fertility treatment.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that r-hCG was non-inferior to u-hCG for inducing ovulation. Furthermore, r-hCG demonstrated an expected safety profile, with no new safety concerns identified.

Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles

BACKGROUND

For the last few decades urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (uhCG) has been used to trigger final oocyte maturation in cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Recombinant technology has allowed the production of two drugs, recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (rhCG) and recombinant luteinising hormone (rLH), that can be used for the same purpose, to mimic the endogenous luteinising hormone (LH) surge. This allows commercial manufacturers to adjust production according to market requirements and to remove all urinary contaminants, facilitating the safe subcutaneous administration of a compound with less batch-to-batch variation. However, prior to a change in practice, it is necessary to compare the effectiveness of the recombinant drugs to the currently used urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (uhCG).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of subcutaneous rhCG and high dose rLH versus uhCG for inducing final oocyte maturation in subfertile women undergoing IVF and ICSI cycles.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (April 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2015, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1946 to April 2015), EMBASE (1980 to April 2015) and PsycINFO (1806 to April 2015) as well as trial registers at ClinicalTrials.gov on 13 May 2015 and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) search portal on 14 May 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently scanned titles and abstracts and selected those that appeared relevant for collection of the full paper. We included randomised controlled trials comparing rhCG and rLH with urinary hCG for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles for treatment of infertility in normogonadotropic women.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently performed assessment for inclusion or exclusion, quality assessment and data extraction. We discussed any discrepancies in the presence of a third author to reach a consensus. The primary review outcomes were ongoing pregnancy/live birth and incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, number of oocytes retrieved and adverse events were secondary outcomes. We combined data to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic. We evaluated the overall quality of the evidence for the main comparisons using GRADE methods.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs involving 2952 participants; 15 compared rhCG with uhCG, and 3 compared rhLH with uhCG. The evidence for different comparisons ranged from very low to high quality: limitations were poor reporting of study methods and imprecision. Pharmaceutical companies funded 9 of the 18 studies, and 5 studies did not clearly report funding source. Ongoing pregnancy/live birthThere was no conclusive evidence of a difference between rhCG and uhCG (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.49; 7 RCTs, N = 1136, I(2) = 0%, moderate quality evidence) or between rhLH and uhCG (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.78, 2 RCTs, N = 289, I(2) = 0%, very low quality evidence) for ongoing pregnancy/live birth rates. OHSS There was no evidence of a difference between rhCG and uhCG in the incidence of OHSS: moderate to severe OHSS (OR 1.76, 95% CI 0.37 to 8.45; 3 RCTs, N = 417, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence), moderate OHSS (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.27; 1 RCT, N = 243, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence), mild to moderate OHSS (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.42 to 2.38; 2 RCTs, N = 320, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence) or undefined OHSS (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.78; 3 RCTs, N = 495, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence). Likewise, there was no evidence of a difference between rhLH and uhCG in OHSS rates for moderate OHSS (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.69, 2 RCTs, N = 280, I(2) = 5%, very low quality evidence). Other adverse events There was no evidence of a difference in miscarriage rates between rhCG and uhCG (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.25; 8 RCTs, N = 1196, I(2) = 0%, low quality evidence) or between rhLH and uhCG (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.40; 2 RCTs, N = 289, I(2) = 0%, very low quality evidence). For other adverse effects (most commonly injection-site reactions) rhCG was associated with a lower number of adverse events than uhCG (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.76; 5 RCTS, N = 561; I(2) = 67%, moderate quality evidence). However, when we used a random-effects model due to substantial statistical heterogeneity, there was no evidence of a difference between the groups (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.13). Only one study comparing rLH and uhCG reported other adverse events, and it was impossible to draw conclusions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is no evidence of a difference between rhCG or rhLH and uhCG for live birth or ongoing pregnancy rates or rates of OHSS.

Comparing the efficacy of urinary and recombinant hCG on oocyte/follicle ratio to trigger ovulation in women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare the number of oocytes per follicles in ovulation induction with 10,000 IU urinary hCG (uhCG) and two different doses of recombinant hCG (rhCG) in women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial which was performed on 180 primary infertile women undergoing ICSI cycles. All eligible patients underwent a standard GnRH-a long protocol. When at least two follicles reached a diameter of 18 mm, all patients were randomized to receive 10,000 IU urinary hCG or 250 μg recombinant hCG or 500 μg recombinant hCG for ovulation induction. Primary outcome measure included the number of oocytes retrieved per aspirated follicles. Secondary outcome measures were the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of mature oocytes, the number and quality of generated embryos, fertilization rate, implantation rate, chemical and clinical pregnancy rates and OHSS occurrence rate.

RESULTS

The mean number of retrieved oocytes per follicles were 71.82 ± 15.09, 69.84 ± 17.44 and 77.16 ± 17.61 in 10,000 IU uhCG, 250 μg rhCG and 500 μg rhCG, respectively which was significantly higher with 500 μg rhCG than the lower dose(P = .04). Other cycles and clinical outcomes were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

Recombinant hCG shows equivalent efficacy to urinary hCG in terms of the number of oocytes per aspirated follicles in selected patients undergoing ICSI; however, 500 μg rhCG seems to be more advantageous than the lower dose in this indication. Larger randomized trials are needed to generalize this strategy.

Triggering ovulation with 250 μg or 500 μg of r-hCG in oocyte donors treated with antagonist protocol has no effect on the number of mature oocytes retrieved: a randomized clinical trial

The aim of this study is to compare two r-hCG doses to trigger ovulation (250 μg vs. 500 μg of r-hCG) in an oocyte donation program. A prospective, randomized study was conducted in 118 oocyte donors. Group DI received 250 μg and Group DII received 500 μg of r-hCG. Both the groups were homogeneous. No significant differences were found in the total dose of gonadotropins, duration of the treatment, total number of oocytes, or Metaphase II (MII)oocytes. The pregnancy rate per embryo transfer in the corresponding recipients was similar for both the groups (58.2% for DII recipients and 56.1% for DI recipients). Mild hyperstimulation was observed in 17 donors in Group DI (29%) and in 23 donors in Group DII (39%). No cases of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (SOHSS) were observed. In conclusion, a double dose of r-hCG in oocyte donors to trigger ovulation after stimulation with r-FSH and antagonist does not translate into a higher number of MII oocytes retrieved or into higher pregnancy rates among recipients. Our results confirm that the optimal dose to induce the final oocyte maturation with r-hCG is 250 μg, and that a higher dose does not add any benefit.

Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles

BACKGROUND

For the last few decades urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) has been used to induce final oocyte maturation triggering in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. Recombinant technology has allowed the production of two drugs that can be used for the same purpose, to mimic the endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. This allows commercial production to be adjusted according to market requirements; the removal of all urinary contaminants; and the safe subcutaneous administration of a compound with less batch-to-batch variation. However, prior to a change in practice the effectiveness of the recombinant drugs should be known compared to the currently used urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (uhCG).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous recombinant hCG (rhCG) and high dose recombinant LH (rLH) compared with intramuscular uhCG for inducing final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (January 2010), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2010) and EMBASE (1980 to January 2010).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two review authors independently scanned titles and abstracts and selected those that appeared relevant for collection of the full paper. Only truly randomised controlled trials comparing rhCG and rLH with urinary hCG for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI cycles for treatment of infertility in normo-gonadotropic women were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessment for inclusion or exclusion, quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two authors. Discrepancies were discussed in the presence of a third author and consensus reached. Quality assessment included method of randomisation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and assessors, reporting of a power calculation and intention-to-treat analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs (n = 2306) were identified; 11 compared rhCG with uhCG and three compared rhLH with uhCG. There was no evidence of a statistically significant difference between rhCG and uhCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy or live birth rate (6 RCTs: OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.37; P = 0.83, I(2) = 0%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) between rhCG and uhCG (3 RCTs: OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.37 to 4.1; P = 0.37, I(2) = 0%). There was no evidence of statistically significant difference between rhLH and uhCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy or live birth rate (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.76) and incidence of OHSS (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.69). These results leave open the possibility of strong differences in favour of either treatment for both ongoing pregnancy and OHSS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that there is no evidence of difference between rhCG or rhLH and uhCG in achieving final follicular maturation in IVF, with equivalent pregnancy rates and OHSS incidence. According to these findings uHCG is still the best choice for final oocyte maturation triggering in IVF and ICSI treatment cycles.

Higher birth rate after recombinant hCG triggering compared with urinary-derived hCG in single-blastocyst IVF antagonist cycles: a randomized controlled trial

In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 119 patients were randomized to receive either recombinant hCG (250 μg) or urinary-derived hCG (10,000 IU) for final oocyte maturation in an antagonist protocol with a fixed dose of recombinant FSH (187.5 IU) and predefined single blastocyst transfer. The delivery rate was improved in the recombinant hCG group compared with the urinary-derived hCG group (44.1 vs. 25.7, respectively); however, adequately powered randomized controlled trials are justified to ascertain whether this difference is true.

An observational study of assisted reproductive technology outcomes in new European Union member states: an overview of protocols used for ovarian stimulation

BACKGROUND

The development of new fertility treatment options has facilitated individualized assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols to improve outcomes. Manufacturing improvements to recombinant human follitropin alfa have allowed precise dosing based on mass (filled-by-mass; FbM) rather than bioactivity (filled-by-bioassay; FbIU). Continued monitoring and reporting of follitropin alfa treatment outcomes in routine clinical practice is essential.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the frequency of different controlled ovarian-stimulation protocols used in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in new European Union member states, and to provide post-registration efficacy and safety data on follitropin alfa.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A 2-year, prospective, observational, multicentre, Phase IV study conducted at ART clinics in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. Women aged 18-47 years undergoing ovarian stimulation with follitropin alfa for conventional IVF or ICSI were eligible for inclusion. The main treatment outcome was cumulative clinical pregnancy rate. Data were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Clinical pregnancy outcomes were available for 4055 of 4085 (99.3%) patients. In total, 1897 (46.8%) patients used follitropin alfa FbIU; 2133 (52.6%) used follitropin alfa FbM. Clinical pregnancy was achieved by 39.5% (1603/4055) of patients. A greater proportion of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome achieved a clinical pregnancy than those with endometriosis (41.8% vs 37.8%, respectively). A higher cumulative pregnancy rate was observed with the use of follitropin alfa FbM than follitropin alfa FbIU (41.3% vs 37.8%, respectively; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the most comprehensive audit of individualized ART in clinical practice in Central and Eastern Europe. Overall, clinical pregnancy was achieved by 39.5% of patients after stimulation with follitropin alfa. The use of follitropin alfa FbM resulted in a higher cumulative pregnancy rate than did the FbIU formulation. However, limitations of the study include the observational and non-comparative study design, and descriptive nature of statistical analyses; furthermore, the study was not designed to make direct comparisons between the success rates of different ovarian-stimulation protocols.

The classification, functions and clinical use of different isoforms of HCG

HCG is composed of two subunits, HCGalpha and HCGbeta. During early pregnancy, HCG stimulates progesterone production in the corpus luteum, and injection of HCG is widely used to induce ovulation in assisted reproduction treatment (ART). Under experimental conditions, the free subunits have been shown to exert functions other than those of HCG, but the relevance of these remains to be determined. Intact HCG, free subunits and degraded forms of these occur in biological fluids, and determinations of these are important for diagnosis and monitoring of pregnancy, pregnancy-related disorders and several types of cancer. Development of optimal methods for the various forms has been hampered by lack of appropriate standards and expression of the concentrations of the various forms in units that are not comparable. Furthermore, the nomenclature for HCG assays is confusing and in some cases misleading. These problems can now be solved; a uniform nomenclature has been established, and new standards are available for HCG, its subunits HCGalpha and HCGbeta, the partially degraded or nicked forms of HCG and HCGbeta, and the beta-core fragment. This review describes the biochemical and biological background for the clinical use of determinations of various forms of HCG. The clinical use of HCG and studies on HCG vaccines are briefly reviewed.

Age-matched comparison of recombinant and urinary HCG for final follicular maturation

This age-matched retrospective analysis compared the clinical outcomes of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (rHCG) and urinary HCG (uHCG) in patients undergoing fresh, nondonor IVF cycles. The patients underwent ovarian stimulation by standard gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist down-regulation or a GnRH antagonist protocol using recombinant FSH (rFSH) alone or in combination with human menopausal gonadotrophin. When two or more follicles had attained a mean diameter of 20 mm, follicular triggering was achieved with either Ovidrel (rHCG) 250 mug SC or uHCG 10,000 IU IM. Patients receiving rHCG were considered subjects, and they were age-matched in a 1:2 ratio to patients receiving uHCG, who were designated as controls. The main outcome measures were number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes obtained, number of oocytes fertilized and clinical pregnancy rates. A total of 273 subjects were age-matched and compared with 546 controls. Recombinant HCG had a minimal effect on the number of oocytes retrieved (13.4 versus 13.2), mature oocytes (10.5 versus 10.3) and oocytes fertilized (8.2 versus 7.8) compared with uHCG. Pregnancy (46.0 versus 45.2%) and clinical pregnancy rates (38.1 versus 36.8%) were similar for rHCG and uHCG. Recombinant HCG was as effective as uHCG for final follicular maturation in IVF cycles.

Recombinant versus urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin for ovulation induction in assisted conception

BACKGROUND

For the last few decades urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin has been used to induce final follicular maturation and for triggering ovulation in assisted conception. Recombinant technology has allowed the production of two drugs that can be used for the same purpose: to mimic the endogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) surge. This would allow commercial production to be adjusted according to market requirements. In addition all urinary contaminants would also be removed. Hence, this would allow the safe subcutaneous administration of a compound with less batch-to-batch variation. However, prior to a change in practice, the effectiveness of the recombinant drugs should be known, compared to the currently used urinary human chorionic gonadotrophins.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous rhCG and high dose rLH compared with intramuscular uhCG for inducing final oocyte maturation and triggering ovulation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (27 August 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to Feb 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to Feb 2004). Searches were not limited by language. The bibliographies of included, excluded trials and abstracts of major meetings were searched for additional trials. Authors and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for missing and unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two reviewers independently scanned titles and abstracts, and selected those that appeared relevant for collection of the full paper. Only truly randomised controlled trials comparing rhCG or high dose r-LH with urinary hCG for triggering ovulation in assisted conception for treatment of infertility in normogonadotrophic women were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Assessment of inclusion/exclusion, quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by at least two reviewers. Discrepancies were discussed in the presence of a third reviewer and a consensus reached. Quality assessment included method of randomisation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and assessors, reporting of a power calculation, intention to treat analysis, and handling of dropouts. Data extraction included characteristics of participants, the intervention and control procedures, and outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven RCTs were identified, four comparing rhCG and uhCG and three comparing rhLH and uhCG. There was no statistically significant difference between rhCG vs uhCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy/ live birth rate (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.39), pregnancy rate, miscarriage or incidence of OHSS. There was no statistically significant difference between rhLH vs uhCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy/ live birth rate (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.76), pregnancy rate, miscarriage or incidence of OHSS. The manufacturer of rhLH has decided not to further develop this product. rhCG was associated with a reduction in the incidence of local site reactions and other minor adverse effects (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.70).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of difference in clinical outcomes between urinary and recombinant gonadotrophins for induction of final follicular maturation. Additional factors should be considered when choosing gonadotrophin type, including safety, cost and drug availability.