Efficacy of a combined protocol of urinary and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone used for ovarian stimulation of patients undergoing ICSI cycle

Effectiveness and safety of gonadotropins used in female infertility: a population-based study in the Lazio region, Italy

PURPOSE

Infertility is a topic of growing interest, and female infertility is often treated with gonadotropins. Evidence regarding comparative safety and efficacy of different gonadotropin formulations is available from clinical studies, while real-world data are missing. The present study aims to investigate effectiveness and safety of treatment with different gonadotropin formulations in women undergoing medically assisted procreation treatments in Latium, a region in central Italy, through a real-world data approach.

METHODS

A retrospective population-based cohort study in women between the ages of 18 and 45 years who were prescribed with at least one gonadotropin between 2007 and 2019 was conducted. Women were enrolled from the regional drug dispense registry, and data on their clinical history, exposure to therapeutic cycles (based on recombinant "REC" or extractives "EXT" gonadotropin, or combined protocol "CMD" (REC + EXT)), and maternal/infantile outcomes were linked from the regional healthcare administrative databases. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to estimate the association between exposure and outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 90,292 therapeutic cycles prescribed to 35,899 women were linked to pregnancies. Overall, 15.8% of cycles successfully led to pregnancy. Compared to extractives, recombinant and combined treatments showed a stronger association with conception rate (RRREC adj = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12; RRCBD adj = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.11-1.24). Maternal outcomes occurred in less than 5% of deliveries, and no significant differences between treatments were observed (REC vs EXT, pre-eclampsia: RR adj = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.86-1.79, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: RR adj = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.59-2.65, gestational diabetes: RR adj = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.84-1.35). Regarding infantile outcomes, similar results were obtained for different gonadotropin formulations (REC vs EXT: low birth weight: RR adj = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.83-1.26, multiple births: RR adj = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.92-1.23, preterm birth: RR adj = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.92-1.26).

CONCLUSIONS

Efficacy and safety profiles of REC proved to be similar to those of EXT. Regarding the efficacy in terms of conception rate and birth rate, protocols using the combined approach performed slightly better. Outcomes related to maternal and infantile safety were generally very rare, and safety features were overlapping between gonadotropin formulations.

Immature oocyte incidence: Contributing factors and effects on mature sibling oocytes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate which factors contribute to the incidence of immature oocytes (germinal vesicle -GV- and metaphase I -MI-) and how they impact the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes of sibling mature oocytes.

Methods

Data from 3,920 cycles performed from June/2010 to August/2016 in a private university-affiliated IVF center were evaluated for the influence of controlled ovarian stimulation protocol (COS) on immature oocytes incidence and its effects on ICSI outcomes.

Results

MI (p=0.004) and GV (p=0.029) number were negatively correlated with gonadotropin dose. Patients stimulated by rFSH had increased GV/oocyte rate in both GnRH agonists (p<0.001) and antagonist (p=0.042) protocols, in comparison to rFSH associated with rLH protocol. MI and GV/oocyte rates were negatively correlated to fertilization (p<0.001), high-quality embryo on da p<0.001; GV/oocyte p=0.033) and pregnancy (MI/oocyte p=0.002; GV/oocyte p=0.013) rates. Cycles above a 10.5% MI/oocyte cut-off were correlated to higher response to ovarian stimulation, poor embryo development and almost two times lower pregnancy rate. Immature oocyte incidence is affected by COS and impacts on ICSI outcomes.

Conclusion

Our evidence suggests that oocytes derived from a cohort with high incidence of maturation fail may have detrimental clinical outcomes.

Comparison of recombinant and urinary follicle-stimulating hormones over 2000 gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: a retrospective study

The objective of this paper was to compare the effect of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and urinary follicle-stimulating hormone (uFSH) on pregnancy rates and live birth rates with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol in China. This retrospective study was conducted from January 2014 through August 2017. Patients treated with uFSH had significantly higher levels of luteinizing hormone (3.79 mIU/ml vs. 3.09 mIU/ml) and progesterone (0.93 ng/ml vs. 1.16 ng/ml) on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) administration, and they also had higher pregnancy rates (24.19% vs. 22.86%). There was no significant difference in the rate of live births. In the logistic regression results of the rFSH group, the pregnancy rate was positively correlated with the level of luteinizing hormone, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.18; P = 0.048). In the uFSH group, the pregnancy rate was negatively correlated with the progesterone level on the day of HCG administration, with an OR of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.27-0.77; P = 0.004). Our research concluded that uFSH performed better than rFSH in terms of pregnancy rates when it was associated with the GnRH antagonist protocol. Meanwhile, no significant differences in the rate of live births were observed between the two groups.

Urinary Versus Recombinant Gonadotropins for Ovarian Stimulation in Women Undergoing Treatment with Assisted Reproductive Technology

Globally, about 10%-15% couples are affected by infertility, with major role being played by the couple's lifestyle. Several gonadotropin preparations (urinary, purified urinary, recombinant, and biosimilars) are available for use. Purified urinary formulations offer numerous advantages over their predecessor, including lesser injection dose required, ability to be administered subcutaneously, less batch-to-batch variability, better efficacy, ability to individualize protocols as per patient's need, better control of developing follicles, less risk of multiple pregnancies, and hyperstimulation. Published results of Cochrane reviews and meta-analysis show no difference in efficacy or safety between urinary and recombinant gonadotropins. In the absence of any significant difference, cost plays an important role in deciding choice of gonadotropins. In this article, we have reviewed the results of comparative clinical trials, Cochrane analysis, and meta-analysis to derive consensus statements regarding efficacy, safety, and cost implications of urinary versus recombinant gonadotropin preparations.

Effect of myo-inositol and melatonin versus myo-inositol, in a randomized controlled trial, for improving in vitro fertilization of patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) induces anovulation in women of reproductive age, and is one of the pathological factors involved in the failure of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Indeed, PCOS women are characterized by poor quality oocytes. Therefore, a treatment for enhancing oocyte quality becomes crucial for these patients. Myo-Inositol and melatonin proved to be efficient predictors for positive IVF outcomes, correlating with high oocyte quality. We tested the synergistic effect of myo-inositol and melatonin in IVF protocols with PCOS patients in a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Five-hundred twenty-six PCOS women were divided into three groups: Controls (only folic acid: 400 mcg), Group A (Inofolic® plus, a daily dose of myo-inositol: 4000 mg, folic acid: 400 mcg, and melatonin: 3 mg), and Group B (Inofolic®, a daily dose of myo-inositol: 4000 mg, and folic acid: 400 mcg). The main outcome measures were oocyte and embryo quality, clinical pregnancy and implantation rates. The treatment lasted from the first day of the cycle until 14 days after embryo transfer. Myo-inositol and melatonin have shown to enhance, synergistically, oocyte and embryo quality. In consideration of the beneficial effect observed in our trial and on the bases of previous studies, we decided to integrate routinely MI and M supplementation in the IVF protocols. The same treatment should be taken carefully in consideration in all procedures of this kind.

Efficacy of Highly Purified Urinary FSH versus Recombinant FSH in Chinese Women over 37 Years Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Techniques

BACKGROUND

Urine derived follicle-stimulating hormone (uFSH) contains a higher proportion of acidic isoforms, whereas recombinant FSH (rFSH) contains a higher proportion of less-acidic isoforms. Less-acidic isoforms have a faster clearance, and thus a shorter half-life than the acidic FSH isoforms. The slow clearance of the acidic isoforms has a longer half-life and higher biological activity. This study was designed to determine whether uFSH or rFSH is more effective in older Chinese women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled cohort study. A total of 508 Chinese women over 37 years were randomized into two following study groups for their in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles: i. group A (n=254) were treated with rFSH, and ii. group B (n=254) were treated with uFSH. Both groups were suppressed with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue using a long down-regulation protocol. The main outcomes for comparison were days of stimulation, estradiol (E2) on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration, number of oocytes collected, amount of FSH used, quantity of FSH/oocyte, endometrial thickness at hCG day, M П oocyte rate, 2PN zygote rate, grade І embryo rate, number of embryos cryopreserved, pregnancy rate, implantation rate, abortion rate and the rate of no transferable embryos.

RESULTS

Twenty two cycles including 16 cycles with poor ovarian response and six cycles with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were cancelled. There were 243 cycles left in each group. The patients treated with uFSH had a significantly higher 2PN zygote rate (87.4 vs. 76.6%, p<0.001), grade І embryo rate (49.8 vs. 40.8%, p<0.001) and endometrial thickness on day of hCG (11.8 mm vs. 11.2 mm, respectively, p=0.006) and a lower rate of no transferable embryos (1.2 vs. 5.3%, p=0.019) than women treated with rFSH. The other measures evaluated showed no statistically significant differences between groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that uFSH produced a significantly higher proportion of grade І embryos than rFSH in older Chinese women and there was a significantly lower chance of no transferable embryos in uFSH cycles. The clinical efficacy of the two gonadotropins was equivalent.

Sequential protocol with urinary-FSH/recombinant-FSH versus standard protocol with recombinant-FSH in women of advanced age undergoing IVF

A stimulation protocol mimicking the physiological pattern of FSH release may improve IVF outcome in women of advanced age. Urinary-FSH delivers a wider range of isoforms including the most acidic produced during the early follicular phase when oestradiol level is low, a common condition in women of advanced reproductive age. We hypothesized that a stimulation protocol using urinary-FSH during the early follicular phase and then shifting toward recombinant-FSH may improve oocyte quality and pregnancy rate in 35-40 years old patients in IVF program. A retrospective study was performed: after a standard down-regulation with GnRH-analogue, 115 women underwent stimulation with urinary-FSH for 6 days according to a step-down approach and then shifting to recombinant-FSH (group A), 115 women underwent a stimulation protocol with only recombinant-FSH (group B). Days of stimulation were lower in group A than in group B, a higher proportion of MII oocytes and of grade 1 embryos, higher implantation rate and pregnancy rate were observed in group A versus group B. We conclude that a sequential protocol using urinary-FSH in the early days of stimulation and subsequently recombinant-FSH may improve the IVF outcome in patients of advanced reproductive age.

Sequential (hFSH + recFSH) vs homogenous (hFSH or recFSH alone) stimulation: clinical and biochemical (cumulus cell gene expression) aspects

FSH is a key hormone in the regulation of follicular development. Together with the EGF network, these molecules mediate oocyte maturation and competence in preparation for the action of LH. FSH isoforms regulate distinct biological pathways and have specific effects on granulosa cell function and maturation of the ovarian follicle. Their dynamic interactions occur during the follicular cycle; short-living forms are predominant in the pre-ovulatory phase, whereas long-acting molecules characterize the luteal-follicular transition. Recombinant FSH (rFSH) molecules have a reduced number of isoforms and are less acidic, with a shorter half-life. We have investigated sequential stimulation, comparing hFSH + rFSH, vs. rFSH alone and hFSH alone for the entire stimulation phase. Sequential stimulation leads to an E2 per MII oocyte ratio that is much lower than is seen during treatment with the two drugs individually. Although there is a positive tendency in favor of the sequential treatment, there was no significant difference in pregnancy rates, even taking frozen embryos into consideration. The cumulus cell transcriptome varies considerably between the treatments, although with no clear significance. When comparing pregnant vs. non-pregnant patients, in general a decrease in mRNA expression can be observed in the pregnant patients, especially in expression of folic acid receptor 1 and ovostatin 2. This indicates that material has been transferred from CC to the oocyte. However, a common observation in the literature is that variations in the transcriptome of the cumulus cells are highly dependent upon the patient genotype; the potential for applying this strategy as a basis for selecting embryos is, at the very least, questionable.

In vitro fertilization at a public hospital in Nigeria

OBJECTIVE

To assess the results of an in vitro fertilization program newly established within a conventional infertility program at a university hospital in Nigeria.

METHODS

From June 1, 2007, to June 30, 2011, following unsuccessful conventional treatments, 600 couples were offered in vitro fertilization with (if needed) intracytoplasmic sperm injection in batches of 30 couples. The outcomes measured were duration of ovarian stimulation and rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; numbers of follicles aspirated, oocytes retrieved, oocytes fertilized, and embryos transferred; and clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

The mean duration of stimulation was 11.8 ± 1.6 days and 1% of the women had severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The mean number of follicles aspirated was 8 ± 2.8; of oocytes retrieved 6 ± 3.2; and fertilized 3 ± 1.8. The maximum number of embryos transferred per woman was 3. The rates of clinical pregnancy and multiple pregnancy were 30% and 6.0%. The rates of abortion and ectopic pregnancy were 6.6% and 0.6%. The preterm delivery rate was 2.5%.

CONCLUSION

Successfully conducting an assisted reproduction program at a public health facility is feasible in a low-resource country. Treating couples in batches was cost effective, with a low complication rate.

Impact of highly purified versus recombinant follicle stimulating hormone on oocyte quality and embryo development in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

The quality of oocytes and developing embryos are the most relevant factors determining the success of an in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. However, there are very few studies analyzing the effects of different gonadotrophin preparations on oocyte and embryo quality. A retrospective secondary analysis of data collected from a prospective randomized study was performed to compare highly purified versus recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (HP-FSH vs. rFSH). The main outcome measures were quantity and quality of oocytes and embryos, dynamics of embryo development, cryopreservation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate. The number of retrieved and of mature (MII) oocytes showed no significant differences. Fertilization rate was significantly higher in the HP-FSH group (68.9% vs. 59.9%, p = 0.01). We also found significantly higher rate of cryopreserved embryos per all retrieved oocytes (23.4% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.002) in the HP-FSH group. There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy and in live birth rates. Oocytes obtained with HP-FSH stimulation showed higher fertilisability, whereas pregnancy and live birth rates did not differ between the groups. However, patients treated with HP-FSH may benefit from the higher rate of embryos capable for cryopreservation, suggesting that cumulative pregnancy rates might be higher in this group.

Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles

BACKGROUND

Several systematic reviews compared recombinant gonadotrophin with urinary gonadotrophins (HMG, purified FSH, highly purified FSH) for ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF and ICSI cycles and these reported conflicting results. Each of these reviews used different inclusion and exclusion criteria for trials. Our aim in producing this review is to bring together all randomised studies in this field under common inclusion criteria with consistent and valid statistical methods.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of recombinant gonadotrophin (rFSH) with the three main types of urinary gonadotrophins (i.e. HMG, FSH-P and FSH-HP) for ovarian stimulation in women undergoing IVF or ICSI treatment cycles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

An extended search was done according to Cochrane guidelines including the Menstrual Disorders & Subfertility Group's Specialised Register of controlled trials, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1966 to May 2010), EMBASE (1980 to May 2010), CINAHL (1982 to May 2010), National Research Register, and Current Controlled Trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials reporting data comparing clinical outcomes for women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles and using recombinant FSH in comparison with HMG or highly purified HMG, purified urinary FSH (FSH-P), and highly purified urinary FSH (FSH-HP) for ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF or ICSI cycles were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Primary outcome measure was live birth rate and OHSS per randomised woman.Binary outcomes were analysed using odds ratios and also reported in absolute terms. Grouped analyses were carried out for all outcomes to explore whether relative effects differed due to key features of the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 42 trials with a total of 9606 couples. Comparing rFSH to any of the other gonadotrophins irrespective of the down-regulation protocol used, did not result in any evidence of a statistically significant difference in live birth rate (28 trials, 7339 couples, odds ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.08). This suggests that for a group with a 25% live birth rate using urinary gonadotrophins the rate would be between 22.5% and 26.5% using rFSH. There was also no evidence of a difference in the OHSS rate (32 trials, 7740 couples, OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.61). This means that for a group with 2% risk of OHSS using urinary gonadotrophins, the risk would be between 1.7% and 3.2% using rFSH.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Clinical choice of gonadotrophin should depend on availability, convenience and costs. Further research on these comparisons is unlikely to identify substantive differences in effectiveness or safety.

Urinary hMG (Meropur) versus recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH (Pergoveris) in IVF: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial

To compare IVF outcome in ovarian stimulation protocols with recombinant FSH plus recombinant LH versus hMG, 122 patients were randomized into two study groups: group A, patients treated with urinary hMG, and group B, patients treated with rFSH plus rLH. The two groups proved to be comparable to the main IVF outcome (pregnancy rate, implantation rate, oocytes, and embryos quality), with an increasing risk of ovarian hyperstimulation in the Pergoveris group.

Ovarian stimulation protocols based on follicle-stimulating hormone glycosylation pattern: impact on oocyte quality and clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) with different glycosylation patterns on oocyte quality and clinical outcomes in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment program.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized, open-label, clinical study.

SETTING

Assisted reproduction center.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred eighty-eight infertile couples undergoing assisted fertilization treatment.

INTERVENTION(S)

All participants underwent a standard down-regulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue. The patients were randomized into three groups: 63 patients received combined sequential acidic and less-acidic FSH, 65 patients received only less-acidic FSH (recombinant FSH), and 60 received only acidic FSH (human-derived FSH).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Number of mature metaphase II oocytes, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy rates, and implantation rates.

RESULT(S)

The pregnancy and implantation rates were statistically significantly lower in the less-acidic recombinant FSH alone group than in the combined sequential acidic hFSH/less-acidic recombinant FSH, and acidic hFSH alone groups (33.3%, 43.5%, 39% and 17.3%, 24.5%, 20.4%, respectively). Metaphase II oocytes and grade 1 embryos were statistically significantly higher in favor of the combined sequential acidic hFSH/less-acidic recombinant FSH group compared with the less-acidic recombinant FSH alone group.

CONCLUSION(S)

The glycosylation patterns of the two types of FSH implemented for ovarian stimulation have different impacts on oocyte quality and clinical outcome. A sequential combined protocol using both acidic and less-acidic FSH for ovarian stimulation improves oocyte maturity and embryo cleavage, and increases pregnancy and implantation rates.

Factors affecting success rates in two concurrent clinical IVF trials: an examination of potential explanations for the difference in pregnancy rates between the United States and Europe

OBJECTIVE

To compare a US clinical trial of gonadotropin therapy for IVF with a similar European trial to determine what factors may explain the higher clinical pregnancy rate in the US trial.

DESIGN

Comparison of baseline, treatment, and outcome variables in the United States (US) and European trials.

SETTING

IVF practices in the US (n=4) and Europe (n=6).

PATIENT(S)

297 women undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULT(S)

Clinical pregnancy rates were 43.4% in the US compared with 29.7% in Europe (p=0.016), with a live birth rate of 38.2% versus 27.6% (p=0.064). This difference in clinical pregnancy rate could not be explained by differences in the US versus Europe for number of embryos transferred (2.3 vs. 2.6) or female age (34.6 vs. 30.4). Although the starting dose of gonadotropin was higher in the US trial compared with the European trial (300 versus 225 IU), the total dose of gonadotropin was only slightly higher in the US. In multiple logistic regression analysis of 81 pretransfer variables on clinical pregnancy, the only two found to be significant predictors of outcome were baseline endometrial thickness following down-regulation and number of days of gonadotropin treatment.

CONCLUSION(S)

This study suggests the possibility that US pregnancy rates may be higher in part because of differences in down-regulation or gonadotropin dosing. Other factors not assessed in these studies or in national datasets likely also contribute to the difference in pregnancy rates.

Efficacy of recombinant versus human derived follicle stimulating hormone on the oocyte and embryo quality in IVF-ICSI cycles: Randomised, controlled, multi-centre trial

The aim of this trial, comparing human follicle stimulating hormone (hFSH) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) was to evaluate the efficacy on oocyte and embryo quality in in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Four-hundred and one women were randomised in two groups to receive or hFSH or rFSH in stimulation protocols. The primary end point of this study was the oocyte/embryo quality. No significant difference in oocyte/embryo quality was observed between the two groups. The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the hFSH group (6 +/- 2.8 in hFSH group vs. 5 +/- 2.6 in rFSH group; P = 0.003). A less amounts of gonadotropins consumed (2106 +/- 719 IU in hFSH group vs. 3536 +/- 1099 IU in rFSH group; P < 0.0001) and shorter duration of stimulation (human chorionic gonadotropin day of administration: Day 12.3 +/- 1.0 in hFSH and Day 13.3 +/- 1.2 in rFSH group, respectively; P < 0.0001) was registered in hFSH group. Fertilisation, cleavage and implantation rates, pregnancy and abortion rates were similar in both groups. However, lower clinical abortion rate (not significant) in hFSH group might be noteworthy. In our study, we demonstrated that hFSH and rFSH products are equivalent in terms of clinical efficacy.