Chromosome heteromorphisms: an impact on infertility

Case report: Comprehensive evaluation and management of male infertility with complete AZFC microdeletion and undescended testicle

This case report presents a 31-year-old male patient with primary infertility, a unilaterally undescended testicle, and a complete AZFc microdeletion. Despite failed attempts at testicular sperm extraction, the patient underwent successful microscopic testicular sperm extraction and subsequent viable sperm extraction, leading to successful fertilization through intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The report underscores the potential for successful ICSI in male infertility cases with complex genetic and reproductive issues, highlighting the importance of comprehensive genetic evaluation and individualized reproductive techniques in managing male infertility associated with undescended testicle and genetic anomalies.

Challenges in classifying human chromosomal heteromorphisms using banding cytogenetics: From controversial guidelines to the need for a universal scoring system

Chromosomal heteromorphisms (CHs) are morphological variations predominantly found in constitutive heterochromatic regions of the genome, primarily composed of tandemly repetitive sequences of satellite DNA. Although not completely devoid of genes, these regions are typically not transcribed into proteins and lack obvious phenotypic impact. Nonetheless, their clinical importance is increasingly under scrutiny, with several studies aiming to assess their influence on human diseases and susceptibilities, especially as they are seemingly part of the long noncoding RNAs in certain tissues. This article summarizes the classification methods of human heterochromatic CHs documented in the literature over the last two decades. Multiple scoring systems have been identified, and previous approaches for CH assessment and reporting in genetic diagnosis have shown inconsistencies. Owing to the current heterogeneity in the classification of CHs, data analysis may be biased, impacting the quality of clinical reports and human genetic research. This review highlights the need for a universal scoring system, which is essential for scientific reproducibility and the accurate identification and clinical evaluation of human CHs.

Clinical Analysis of Y Chromosome Microdeletions and Chromosomal Aberrations in 1596 Male Infertility Patients of the Zhuang Ethnic Group in Guangxi

The long arm of the Y chromosome (Yq) contains many amplified and palindromic sequences that are prone to self-reorganization during spermatogenesis, and tiny submicroscopic segmental deletions in the proximal Yq are called Y chromosome microdeletions (YCM). A retrospective study was conducted on male infertility patients of Zhuang ethnicity who presented at Reproductive Medical Center of Nanning between January 2015 and May 2023. Seminal fluid was collected for standard examination. YCM were detected by using a combination of multiplex PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. Preparation of peripheral blood chromosomes and karyotyping of chromosomes was performed. 147 cases (9.22%) of YCM were detected in 1596 male infertility patients of Zhuang ethnicity. Significant difference was found in the detection rate of YCM between the azoospermia group and the oligospermia group (P < 0.001). Of all types of YCM, the highest detection rate was AZFc (n = 83), followed by AZFb + c (n = 28). 264 cases (16.54%) of sex chromosomal aberrations were detected. The most prevalent karyotype was 47, XXY (n = 202). The detection rate of sex chromosomal aberrations in azoospermia group was higher than that in severe oligospermia group and oligospermia group, and the differences were significant (P < 0.001). 28 cases (1.57%) of autosomal aberrations and 105 cases (6.58%) of chromosomal polymorphism were identified. The current research has some limitations due to the lack of normal men as the control group but suggests that YCM and chromosomal aberrations represent key genetic factors influencing spermatogenesis in infertile males of Zhuang ethnicity in Guangxi.

The effects of chromosome polymorphism on the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer-assisted reproduction

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of chromosome polymorphism on the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET)-assisted reproductive technology.

METHODS

The case data of 2740 patients treated between January 2018 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were organized into two groups: a case group and a control group. In the case group (n = 81), one or both parents were characterized by chromosomal polymorphism; in the control group (n = 2659), both parents had normal chromosome karyotyping. The primary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate (clinical pregnancy rate of fresh transfer cycles = number of clinical pregnancy cycles/number of fresh embryo transfer cycles × 100%) and live birth rate (live birth rate per fresh transfer cycles = number of live births/numbers of fresh embryo transfer cycles × 100%). The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

After PSM 1:2 matching for the patients in the two groups, 72 patients were successfully matched. The clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in the case group were lower than in the control group before PSM (clinical pregnancy rate: 33.30% case group vs. 46.60% control group, p = .020; live birth rate: 30.90% case group vs. 47.90% control group, p = .03). The differences were statistically significant (p < .05). The live birth rate in the case group was also significantly lower than in the control group after PSM (34.98% case group vs. 74.52% control group; p = .028). The correlation coefficient between clinical pregnancy and grouping (i.e. if there was a characteristic chromosome polymorphism) was -.045 (p = .02), while the correlation coefficient between live birth and grouping was -.046.

CONCLUSION

Chromosome polymorphism is weakly negatively correlated with live birth in IVF/ET-assisted reproduction and can significantly reduce the live birth rate of patients.

Effect of chromosomal polymorphisms on the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

PURPOSE

The incidence of chromosomal polymorphisms (CP) is increased in infertile couples, but its impact on reproduction is uncertain, especially undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of CP on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) treatment METHODS: A total of 1331 infertile couples undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment were involved in this retrospective case-control study. The participants were divided into 4 groups according to CP variations: (i) normal chromosomes (NC) group; (ii) CP group; (iii) both chromosomal polymorphisms (BCP) group; and (iv) double chromosomal polymorphisms (DCP) group. The CP group was further divided into five subgroups: qh+, D/G, inv(9), Yqh+ and Yqh-. The outcomes of IVF/ICSI-ET treatment were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

There were no differences observed between the eight groups in terms of number of oocytes retrieved, MII rate, fertilization rate, cleaved embryo rate, and quality embryo rate for both females and males (p > 0.05). In both male and female, some of the CP subgroups experienced more oocyte retrieval operations and more embryo transfer operations to achieve pregnancy than the NC groups (p < 0.05). The rates of live births were significantly lower in some of the CP subgroups compared to the NC group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the pregnancy outcomes of ET were affected by CP. It was speculated that this may be associated with the effect of chromosome polymorphism on embryo quality, although this could not be observed or determined by morphological evaluation.

Challenges and Opportunities for Clinical Cytogenetics in the 21st Century

The powerful utilities of current DNA sequencing technology question the value of developing clinical cytogenetics any further. By briefly reviewing the historical and current challenges of cytogenetics, the new conceptual and technological platform of the 21st century clinical cytogenetics is presented. Particularly, the genome architecture theory (GAT) has been used as a new framework to emphasize the importance of clinical cytogenetics in the genomic era, as karyotype dynamics play a central role in information-based genomics and genome-based macroevolution. Furthermore, many diseases can be linked to elevated levels of genomic variations within a given environment. With karyotype coding in mind, new opportunities for clinical cytogenetics are discussed to integrate genomics back into cytogenetics, as karyotypic context represents a new type of genomic information that organizes gene interactions. The proposed research frontiers include: 1. focusing on karyotypic heterogeneity (e.g., classifying non-clonal chromosome aberrations (NCCAs), studying mosaicism, heteromorphism, and nuclear architecture alteration-mediated diseases), 2. monitoring the process of somatic evolution by characterizing genome instability and illustrating the relationship between stress, karyotype dynamics, and diseases, and 3. developing methods to integrate genomic data and cytogenomics. We hope that these perspectives can trigger further discussion beyond traditional chromosomal analyses. Future clinical cytogenetics should profile chromosome instability-mediated somatic evolution, as well as the degree of non-clonal chromosomal aberrations that monitor the genomic system's stress response. Using this platform, many common and complex disease conditions, including the aging process, can be effectively and tangibly monitored for health benefits.

Prevalence of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Iranian Patients with Infertility

BACKGROUND

The numerical and structural abnormalities of chromosomes are the most common cause of infertility. Here, we evaluated the prevalence and types of chromosomal abnormalities in Iranian infertile patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 1750 couples of reproductive age with infertility, who referred to infertility clinics in Tehran during 2014- 2019, in order to perform chromosomal analysis. Peripheral blood samples were obtained from all couples and chromosomal abnormalities were evaluated by G-banded metaphase karyotyping. In some cases, the detected abnormalities were confirmed using fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH).

RESULTS

We detected various chromosomal abnormalities in 114/3500 (3.257%) patients with infertility. The prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities was 44/114 (38.596%) among infertile females and 70/114 (61.403%) among infertile males. Structural chromosomal abnormalities were found in 27/1750 infertile females and 35/1750 infertile males. Numerical chromosomal abnormalities were found in 17/1750 of females and 35/1750 of males. The 45, XY, rob (13;14) (p10q10) translocation and Klinefelter syndrome (47, XXY) were the most common structural and numerical chromosomal abnormalities in the Iranian infertile patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In general, we found a high prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in Iranian patients with reproductive problems. Our study highlights the importance of cytogenetic studies in infertile patients before starting infertility treatments approaches.

Chromosomal polymorphisms have no negative effect on reproductive outcomes after IVF/ICSI-ET/FET

The present study aimed to explore whether chromosomal polymorphisms (CPs) have negative effects on reproductive outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET)/frozen-thawing embryo transfer (FET)? We conducted a retrospective study consisting of 21,867 assisted reproductive technology treatment cycles, among which, fresh embryo transfer cycles accounted for 10,400, and the rest were FET cycles. According to karyotype of CPs, the former was grouped as: group 1 (male carrier, n = 425), group 2 (female carrier, n = 262), and group 3 (couple without CPs, n = 9713). Accordingly, FET cycles were divided into 3 groups: group 4 (male carrier, n = 298), group 5 (female carrier, n = 311), and group 6 (couple without CPs, n = 10,858). The embryo implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), and early miscarriage rate (EMR) were compared among the groups. In fresh embryo transfer cycles after IVF/ICSI, there were no significant differences in the infertility duration, BMI, basal FSH, no. of oocyte, no. of 2PN, endometrial thickness on trigger day, serum E2, P, and LH level on trigger day (P > 0.05). The female age, no. of 2PN embryo cleavage, top-quality embryo, and no. of embryo transferred were significantly different among groups (P < 0.05). The IR was 38.8%, 36.2%, and 34.0% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The CPR was 55.1%, 52.3%, and 49.7%, respectively. The LBR was 36.9%, 37.4%, and 36.4%, respectively. The CPR and LBR showed no significant differences among groups. The IR was lower and the EMR was higher in group 3 than those of groups 1 and 2. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that female age, no. of embryo transferred, EMT, LH, and P on the trigger day were independently factors associated with CPR. Besides, no. of embryo transferred, and EMT on trigger day were associated with LBR, while the CPs was not related with CPR and LBR after IVF/ICSI-ET. In FET cycles, the infertility duration was similar (P > 0.05), but the female age, BMI, no. of embryo transferred were significantly different among groups (P > 0.05). The IR was 24.3%, 23.6% and 22.3% in group 4, 5, and 6, receptivity. The CPR was 31.8%, 30.9%, and 30.0%, the LBR was 23.8%,26.3%, and 23.8%, while the EMR was 12.6%, 13.1%, 14.4%, respectively. The IR, CPR, EMR, and LBR showed no significant differences among groups (P > 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that female age, infertility duration, and no. of embryo transferred were independently factors affecting CPR and LBR after FET. The CPs were not associated with CPR and LBR after FET. The results suggested that uniparental carrying of CPs have no effects on the reproductive outcomes after IVF/ICSI-ET/FET. However, it is not clear whether both parents carrying CPs would affect pregnancy outcome.

Systematic review of subsequent pregnancy outcomes in couples with parental abnormal chromosomal karyotypes and recurrent pregnancy loss

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current evidence of pregnancy outcomes among couples with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) with abnormal karyotypes vs. those with normal karyotypes and among couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes after receiving expectant management vs. preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING

Academic medical centers.

PATIENT(S)

Pregnancy outcomes in 6,301 couples with RPL who conceived without medical intervention in 11 studies were analyzed. However, only 2 studies addressed the outcomes of couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes after expectant management (75 cases) vs. PGD (50 cases).

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The pregnancy outcomes in couples with RPL with abnormal and normal karyotypes across included studies were evaluated.

RESULT(S)

Compared with those with a normal karyotype, a significantly lower first pregnancy live birth rate (LBR) was found in couples with RPL with abnormal karyotypes (58.5% vs. 71.9%; odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.65; I² =27%). A markedly decreased first pregnancy LBR was found in couples with a translocation (52.9% vs. 72.4%; OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.61; I² =33%) but not in couples with an inversion. However, the differences in accumulated LBR (81.4% vs. 74.8%; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90-1.03; I² = 0) were nonsignificant, whereas the miscarriage rate was distinctly higher in couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes (53.0% vs. 34.7%; OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.69-2.89; I² = 0). Compared with those who chose expectant management, differences in accumulated LBR were nonsignificant (60% vs. 68%; OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.11-2.62; I² =71%), whereas the miscarriage rate (24% vs. 65.3%; OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.51; I² = 45) was markedly low in couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes who chose PGD.

CONCLUSION(S)

Couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes had a higher miscarriage rate than couples with normal karyotypes but achieved a noninferior accumulated LBR through multiple conception attempts. In couples with RPL and abnormal karyotypes, PGD treatment did not increase the accumulated LBR but markedly reduced miscarriage rate compared with expectant management.

Segmental duplications and their variation in a complete human genome

Despite their importance in disease and evolution, highly identical segmental duplications (SDs) are among the last regions of the human reference genome (GRCh38) to be fully sequenced. Using a complete telomere-to-telomere human genome (T2T-CHM13), we present a comprehensive view of human SD organization. SDs account for nearly one-third of the additional sequence, increasing the genome-wide estimate from 5.4 to 7.0% [218 million base pairs (Mbp)]. An analysis of 268 human genomes shows that 91% of the previously unresolved T2T-CHM13 SD sequence (68.3 Mbp) better represents human copy number variation. Comparing long-read assemblies from human (n = 12) and nonhuman primate (n = 5) genomes, we systematically reconstruct the evolution and structural haplotype diversity of biomedically relevant and duplicated genes. This analysis reveals patterns of structural heterozygosity and evolutionary differences in SD organization between humans and other primates.

Frequency and clinical manifestation of prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis of chromosomal polymorphisms in Northeast China

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively analyze the incidence of chromosomal polymorphisms in prenatal cytogenetic diagnostic cases and the effect of the clinical manifestation of these fetuses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

490 fetuses with chromosomal polymorphisms among 9996 pregnant women who underwent prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis were included in this study and were set as group 1. Other 500 pregnant women, whose fetuses were with normal karyotypes, were randomly selected from the remaining pregnant women and set as group 2. Clinical information and outcomes and maternal serum screening results of group 1 were compared with group 2.

RESULTS

The frequency of fetal chromosomal polymorphism was 4.90% (490/9996). The most common variants observed were 1/9/16 qh± (2.27%, 227/9996), followed by inv(9) (0.90%, 90/9996). 94.62% (264/279) of fetal chromosomal variants were inherited from parents. No statistical difference was found in clinical information and outcomes and maternal serum screening results between group 1 and group 2.

CONCLUSION

The fetus with chromosomal polymorphism has no impact on serum markers of second trimester screening and does not play an important role for the clinical outcome of the current pregnancy either, whether it is inherited from the parents or a de novo mutation.

A case–control study identifying the frequency and spectrum of chromosomal anomalies and variants in a cohort of 1000 couples with a known history of recurrent pregnancy loss in the Eastern region of India

Background:

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a common occurrence that affects up to 15% of couples in their reproductive years. In both males and females with RPL and infertility, chromosomal abnormalities play a significant impact.

Aim:

The study was designed to examine the involvement of chromosomal anomalies and the frequency of certain chromosomal variants persistent among couples experiencing RPL.

Setting and Design:

This case–control study was conducted on 1000 couples from January 2015 to September 2020 in the state of Odisha, India, strictly adhering to principles of Helsinki Declaration (1975). The study was performed at the School of Biotechnology, KIIT University in collaboration with inDNA Life Sciences Private Limited.

Materials and Methods:

A cohort of 1148 individuals with a history of RPL were selected for the study and they were screened with respect to fertile controls for the presence of any chromosomal anomaly using G-banding, nucleolar organizing region (NOR)-banding and fluorescence in situ hybridisation wherever necessary.

Statistical Analysis:

The connection between distinct polymorphic variations and the occurrence of RPL was assessed using Fisher's exact test. Significant was defined as a P ≤ 0.005.

Results:

One hundred and thirty-four individuals were found to harbor chromosomal anomalies. This study elucidates that along with balanced chromosomal translocations, the involvement of polymorphic variants also plays a significant role in cases of RPL.

Conclusion:

The cumulative occurrence of chromosomal anomalies and variants across our cohort of 1148 individuals indicates that the chromosomal assessment of all couples experiencing RPL must be performed by all the clinicians. This study aids us in identifying chromosomal polymorphisms as major players of RPL in addition to novel chromosomal translocations.

Clinical Manifestations of Chromosomal Anomalies and Polymorphic Variations in Patients Suffering from Reproductive Failure

Background:

Human reproduction is the most intricate event as ~ 20% of human pregnancies end in miscarriages for which chromosomal anomalies are a common factor. The chromosomal variations associated with reproductive failures include translocations, inversions, supernumerary marker chromosomes, heterochromatic polymorphisms, etc., Till date, the significance of heteromorphic variants in reproductive failures is unclear.

Aim:

The aim of this study is to investigate the role of chromosomal anomalies and polymorphic variations in reproductive failure.

Materials and Methods:

Chromosomal analysis using GTG banding was performed on 638 couples (1276 individuals).

Results:

In the present study, 138 of 1276 individuals showed chromosomal variations with respect to heterochromatic variants and Robertsonian translocations. The most common variants observed across the population studied were the pericentric inversion of the chromosome 9 [inv(9)(p11q13), 3.68%] followed by pstk + on the short arm of chromosome 15 (15pstk+, 1.95%) and Robertsonian translocation of chromosomes 13 and 14 [rob(13;14)(q10;q10), 1.25%]. The maximum percentage of heterochromatic variation was observed in females with recurrent pregnancy loss (Groups A, 4.78%) and males with wives having recurrent miscarriages (Group B, 3.68%) and the minimum was recorded in patients with in vitro fertilization (IVF) failures (Group C, 0.23%) and couples having a history of the malformed child (Group F, 0.23%).

Conclusions:

High level of chromosomal polymorphic variations in patients with reproductive failures warrants their in-depth analysis to nail down the causative factors. Hence, cytogenetic analysis coupled with genetic counseling becomes indispensable for patients suffering from infertility, reproductive failures and pregnancy losses before IVF treatment to rule out the carrier status.

[Chromosomal polymorphisms are associated with blastomere multinucleation in IVF/ICSI cycles]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of chromosomal polymorphisms with multinucleated embryos in infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI).

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study was conducted among 1145 infertile couples undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycles. According to their karyotype, the couples were divided into chromosomal polymorphism group and control group, and the former group was divided into 3 subgroups: inversion group, D and G genome polymorphic group and 1, 9, and 16 qh+group. The blastomere multinucleation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Of the total of 1145 couples, 139 (6.10%) had chromosomal polymorphisms at least in one partner. No significant differences were found in female age, BMI, basal FSH level, total gonadotropin dose, E₂ level on day of HCG, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, top quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate or live birth rate among the groups (P > 0.05). The multinuclear rate of the embryos in couples with pericentric inversion of chromosomes 1, 9, and Y chromosomes and those with D and G genome polymorphisms were 8.23% and 4.65%, respectively, significantly higher than that in the control group (2.69%; P < 0.05); the multinuclear rate of the embryos was 2.77% in 1, 9, and 16 qh+ group, similar with that in the control group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Infertile couples with pericentric inversion of chromosomes 1, 9, and Y chromosomes and in those with D and G genome polymorphism are at higher risks of blastomere multinucleation in IVF- ICSI cycles; 1, 9, and 16 qh + polymorphisms do not increase the rate of blastomere multinucleation of the embryos.

Chromosomal polymorphisms associated with reproductive outcomes after IVF-ET

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the effect of the detail type of chromosomal polymorphisms (1/9/16qh^+/−, D/G group polymorphisms, and inv(9)) on the IVF-ET outcomes.

Methods

A total of 1335 infertile couples undergoing IVF/ICSI were enrolled and comprehensively analyzed the correlation between three detail types of chromosomal polymorphisms (1/9/16qh^+/−, D/G group polymorphisms, and inv(9)) and the outcome of IVF/ICSI embryo transfer. The fertilized rate, cleaved embryo rate, good-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and early stage miscarriage rate were compared between the chromosomal polymorphisms groups and the control group.

Results

Both the inv(9) and D/G group chromosomal polymorphisms related to female infertility significantly lead to a lower 2PN cleavage rate (86.44% vs. 97.58% and 90.67% vs. 97.58%, respectively, P < 0.05) undergoing IVF insemination, the inv(9) adversely increasing the early miscarriage rate, either undergoing IVF (21.4% vs. 3.0%, P < 0.05) or ICSI (50.0% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.05) insemination, female carriers (23.08% vs. 2.87%, P < 0.05) or male carriers (44.44% vs. 2.87%, P < 0.05). For D/G groups, ICSI insemination may increase the implantation rate (44.8% vs. 23.69%, P < 0.05) and clinical pregnancy rate (78.6% vs. 40.65%, P < 0.05). 1/9/16qh^+/− had no apparent adverse effect on the patient’s clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that chromosome karyotype analysis is necessary for IVF patients in clinical practice; we should afford individual genetic counseling suggestion according to the polymorphism types.

The association between the two more common genetic causes of spermatogenic failure: a 7-year retrospective study

Chromosomal abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions are considered to be the two more common genetic causes of spermatogenic failure. However, the relationship between chromosomal aberrations and Y chromosome microdeletions is still unclear. This study was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of chromosomal aberrations and Y chromosome microdeletions in infertile men, and to explore whether there was a correlation between the two genetic defects of spermatogenic failure. A 7-year retrospective study was conducted on 5465 infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia or oligozoospermia. Karyotype analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes was performed by standard G-banding techniques. Y chromosome microdeletions were screened by multiplex PCR amplification with six specific sequence-tagged site (STS) markers. Among the 5465 infertile men analyzed, 371 (6.8%) had Y chromosome microdeletions and the prevalence of microdeletions in azoospermia was 10.5% (259/2474) and in severe oligozoospermia was 6.3% (107/1705). A total of 4003 (73.2%) infertile men underwent karyotyping; 370 (9.2%) had chromosomal abnormalities and 222 (5.5%) had chromosomal polymorphisms. Karyotype analysis was performed on 272 (73.3%) patients with Y chromosome microdeletions and 77 (28.3%) had chromosomal aberrations, all of which involved sex chromosomes but not autosomes. There was a significant difference in the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities between men with and without Y chromosome microdeletions (P < 0.05).

Co-occurrences of polymorphic heterochromatin regions of chromosomes and effect on reproductive failure

Although the polymorphic heterochromatin regions of chromosomes (heteromorphisms) have been extensively studied for their phenotypic effects on humans, co-occurrences of chromosome 1, 9, 16 and Y heteromorphisms and of acrocentric variants have never been studied on humans with an objective scoring system. Here we compared the frequencies of individual heteromorphisms on a total of 602, 768 and 224 patients with the indications of infertility, recurrent miscarriage and in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure, respectively and on 272 controls. Then we examined whether there were significant co-occurrences between heteromorphisms within and between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequencies of heteromorphisms between the groups. Both statistically significant and non-significant correlations were observed within the non-acrocentric and certain acrocentric heteromorphisms in each group. When these co-occurrences were examined between the groups, a 2.2 fold increased risk of IVF failure in males in the presence of either chromosome 13 or chromosome 21 variants was observed (95 %CI:1.1-4.2). We conclude that the simultaneous manifestations of heteromorphisms have no effect on reproductive failure. There seems to be a correlation between the non-acrocentric heteromorphisms (1qh+, 9qh+, 16qh + and Yqh+/-), which might be the result of complex interactions of formation of these heterochromatin regions. The correlations observed between certain acrocentric chromosomes might be related to satellite association and nucleolus formation. The increased risk observed in males with IVF failure in the presence of either chromosome 13 or 21 variants should be interpreted cautiously due to the heterogeneity of the group.

Multi-institutional experience of genetic diagnosis in Ecuador: National registry of chromosome alterations and polymorphisms

BACKGROUND

Detection of chromosomal abnormalities is crucial in various medical areas; to diagnose birth defects, genetic disorders, and infertility, among other complex phenotypes, in individuals across a wide range of ages. Hence, the present study wants to contribute to the knowledge of type and frequency of chromosomal alterations and polymorphisms in Ecuador.

METHODS

Cytogenetic registers from different Ecuadorian provinces have been merged and analyzed to construct an open-access national registry of chromosome alterations and polymorphisms.

RESULTS

Of 28,806 karyotypes analyzed, 6,008 (20.9%) exhibited alterations. Down syndrome was the most frequent autosome alteration (88.28%), followed by Turner syndrome (60.50%), a gonosome aneuploidy. A recurrent high percentage of Down syndrome mosaicism (7.45%) reported here, as well as by previous Ecuadorian preliminary registries, could be associated with geographic location and admixed ancestral composition. Translocations (2.46%) and polymorphisms (7.84%) were not as numerous as autosomopathies (64.33%) and gonosomopathies (25.37%). Complementary to conventional cytogenetics tests, molecular tools have allowed identification of submicroscopic alterations regions or candidate genes which can be possibly implicated in patients' symptoms and phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

The Ecuadorian National Registry of Chromosome Alterations and Polymorphisms provides a baseline to better understand chromosomal abnormalities in Ecuador and therefore their clinical management and awareness. This data will guide public policy makers to promote and financially support cytogenetic and genetic testing.

Long-read sequencing and haplotype linkage analysis enabled preimplantation genetic testing for patients carrying pathogenic inversions

Background

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has already been applied in patients known to carry chromosomal structural variants to improve the clinical outcome of assisted reproduction. However, conventional molecular techniques are not capable of reliably distinguishing embryos that carry balanced inversion from those with a normal karyotype. We aim to evaluate the use of long-read sequencing in combination with haplotype linkage analysis to address this challenge.

Methods

Long-read sequencing on Oxford Nanopore platform was employed to identify the precise positions of inversion break points in four patients. Comprehensive chromosomal screening and genome-wide haplotype linkage analysis were performed based on SNP microarray. The haplotypes, including the break point regions, the whole chromosomes involved in the inversion and the corresponding homologous chromosomes, were established using informative SNPs.

Results

All the inversion break points were successfully identified by long-read sequencing and validated by Sanger sequencing, and on average only 13 bp differences were observed between break points inferred by long-read sequencing and Sanger sequencing. Eighteen blastocysts were biopsied and tested, in which 10 were aneuploid or unbalanced and eight were diploid with normal or balanced inversion karyotypes. Diploid embryos were transferred back to patients, the predictive results of the current methodology were consistent with fetal karyotypes of amniotic fluid or cord blood.

Conclusions

Nanopore long-read sequencing is a powerful method to assay chromosomal inversions and identify exact break points. Identification of inversion break points combined with haplotype linkage analysis is an efficient strategy to distinguish embryos with normal or balanced inversion karyotypes, facilitating PGT applications.

Effects of chromosome 9 inversion on IVF/ICSI: A 7-year retrospective cohort study

Background

This study focused on the outcomes of patients with pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 who underwent IVF/ICSI and fresh day 2 or day 3 embryo transfer and the possible impacts of carrier gender and chromosome karyotype on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

A total of 214 couples (107 couples with one pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 in one partner [Group 1], 107 couples with normal karyotypes [Group 2]) underwent their first IVF/ICSI treatment and were included in this study. Oocyte number, normal fertilization rates, abnormal fertilization rates, cleavage rates, embryo utilization rates, fresh embryo transfer rates, clinical pregnancy rates (CPR), implantation rates, miscarriage rates, and live birth rates per embryo transfer (LBR) were compared between groups.

Results

Group 1 did not show any disadvantage when compared with Group 2. The CPR and LBR were similar between all groups. The female carrier group had a higher normal fertilization rate and higher utilization rate than the male carrier group. Cases with inv(9)(p12;q13) had a lower utilization rate but a higher implantation rate than the remaining karyotypes.

Conclusion

In the first IVF or ICSI cycle, couples with one pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 in one partner had satisfactory outcomes. The subgroup analysis showed a tendency of better prognosis for the female carrier and inv(9)(p12;q13) type.

This is a retrospective cohort study during 7 years period. In the first IVF or ICSI cycle, couples with one pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 in one partner had satisfactory outcomes. The subgroup analysis showed a tendency of better prognosis for the female carrier and inv(9)(p12;q13) type.

Reproductive success of assisted reproductive technology in couples with chromosomal abnormalities

PURPOSE

Infertility is estimated to affect 15% of couples, having chromosome abnormalities an important role in its etiology. The main objective of this work was to access the reproductive success of ART in infertile couples with chromosomal abnormalities comparing to a control group with normal karyotype.

METHODS

A 7-year retrospective karyotype analysis of infertile couples was done. Data regarding type of infertility, couples' ages, ART performed, and their reproductive success were obtained. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) were used to estimate magnitude of association between the reproductive success and the different groups.

RESULTS

We found a prevalence of 7.83% of chromosome abnormalities in our population (233 couples out of 2989). Chromosomal anomalies were found in 82 men (34.75%) and 154 women (65.25%), with low-grade mosaicism being the most prevalent (50.85%), followed by autosomal translocations (17.37%) and sex chromosomes abnormalities (13.56%). Only 2359 couples were treated with ART. There was a non-significant lower reproductive success rate in the cases (OR = 0.899, p = 0.530) with IVF providing the higher success rate. In general, female carriers of chromosome anomalies had a higher success rate, although not significant.

CONCLUSION

Although the differences regarding success rate between groups were not found statistically significant, we still advocate that cytogenetic analysis should be performed routinely in all infertile couples namely before ART. This might help deciding the best treatment options including Preimplantation Genetic Testing for aneuploidies or structural rearrangements and minimize the risk of transmission of anomalies to the offspring.

Centromeric Satellite DNAs: Hidden Sequence Variation in the Human Population

The central goal of medical genomics is to understand the inherited basis of sequence variation that underlies human physiology, evolution, and disease. Functional association studies currently ignore millions of bases that span each centromeric region and acrocentric short arm. These regions are enriched in long arrays of tandem repeats, or satellite DNAs, that are known to vary extensively in copy number and repeat structure in the human population. Satellite sequence variation in the human genome is often so large that it is detected cytogenetically, yet due to the lack of a reference assembly and informatics tools to measure this variability, contemporary high-resolution disease association studies are unable to detect causal variants in these regions. Nevertheless, recently uncovered associations between satellite DNA variation and human disease support that these regions present a substantial and biologically important fraction of human sequence variation. Therefore, there is a pressing and unmet need to detect and incorporate this uncharacterized sequence variation into broad studies of human evolution and medical genomics. Here I discuss the current knowledge of satellite DNA variation in the human genome, focusing on centromeric satellites and their potential implications for disease.

Cytogenetic abnormalities in couples with a history of primary and secondary recurrent miscarriage: a Brazilian Multicentric Study

Objective: To evaluate the difference between chromosomal abnormalities between the gender of couples affected by Recurrent miscarriage (RM) and if there is an association between previous obstetric history and chromosomal abnormalities of the parents.Methods: Multicenter, retrospective, observational study from seven different RM clinics between 2006 and 2016. We enrolled 707 couples (1014 participants) with a history of RM. We compared the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities between groups of couples with primary and secondary RM and separated between women and their partners. Furthermore, we compared the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities between groups based on the number of previous spontaneous abortions.Results: The overall prevalence of all cytogenetic abnormalities was 5.59% (n = 1414, women and their partners). Excluding cases of polymorphism and inversion of chromosome 9, which are considered variants of normality, the prevalence in all individuals was 2.26% (n = 32/1414). The comparative analysis of cases of chromosomal abnormalities among couples with primary and secondary RM based on the number of previous miscarriages (PM) revealed a similar frequency between groups. The statistical analysis of the total cases (primary PM + secondary PM) in these three groups were as follows: (a) couple, 2 pm versus 3 pm vs. ≥4 PM, p = .514; (b) women, 2 pm versus 3 pm vs. ≥4 PM, p = .347; and (3) partner, 2 pm versus 3 pm vs. ≥4 PM, p = .959. Chromosomal abnormalities were significantly more prevalent among women than among their partners (6.9 versus 4.2%; p = .027). Moreover, the distribution of leading chromosomal abnormalities among women was different compared with their partners. Among women, we observed these abnormalities in the following frequency order: mosaicism (38.8%), polymorphism (32.6%), translocation (16.3%), and inversion (12.3%). Among their partners, these abnormalities were polymorphism (73.3%), inversion (13.3%), mosaicism (6.7%), and translocation (6.7%).Conclusion: The number of PM and the history of full-term pregnancy does not correlate with an increase or decrease in the prevalence of cytogenetic abnormalities in couples with RM.

Role of male genetic factors in recurrent pregnancy loss in Northeast China

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the roles of male genetic factors, including Y chromosome microdeletions and chromosomal heteromorphism, in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in Northeast China.

STUDY DESIGN

We evaluated 1072 male patients from Northeast China whose wives had a history of two or more consecutive miscarriages. We also selected 971 infertile and 200 fertile men as control groups. Semen analysis was carried out by computer-assisted sperm analysis. Y chromosome microdeletions were detected by polymerase chain reaction and chromosomes were evaluated by karyotype analysis.

RESULTS

There were no microdeletions in the RPL and fertile control groups, but 112 of the infertile men had Y chromosome microdeletions. Chromosomal heteromorphism was detected in all the groups. Patients in the infertile control group had a significantly higher percentage (2.16%) of Y variation (Yqh±) heteromorphism compared with the RPL group, but there were no significant differences in the incidences of chromosomal heteromorphism among the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Y chromosome microdeletions and chromosomal heteromorphism are not associated with RPL in Northeast China. Some RPL males had structural chromosome anomalies, all of which were reciprocal translocations. We suggest that it may not be necessary to detect Y chromosome microdeletions in RPL males with Yqh±.

Prevalence of Cytogenetic Anomalies in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case-control Study

Background:

About 15%–20% of couples get affected by recurrent miscarriages (RM) and chromosomal abnormality in one partner affects 3%–6% of RM couples.

Aims:

The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of cytogenetic anomalies in couples with RM.

Settings and Design:

A case–control study was undertaken, in which 243 couples who had experienced 2 or >2 miscarriages were investigated for chromosomal abnormalities and compared with 208 healthy, age-matched control couples who had at least one healthy live born and no history of miscarriages.

Material and Methods:

Peripheral blood (PB) lymphocytes were cultured using PB-Max Karyotyping medium (GIBCO) for chromosomal analysis and 20 metaphases were analyzed for each individual.

Statistical Analysis:

Student's t-test was used for statistical evaluation and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all instances.

Results:

The current study revealed 3.1% RM cases showing structural chromosomal aberrations, of which balanced translocations and Robertsonian translocations constituted 66.7% and 26.7% cases, respectively, while inversions constituted 6.7% abnormal RM cases. Polymorphic variations were observed in 1.9% RM patients and 1.2% controls as well. However, the number of abortions were significantly more (P = 0.027) in male carriers of balanced translocations as compared to female carriers in the RM group. There was no significant difference for age (P = 0.539) between RM women and control women.

Conclusions:

Although similar studies exist in literature, our study is the first of its kind from our region that has compared the chromosomal anomalies between the RM group and the control group. We observed 3.1% of balanced translocations and an increased number (though nonsignificant) of polymorphic variations and satellite associations in the RM group as compared to the control group.

Male chromosomal polymorphisms reduce cumulative live birth rate for IVF couples

PURPOSE

Chromosomal polymorphisms are associated with infertility, but their effects on assisted reproductive outcomes are still quite conflicting, especially after IVF treatment. This study evaluated the role of chromosomal polymorphisms of different genders in IVF pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

Four hundred and twenty-five infertile couples undergoing IVF treatment were divided into three groups: 214 couples with normal chromosomes (group A, control group), 86 couples with female polymorphisms (group B), and 125 couples with male polymorphisms (group C). The pregnancy outcomes after the first and cumulative transfer cycles were analyzed, and the main outcome measures were live birth rate (LBR) after the first transfer cycle and cumulative LBR after a complete IVF cycle.

RESULTS

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after the first transfer cycle within group A, group B, and group C demonstrated a similar LBR as well as other rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, early miscarriage, and ongoing pregnancy (P > 0.05). However, the analysis of cumulative pregnancy outcomes indicated that compared with group A, group C had a significantly lower LBR per cycle (80.4 vs 68.00%), for a rate ratio of 1.182 (95% CI 1.030 to 1.356, P = 0.01) and a significantly higher cumulative early miscarriage rate (EMR) among clinical pregnancies (7.2 vs 14.7%), for a rate ratio of 0.489 (95% CI 0.248 to 0.963, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Couples with chromosomal polymorphisms in only male partners have poor pregnancy outcomes after IVF treatment manifesting as high cumulative EMR and low LBR after a complete cycle.

The incidence of long heterochromatic polymorphism variants in infants conceived through assisted reproductive technologies

Long heterochromatic variants on chromosomes 1, 9, 16 and Y are suspected to be implicated in infertility and early pregnancy loss, but little is known about how these variants are inherited in children conceived by infertile couples through assisted reproductive technologies. In this case-control study, the incidence of these variants was compared between infants conceived using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), IVF and natural intercourse by karyotyping lymphocytes from cord blood or peripheral blood. This study included a total of 647 infants, including 189 conceived by ICSI, 177 by IVF, and 281 naturally conceived (NC). Variants were observed in 13.23% of ICSI, 15.82% of IVF and 12.46% of NC infants, showing that the incidence of variants does not appear to be significantly different between infants conceived using assisted reproductive technologies and infants conceived naturally. Because the parents of these infants were not karyotyped, we can only speculate as to whether these variants were directly inherited. This study concludes that infants born from infertile parents using assisted reproductive technologies to achieve pregnancy do not appear to be any more likely than NC infants of fertile parents to possess long heterochromatic variants.

Chromosomal polymorphisms are associated with female infertility and adverse reproductive outcomes after infertility treatment: a 7-year retrospective study

Data from 19,950 women were retrospectively analysed to determine the effect of chromosomal polymorphisms on female infertility and pregnancy outcome; fertile women were used as controls. Frequency of chromosomal polymorphisms and adverse pregnancy outcomes were compared between groups. A significantly higher incidence of chromosomal polymorphisms was found in total infertile patients, and patients with tubal infertility, ovulatory dysfunction, cervical and uterine abnormalities, and unexplained infertility compared with controls (5.53% [P < 0.001], 4.86% [P = 0.012] 5.40% [P < 0.001], 5.75% [P < 0.001] and 8.51% [P < 0.001], versus 3.74%, respectively). Infertile women had a higher incidence of 9qh+ and inv(9) compared with controls (P < 0.001 and P = 0.027). Logistic regression analysis showed an effect of chromosomal polymorphisms on female infertility (adjusted OR 1.662, 95% CI 1.551 to 1.796, P < 0.001). All couples reported a phenotypically normal baby. In control and tubal infertility groups, miscarriage rates were higher in women with chromosomal polymorphisms than in women with normal chromosomes (4.95% versus 0.96%, P = 0.001 and 6.17% versus 1.08%, P < 0.001). Preterm birth rate showed a similar trend. Chromosomal polymorphisms adversely affected spontaneous miscarriage rates (adjusted OR 1.625, 95% CI 1.514 to 1.769, P = 0.005).

The effect of chromosomal polymorphisms on the outcomes of fresh IVF/ICSI-ET cycles in a Chinese population

PURPOSE

Chromosomal polymorphisms (CPs) have been reported to be associated with infertility; however, their effects on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) are still controversial. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of CPs on IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes.

METHODS

To investigate whether CPs affected the outcomes of fresh IVF/ICSI-ET cycles in a Chinese population, we evaluated infertile couples with male carriers of CPs (n = 348), infertile couples with female carriers (n = 99), and unaffected couples (n = 400) who had received their first treatment cycles in our hospital between January 2013 and March 2015.

RESULTS

CPs in either male or female carriers seemed to have adverse effects on IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes. CPs in male carriers affected outcomes mainly by decreasing the rates of fertilization, embryo cleavage, good quality embryos, clinical pregnancies, ongoing pregnancies, and deliveries as well as increasing the biochemical pregnancy rate (P < 0.05); CPs in female carriers affected outcomes only by lowering the embryo cleavage rate (P < 0.05). The mean fertilization rate of couples with male CP carriers undergoing IVF was significantly lower than that in those undergoing ICSI (61.1 versus 66.5 %, respectively; P = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide evidence for the involvement of CPs in the poor outcomes of fresh IVF/ICSI-ET cycles in a Chinese population. The use of ICSI might improve outcomes by increasing the fertilization rate for men with CPs.

Karyotype analysis in large sample cases from Shenyang Women's and Children's hospital: a study of 16,294 male infertility patients

To explore that it is necessary to routinely detect chromosomes in infertile patients, we investigated peripheral blood lymphocyte karyotype in 16,294 male infertile patients in the north-east of China and analysed the incidence and type of chromosomal anomaly and polymorphism. G-banding karyotype analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes was performed in 16,294 cases. Semen analysis was performed three times in all the men. PCR and FISH confirmed the presence of the SRY gene. The rate of chromosomal anomaly in the 16,294 male infertile patients was 4.15% (677/16,294). The rates of chromosomal anomaly were 0.24% in normal semen group, 12.6% in light oligoasthenospermia group, 4.7% in moderate-to-severe oligoasthenospermia group and 9.59% in azoospermia group. There are two male infertile patients with 45,X chromosome karyotype. One X male patient had confirmed the presence of the SRY gene and FISH analysis demonstrated its location on the p arm of chromosome 13. The other X male patient had not found SRY gene in its whole-genome DNA. Meanwhile, sperm motility is slightly oligo-asthenozoospermic at the age of 35-39 and nearly azoospermic at the age of 40-45. As the rates of chromosomal anomaly are 0.24% and 12.6% even in normal semen group and light oligoasthenospermia group, the rates of chromosomal polymorphism are 5.36% and 25.51% in normal semen group and light oligoasthenospermia group, respectively; it is necessary to explore peripheral blood lymphocyte karyotype in all infertile couples. We mentioned that Y, 1, 2, 9 and 12 chromosomes were quite important about male infertility. These findings demonstrate that autosomal retention of SRY can be submicroscopic and emphasise the importance of PCR and FISH in the genetic workup of the monosomic X male. At the same time, it suggested that male infertility might be related to meiotic disturbances with spermatogenetic arrest in Y-autosome translocations, which could result in infertility by reduction of sperm production. Last but not least, ageing is one of the factors that could reduce sperm motility and quality.

Chromosomal aberrations and polymorphic evaluation in males with primary infertility from Indian population

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The chromosomal abnormalities are one of the important causes of male infertility. In view of the genetic risks for the next generation, the importance of careful evaluation of karyotype is essential. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in infertile men with primary infertility from Indian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 78 infertile men with primary infertility, out of which 26 men were azoospermic, 19 men were oligospermic, 4 men were asthenospermic and 29 men were oligoasthenospermic were studied. Karyoptying was performed on peripheral blood lymphocytes by using the Giemsa trypsin banding (GTG) banding technique. Additional data was collected from published studies in Indian population leading to a total of 1814 cases.

RESULTS

Chromosome analysis of 78 infertile males showed major chromosome abnormalities in 10.2%, with 6.4% in autosomal chromosome abnormalities and 3.8% in sex chromosome abnormalities. The incidence of major chromosome abnormalities in oligospermic males were 21% and azoospermic males were 15.4 %. Chromosomal polymorphic variants were identified to be 16.7%. Combining the data from other published studies identified 153/ 1814 (8.4%) infertile men of chromosomal abnormalities; with 10.8% in azoospermia, 7.3% in oligospermia and 7.3% in oligoasthenoteratospermic from India.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION

The overall high prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in infertile males suggests that the conventional chromosomal analysis is an important investigative tool for male infertility, especially prior to use of any assisted reproductive techniques.

Effect of chromosomal polymorphisms of different genders on fertilization rate of fresh IVF-ICSI embryo transfer cycles

To explore whether chromosomal polymorphisms of different genders affect outcomes of fresh IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) embryo transfer cycles differently, 37 couples with chromosomal polymorphisms were identified out of 614 infertile couples undergoing IVF-ICSI treatments. Group 1 included 20 couples in which only the male carried chromosomal polymorphisms; group 2 included 17 couples with female carriers only; group 3 included 19 infertile couples with normal karyotypes randomly selected as controls. A significantly lower fertilization rate was found in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (56.68% in Group 1, 78.02% in group 2 and 71.74% in group 3; group 1 versus group 2, P < 0.001; group 1 versus group 3, P = 0.001; respectively). When stratified according to fertilization method, the fertilization rate in IVF cycles of group 1 was significantly lower than group 3 (50.00% in Group 1, 73.89% in Group 3, P < 0.001). Fertilization rates in ICSI cycles between groups 1 and 3 were not significantly different. This study suggests that male chromosomal polymorphisms adversely influence fertilization rates of IVF cycles. The use of ICSI may improve the success of infertility treatment by increasing the fertilization rate for men with chromosomal polymorphisms.

Heterochromatin variants in human karyotypes: a possible association with reproductive failure

Heterochromatin variants are commonly found during cytogenetic examinations, and chromosomes 1, 9, 16 and Y are commonly involved in these variations. These variants are believed to be clinically insignificant variations in human karyotypes. Nevertheless, reproductive failure has been frequently discussed as possibly being associated with these variants. Various authors have reported a significantly elevated incidence of these variants in individuals with idiopathic reproductive failure compared with individuals with no such history. This study compared the incidence of heterochromatin variants in individuals with idiopathic reproductive failure (n=1036) with that of a control group of healthy fetuses (n=995) indicated for prenatal karyotype examination solely based on the advanced ages of their mothers. The heterochromatin variants occurred more frequently in the reproductive failure group than in the controls (P=0.006). Regarding individual chromosomes, chromosome 9 variants were most frequently found in the study and control groups, and they also occurred more frequently in the reproductive failure group. The most significant difference between the study and control groups was found for the 9qh+ variant (P=0.026), and although the results are statistically significant, the cause of this phenomenon remains unknown.

Chromosomal abnormality in men with impaired spermatogenesis

BACKGROUND

Chromosomal abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions are regarded as two most frequent genetic causes associated with failure of spermatogenesis in the Caucasian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To investigate the distribution of genetic defects in the Romanian population with azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia, karyotype analysis by G-banding was carried out in 850 idiopathic infertile men and in 49 fertile men with one or more children. Screening for microdeletions in the azoospermia factor (AZF) region of Y chromosome was performed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on a group of 67 patients with no detectable chromosomal abnormality. The results of the two groups were compared by a two-tailed Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

In our study chromosomal abnormalities were observed in 12.70% and 8.16% of infertile and fertile individuals respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that infertile men with severe azoospermia have higher incidences of genetic defects than fertile men and also patients from any other group. Infertile men with normal sperm present a higher rate of polymorphic variants. It is important to know whether there is a genetic cause of male infertility before patients are subjected to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE)/ICSI treatment.

A retrospective chromosome studies among Iranian infertile women: Report of 21 years

BACKGROUND

The infertility is an important health problem, affecting about 15% of couples. The important role of genetic factors in pathogenesis of infertility is now increasingly recognized. The value of karyotyping women in the routine work-out of couples referred for sterility has long been recommended.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to define the frequency of all chromosomal aberrations among women which referred to our department due to infertility during the 21-year period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this 21-year retrospective study, for the first time, we investigated 896 women which referred to our department due to infertility during 1986 to 2006. For chromosome analysis, heparinized peripheral blood samples were cultured, harvested and banded according to standard methods.

RESULTS

Out of 896 patients, 710 patients (79.24%) had a normal karyotype, and 186 patients (20.76%) showed abnormal karyotype. Among the abnormal ones 48 patients (25.81%) showed Turner's syndrome (45,X), and 45 patients (24.19%) were sex reversal with 46,XY karyotype. The rest of 93 patients (50%) revealed a wide range of chromosome abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Our results emphasized the importance of the standard cytogenetic methods in assessing the genetic characteristics of infertile females, which allows detecting a variety of somatic chromosome abnormalities, because some of these may interfere with the success of reproduction.

Karyotype analysis in large-sample infertile couples living in Central China: a study of 14965 couples

OBJECTIVE

To explore that it is necessary to routinely detect chromosomes in fertile couples, we detected peripheral blood lymphocyte karyotype in 14965 infertile couples living in Central China and analyzed the incidence and type of chromosomal anomaly.

METHODS

G-banding karyotype analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes was performed in 14965 couples who went to the outpatient department of our reproductive medical center for counseling on infertility between January 2004 and December 2011. Semen analysis was performed three times in all the men from the 14965 couples.

RESULTS

The rate of chromosomal anomaly in the 14965 infertile couples was 3.84 % (1150/29930). The rate of chromosomal anomaly in the men from 14965 couples was 6.84 % (1024/14965) and in the women 0.84 % (126/14965). The rates of chromosomal anomaly were 1.69 % in normal semen group, 11.82 % in light oligo-astheno-spermis group, 6.58 % in moderate to severe olig-astheno-spermia group and 17.26 % in azoospermia group.

CONCLUSION

Since the rates of chromosomal anomaly are 1.69 % and 11.82 % even in normal semen group and light oligo-astheno-spermia group, respectively, it is necessary to detect peripheral blood lymphocyte karyotype in all infertile couples.

Impact of chromosomal heteromorphisms on reproductive failure and analysis of 38 heteromorphic pedigrees in Northeast China

Purpose

To compare the frequency of chromosomal heteromorphisms in reproductive failure and fertile control individuals in Northeast China, and investigate the impact on reproductive failure

Methods

1751 males and 1424 couples with reproductive failure (n = 4599) and 777 fertile control individuals in Northeast China were enrolled. Chromosome karyotype analysis was performed on peripheral blood lymphocytes with standard G-banding. Additionally, C-banding was performed with heterochromatin heteromorphisms, and NORs-banding with satellites/stalks variations. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) adopted for the amplification using nine specific sequence tagged sites (STS) were used to detect Y-chromosome microdeletions with Y chromosome variations (Yqh±). At the same time, 38 heteromorphic probands’ family members were recalled for performing karyotype analysis and to be surveyed for their detailed reproductive history.

Results

The frequency of chromosomal heteromorphisms in reproductive failure patients (2.74 %, 126/4599) was of no statistically significant difference as compared with fertile control individuals (2.06 %, 16/777) (P > 0.05). Eight cases of Y variation (Yqh±) probands with Y-chromosomal microdeletions were detected among 44 reproductive failure patients and 6 fertile control men. In the 38 recalled families, the probands of fathers or mothers, even some of their brothers or sisters, had the same heteromorphic karyotypes as probands’ despite that they didn’t have any adverse reproductive history.

Conclusions

There was no statistically significant difference in frequency of chromosomal heteromorphisms between reproductive failure and fertile control individuals in Northeast China. Males with Y variations (Yqh±) should be ordered Y-chromosomal microdeletions detection. Through the analysis of 38 recalled families, we can also conclude that chromosomal heteromorphisms were not the impact factors for reproductive failure.

A preliminary study of the relationship between the long arm of the Y chromosome (Yqh+) and reproductive outcomes in IVF/ICSI-ET

OBJECTIVE

To compare the reproductive outcomes of Yqh+-carrying and control couples undergoing IVF/ICSI treatments.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 72 Yqh+ carriers and 986 Yqh+ non-carriers undergoing their first cycle of ART in a single centre between August 2005 and May 2011.

RESULTS

Yqh+ carrying couples had significantly worse reproductive outcomes compared with control couples undergoing IVF treatment. There were a significantly higher cancellation rate (20.69% vs 7.9%; P<0.05; OR, 3.03; CI, 1.18-7.79) and a significant lower fertilisation rate (50.05% vs 66.01%; P<0.05; OR, 0.61; CI, 0.49-0.57), implantation rate (8.33% vs 20.87%; P<0.05; OR, 0.35; CI, 0.14-0.87), good quality embryo ratio (44.70% vs 57.89%; P<0.05; OR, 0.59; CI, 0.43-0.80) and clinical pregnancy rate (17.39% vs 39.59%; P<0.05; OR, 0.32; CI, 0.11-0.96) in Yqh+ group compared with control group undergoing IVF treatment. Yqh+ carrying couples had similar reproductive outcomes compared with control couples undergoing ICSI treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The Y chromosome polymorphic variant Yqh+ most likely plays a role in infertility. Yqh+ couples with poor reproductive outcomes in IVF treatment can be advised to undergo ICSI to improve their reproductive results in the next cycle.

The role of male chromosomal polymorphism played in spermatogenesis and the outcome of IVF/ICSI-ET treatment

Chromosomal polymorphism has been reported to be associated with infertility, but its effect on IVF/ICSI-ET outcome is still controversial. To evaluate whether or not chromosomal polymorphism in men plays a role in spermatogenesis and the outcome of IVF/ICSI-ET, we retrospectively analysed 281 infertile couples. Measures included fertilization rate, implantation rate, pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate and preterm rate. Men with chromosomal polymorphism had significantly higher frequencies of severe oligozoospermia and azoospermia than those without (37.12% vs. 16.11%, p < 0.001; 27.27% vs. 10.74%, p < 0.001; respectively). Significantly, lower fertilization rate (68.02% vs. 78.00%, p < 0.001) and clinical pregnancy rate (45.00% vs. 66.67%, p = 0.031) were observed in polymorphism-carrying men with severe oligozoospermia compared with non-carriers with severe oligozoospermia. This suggests that chromosomal polymorphism has adverse effects on spermatogenesis, negatively influencing the outcome of IVF/ICSI-ET treatment. Polymorphic variations on the Y chromosome have been found to be the most prevalent polymorphism in infertile men, most frequently occurring in patients with severe oligozoospermia.

A novel chromosomal translocation and heteromorphism in a female with recurrent pregnancy loss--a case study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical, biochemical and cytogenetic analyses of a couple with reproductive failure.

METHODS

A couple with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss was referred to the Institute of Genetics for cytogenetic evaluation. Chromosomal analysis of the phenotypically normal parents was done to ascertain the role of chromosomal abnormalities and offer appropriate genetic counseling. Further, advanced karyotype analysis by spectral karyotyping was also carried out in the couple and parents of the female partner.

RESULTS

Clinical and hormonal profile of the couple revealed normal phenotypes. The ultrasound scan of the female showed normal uterus and ovaries. Chromosomal analysis of the couple revealed a normal 46, XY karyotype in the male spouse, and a unique balanced reciprocal translocation 46, XX, t(12;13) (q13;q33) + 15pstk+ chromosomal constitution in the female partner. Cytogenetic analysis of her parents revealed a similar translocation between chromosomes 12 and 13 in the father and 15pstk+ in the mother. Further, corroboration of the chromosome abnormalities was carried out by spectral karyotyping.

CONCLUSION

A unique and novel familial transmission of paternally derived balanced reciprocal translocation and maternally derived heteromorphism in a female with the history of recurrent pregnancy loss was reported as an original investigation.

DYZ1 copy number variation, Y chromosome polymorphism and early recurrent spontaneous abortion/early embryo growth arrest

OBJECTIVES

To find the association between recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA)/early embryo growth arrest and Y chromosome polymorphism.

STUDY DESIGN

Peripheral blood samples of the male patients of big Y chromosome, small Y chromosome and other male patients whose partners suffered from unexplained RSA/early embryo growth arrest were collected. PCR and real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR were used to test the deletion and the copy number variation of DYZ1 region in Y chromosome of the patients. A total of 79 big Y chromosome patients (48 of whose partners suffered from RSA or early embryo growth arrest), 7 small Y chromosome patients, 106 other male patients whose partners had suffered from unexplained RSA or early embryo growth arrest, and 100 normal male controls were enrolled.

RESULTS

There was no fraction deletion of DYZ1 detected both in big Y patients and in normal men. Of RSA patients, 1 case showed deletion of 266bp from the gene locus 25-290bp, and 2 cases showed deletion of 773bp from 1347 to 2119bp. Of only 7 small Y chromosome patients, 2 cases showed deletion of 266bp from 25 to 290bp, and 4 cases showed deletion of 773bp from 1347 to 2119bp and 275bp from 3128 to 3420bp. The mean of DYZ1 copies was 3900 in normal control men; the mean in big Y patients was 5571, in RSA patients was 2655, and in small Y patients was 1059. All of the others were significantly different (P<0.01) compared with normal control men, which meant that DYZ1 copy number in normal control men was less than that of big Y chromosome patients, and was more than that of unexplained early RSA patients and small Y patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The integrity and copy number variation of DYZ1 are closely related to the Y chromosome length under microscope. The cause of RSA/early embryo growth arrest in some couples may be the increase (big Y patients) or decrease of DYZ1 copy number in the husbands' Y chromosome.

Do polymorphic variants of chromosomes affect the outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of chromosomal polymorphic variations on the outcome of IVF and embryo transfer (IVF–embryo transfer) treatment for infertile couples.

METHODS

During the period from October 2006 to December 2009, 1978 infertile couples who had received their first IVF–embryo transfer treatment cycle in our hospital were selected for this retrospective study, and the frequency of chromosomal polymorphic variations was calculated. From these, 1671 couples were selected and divided into three groups: 1402 couples with normal chromosomes (Group 1/control group), 82 couples with chromosomal polymorphic variations in only females (Group 2) and 187 couples with chromosomal polymorphic variations in only males (Group 3). The clinical pregnancy rates (CPR), early miscarriage rates and ongoing pregnancy rates after IVF–embryo transfer treatment were compared.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in implantation rates (29.37% in the control group, 29.70% in Group 2 and 31.41% in Group 3, P > 0.05) and CPR (45.86, 46.34 and 51.87%, respectively, P > 0.05). Although there was a trend toward higher first trimester pregnancy loss rates in Group 3 (male chromosomal polymorphic variations), but not in Group 2, compared with normal karyotype couples (10.31 versus 6.84%), the difference did not reach significance (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Chromosomal polymorphic variations appear to have no adverse effects on the outcome of IVF–embryo transfer treatment.

Consensus statement on diagnosis and clinical management of Klinefelter syndrome

Nearly 70 years after its description, Klinefelter syndrome (KS) remains a largely undiagnosed condition. As its clinical presentation may be subtle, many of those affected may be unaware or diagnosed only during evaluation for hypogonadism and/or infertility. In February 2010 an interdisciplinary panel of specialists met in Abano Terme (Padua, Italy) in a workshop on "Klinefelter Syndrome: diagnosis and clinical management". The main aim of this meeting was to discuss several aspects related to the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and evaluation of KS and to develop a consensus defining its early diagnosis and treatment. In the present consensus we have highlighted the features that may prompt the physicians to look after patients with KS both for the syndrome and correlated diseases. We have provided evidences that, during the different phases of life, there might be some advantages in establishing the diagnosis and starting proper follow-up and treatment. The workshop was carried out under the auspices of the Italian Society of andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS).

Long Y chromosome is not a fetal loss risk

PURPOSE

To assess the long Y chromosome genetic effect on human pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

We studied all records of pregnancies by human sperm donors after artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization at the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of Citic-Xiangya. Fetal losses were compared from two groups of sperm donors: the observation group (with long Y chromosome) and the control group (without long Y chromosome).

RESULTS

2885 pregnancies were achieved with donor sperm by artificial insemination and 1746 by in vitro fertilization. The rates of fetal loss, congenital malformation and donor fecundity in the observation group after both assisted reproductive technique were the same as for the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

A long Y chromosome may therefore be considered as a normal variant.