1
|
Yang H, Liu F, Ma Y, Di M. Clinical pregnancy outcomes prediction in vitro fertilization women based on random forest prediction model: A nested case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e32232. [PMID: 36626443 PMCID: PMC9750545 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The present study aimed to analyze the risk factors influencing the in vitro fertilization embryo transfer (IVF-ET) pregnancy and to construct a prediction model for clinical pregnancy outcome in patients receiving IVF-ET based on the predictors. In this nested case-control study, the data of 369 women receiving IVF-ET were enrolled. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the potential predictors. Ten-fold cross validation method was used to validate the random forest model for predicting the clinical pregnancy. The receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to evaluate the prediction ability of the model. The importance of variables was shown according to Mean Decrease Gini. The data delineated that age (odds ratio [OR]= 1.093, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.036-1.156, P = .0010), body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.094, 95%CI: 1.021-1.176, P = .012), 3 cycles (OR = 0.144, 95%CI: 0.028-0.534, P = .008), hematocrit (HCT) (OR = 0.865, 95% CI: 0.791-0.943, P = .001), luteinizing hormone (LH) (OR = 0.678, 95%CI: 0.549-0.823, P < .001), progesterone (P) (OR = 2.126, 95%CI: 1.112-4.141, P = .024), endometrial thickness (OR = 0.132, 95%CI: 0.034-0.496, P = .003) and FSH (OR = 1.151, 95%CI: 1.043-1.275, P = .006) were predictors associated with the clinical pregnancy outcome of patients receiving IVF-ET. The results might provide a novel method to identify patients receiving IVF-ET with a high risk of poor pregnancy outcomes and provide interventions in those patients to prevent the occurrence of poor pregnancy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongya Yang
- Reproductive Medical Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Fang Liu
- Reproductive Medical Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Yuan Ma
- Reproductive Medical Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Man Di
- Reproductive Medical Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China
- * Correspondence: Man Di, Reproductive Medical Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, No. 569, Xinsi Road, Baqiao District, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province 710038 China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang C, Shi Q, Yan Y, Shen X, Shan H, Zhu Y, Sun H, Xing J, Kong N. Effect of Exogenous Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Supplementation on Clinical Pregnancy of Patients Receiving Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist (GnRHa) Cycles: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int J Womens Health 2022; 14:1691-1700. [DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s388726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
3
|
Xia X, Shi Y, Geng L, Liu D, Hou Z, Lin H, Li R, Wang H, Tao L, Meng F, Da J, Chen Y, Qiao J, Qian W, Li H. A cohort study of both human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and recombinant luteinizing hormone addition at early follicular stage in in vitro fertilization outcome: A STROBE-compliant study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e15512. [PMID: 31083194 PMCID: PMC6531138 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
At present, the precise role of human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) supplementation at an early time of follicular phase on in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intra cytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes remains uncertain.Here infertile women of normal ovarian function undergoing their first cycle of IVF/ICSI were studied and were randomly allocated into 3 groups. Group 1, ovarian stimulation with 150IU recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone. Group 2, patients received 75IU rFSH and 75IU HMG. Group 3 patients were given 150IU rFSH and 75IU rLH.There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics, ovarian response, the biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates among the 3 groups. No significant differences were found in biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between the patients whose LH levels were lower than 0.75 mIU/ml and those above this threshold in group 1. Furthermore, there were also no significant differences in biochemical, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates among the 3 group patients whose LH level lower than 0.75 mIU/ml.The results showed that either the addition of HMG or rLH supplementation at an early time of follicular phase produce no significant benefit on IVF outcome in patients with normal ovarian function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Xia
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lotus Road, FuTian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North HuaYuan Road, HaiDian District, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Shi
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lotus Road, FuTian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
| | - Lan Geng
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lotus Road, FuTian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
| | - Dan Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lotus Road, FuTian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
| | - Zhenhui Hou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lotus Road, FuTian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
| | - Hongbo Lin
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lotus Road, FuTian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
| | - Rong Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North HuaYuan Road, HaiDian District, Beijing, China
| | - Haiyan Wang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North HuaYuan Road, HaiDian District, Beijing, China
| | - Liyuan Tao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North HuaYuan Road, HaiDian District, Beijing, China
| | - Fanhua Meng
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lotus Road, FuTian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
| | - Jian Da
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lotus Road, FuTian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
| | - Yun Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lotus Road, FuTian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
| | - Jie Qiao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North HuaYuan Road, HaiDian District, Beijing, China
| | - Weiping Qian
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, No. 1120 Lotus Road, FuTian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
| | - Hongzhen Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North HuaYuan Road, HaiDian District, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alviggi C, Conforti A, Esteves SC, Andersen CY, Bosch E, Bühler K, Ferraretti AP, De Placido G, Mollo A, Fischer R, Humaidan P. Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review. Fertil Steril 2018; 109:644-664. [PMID: 29653717 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2017] [Revised: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the role of recombinant human LH (r-hLH) supplementation in ovarian stimulation for ART in specific subgroups of patients. DESIGN Systematic review. SETTING Centers for reproductive care. PATIENT(S) Six populations were investigated: 1) women with a hyporesponse to recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) monotherapy; 2) women at an advanced reproductive age; 3) women cotreated with the use of a GnRH antagonist; 4) women with profoundly suppressed LH levels after the administration of GnRH agonists; 5) normoresponder women to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; and 6) women with a "poor response" to ovarian stimulation, including those who met the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology Bologna criteria. INTERVENTION(S) Systematic review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Implantation rate, number of oocytes retrieved, live birth rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, fertilization rate, and number of metaphase II oocytes. RESULT(S) Recombinant hLH supplementation appears to be beneficial in two subgroups of patients: 1) women with adequate prestimulation ovarian reserve parameters and an unexpected hyporesponse to r-hFSH monotherapy; and 2) women 36-39 years of age. Indeed, there is no evidence that r-hLH is beneficial in young (<35 y) normoresponders cotreated with the use of a GnRH antagonist. The use of r-hLH supplementation in women with suppressed endogenous LH levels caused by GnRH analogues and in poor responders remains controversial, whereas the use of r-hLH supplementation to prevent the development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome warrants further investigation. CONCLUSION(S) Recombinant hLH can be proposed for hyporesponders and women 36-39 years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Alviggi
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Conforti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Sandro C Esteves
- Androfert, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Claus Yding Andersen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ernesto Bosch
- Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, Valencia, Spain
| | - Klaus Bühler
- Center for Gynecology, Endocrinology, and Reproductive Medicine, Ulm and Stuttgart, Germany
| | | | - Giuseppe De Placido
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Mollo
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Peter Humaidan
- Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Skive, Denmark, and Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
He W, Lin H, Lv J, Wen Y, Cai L. The impact of luteinizing hormone supplementation in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: a retrospective cohort study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2018; 34:513-517. [PMID: 29212429 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1411473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) supplementation to patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists on cycle outcomes is controversial. Here, we present a retrospective cohort study including cycles from December 2015 to December 2016. Totally 320 cycles were divided into two groups according to with or without exogenous LH supplementation. No significant differences regarding the number of retrieved oocytes, the number of good-quality embryos, and clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups were found. The logistic regression analysis revealed that LH supplementation was not independently associated with clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 0.577, 95% CI: 0.272-1.222, p = .58) or a biochemical pregnancy rate (OR = 0.922, 95% CI: 0.444-1.916, p = .83). When patients were divided into subgroups based on age, more retrieved oocytes (5.60 vs. 3.97, p = .04) and good-quality embryos (3.07 vs. 1.93, p = .01) were achieved in cycles with exogenous LH supplementation for 40 years and over group. We conclude that for aged women (40 years old and over), LH supplementation has a positive impact on the number of retrieved oocytes and good-quality embryos in GnRH antagonist cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen He
- a Center for Reproductive Medicine , The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Hui Lin
- a Center for Reproductive Medicine , The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Jie Lv
- a Center for Reproductive Medicine , The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Yanfei Wen
- b Center for Reproductive Medicine , Jiangmen Central Hospital, Affiliated Jiangmen Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University , Jianmen , China
| | - Liuhong Cai
- a Center for Reproductive Medicine , The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University , Guangzhou , China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shahrokh Tehraninejad E, Farshbaf Taghinejad M, Hossein Rashidi B, Haghollahi F. Controlled ovarian stimulation with r-FSH plus r-LH vs. HMG plus r-FSH in patients candidate for IVF/ICSI cycles: An RCT. Int J Reprod Biomed 2017. [DOI: 10.29252/ijrm.15.7.435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
|
7
|
Shahrokh Tehraninejad E, Farshbaf Taghinejad M, Hossein Rashidi B, Haghollahi F. Controlled ovarian stimulation with r-FSH plus r-LH vs. HMG plus r-FSH in patients candidate for IVF/ICSI cycles: An RCT. Int J Reprod Biomed 2017; 15:435-440. [PMID: 29177245 PMCID: PMC5601935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different combination of gonadotropin preparation has been introduced with no definite superiority of one over others in in vitro fertilization (IVF), but individualized regimens for each patient are needed. OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant- follicle stimulating hormone (r-FSH) plus recombinant-luteinizing hormone (rLH) versus human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) plus r-FSH on fertility outcomes in IVF patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a randomized clinical trial study that was performed from October 2014-April 2016 on 140 infertile patients with a set of inclusion criteria that referred to infertility clinics in Vali- asr and Gandhi Hospital in Tehran. The women were randomly divided into two treatment groups. The first group (n=70) received rFSH from the second day of cycle and was added HMG in 6th day and the 2nd group (n=70), received rFSH from the second day of cycle and was added recombinant-LH in 6th day. Then ovum Pick-Up and embryo transfer were performed. In this study, we assessed the outcomes such as; chemical and clinical pregnancy rate, live birth and abortion rate. RESULTS Number of follicles in ovaries, total number of oocytes or M2 oocytes and quality of fetuses has no significant differences between two groups (p>0.05). Total number of fetuses were significantly higher in patients who received rFSH + HMG (p=0.02). Fertility outcomes consisted of: live birth rate, chemical pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rate were higher in rFSH + HMG group in comparison to rFSH +r-LH group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION It seems that in IVF patients, HMG + rFSH used for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation have better effects on fertility outcomes, but in order to verify the results, it is recommended to implement studies on more patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Papathanasiou A, Searle BJ, King NMA, Bhattacharya S. Trends in 'poor responder' research: lessons learned from RCTs in assisted conception. Hum Reprod Update 2016; 22:306-19. [PMID: 26843539 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2015] [Accepted: 01/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A substantial minority of women undergoing IVF will under-respond to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. These women-so-called 'poor responders'-suffer persistently reduced success rates after IVF. Currently, no single intervention is unanimously accepted as beneficial in overcoming poor ovarian response (POR). This has been supported by the available research on POR, which consists mainly of randomized controlled trials (RCTs ) with an inherent high-risk of bias. The aim of this review was to critically appraise the available experimental trials on POR and provide guidance towards more useful-less wasteful-future research. METHODS A comprehensive review was undertaken of RCTs on 'poor responders' published in the last 15 years. Data on various methodological traits as well as important clinical characteristics were extracted from the included studies and summarized, with a view to identifying deficiencies from which lessons can be learned. Based on this analysis, recommendations were provided for further research in this field of assisted conception. RESULTS We selected and analysed 75 RCTs. A valid, 'low-risk' randomization method was reported in three out of four RCTs. An improving trend in reporting concealment of patient allocation was also evident over the 15-year period. In contrast, <1 in 10 RCTs 'blinded' patients and <1 in 5 RCTs 'blinded' staff to the proposed intervention. Only 1 in 10 RCTs 'blinded' ultrasound practitioners to patient allocation, when assessing the outcome of early pregnancy. The majority of trials reported an intention-to-treat analysis for at least one of their outcomes, with an improving trend in the recent years. Substantial variation was noted in the definitions used for 'poor responders', the most popular being 'low ovarian response at previous stimulation'. The preferred cut-off value for defining previous low response has been 'less or equal to three retrieved oocytes'. The most popular tests used for diagnosing diminished ovarian reserve have been antral follicle count and FSH. Although the Bologna criteria for POR were only recently introduced, they are expected to become a popular definition in future 'poor responder' trials. Numerous interventions have been studied on 'poor responders'. Most of these have been applied before/during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. The antagonist protocol, the microdose flare protocol and the long down-regulation protocol have been among the most popular interventions. The analysis of outcomes revealed a clear improving trend in reporting live birth. In contrast, only 10% of RCTs reported significant improvement in reproductive outcomes among tested interventions. Twelve 'significant' interventions were reported, each supported by a single 'positive' RCT. Finally, trials of higher methodological quality were more likely to have been published in a high-impact journal. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the majority of published trials on POR suffer from methodological flaws and are, thus, regarded as being high-risk for bias. The same trials have used a variety of definitions for their poor responders and a variety of interventions for their head-to-head comparisons. Not surprisingly, discrepancies are also evident in the findings of trials comparing similar interventions. Based on the identified deficiencies, this novel type of 'methodology and clinical' review has introduced custom recommendations on how to improve future experimental research in the 'poor responder' population.
Collapse
|
9
|
Revelli A, Pettinau G, Basso G, Carosso A, Ferrero A, Dallan C, Canosa S, Gennarelli G, Guidetti D, Filippini C, Benedetto C. Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with recombinant-FSH plus recombinant-LH vs. human Menopausal Gonadotropin based on the number of retrieved oocytes: results from a routine clinical practice in a real-life population. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 13:77. [PMID: 26209525 PMCID: PMC4514947 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-015-0080-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association of recombinant FSH (rFSH) plus recombinant LH (rLH) is currently used for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) in human IVF, but its efficacy has, to date, not yet been compared to that of human Menopausal Gonadotropin (hMG), the FSH + LH activity-containing urinary drug. METHODS Eight hundred forty-eight (848) IVF patients classified as expected "poor" or "normal" responders according to antral follicle count (AFC) and basal (day 3) FSH were treated with rFSH + rLH (2:1 ratio, n = 398, Group A) or hMG (n = 450, Group B). Data were collected under real-life practice circumstances and the pregnancy rate with fresh embryos was calculated by stratifying patients according to the number of retrieved oocytes (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, >8). RESULTS Overall, the pregnancy rate in both groups progressively improved according to the number of oocytes retrieved. When comparing patients within the same subgroup of oocyte yield, Group A and B showed a comparable outcome up to the reported highest yield (>8). When more than 8 oocytes were available, Group A had a significantly better pregnancy rate outcome. Patients' characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups and the better outcome in the best responding patients in Group A was confirmed by a multivariable logistic regression analysis, that showed that both the use of rFSH + rLH and the total number of retrieved oocytes increased the probability of pregnancy with odd ratio (OR) of 1.628 and 1.083, respectively. CONCLUSIONS When comparing patients with the same number of retrieved oocytes under real-life circumstances, the association of rFSH + rLH results in a significantly higher pregnancy rate than hMG when more than 8 oocytes are retrieved. The reason(s) for this are unknown, but a more favorable effect on oocyte quality and/or endometrial receptivity could be involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Revelli
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.
- LIVET Infertility and IVF Clinic, Torino, Italy.
| | - Grazia Pettinau
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.
| | - Gemma Basso
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.
| | - Andrea Carosso
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.
| | - Cecilia Dallan
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.
| | - Stefano Canosa
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.
| | - Gianluca Gennarelli
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.
- LIVET Infertility and IVF Clinic, Torino, Italy.
| | | | - Claudia Filippini
- Statistics, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, MolinetteHospital, Torino, Italy.
| | - Chiara Benedetto
- Gynecology and Obstetrics, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, S. Anna Hospital, Torino, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Papaleo E, Vanni VS, Viganò P, La Marca A, Pagliardini L, Vitrano R, Zanirato M, Marsiglio E, Privitera L, Candiani M. Recombinant LH administration in subsequent cycle after "unexpected" poor response to recombinant FSH monotherapy. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014; 30:813-6. [PMID: 24968088 DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2014.932342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Poor ovarian response (POR) is most frequently linked to the condition known as diminished ovarian reserve, but it can also occur in the absence of pathological ovarian reserve tests ("unexpected" POR). Because possible explanations include theca cells function deficiency, our aim was to evaluate the effect of r-LH administration in "unexpected" poor responders. A retrospective, single-centre, cohort study was conducted on 65 patients with AMH >0.5 ng/ml and/or AFC >5 with POR in their first cycle. Patients underwent a second IVF cycle with same protocol (long- or antagonist) and same starting dose of r-FSH used in the first cycle, plus daily addiction of 150 IU of r-LH from day 1. Compared to the first cycle, r-LH addition in the second cycle determined an increase in number of oocytes retrieved (p < 0.001), number of metaphase II oocytes (p < 0.05), E2 levels at hCG triggering (p < 0.001) and number of embryos transferred (p = 0.002). A 15% clinical pregnancy rate was also observed in the second cycle. Our results suggest that patients with non-pathological ovarian reserve tests and previous "unexpected" POR seem to benefit from r-LH addition in subsequent cycles without the need to increase the r-FSH starting dose, possibly due to an underlying occult theca cells deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Papaleo
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Centro Scienze della Natalità, Ospedale San Raffaele , Milan , Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lan KC, Chang SY, Huang FJ, Lin HJ, Lin CY, Huang KE, Kang HY. Analysis of androgen receptor and anti-Müllerian hormone pathways in human granulosa cells under luteinizing hormone treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2013; 11:11. [PMID: 23433069 PMCID: PMC3599510 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2012] [Accepted: 02/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to determine the gene expression profiles of the androgen/androgen receptor (AR) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH)/ Sry-related high-mobility group box 9 (SOX9) pathways in granulosa-luteal cells from patients undergoing standard in vitro fertilization (IVF) with or without recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) therapy. METHODS Levels of reproductive hormones in the pre-ovulatory follicular fluid and the expression levels of LHR (luteinizing hormone receptor), AR, SOX9, AMH, AR-associated protein 54(ARA54)and ARA70 were determined in granulosa-luteal cells by real-time reverse-transcription PCR. The effects of androgen and rLH treatments on AR and AMH expression levels were also tested in vitro using HO23 cells. RESULTS We collected 35 an 70 granulosa cell samples from patients cycled with and without rLH supplementation, respectively. The clinical outcomes were similar in patients who received rLH therapy and those who did not, though the pre-ovulatory follicular fluid levels of androstenedione, testosterone, and estradiol were significantly higher and progesterone was lower in the rLH supplementation group. Moreover, granulosa-luteal cell mRNA levels of LHR, AR, AMH, and SOX9 were significantly higher in the rLH supplementation group relative to the group that did not receive rLH supplementation. In addition, we observed significant correlations between LHR and AR mRNA expression and among AR, AMH, and SOX9 mRNA expression in granulosa-luteal cells from patients undergoing standard IVF treatment. CONCLUSIONS Increased expression of LHR, AR, AMH, and SOX9 is characteristic of granulosa-luteal cells from IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) patients receiving rLH supplementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuo-Chung Lan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Menopause and Reproductive Medicine Research, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | - Fu-Jen Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Jung Lin
- Center for Menopause and Reproductive Medicine Research, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Yuang Lin
- College of Medicine, China Medical University, Clinical Immunology Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ko-En Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Menopause and Reproductive Medicine Research, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Yo Kang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Menopause and Reproductive Medicine Research, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|