Live birth after SrCl(2) oocyte activation in previous repeated failed or low fertilization rates after ICSI of frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa: case report

Clinical Applications of Assisted Oocyte Activation in Couples with Various Reproductive Problems: A Systematic Review

ICSI may face fertilization failure, prompting the use of assisted oocyte activation (AOA) techniques. While AOA is implemented in infertility clinics, its target patients and definitive application remain uncertain. This systematic review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess reproductive outcomes in ICSI-AOA cycles compared to conventional ICSI and evaluate AOA effectiveness in various infertility disorders. A literature search encompassed PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus databases until December 2023 for relevant English studies. Included studies compared ICSI-AOA with conventional ICSI in couples with prior fertilization failure, utilizing diverse AOA methods. Control groups consisted of sibling oocytes, previous cycles of the same couples, or couples undergoing conventional ICSI. Evaluated outcomes included fertilization, cleavage, embryo quality, implantation, pregnancy, and live birth rates. Article screening and data extraction were performed by two authors, with risk of bias assessed by another investigator. Out of 3088 initially identified articles, 30 studies were included, focusing on fertilization failure (n = 10), female infertility (n = 3), PLCζ defects (n = 4), poor sperm quality (n = 4), Globozoospermia (n = 4), and surgically retrieved sperm (n = 8). Most studies concluded that AOA could overcome fertilization failure, but success rates varied based on sperm-related or oocyte-related factors in ICSI-AOA cycles. Due to differences in patient inclusion criteria and sample sizes, most studies were not sufficiently similar for pooled analysis, limiting robust conclusions. There is insufficient evidence, particularly from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to determine the efficacy or safety of ICSI-AOA as a treatment strategy. Registration number is PROSPERO, CRD42024551221.

Artificial Egg Activation Using Calcium Ionophore

Artificial oocyte activation, most commonly using calcium ionophore, is a treatment add-on utilized to avoid recurrence of abnormally low or total failed fertilization following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. It aims to modify defective physiological processes, specifically calcium-mediated cell signaling that are critical to events required for fertilization. Routine application of artificial oocyte activation is neither required nor recommended; however, it represents an invaluable intervention for a subgroup of patients affected by sperm-related oocyte activation deficiency.

Comparative study of preimplantation development following distinct assisted oocyte activation protocols in a PLC-zeta knockout mouse model

Mammalian fertilization encompasses a series of Ca2+ oscillations initiated by the sperm factor phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ). Some studies have shown that altering the Ca2+ oscillatory regime at fertilization affects preimplantation blastocyst development. However, assisted oocyte activation (AOA) protocols can induce oocyte activation in a manner that diverges profoundly from the physiological Ca2+ profiling. In our study, we used the newly developed PLCζ-null sperm to investigate the independent effect of AOA on mouse preimplantation embryogenesis. Based on previous findings, we hypothesized that AOA protocols with Ca2+ oscillatory responses might improve blastocyst formation rates and differing Ca2+ profiles might alter blastocyst transcriptomes. A total of 326 MII B6D2F1-oocytes were used to describe Ca2+ profiles and to compare embryonic development and individual blastocyst transcriptomes between four control conditions: C1 (in-vivo fertilization), C2 (ICSI control sperm), C3 (parthenogenesis) and C4 (ICSI-PLCζ-KO sperm) and four AOA groups: AOA1 (human recombinant PLCζ), AOA2 (Sr2+), AOA3 (ionomycin) and AOA4 (TPEN). All groups revealed remarkable variations in their Ca2+ profiles; however, oocyte activation rates were comparable between the controls (91.1% ± 13.8%) and AOA (86.9% ± 11.1%) groups. AOA methods which enable Ca2+ oscillatory responses (AOA1: 41% and AOA2: 75%) or single Ca2+ transients (AOA3: 50%) showed no significantly different blastocyst rates compared to ICSI control group (C2: 70%). In contrast, we observed a significant decrease in compaction (53% vs. 83%) and blastocyst rates (41% vs. 70%) in the absence of an initial Ca2+ trigger (AOA4) compared with the C2 group. Transcription profiles did not identify significant differences in gene expression levels between the ICSI control group (C2) and the four AOA groups.

Strontium fails to induce Ca2+ release and activation in human oocytes despite the presence of functional TRPV3 channels

STUDY QUESTION

Are the transient receptor potential cation channels vanilloid 3 (TRPV3) present and able to mediate strontium (Sr²⁺) induced artificial activation in human oocytes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Sr²⁺ did not induce Ca²⁺ rises or provoke activation in human oocytes, however, mRNA for the TRPV3 channel was present in metaphase II (MII) human oocytes after IVM and TRPV3 agonists induced Ca²⁺ rises and oocyte activation, demonstrating the channels were functional.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Selective activation of TRPV3 by agonists induces Ca²⁺ entry and promotes mouse oocyte activation, and the absence of TRPV3 channels in mouse oocytes prevents Sr²⁺ mediated artificial activation. Sr²⁺ is sometimes used to overcome fertilization failure after ICSI in the clinic, but its efficiency is still controversial and the mechanism(s) of how it mediates the Ca²⁺ flux has not been studied yet in human.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The protein distribution (n = 10) and mRNA expression level (n = 19) of the TRPV3 channels was investigated in human MII oocytes after IVM. The Sr²⁺ (10 mM) and TRPV3 agonists (200 μM 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate [2-APB] and 200 μM carvacrol)-induced Ca²⁺ response was analyzed in human (n = 15, n = 16 and n = 16, respectively) and mouse oocytes (n = 15, n = 19 and n = 26, respectively). The subsequent embryonic developmental potential following the parthenogenetic activation using these three agents was recorded in human (n = 10, n = 9 and n = 9, respectively) and mouse (n = 20 per agent) oocytes, by determining pronucleus, or 2-cell and blastocyst formation rates.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

MII oocytes from B6D2F1 mice (6–10 weeks old) as well as human IVM oocytes and IVO oocytes (from patients aged 25–38 years old) with aggregates of smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters were used. The expression of TRPV3 channels was determined by immunofluorescence staining with confocal microscopy and RT-PCR, and the temporal evolution of intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration was measured by time-lapse imaging after exposure to Sr²⁺ and TRPV3 agonists (2-APB and carvacrol). Artificial activation efficiency was assessed using these agents.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Sr²⁺ did not promote Ca²⁺ oscillations or provoke activation in human oocytes. Transcripts of TRPV3 channels were present in IVM MII human oocytes. TRPV3 protein was expressed and distributed throughout the ooplasm of human oocytes, rather than particularly concentrated in plasma membrane as observed in mouse MII oocytes. Both agonists of TRPV3 (2-APB and carvacrol), promoted a single Ca²⁺ transient and activated a comparable percentage of more than half of the exposed human oocytes (P > 0.05). The agonist 2-APB was also efficient in activating mouse oocytes, however, significantly fewer mouse oocytes responded to carvacrol than 2-APB in both the Ca²⁺ analysis and activation test (P < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The availability of fresh IVO matured oocytes in human was limited. Data from TRPV3 knockout model are not included.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The benefit of clinical application using Sr²⁺ to overcome fertilization failure after ICSI requires further validation.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by FWO-Vlaanderen, China Scholarship Council and Special Research Fund from Ghent University (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds, BOF). No competing interests are declared.

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and Its Sulfate (DHEA-S) in Mammalian Reproduction: Known Roles and Novel Paradigms

Steroid hormones form an integral part of normal development in mammalian organisms. Cholesterol is the parent compound from which all steroid hormones are synthesized. The product pregnenolone formed from cholesterol serves as precursor for mineralocorticoids, glucocorticoids, as well as dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its derived sexual hormones. DHEA assumes the prohormone status of a predominant endogenous precursor and a metabolic intermediate in ovarian follicular steroidogenesis. DHEA supplementation has been used to enhance ovarian reserve. Steroids like estradiol and testosterone have long been contemplated to play important roles in regulating meiotic maturation of oocytes in conjunction with gonadotropins. It is known that oocyte priming with estrogen is necessary to develop calcium (Ca²⁺) oscillations during maturation. Accruing evidence from diverse studies suggests that DHEA and its sulfate (dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, DHEA-S) play significantly vital role not only as intermediates in androgen and estrogen formation, but may also be the probable 'oocyte factor' and behave as endogenous agonists triggering calcium oscillations for oocyte activation. DHEA/DHEA-S have been reported to regulate calcium channels for the passage of Ca²⁺ through the oocyte cytoplasm and for maintaining required threshold of Ca²⁺ oscillations. This role of DHEA/DHEA-S assumes critical significance in assisted reproductive technology and in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles where physical, chemical, and mechanical methods are employed for artificial oocyte activation to enhance fertilization rates. However, since these methods are invasive and may also cause adverse epigenetic modifications; oral or culture-media supplementation with DHEA/DHEA-S provides a noninvasive innate mechanism of in-vitro oocyte activation based on physiological metabolic pathway.

Gamete activation: basic knowledge and clinical applications

Background

The first clues to the process of gamete activation date back to nearly 60 years ago. The mutual activation of gametes is a crucial event during fertilization. In the testis and ovaries, spermatozoa and oocytes are in a state of meiotic and metabolic quiescence and require reciprocal signals in order to undergo functional changes that lead to competence for fertilization. First, the oocyte activates sperm by triggering motility, chemoattraction, binding and the acrosome reaction, culminating with the fusion of the two plasma membranes. At the end of this cascade of events, collectively known as sperm capacitation, sperm-induced oocyte activation occurs, generating electrical, morphological and metabolic modifications in the oocyte.

Objective and rationale

The aim of this review is to provide the current state of knowledge regarding the entire process of gamete activation in selected specific animal models that have contributed to our understanding of fertilization in mammals, including humans. Here we describe in detail the reciprocal induction of the two activation processes, the molecules involved and the mechanisms of cell interaction and signal transduction that ultimately result in successful embryo development and creation of a new individual.

Search methods

We carried out a literature survey with no restrictions on publication date (from the early 1950s to March 2016) using PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and Web of Knowledge by utilizing common keywords applied in the field of fertilization and embryo development. We also screened the complete list of references published in the most recent research articles and relevant reviews published in English (both animal and human studies) on the topics investigated.

Outcomes

Literature on the principal animal models demonstrates that gamete activation is a pre-requisite for successful fertilization, and is a process common to all species studied to date. We provide a detailed description of the dramatic changes in gamete morphology and behavior, the regulatory molecules triggering gamete activation and the intracellular ions and second messengers involved in active metabolic pathways in different species. Recent scientific advances suggest that artificial gamete activation may represent a novel technique to improve human IVF outcomes, but this approach requires caution.

Wider implications

Although controversial, manipulation of gamete activation represents a promising tool for ameliorating the fertilization rate in assisted reproductive technologies. A better knowledge of mechanisms that transform the quiescent oocyte into a pluripotent cell may also provide new insights for the clinical use of stem cells.