A non-mosaic isodicentric Y chromosome resulting from breakage and fusion at the Yq pseudo-autosomal region in a fetus

Clinical and molecular cytogenetic findings and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with isochromosome Y

BACKGROUND

The mosaic forms and clinical phenotypes of fetuses with isochromosome Y are difficult to predict. Therefore, we summarized the cases of nine fetuses with isochromosome Y identified in prenatal diagnosis with a combination of molecular cytogenetic techniques, providing clinical evidence for prenatal genetic counseling.

METHODS

The prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy outcomes of nine fetuses with isochromosome Y were obtained by a  retrospective analysis. Isochromosome Y was identified prenatally by different approaches, such as conventional karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

RESULTS

Seven idic(Y) fetuses and two i(Y) fetuses were identified. One fetus was complete for i(Y)(p10), and the rest with 45,X had mosaic forms. A break and fusion locus was identified in Yp11.3 in one fetus, in Yq11.22 in six fetuses and in Yp10 in two fetuses. The CMA results suggested that different deletions and duplications were found on the Y chromosome. The deletion fragments ranged from 4.7 Mb to the entire Y chromosome, and the duplication fragments ranged from 10.4 to 18.0 Mb. QF-PCR analysis suggested that the AZF region was intact in one fetus, four fetuses had AZFb+c+d deletion, one fetus had AZFa+b+c+d deletion, and one fetus had AZFc+d deletion. Finally, four healthy male neonates were delivered successfully, but the parents of the remaining five fetuses, including three healthy and two unhealthy fetuses, chose to terminate their pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

The fetus and neonate phenotype of prenatally detected isochromosome Y usually is that of a normally developed male, ascertained in the absence of other indicators of a fetal structural anomaly. Our study provides clinical reference materials for risk assessment and permits better prenatally counseling and preparation of parents facing the birth of isochromosome Y fetuses.

A rare karyotype of nonmosaic isodicentric (Y) (p11.31) with azoospermia and short stature

Chromosome aberration is one of the common causes of male infertility. Isodicentric chromosome is a chromosomal aberration in which two arms of a chromosome are identical in morphology and genetics and connected by two centromeres. We firstly reported a case of infertile male with nonmosaic 46, X, idic (Y) (qter-p11.31::p11.31-qter) but with the sex-determining region Y (SRY). The broken site is the chromosome Y (p11.31). The patients' clinical phenotype was azoospermia and short stature. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), chromosomal microarray comparative genomic hybridisation (array CGH) and related molecular analysis were performed. Azoospermia of this case may be caused by the abnormal chromosome structure, which leads to abnormal chromosome synapsis in spermatogenesis. Loss of genes in PAR1 and gain of genes copies in azoospermia factor (AZF) region on the Y chromosome may also contribute to the pathogenesis of azoospermia.

Clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular findings of isodicentric Y chromosomes

Background

Isodicentric Y chromosomes [idic(Y)] are one of the most common structural abnormalities of the Y chromosome. The prenatal diagnosis of isodicentric Y chromosomes is of vital importance, and the postnatal phenotypes vary widely. Therefore, we present six patients prenatally diagnosed with isodicentric Y chromosomes and review the literature concerning the genotype-phenotype correlations.

Method

The clinical materials of six patients were obtained. Cytogenetic and molecular approaches were carried out for these six patients.

Results

Isodicentric Y chromosomes were found in all sixpatients. Among them, four patients presented with a mosaic 45,X karyotype, one patient had a 46,XY cell line, and one patient was nonmosaic. Five of these six isodicentric Y chromosomes had a breakpoint in Yq11.2, and the other had a breakpoint in Yp11.3. The molecular analysis demonstrated different duplications and deletions of the Y chromosome. Finally, three patients chose to terminate the pregnancy, two patients gave birth to normal-appearing males, and one patient was lost to follow-up.

Conclusion

The incorporation of multiple cytogenetic and molecular techniques would offer a more comprehensive understanding of this structural chromosomal abnormality for genetic counselling.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of an isodicentric Yq and a neocentric isochromosome Yp in an azoospermic male

Isodicentric Y chromosomes are considered one of the most common structural abnormalities of the Y chromosome. Neocentric marker chromosomes, with neocentromeres, have drawn increasing attention in recent years. The present study reported an azoospermic male with a neocentric isochromosome Yp, neo(Yp), and an isodicentric Yq, idic(Yq). The karyotype was analyzed using G‑banding, chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with various detection probes, including sex‑determining region on the Y chromosome (SRY) and Y centromeric, applied at the same time. G‑banding initially revealed the karyotype 47,X,i(Y)(q10),+mar. CMA indicated the presence of an extra Y chromosome, seemingly equivalent to 47,XYY males. FISH delineated the existence of two centromeres on the idic(Yq). For the marker chromosome, two SRY signals were detected instead of the Y‑specific centromere signal, and a visual centromere was observed. This indicated the possible existence of a neocentromere in the marker chromosome, located in the connected region in Yp11.2 band. Finally, the patient's karyotype was established as 47,X,idic(Y)(p11.2), neo(Y)(pter→Yp11.2::Yp11.2→pter). The findings suggested that both idic(Yq) and neo(Yp) could be the main causes of the patient's azoospermia, despite the fact that the partial disomy of Ypter to Yp11.2 did not lead to any major malformations. The present study not only improves the understanding of karyotype/phenotype relationships between neocentric marker Y chromosomes and male infertility, but also supports the hypothesis that the combined application of molecular cytogenetic analysis could aid in reliably confirming breakpoints, origins, and the constitution of the marker chromosomes.

Discrepancy of QF-PCR, CMA and karyotyping on a de novo case of mosaic isodicentric Y chromosomes

Background

Isodicentric chromosomes are the most frequent structural aberrations of human Y chromosome, and usually present in mosaicism with a 45, X cell line. Several cytogenetic techniques have been used for diagnosing of uncommon abnormal sex chromosome abnormalities in prenatal cases.

Case presentation

A 26-year-old healthy woman was referred to our centre at 24 weeks of gestation age. Ultrasound examination indicated she was pregnant with imbalanced development of twins. Amniocentesis was referred to the patient for further genetic analyses. Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (QF-PCR) indicated the existence of an extra Y chromosome or a structurally abnormal Y chromosome in primary amniotic cells. Chromosome microarray (CMA) analysis based on Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) platform was performed and identified a 10.1 Mb deletion on Y chromosome in 8-days cultured amniotic cells. Combined with the data of QF-PCR and aCGH, karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed a mosaic cell line of 45,X[27]/46,X, idic(Y)(q11.22) [14] in fetus.The karyotyping analysis of cord blood sample was consistent with amniotic cells. The parental karyotypes were normal, which indicated this mosaic case of isodicentric Y (idicY) chromosomes of the fetus was a de novo case.

Conclusion

Several approaches have been used for the detection of numerical and structural chromosomal alterations of on prenatal cases. Our report supported the essential role of incorporating multiple genetic techniques in prenatal diagnosing and genetic counseling of potential complex sex chromosomal rearrangements.

Molecular characterisation of a case of dicentric Y presented as nonobstructive azoospermia with testicular early maturation arrest

The dicentric Y chromosome is the most common cytogenetically visible structural abnormality of Y chromosome. The sites of break and fusion of dicentric Y are variable, but break and fusion at Yq12 (proximal to the pseudoautosomal region 2/PAR 2) is very rare. Dicentric Y chromosome is unstable during cell division and likely to generate chromosomal mosaicism. Here, we report a case of infertile male with nonmosaic 46,XY where chromosome Y was dicentric with break and fusion at Yq12 (proximal to PAR 2). Clinical presentation of the case was nonobstructive azoospermia due to early maturation arrest at the primary spermatocyte stage. Various molecular techniques such as FISH, STS-PCR and DNA microarray were carried out to characterise genetic defect leading to testicular maturation arrest in the patient. The break and fusion was found at Yq12 (proximal to PAR 2) and resulted in near total duplication of Y chromosome (excluding PAR 2). The reason for maturation arrest seems due to CNVs of PARs (gain in PAR 1 and loss of PAR 2) and azoospermia factors (gain).