Genetic counseling for men with recurrent pregnancy loss or recurrent implantation failure due to abnormal sperm chromosomal aneuploidy

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Could Not Improve Cumulative Live Birth Rate Among 705 Couples with Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure

Objective

We evaluate whether next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improves the cumulative pregnancy outcomes of patients with unexplained recurrent implantation failure (uRIF) as compared to conventional in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study (2015-2022). A total of 705 couples diagnosed with uRIF were included in the study. 229 women transferred blastocysts based on morphological grading (IVF/ICSI) and 476 couples opted for PGT-A to screen blastocysts by NGS. Women were further stratified according to age at retrieval (<38 years and ≥38 years). The primary outcome was the cumulative live-birth rate after all the embryos were transferred in a single oocyte retrieval or until achieving a live birth. Confounders were adjusted using binary logistic regression models.

Results

Cumulative live-birth rate was similar between the IVF/ICSI group and the PGT-A group after stratified by age: IVF/ICSI vs PGT-A in the <38 years subgroup (49.7% vs 57.7%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.25 (0.84-1.84), P = 0.270) and in the ≥38 years subgroup (14.0% vs 19.5%, adjusted OR (95% CI) = 1.09 (0.41-2.92), P = 0.866), respectively. Nonetheless, the PGT group had a lower first-time biochemical pregnancy loss rate (17.0% vs 8.7%, P = 0.034) and a higher cumulative good birth outcome rate (35.2% vs 46.4%, P = 0.014) than the IVF/ICSI group in the <38 years subgroup. Other pregnancy outcomes after the initial embryo transfer and multiple transfers following a single oocyte retrieval were all similar between groups.

Conclusion

Our results showed no evidence of favorable effects of PGT-A treatment on improving the cumulative live birth rate in uRIF couples regardless of maternal age. Use of PGT-A in the <38 years uRIF patients would help to decrease the first-time biochemical pregnancy loss and increase the cumulative good birth outcome.

Maternal hypercholesterolemia would increase the incidence of embryo aneuploidy in couples with recurrent implantation failure

BACKGROUND

The association of dyslipidemia with embryo development and pregnancy outcomes is largely unknown, especially in unexplained recurrent implantation failure (uRIF) patients. Here, this study aimed to explore the impact of abnormal blood lipid levels on embryo genetic status and pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) from a clinical perspective.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 502 patients diagnosed as uRIF. They were divided into four groups according to the levels of cholesterol and triglyceride: nonhyperlipidemia group (NonH group), simple hypercholesterolemia group (SHC group), simple hypertriglyceridemia group (SHC group) and mixed hyperlipidemia group (MixH group). At the same time, patients were divided into non-low HDL-C group and low HDL-C group according to their HDL-C level. The outcomes of embryos genetic testing and pregnancy outcomes after PGT-A was analyzed between groups. Binary logistic regression and/or generalized estimating equation (GEE) model were conducted to investigate the association of different types of dyslipidemia with embryonic aneuploidy rate and cumulative live-birth rate.

RESULTS

474 women who met the inclusion criteria were divided into four groups: NonH group (N = 349), SHC group (N = 55), SHT group (N = 52) and MixH group (N = 18). Compared with the NonH group, SHC group had a significantly increased rate of embryo aneuploidy [48.3% vs. 36.7%, P = 0.006; adjusted OR (95% confidence interval) = 1.52(1.04-2.22), P = 0.029], as well as a reduced number of good-quality embryos on day 5 or 6 [3.00 ± 2.29 vs. 3.74 ± 2.77, P = 0.033]. The SHC group showed a tendency of a lower cumulative live birth rate (47.0% vs. 40.0%), a lower incidence of good birth outcome (37.2% vs. 34.5%) and a higher risk of clinical pregnancy loss (11.1% vs. 17.9%), but did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). The incidences of obstetric or neonatal complications and other adverse events were similar in the four groups. Whether patients have low HDL-C did not differ in pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that uRIF women with hypercholesterolemia had an increased proportion of aneuploid embryos and a reduced proportion of high-quality embryos, while different types of hyperlipidemia had no correlation with cumulative live birth rate as well as pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Recurrent miscarriage and male factor infertility: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. A narrative review

Introduction

Recurrent miscarriage is defined as 2 or more failed clinical pregnancies, typically known as repeated pregnancy loss, occurring before 20 gestational weeks, and further categorized into primary and secondary types. It represents a common and distressing condition to deal with in the field of reproductive medicine, usually affecting <5% of couples, with up to 50% of cases lacking a clearly defined aetiology. The epidemiology also varies depending on maternal age. Remarkably, the situation significantly afflicts expecting parents, whereas maternal factors, such as age and previous pregnancy loss rate, are commonly reported as risk factors. Although previously underestimated, existing evidence suggests the male factor is a possible cause of recurrent pregnancy loss.

Material and methods

A non-systematic literature review was conducted in the PubMed and Scopus databases for articles written in English investigating the possible association of the male factor in recurrent pregnancy loss. The eligible studies were synthesized in a narrative review format upon discussion and consensus among the authors after being previously independently assessed and selected.

Results

Lifestyle, obesity, genetic predisposition, chromosomal anomalies, endocrine dysfunction, anatomical abnormalities, immunological factors, infections, and oxidative stress can result in poor embryo development and recurrent miscarriage. Although professional organizations currently recognize male gender as a possible risk factor, specific recommendations on the diagnostic and therapeutic field are still lacking, and the condition necessitates a high level of suspicion and case-by-case management.

Conclusions

In this review, we delve deeper into the contribution of the male factor in the concept of recurrent miscarriage.

From Diagnosis to Treatment: Comprehensive Care by Reproductive Urologists in Assisted Reproductive Technology

Infertility is a global health concern, with male factors playing an especially large role. Unfortunately, however, the contributions made by reproductive urologists in managing male infertility under assisted reproductive technology (ART) often go undervalued. This narrative review highlights the important role played by reproductive urologists in diagnosing and treating male infertility as well as any barriers they face when providing services. This manuscript presents a comprehensive review of reproductive urologists' role in managing male infertility, outlining their expertise in diagnosing and managing male infertility as well as reversible causes and performing surgical techniques such as sperm retrieval. This manuscript investigates the barriers limiting urologist involvement such as limited availability, awareness among healthcare professionals, and financial constraints. This study highlights a decrease in male fertility due to lifestyle factors like sedentary behavior, obesity, and substance abuse. It stresses the significance of conducting an evaluation process involving both male and female partners to identify any underlying factors contributing to infertility and to identify patients who do not require any interventions beyond ART. We conclude that engaging urologists more effectively in infertility management is key to optimizing fertility outcomes among couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatments and requires greater education among healthcare providers regarding the role urologists and lifestyle factors that could have an effect on male fertility.

Polymorphic Rearrangements of Human Chromosome 9 and Male Infertility: New Evidence and Impact on Spermatogenesis

Chromosomal polymorphisms are structural variations in chromosomes that define the genomic variance of a species. These alterations are recurrent in the general population, and some of them appear to be more recurrent in the infertile population. Human chromosome 9 is highly heteromorphic, and how its rearrangement affects male fertility remains to be fully investigated. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between the polymorphic rearrangements of chromosome 9 and male infertility via an Italian cohort of male infertile patients. Cytogenetic analysis was carried out, along with Y microdeletion screening, semen analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and TUNEL assays using spermatic cells. Chromosome 9 rearrangements were observed in six patients: three of them showed a pericentric inversion, while the others showed a polymorphic heterochromatin variant 9qh. Of these, four patients exhibited oligozoospermia associated with teratozoospermia, along with a percentage of aneuploidy in the sperm of above 9%, in particular, an increase in XY disomy. Additionally, high values for sperm DNA fragmentation (≥30%) were observed in two patients. None of them had microdeletions to the AZF loci on chromosome Y. Our results suggest that polymorphic rearrangements of chromosome 9 might be associated with abnormalities in sperm quality due to incorrect spermatogenesis regulation.

Advanced sperm tests and impact on clinical male factor management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although semen analysis remains a cornerstone of male fertility evaluation, conventional semen analysis parameters do not assess for DNA integrity or functional capacity of sperm. Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) and sperm aneuploidy tests have been utilized as adjunct tools to distinguish fertile and infertile men and predict pregnancy outcomes. This review serves as an update on indications and utility of advanced sperm tests, as well as associated controversies and limitations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Elevated SDF is associated with prolonged time to pregnancy, lower chance of spontaneous pregnancy, and lower live birth rates. Sperm aneuploidy is more frequent in infertile men, in male partners of couples experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss, and recurrent failure of assisted reproductive technology (ART). These tests can, therefore, provide important information to guide management and counseling of infertile couples to optimize reproductive outcomes.

SUMMARY

We evaluated data surrounding SDF and sperm aneuploidy tests, which are utilized both within and beyond the scope of AUA/ASRM guidelines. While the tests at hand require further standardization and randomized controlled studies, the current data suggest strong associations with pregnancy outcomes and can be utilized to counsel and manage infertile males.

The Sixth Edition of the WHO Manual for Human Semen Analysis: A Critical Review and SWOT Analysis

Semen analysis is the cornerstone of male fertility evaluation with WHO guidelines providing the basis for procedural standardization and reference values worldwide. The first WHO manual was published in 1980, and five editions have been subsequently released over the last four decades. The 6th Edition was published in July 2021. In this review, we identify the key changes of this 6th Edition. Additionally, we evaluate the utility of this 6th Edition in clinical practice using SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. This new Edition has made the analysis of basic semen parameters more robust, taking into account the criticisms and grey areas of the previous editions. The tests assessing sperm DNA fragmentation and seminal oxidative stress are well-described. The main novelty is that this latest edition abandons the notion of reference thresholds, suggesting instead to replace them with “decision limits”. While this seems attractive, no decision limits are proposed for either basic semen parameters, or for extended or advanced parameters. This critical review of the 6th Edition of the WHO laboratory manual combined with a SWOT analysis summarizes the changes and novelties present in this new Edition and provides an in-depth analysis that could help its global use in the coming years.

Non-Coding RNAs Regulate Placental Trophoblast Function and Participate in Recurrent Abortion

Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) is a serious pregnancy complication with an increasing clinical incidence. The various causes of recurrent abortion are complicated. Developments in genetics, immunology, and cell biology have identified important roles of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the occurrence and progress of recurrent abortion. NcRNAs can affect the growth, migration, and invasion of placental trophoblasts by regulating cell processes such as the cell cycle, apoptosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. Therefore, their abnormal expression might lead to the occurrence and development of RSA. NcRNAs include small nuclear RNA (snRNA), small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), transfer, RNA (tRNA), circular RNA (cRNA), and Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA). In this review, we discuss recent research that focused on the function and mechanism of microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNA (circRNA) in regulating placental trophoblasts. The use of ncRNAs as potential diagnostic and predictive biomarkers in RSA is also discussed to provide future research insights.

Lack of trusted diagnostic tools for undetermined male infertility

Semen analysis is the cornerstone of evaluating male infertility, but it is imperfect and insufficient to diagnose male infertility. As a result, about 20% of infertile males have undetermined infertility, a term encompassing male infertility with an unknown underlying cause. Undetermined male infertility includes two categories: (i) idiopathic male infertility-infertile males with abnormal semen analyses with an unknown cause for that abnormality and (ii) unexplained male infertility-males with "normal" semen analyses who are unable to impregnate due to unknown causes. The treatment of males with undetermined infertility is limited due to a lack of understanding the frequency of general sperm defects (e.g., number, motility, shape, viability). Furthermore, there is a lack of trusted, quantitative, and predictive diagnostic tests that look inside the sperm to quantify defects such as DNA damage, RNA abnormalities, centriole dysfunction, or reactive oxygen species to discover the underlying cause. To better treat undetermined male infertility, further research is needed on the frequency of sperm defects and reliable diagnostic tools that assess intracellular sperm components must be developed. The purpose of this review is to uniquely create a paradigm of thought regarding categories of male infertility based on intracellular and extracellular features of semen and sperm, explore the prevalence of the various categories of male factor infertility, call attention to the lack of standardization and universal application of advanced sperm testing techniques beyond semen analysis, and clarify the limitations of standard semen analysis. We also call attention to the variability in definitions and consider the benefits towards undetermined male infertility if these gaps in research are filled.

Advanced sperm testing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The sensitivity of semen analysis for detection of infertility remains low. Many factors not measured in traditional semen analysis may contribute to male factor infertility. DNA fragmentation, oxidative stress, and sperm aneuploidy are three factors that may contribute further information to the evaluation when semen analysis is inconclusive.

RECENT FINDINGS

DNA fragmentation measures the destruction of and failure to repair damage to DNA. Increased DNA fragmentation has been used as a marker for oxidative stress as well as toxic exposure. The oxidative stress adduct measures DNA aberrations, which sperm cannot repair and has been used to support use of antioxidants. Lastly, the aneuploid sperm frequency is a quantitative measure of deviation from the normal chromosomal complement. Although elevated sperm aneuploid frequency has been associated with recurrent pregnancy loss and implantation failures, barriers remain to its routine use.

SUMMARY

We identified these three adjunctive tests, which have the potential to alter either management or counseling of patients with regards to male factor infertility. Elevated DNA fragmentation or significant sperm aneuploidy may suggest the need for further investigation or further preimplantation genetic testing prior to IVF. The oxidative stress adduct may lend further explanation and improved counseling of the infertile patient.

How much, if anything, do we know about sperm chromosomes of Robertsonian translocation carriers?

In men with oligozoospermia, Robertsonian translocations (RobTs) are the most common type of autosomal aberrations. The most commonly occurring types are rob(13;14) and rob(14;21), and other types of RobTs are described as 'rare' cases. Based on molecular research, all RobTs can be broadly classified into Class 1 and Class 2. Class 1 translocations produce the same breakpoints within their RobT type, but Class 2 translocations are predicted to form during meiosis or mitosis through a variety of mechanisms, resulting in variation in the breakpoint locations. This review seeks to analyse the available data addressing the question of whether the molecular classification of RobTs into Classes 1 and 2 and/or the type of DD/GG/DG symmetry of the involved chromosomes is reflected in the efficiency of spermatogenesis. The lowest frequency value calculated for the rate of alternate segregants was found for rob(13;15) carriers (Class 2, symmetry DD) and the highest for rob(13;21) carriers (Class 2, DG symmetry). The aneuploidy values for the rare RobT (Class 2) and common rob(14;21) (Class 1) groups together exhibited similarities while differing from those for the common rob(13;14) (Class 1) group. Considering the division of RobT carriers into those with normozoospermia and those with oligoasthenozoospermia, it was found that the number of carriers with elevated levels of aneuploidy was unexpectedly quite similar and high (approx. 70%) in the two subgroups. The reason(s) that the same RobT does not always show a similar destructive effect on fertility was also pointed out.

Expectant management and live birth outcomes for male balanced-translocation carriers: Two case reports and a literature review

RATIONALE

Couples with male balanced-translocation carriers may experience recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Although the expectant management of RPL has developed over many years, genetic counseling for RPL couples with male balanced-translocation carriers remains challenging. Here, we describe the expectant management of 2 male carriers of balanced translocations.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 32-year-old and a 28-year-old man presented at the clinic with diagnoses of infertility following spontaneous abortions by their wives.

DIAGNOSIS

Both patients had normal semen diagnosed by routine semen analysis and underwent cytogenetic diagnoses.

INTERVENTIONS

Following genetic counseling and informed consent, both couples voluntarily chose expectant management with natural conception.

OUTCOMES

One couple experienced 2 natural pregnancies, the first of which ended in spontaneous abortion and the second produced a phenotypically normal infant. The other couple's first pregnancy resulted in a fetus with a balanced translocation confirmed by amniocentesis and cytogenetic analysis.

LESSONS

Expectant management with natural conception may be an alternative to genetic counseling in male balanced-translocation carriers with RPL, especially those who are reluctant to undergo preimplantation diagnosis.

Role of genetics and epigenetics in male infertility

Male infertility is a complex condition with a strong genetic and epigenetic background. This review discusses the importance of genetic and epigenetic factors in the pathophysiology of male infertility. The interplay between thousands of genes, the epigenetic control of gene expression, and environmental and lifestyle factors, which influence genetic and epigenetic variants, determines the resulting male infertility phenotype. Currently, karyotyping, Y-chromosome microdeletion screening and CFTR gene mutation tests are routinely performed to investigate a possible genetic aetiology in patients with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. However, current testing is limited in its ability to identify a variety of genetic and epigenetic conditions that might be implicated in both idiopathic and unexplained infertility. Several epimutations of imprinting genes and developmental genes have been postulated to be candidate markers for male infertility. As such, development of novel diagnostic panels is essential to change the current landscape with regard to prevention, diagnosis and management. Understanding the underlying genetic mechanisms related to the pathophysiology of male infertility, and the impact of environmental exposures and lifestyle factors on gene expression might aid clinicians in developing individualised treatment strategies.

Genetic abnormalities and pregnancy loss

Genetic abnormalities, whether occurring in the conceptus or the parents, can predispose to sporadic or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Abnormalities in the conceptus include aneuploidy, copy number changes, skewed X inactivation, and single gene disorders or mutations. Among parents who suffer RPL, the best studied genetic cause is balanced chromosomal translocations. For evaluation of genetic abnormalities in cases of pregnancy loss, chromosomal microarray is more likely to yield interpretable results than karyotype due to cell culture failure. For parents, karyotype remains the standard since microarray may not detect truly balanced translocations. For those with an identified underlying genetic abnormality, preimplantation genetic testing has been proposed to optimize the live birth rate. This approach shows promise, but currently lacks supporting evidence. In summary, various genetic causes for recurrent pregnancy loss are known, but when such a cause is identified, the implications for management remain unclear.

The male contribution to recurrent pregnancy loss

There are several known causes of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) in a couple, which include endocrine abnormalities, immunologic abnormalities, structural uterine abnormalities and karyotype abnormalities. The evaluation largely focuses on the female. The male contribution to RPL remains understudied. With the exception of the karyotype analysis, there is currently no other recommended testing for the male partner of a woman who has suffered multiple pregnancy losses. Chromosomal abnormalities are well defined causes of pregnancy losses in the literature. However, despite the fact that abnormal DNA fragmentation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of unexplained RPL, it is not routinely checked during the evaluation of RPL. This is likely due to the fact that abnormal DNA fragmentation is the end result of multiple different mechanisms including environmental exposures, varicoceles, gene alteration and epigenetic changes resulting in an inherent susceptibility to DNA damage? We are just beginning to scratch the surface of our understanding of the male contribution to RPL and more studies especially focusing on epigenetic modifications and gene alterations are needed.

Impact of a mild scrotal heating on sperm chromosomal abnormality, acrosin activity and seminal alpha-glucosidase in human fertile males

The aim of this study was to observe sperm aneuploidy, DNA integrity, seminal alpha-glucosidase (NAG) and acrosin activity (AA) under testicular heat stress (SH). Spermatozoa were obtained from 30 healthy adult volunteers subjected to scrotal warming at 43°C for 30-40 min on two successive days per week for 3 months between February 2012 and September 2016. Aniline blue (AB), acridine orange (AO) staining, TUNEL assay and FISH analysis to evaluate sperm function, sperm DNA integrity and chromosomal abnormalities were carried on before, during and after SH. Sperm AA and NAG was measured by microplate reader. The mean parameters of sperm parameters, AA and NAG were significantly decreased. In contrast, the mean percentage of sperm DNA fragmentation and the proportion of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y were significantly increased for spermatozoa collected during SH versus before SH (p < .01-.001). After stopping scrotal heating for 3 months, most parameters were completely restored to pre-SH levels. Sperm parameters, sperm DNA integrity, chromosomes, AA and NAG are affected by scrotal exposure to constant SH temperatures several degrees over normal physiological temperature, and after treatment, these parameters were reversibly restored to the level before SH in adult men.