A family study of complex chromosome rearrangement involving chromosomes 1, 8, and 11 and its reproductive consequences

Identification of Balanced and Unbalanced Complex Chromosomal Rearrangement Involving Chromosomes 1, 11, and 15

Chromosomal abnormalities are the common genetic factors that significantly impact fertility, miscarriage possibility and abnormal offspring with unbalanced karyotype. Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) refer to structural rearrangements which involve more than two breakpoints and often more than two chromosomes. According to the mode of transmission, they can be either familial or de novo rearrangements.

Here we report a complex chromosomal rearrangement leading to intellectual disability, speech delay and multiple dysmorphic features, including cleft lip and inguinal hernia. Proband karyotype shows 46,XY,ins (1::11) (q42→qter::q25) compatible to partial trisomy 1 q42→qter, while the karyotype of his mother was 45,XX, ins (1::15) (q42;q11.1→qter), t (1;11)(q42,q25) compatible to apparently normal female phenotype.

Familial Infertility (Azoospermia and Cryptozoospermia) in Two Brothers-Carriers of t(1;7) Complex Chromosomal Rearrangement (CCR): Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis

Structural aberrations involving more than two breakpoints on two or more chromosomes are known as complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs). They can reduce fertility through gametogenesis arrest developed due to disrupted chromosomal pairing in the pachytene stage. We present a familial case of two infertile brothers (with azoospermia and cryptozoospermia) and their mother, carriers of an exceptional type of CCR involving chromosomes 1 and 7 and three breakpoints. The aim was to identify whether meiotic disruption was caused by CCR and/or genomic mutations. Additionally, we performed a literature survey for male CCR carriers with reproductive failures. The characterization of the CCR chromosomes and potential genomic aberrations was performed using: G-banding using trypsin and Giemsa staining (GTG banding), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (including multicolor FISH (mFISH) and bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-FISH), and genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). The CCR description was established as: der(1)(1qter->1q42.3::1p21->1q42.3::7p14.3->7pter), der(7)(1pter->1p2 1::7p14.3->7qter). aCGH revealed three rare genes variants: ASMT, GARNL3, and SESTD1, which were ruled out due to unlikely biological functions. The aCGH analysis of three breakpoint CCR regions did not reveal copy number variations (CNVs) with biologically plausible genes. Synaptonemal complex evaluation (brother-1; spermatocytes II/oligobiopsy; the silver staining technique) showed incomplete conjugation of the chromosomes. Associations between CCR and the sex chromosomes (by FISH) were not found. A meiotic segregation pattern (brother-2; ejaculated spermatozoa; FISH) revealed 29.21% genetically normal/balanced spermatozoa. The aCGH analysis could not detect smaller intergenic CNVs of few kb or smaller (indels of single exons or few nucleotides). Since chromosomal aberrations frequently do not affect the phenotype of the carrier, in contrast to the negative influence on spermatogenesis, there is an obvious need for genomic sequencing to investigate the point mutations that may be responsible for the differences between the azoospermic and cryptozoospermic phenotypes observed in a family. Progeny from the same parents provide a unique opportunity to discover a novel genomic background of male infertility.

The influence of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements on preimplantation embryonic development potential and molecular karyotype

BACKGROUND

Balanced complex chromosome rearrangements (BCCR) are balanced chromosomal structural aberrations that involve two or more chromosomes and at least three breakpoints. It is very rare in the population. The objective is to explore the difference of influence of three types of BCCR on early embryonic development and molecular karyotype.

RESULTS

Twelve couples were recruited including four couples of three-way rearrangements carriers (group A), three couples of double two-way translocations carriers (group B) and five couples of exceptional CCR carriers (group C). A total of 243 oocytes were retrievedin the seventeen preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles, and 207 of these were available for fertilization. After intracytoplasmic sperm injection, 181oocytes normally fertilized. The rates of embryos forming on day3 in three groups were 87.88, 97.78 and77.14%, which was significantly different (P = 0.01). Compared with group B, the rate of embryo formation was statistically significantly lower in group C (P = 0.01). Furthermore, the rates of high-quality blastocysts in three group were 14.71, 48.15 and 62.96%, respectively, which was significantly different (P = 0.00). Compared with group B andC, the rate of high-quality blastocysts in group A was statistically significantly lower (P = 0.00;P = 0.00). Comprehensive chromosome analysis was performed on 83 embryos, including 75 trophectodermcellsand 8 blastomeres. Except 7 embryos failed to amplify, 9.01%embryos were diagnosed as euploidy, and 90.91% were diagnosed as abnormal. As for group A, the euploid embryo rate was 10.71%and the abnormal embryo rate was 89.29%. In group B,the euploid embryo rate was 3.85%, the abnormal embryo rate was 96.15%. The euploid embryo rate was 13.04%, the abnormal embryo rate was 86.96% in group C. There were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

The lowest rate of high quality blastocysts has been for three-way rearrangements and the lowest rate of euploidy has been for double two-way translocations, although no significant difference. Different types of BCCR maybe have little effect on the embryonic molecular karyotype. The difference of influence of BCCR on early embryonic developmentandmolecular karyotypeshould be further studied.

[Genetic analysis of a fetus with multiple malformations caused by complex translocations of four chromosomes]

OBJECTIVE

To conduct genetic analysis in a fetus with complex translocation of four chromosomes.

METHODS

G-banded chromosome karyotype analysis, single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP array) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were performed in a fetus with multiple malformations. Peripheral blood chromosome karyotype and FISH were also carried out for the parents.

RESULTS

The fetal amniotic fluid karyotype was 46, XY, t(12; 13)(q22; q32). SNP array analysis showed that there were 20 192 kb duplication at 1q42.13q44 and 13 293 kb deletion at 15q26.1q26.3 in the fetus. The results of karyotype and SNP array were inconsistent. FISH analyses on the parental peripheral blood samples demonstrated that the mother was a cryptic 46, XX, t(1; 15)(q42.1; q26.1) translocation. The fetus had inherited 46, XY, t(12; 13)(q22; q32) from his father and der(15)t(1; 15)(q42.1; q26.1) from his mother.

CONCLUSIONS

The 1q42.13q44 duplication and 15q26.1q26.3 deletion may have contributed to the abnormal sonographic features of the fetus. The combination of cytogenetic, SNP array and FISH techniques was beneficial for providing an accurate genetic counseling.

Chromoanasynthesis: another way for the formation of complex chromosomal abnormalities in human reproduction

Chromoanasynthesis has been described as a novel cause of massive constitutional chromosomal rearrangements. Based on DNA replication machinery defects, chromoanasynthesis is characterized by the presence of chromosomal duplications and triplications locally clustered on one single chromosome, or a few chromosomes, associated with various other types of structural rearrangements. Two distinct mechanisms have been described for the formation of these chaotic genomic disorders, i.e. the fork stalling and template switching and the microhomology-mediated break-induced replication. Micronucleus-based processes have been evidenced as a causative mechanism, thus, highlighting the close connection between segregation errors and structural rearrangements. Accumulating data indicate that chromoanasynthesis is operating in human germline cells and during early embryonic development. The development of new tools for quantifying chromoanasynthesis events should provide further insight into the impact of this catastrophic cellular phenomenon in human reproduction.

A novel male 2;4;14 complex chromosomal translocation with normal semen parameters but 100% embryonic aneuploidy

We report a case of a couple with a history of six spontaneous miscarriages in which a novel complex chromosomal rearrangement was detected in the male partner who had a totally normal semen analysis. Preimplantation genetic testing of their embryos demonstrated 100% aneuploidy.