Prenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities in IVF patients that opted for preimplantation genetic screening/diagnosis (PGS/D): a need for revised algorithms in the era of personalized medicine

Prenatal screening after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: time to evaluate old strategies

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does first-trimester aneuploidy screening perform in pregnancies achieved through IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in a medical setting?

DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study was undertaken in a single tertiary care centre between January 2013 and June 2022. In total, 20,237 women had prenatal follow-up at the study centre and were included in the study. The women were divided into three groups: singleton pregnancies conceived through the transfer of a PGT-A-screened euploid embryo (n = 510); singleton pregnancies conceived through IVF without PGT-A (n = 3291); and singleton pregnancies conceived naturally (n = 16,436).

RESULTS

The conventional combined screening test for pregnancies conceived through IVF with PGT-A had specificity of 91%; sensitivity could not be calculated as there were no cases of fetal aneuploidy in this group. In 89.1% of pregnancies conceived through IVF with PGT-A with high risk for trisomy 21, 18 or 13, the result was related to advanced maternal age (>35 years at time of screening).

CONCLUSIONS

The current screening strategy for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 can generate unnecessary tests in pregnancies achieved through IVF with PGT-A. A new protocol is needed for these patients, with greater weight given to ultrasound markers.

Noninvasive prenatal testing in women undergoing in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the utilization, performance, and interpretation of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results in women achieving pregnancy through in vitro fertilization (IVF) and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

RECENT FINDINGS

Although PGT-A is a highly accurate method for the selection of euploid embryos the possibility for error still exists. Many women pursue NIPT after conception via IVF with or without PGT-A, whereas some forgo prenatal screening all together. Recent evidence suggests that the prevalence of a positive NIPT following PGT-A is low, and the positive predictive value is altered in this population.

SUMMARY

NIPT is a valuable prenatal screening tool that should be offered to pregnant women regardless of prior PGT. In women who conceive following IVF and PGT-A through the transfer of euploid embryos, positive test results should be interpreted with caution.

Non-invasive prenatal testing in the context of IVF and PGT-A

The high incidence of chromosome aneuploidy in human gametes and embryos is a major cause of in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure and miscarriage. In order to improve live birth rates with single embryo transfer, the use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has significantly increased. PGT encompasses methods that allow embryos to be tested for inherited conditions or screened for chromosomal abnormalities. However, PGT-A is a screening method and results can never be used to definitively predict the chromosomal status of the embryo and fetus. The objective of this manuscript is to review prenatal screening and diagnostic methods available in pregnancies conceived by IVF-PGT-A.

Prenatal testing in pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization with pre-implantation genetic testing

OBJECTIVE

Women with pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization (IVF) with normal pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) are advised to undergo prenatal screening and testing during pregnancy. It is not well known how many follow these recommendations. Our objective was to study prenatal testing decisions made by women with pregnancies conceived through IVF with PGT-A.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of women who received genetic counseling during pregnancies conceived through IVF with normal PGT-A. We excluded those who received genetic counseling preconceptionally prior to IVF. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and after testing for normality by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, independent t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or Chi-square/Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Data from 83 women were included. Of these, 53 (63.9%) had at least one of the following prenatal tests: first trimester combined screening (16.9%), non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) (45.8%), second trimester serum screening (6%), and invasive diagnostic testing (6%). 10.8% had more than one of the above tests and 36.1% declined all tests.

CONCLUSION

Almost two-thirds of women who were pregnant after IVF with normal PGT-A had prenatal aneuploidy screening or testing. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to further ascertain decision making in this population.

Do patients who achieve pregnancy using IVF-PGS do the recommended genetic diagnostic testing in pregnancy?

PURPOSE

Patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) are counseled about the limitations of this technique. As part of the consent process for PGS, physicians recommend diagnostic genetic testing performed in early pregnancy to definitively rule out chromosomal abnormalities. We have noted anecdotally, however, that few patients undergo the recommended diagnostic testing. In this study, we are examining if women who conceived using IVF-PGS did early pregnancy chromosomal testing, and if they did, what type of testing they had.

METHODS

This study was performed from 2015 to 2017 in the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility at Northwestern University. We included patients who became pregnant after IVF-PGS who were seen by the Division of Reproductive Genetics and non-PGS control group.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were included. A total of 50 patients (73.5%) opted for non-invasive prenatal screening; 5 (7.4%) had invasive testing (4 had chorionic villus sampling and 1 had amniocentesis). A total of 13 patients (19%) declined further genetic testing. When comparing demographic data, the mean age was significantly higher in the group of patients who pursued non-invasive testing than in the group who declined further testing (37.15 vs 34.05 years old, p < 0.05). Control group declined invasive diagnostic testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who conceive using IVF-PGS do not pursue diagnostic prenatal chromosomal testing. Future studies focusing on decision making in this patient group are warranted to further elucidate why a small percentage of patients opt for diagnostic testing, even when adequately counseled about the inherent limitations of PGS.