Replacing single frozen-thawed euploid embryos in a natural cycle in ovulatory women may increase live birth rates compared to medicated cycles in anovulatory women

Euploid programmed frozen embryo transfer cycles are associated with a higher live birth rate when estradiol levels more closely mimic physiology

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether peak estradiol (E2) levels above the usual physiologic range (300-500 pg/mL) will impact programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) outcomes in an ideal study population of those using good-quality single euploid blastocysts.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-based clinic.

PATIENTS

Single euploid-programmed FET done at a single academic institution from January 2016 to December 2019. The population was divided into three groups on the basis of peak serum E2 levels during endometrial preparation: group A (E2 <300 pg/mL), group B (300-500 pg/mL), and group C (>500 pg/mL). Group B was used as the reference range for statistical analysis.

INTERVENTION

Frozen embryo transfer cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). Secondary outcomes included implantation, biochemical, ectopic, and miscarriage rates.

RESULTS

A total of 750 FET cycles were included in this study. Poisson regression analysis showed a negative impact of higher peak E2 on the LBR. A decrease in LBR was noted between group C and referent group B (50.2% vs. 63.4%, risk ratio 0.79 [0.68-0.91]) and group A and referent group B (42.5% vs. 63.4%, risk ratio 0.67 [0.46-0.98]). Secondary outcomes were notable for a lower implantation rate when groups A and C were compared with group B and a higher biochemical rate between group C and group B. There was no notable difference between groups in ectopic or miscarriage rates.

CONCLUSION

Limiting peak serum E2 levels to 300-500 pg/mL during programmed FET cycles is associated with improved LBRs compared with cycles with peak E2 levels of <300 pg/mL or >500 pg/mL in an ideal study population.

The natural cycle protocol of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer decreases the miscarriage rate in women with recurrent pregnancy loss

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether different endometrial preparation methods lead to different results.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Women with recurrent pregnancy loss undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET).

INTERVENTIONS

Natural cycle (NC) protocol (n = 111) with no drug or human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) used for endometrial preparation, vs. the hormone replacement therapy (HRT) protocol (n = 797) with estrogen or gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) plus estrogen used for endometrial preparation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Miscarriage rate and live birth rate (LBR).

RESULTS

Compared to women in the HRT protocol, women undergoing NCs had fewer previous FET cycles, lower antral follicle counts (AFCs), fewer oocytes retrieved and a thicker endometrium on the day of progesterone administration. Women in the HRT group had a higher miscarriage rate (29.4% vs. 17.2%) and a lower LBR (37% vs. 46.9%) than the rates of women in the NC group. Univariate analysis showed that female age also had a negative association with the miscarriage rate. Logistic regression indicated that endometrial preparation using the NC protocol was linked to a decreased likelihood of miscarriage.

CONCLUSIONS

The NC protocol decreased the miscarriage rate and increased the LBR for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss compared with the HRT protocol.

Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A normal chromosomal constitution defined through PGT-A assessing all chromosomes on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies represents the strongest predictor of embryo implantation. Yet, its positive predictive value is not higher than 50-60%. This gap of knowledge on the causes of euploid blastocysts' reproductive failure is known as 'the black box of implantation'.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

Several embryonic, maternal, paternal, clinical, and IVF laboratory features were scrutinized for their putative association with reproductive success or implantation failure of euploid blastocysts.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic bibliographical search was conducted without temporal limits up to August 2021. The keywords were '(blastocyst OR day5 embryo OR day6 embryo OR day7 embryo) AND (euploid OR chromosomally normal OR preimplantation genetic testing) AND (implantation OR implantation failure OR miscarriage OR abortion OR live birth OR biochemical pregnancy OR recurrent implantation failure)'. Overall, 1608 items were identified and screened. We included all prospective or retrospective clinical studies and randomized-controlled-trials (RCTs) that assessed any feature associated with live-birth rates (LBR) and/or miscarriage rates (MR) among non-mosaic euploid blastocyst transfer after TE biopsy and PGT-A. In total, 41 reviews and 372 papers were selected, clustered according to a common focus, and thoroughly reviewed. The PRISMA guideline was followed, the PICO model was adopted, and ROBINS-I and ROB 2.0 scoring were used to assess putative bias. Bias across studies regarding the LBR was also assessed using visual inspection of funnel plots and the trim and fill method. Categorical data were combined with a pooled-OR. The random-effect model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was addressed using I2. Whenever not suitable for the meta-analysis, the included studies were simply described for their results. The study protocol was registered at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (registration number CRD42021275329).

OUTCOMES

We included 372 original papers (335 retrospective studies, 30 prospective studies and 7 RCTs) and 41 reviews. However, most of the studies were retrospective, or characterized by small sample sizes, thus prone to bias, which reduces the quality of the evidence to low or very low. Reduced inner cell mass (7 studies, OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.52, I2 = 53%), or TE quality (9 studies, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.67, I2 = 70%), overall blastocyst quality worse than Gardner's BB-grade (8 studies, OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, I2 = 83%), developmental delay (18 studies, OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.49-0.63, I2 = 47%), and (by qualitative analysis) some morphodynamic abnormalities pinpointed through time-lapse microscopy (abnormal cleavage patterns, spontaneous blastocyst collapse, longer time of morula formation I, time of blastulation (tB), and duration of blastulation) were all associated with poorer reproductive outcomes. Slightly lower LBR, even in the context of PGT-A, was reported among women ≥38 years (7 studies, OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00, I2 = 31%), while obesity was associated with both lower LBR (2 studies, OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79, I2 = 0%) and higher MR (2 studies, OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.08-2.99, I2 = 52%). The experience of previous repeated implantation failures (RIF) was also associated with lower LBR (3 studies, OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.93, I2 = 0%). By qualitative analysis, among hormonal assessments, only abnormal progesterone levels prior to transfer were associated with LBR and MR after PGT-A. Among the clinical protocols used, vitrified-warmed embryo transfer was more effective than fresh transfer (2 studies, OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05-2.33, I2 = 23%) after PGT-A. Lastly, multiple vitrification-warming cycles (2 studies, OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.77, I2 = 50%) or (by qualitative analysis) a high number of cells biopsied may slightly reduce the LBR, while simultaneous zona-pellucida opening and TE biopsy allowed better results than the Day 3 hatching-based protocol (3 studies, OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.18-1.69, I2 = 0%).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Embryo selection aims at shortening the time-to-pregnancy, while minimizing the reproductive risks. Knowing which features are associated with the reproductive competence of euploid blastocysts is therefore critical to define, implement, and validate safer and more efficient clinical workflows. Future research should be directed towards: (i) systematic investigations of the mechanisms involved in reproductive aging beyond de novo chromosomal abnormalities, and how lifestyle and nutrition may accelerate or exacerbate their consequences; (ii) improved evaluation of the uterine and blastocyst-endometrial dialogue, both of which represent black boxes themselves; (iii) standardization/automation of embryo assessment and IVF protocols; (iv) additional invasive or preferably non-invasive tools for embryo selection. Only by filling these gaps we may finally crack the riddle behind 'the black box of implantation'.

Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes Following a Natural Cycle vs. Artificial Endometrial Preparation for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: The proportion of frozen embryo transfer cycles has consistently grown in recent decades. Some adverse obstetric outcomes after frozen embryo transfer could possibly be explained by different approaches in endometrial preparation. The aim of the present study was to investigate reproductive and obstetric outcomes after frozen embryo transfer, comparing different endometrial preparation strategies. Methods: This retrospective study included 317 frozen embryo transfer cycles, of which 239 had a natural or modified natural cycle and 78 underwent artificial endometrial preparation. After excluding late abortion and twin pregnancies, the outcomes of 103 pregnancies were analyzed, 75 of which were achieved after a natural cycle/modified natural cycle, and 28 were achieved after an artificial cycle. Results: The overall clinical pregnancy rate/embryo transfer was 39.7%, the miscarriage rate was 10.1%, and the live birth rate/embryo transfer was 32.8%, without significant differences in reproductive outcomes between natural/modified cycle and artificial cycle groups. The risks of pregnancy-induced hypertension and abnormal placental insertion were significantly increased in pregnancies achieved after the artificial preparation of the endometrium (p = 0.0327 and =0.0191, respectively). Conclusions: Our study encourages the use of a natural cycle or modified natural cycle for endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer in order to ensure the presence of a corpus luteum able to orchestrate maternal adaptation to pregnancy.

Natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: a survey of current assisted reproductive technology practices in the U.S

PURPOSE

Emerging data suggests improved obstetric outcomes with frozen embryo transfer (FET) in an ovulatory or natural cycle (NC-FETs), as compared to programmed endometrial preparation. The objective of this study is to better understand practice patterns and provider attitudes regarding the use of NC-FETs in the United States (U.S.).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, an anonymous 22-question survey was emailed to 441 U.S. Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) clinics to assess the utilization of NC endometrial preparation for FET, protocols used, restrictions to offering NC-FET, and providers' perspectives on advantages and disadvantages of NC-FET. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses.

RESULT(S)

The survey response rate was 49% (216/441). Seventeen percent of responding clinics did not offer NC-FET. Of the clinics that did not offer NC-FET, 65% had only 1-2 physicians in their practice. Common reasons for not offering NC-FET included "lack of timing predictability for transfer" (81%) and "increased burden on staff/laboratory personnel on holidays and weekends" (54%). Of clinics offering NC-FET, 76% reported < 25% of cycles used the NC for endometrial preparation. Over half (52%) of clinics that offered NC-FET reported having eligibility restrictions for NC-FET. Reported benefits of NC-FET were "patient satisfaction" (18%), "decreased cost of medications" (18%), and "avoidance of intramuscular progesterone" (17%). The attitude towards NC-FET in their clinics was reported as positive by 65% of respondents.

CONCLUSION

NC-FETs are offered by most U.S. ART clinics but are used only in the minority of FET cycles for endometrial preparation, and use is often restricted.

Endometrial preparation methods prior to frozen embryo transfer: A retrospective cohort study comparing true natural cycle, modified natural cycle and artificial cycle

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of three endometrial preparation methods prior to frozen embryo transfer (FET): Natural cycle (NC), modified natural cycle (mNC), and programmed/artificial cycle (AC) protocols. Primary outcomes investigated were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR).

Methods

A retrospective study on 2080 FET cycles including patients ≤ 35 years with a BMI ≤ 30 who underwent FET with a single autologous blastocyst stage embryo at Aarhus University Hospital or Horsens Regional Hospital in the period 2013–2019. Only blastocysts frozen by vitrification were included. No luteal phase support (LPS) was used in natural cycles.

Results

In NC, mNC and AC, CPRs were 34.9%, 40.6% and 32.0%, while LBRs were 32.3%, 36.3% and 26.6%, respectively. There were no significant differences in main outcomes when comparing AC with NC [LBR: OR = 0.9 (0.6; 1.2), p = 0.4]. Compared to NC, mNC-FET displayed significantly higher positive hCG, implantation rate, CPR and LBR [LBR: OR = 1.4 (1.0; 1.9), p = 0.03]. An analysis with mNC as reference group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in the mNC group compared to AC [LBR: OR 0.6 (0.5; 0.8), p =  < 0.01].

Conclusion

The present study overall demonstrated better outcomes including LBR with mNC protocol as compared to NC and AC protocol, while comparison of AC and NC showed both protocols to be equally effective. A programmed cycle may be necessary for women with anovulatory cycles; however, normo-ovulating women may be offered a natural cycle protocol.

Trial registration number

3-3013-3047/1 and 31-1522-44. Date of registration: June 24, 2019 and April 23, 2020.

Frozen Blastocyst Embryo Transfer: Comparison of Protocols and Factors Influencing Outcome

Background: Various factors, including treatment protocols, can influence the outcomes of frozen embryo transfers (FETs). The study objectives were to compare different endometrial preparation protocols of FET cycles and to evaluate the factors, including the endometrial thickness (ET), that affect outcomes. Methods: This observational cohort study involved 5037 women undergoing FETs at eight tertiary clinics in the UK between January 2016 and March 2019. The endometrial preparation protocols used were natural cycle (NC-FETs), artificial hormone support cycle with oestradiol valerate but without pituitary downregulation (AC-FETs) and artificial hormone support cycle with agonist downregulation (ACDR-FETs). Results: The mean (±SD) ages across NC-FET, AC-FET and ACDR-FET groups were 36.5 (±4.2), 35.9 (±5.0) and 36.4(±4.9) years, respectively. LBRs were comparable (40.7%, 175/430; 36.8%, 986/2658; and 36.7%, 716/1949, respectively) across the three groups. Clinical pregnancy, implantation, multiple pregnancies, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates were also similar. In the regression analysis of variables including age, duration of infertility, number of embryos transferred, protocol type and endometrial thickness, age was the only significant predictor of LBRs, although its predictive ability was poor (AUC: 0.55). With the overall LBR of the study population being 37.1%, the post-test probability of a live birth at an ET of <5 mm was 0%, and at 5–5.9, 6–6.9, 7–7.9 and 8–8.9 mm, the probabilities were 16.7%, 33.8%, 36.7% and 37.7%, respectively. The LBR remained above 35% up to the 14–14.9 mm range and then declined gradually to 23% for the 17–25 mm range. Conclusions: The FET outcomes were similar for the three protocols used for endometrial preparation. The protocol type and endometrial thickness were not predictive of FET outcomes; age was the only predictive variable, despite its low predictive ability.

Natural cycle increases the live-birth rate compared with hormone replacement treatment for frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer

BACKGROUND

A number of studies have compared the clinical outcomes between the two endometrial preparation methods: natural cycles (NCs) and hormone replacement treatment (HRT) before frozen embryo transfer, but the results were conflicting. In order to mitigate the potential effect of embryos per se, several researchers have worked on this subject for euploid blastocyst transfer, but the results were still inconsistent. Therefore, the present study was aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes between HRT and NC for autologous single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer based on our data.

METHODS

A total of 598 frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer cycles in the assisted reproductive center of Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital from January 2014 to May 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Women were stratified into the NC (n = 125) or HRT (n = 473) group according to the patient's preference and the physician's guidance. Multivariate regression models and subgroup analysis were constructed to analyze the association between endometrial preparation and live birth.

RESULTS

Women in the NC group had a higher live birth rate (68.80% versus 58.35%, P = 0.034) and a lower risk of total pregnancy loss (8.51% versus 21.14%, P = 0.005) when compared with women in the HRT group. The biochemical pregnancy rate (75.20% versus 74.00%, P = 0.784) and clinical pregnancy rate (74.40% versus 69.98%, P = 0.334) were similar between the two groups (NC versus HRT). NC was associated with an increased odds of live birth compared with HRT by different multivariable analysis models (Model 1: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57, 0.36 - 0.90; Model 2: aOR, 95%CI: 0.57, 0.35 - 0.92). In addition, the increased chance of live birth in the NC group was found in all subgroups. No major obstetrical complications and two malformation livebirths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In women undergoing single euploid frozen blastocyst transfers, the NC group was associated with a lower pregnancy loss rate and an ultimately higher live birth rate than the HRT group. Although HRT is convenient for both clinicians and patients, the lower live birth rate should be taken into account and NC might be the first choice of endometrial preparation method.

Comparison of fresh and frozen ejaculated spermatozoa in sibling oocyte recipient cycles

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles using fresh and frozen ejaculated spermatozoa result in similar pregnancy outcomes in couples with non-male factor infertility?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study; patients undergoing donor egg recipient cycles, in which oocytes from a single ovarian stimulation were split between two recipients, were reviewed. Two recipients of oocytes from a single donor were paired and categorized based on the type of ejaculated spermatozoa (fresh/frozen). Outcomes included delivery rate, implantation, pregnancy, pregnancy loss and fertilization rates.

RESULTS

Of the 408 patients who received oocytes from a split donor oocyte cycle, 45 pairs of patients used discrepant types of ejaculated spermatozoa and were included in the study. Fertilization rate: fresh (74.8%); frozen (68.6%) (P = 0.13). Pregnancy rate: fresh (76%); frozen (67%); delivery rate: fresh (69%); frozen (44%); implantation rate was significantly higher: fresh (64%); frozen (36%) (P = 0.04). Rate of pregnancy loss was significantly higher in the frozen group compared with the fresh group (33% versus 5.9%, P = 0.013). Adjusted odds for delivery was 67% lower in the frozen group (95% CI 0.12, 0.89). Adjusted odds of pregnancy (adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.20, 2.27) and implantation (adjusted OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.12, 2.12) were not significantly different between the frozen and fresh sperm groups.

CONCLUSION

In this model that controls for oocyte quality by using paired recipients from the same donor, frozen ejaculated spermatozoa resulted in lower delivery rates than those using fresh spermatozoa.

Pregnancy Outcomes After Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer in the Absence of a Corpus Luteum

Background: Nowadays, frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles represent a high proportion of fertility treatments worldwide. Recent studies suggest differences in pregnancy outcomes depending on the FET treatment protocol used. The reason for this is still unclear, but the number of corpora lutea (CL) at conception is discussed as a possible factor. This study aims to investigate whether maternal and neonatal outcomes for pregnancies following FET lacking a CL differ from FET with one or more CL in order to explore a potential link between CL absence and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: The study was designed as a retrospective, multi-center observational study with two cohorts after singleton live birth [0 CL cohort (FET in a programmed cycle, n = 114) and ≥ 1 CL cohort (FET in a natural or stimulated cycle, n = 68)]. Participants completed a questionnaire on the outcome of pregnancy and birth records were analyzed in a descriptive way. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were performed in order to explore associations between CL absence and pregnancy outcomes. The strength of the agreement between the information in the survey and the diagnoses extracted from the files was assessed by Cohen's Kappa.

Results: The risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was higher after FET in the absence of a CL compared to FET with CL presence (aOR 5.56, 95% CI 1.12 – 27.72). Birthweights and birthweight percentiles were significantly higher in the 0 CL group. CL absence was a predictor of higher birthweight (adjusted coefficient B 179.74, 95% CI 13.03 – 346.44) and higher birthweight percentiles (adjusted coefficient B 10.23, 95%, 95% CI 2.28 – 18.40) particularly in female newborns of the 0 CL cohort. While the strength of the agreement between the reported information in the survey and the actual diagnoses extracted from the files was good for the majority of outcomes of interest it was fair in terms of hypertension (κ = 0.38).

Conclusion: This study supports observations suggesting a potential link between a lack of CL at conception and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Further investigations on causes and pathophysiological relationships are yet to be conducted.

Live birth rates after natural cycle versus hormone replacement therapy for single euploid blastocyst transfers: a retrospective cohort study

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is there any difference in live birth rate between the natural cycle and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) endometrial preparation protocols for women with regular menstrual cycles undergoing their first single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer?

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study that enrolled 722 women who underwent vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer at assisted reproductive technology (ART) centre of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, from January 2013 to December 2019. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyse the relationship between the endometrial preparation protocols and live birth rates. Stratified analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the reliability and stability of the results.

RESULTS

A total of 722 single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer cycles were included. Overall, the live birth rates were 50.00% (110/220) in the natural cycle group and 47.61% (239/502) in the HRT group. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that there was no significant association (adjusted odds ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.56-1.20; P = 0.313) between natural cycle and HRT protocols and the live birth rate. Interaction analysis showed that there was no significant difference in live birth rates between the two groups for any subgroup after adjusting for confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

For single vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer, natural cycle and HRT endometrial preparation protocols result in similar live birth rates among women with regular menstrual cycles. Further studies are needed into the effects of endometrial preparation protocols on pregnancy outcomes.

The position of the euploid blastocyst in the uterine cavity influences implantation

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the position of the euploid blastocyst in the uterine cavity upon transfer, measured as distance in millimetres (mm) from the fundus (DFF) to the air bubble, influence implantation potential?

DESIGN

A total of 507 single/double euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles at blastocyst stage were included retrospectively between March 2017 and November 2018 at a single centre. The patients were on average 33.3 years old. The FET were performed in natural cycles (n = 151) or hormone replacement therapy cycles (n = 356).

RESULTS

Of the 507 transfers, 370 (73.0%) resulted in a pregnancy, defined as human chorionic gonadotrophin concentration over 15 mIU/ml, and 341 (67.3%) in a clinical pregnancy, with an implantation rate of 62.0% and ongoing pregnancy rate of 59.6% (302/507). When comparing the number of embryos transferred, the pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate were significantly higher after double-embryo transfer (DET) (P = 0.002: P < 0.001 and P = 0.002). The quality of the blastocyst in the single-embryo transfer group had a positive effect on the pregnancy rate (A versus B, P = 0.016; A versus C, P = 0.003) and clinical pregnancy rate (A versus C, P = 0.013). After performing a multivariate logistic regression analysis to consider the effect of all explanatory variables, a negative effect between DFF and pregnancy (P = 0.001), clinical pregnancy (P = 0.001) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.030) was found. When all variables remained constant, an increase of 1 mm of DFF changed the odds of pregnancy by 0.882, of clinical pregnancy by 0.891 and of ongoing pregnancy by 0.925. No significant effect of DFF was found on the miscarriage outcome (P = 0.089).

CONCLUSIONS

The depth of blastocyst replacement inside the uterine cavity may influence the pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates and should be considered as an important factor to improve the success of IVF cycles.

Natural cycle versus hormone replacement cycle for transferring vitrified-warmed embryos in eumenorrhoeic women. A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rates and cycle monitoring parameters between Natural Cycle (NC-FET) and Hormone replacement cycle (HRC-FET) in eumenorrhoeic women undergoing vitrified-warmed autologous embryo transfer.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-centre retrospective cohort study analyzed 173 NC-FET and 507 HRC-FET cycles with transfer of day2/3/5/6 embryos. Natural cycle monitoring occurred with serial ultrasound with the first day of the scan determined by the shortest cycle frequency. Serum progesterone was ordered when ultrasound was ambiguous in ascertaining ovulation. For HRC-FET oral estradiol valerate was used in fixed or escalating doses with maximum daily dose of 12 mg. Transdermal estradiol gel was added when desired endometrial thickness was not achieved. Vaginal progesterone was introduced with Endometrial thickness(ET)> = 7 mm. Embryos were transferred after stage-appropriate progesterone exposure. Luteal support was given with vaginal progesterone in NC-FET and vaginal and oral progesterone in HRC-FET. Primary outcome was live-birth-rate. Secondary outcomes were ET, length-of-estrogenic-phase, numbers-of-ultrasounds&hormone-monitoring, pregnancy&miscarriage rate. The odds ratio for live-birth was adjusted for age, embryo number, previous-live-births, previous-losses, past-negative-ET-cycles, IVF-indication and embryo-developmental-stage. Quantitative variables were compared using unpaired-t-test and qualitative variables with chi-square test. Two tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Binary logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds for live-births.

RESULTS

The two cohorts were comparable in age, infertility-duration, previous-live-births, previous-losses, past-negative-ET-cycles, IVF-indication and embryo-developmental-stage. Length-of-estrogenic-phase was significantly shorter for NC-FET than HRC-FET 14.32 ± 2.83vs.18.18 ± 4.48; p = 0.0001) as was mean ultrasound-monitoring-scans (2.73 ± 0.95vs. 3.3 ± 1.04; p = 0.0001). Mean-endometrial-thickness (8.75 ± 1.83vs. 8.5 ± 1.25; p = 0.25) and mean-hormonal-tests (1.75 ± 1.28 vs. 1.88 ± 0.69; p = 0.09) did not differ significantly between NC-FET vs HRC-FET. Significantly higher live births took place in NC-FET vs. HRC-FET (87/173 = 50.3%vs.204/507 = 40.2%;p = 0.026). No significant difference was found in pregnancy rate (66.5% vs. 58%; p = 0.058) or in the pregnancy loss rate (24.3%vs30.6%; p = 0.23). The odds ratio for live-births adjusted for relevant variables was 1.48 (1.03-2.13) in NC-FET compared to HRC-FET.

CONCLUSIONS

NC-FET is a superior method of endometrial preparation compared to HRC-FET in eumenorrhoeic women since it has a shorter estrogenic phase, reduces patient visits to the hospital and improves live birth rates. Future adequately powered studies should look at antenatal and perinatal outcomes, patient satisfaction rates and cost-effectiveness in the two endometrial preparation regimes.

When Should We Freeze Embryos? Current Data for Fresh and Frozen Embryo Replacement IVF Cycles

Recent years have seen a dramatic rise in the number of frozen-thawed embryo replacement (FER) cycles. Along with the advances in embryo cryopreservation techniques, the optimization of endometrial receptivity has resulted in outcomes for FER that are similar to fresh embryo transfer. However, the question of whether the Freeze all strategy is for all is nowadays a hot topic. This review addresses this issue and describes current evidence based on randomized controlled trials and observational studies. To date, it is reasonable to perform FER in cases with a clear indication for the benefits of such strategy including impending ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) or preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A); however, this strategy does not fit for all. This review analyses the pros and cons of the freeze all strategy highlighting the need to follow a personalized plan in embryo transfer, avoiding a freeze all methodology for all patients in an unselected manner.

Is increasing paternal age negatively associated with donor oocyte recipient success? A paired analysis using sibling oocytes

OBJECTIVE

To determine if increasing paternal age has an adverse effect on pregnancy outcomes in paired donor egg recipients who received oocytes from the same donor in the same stimulation cycle.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Reproductive Medicine Center.

PATIENT(S)

The study included 154 recipients who received oocytes from a split donor oocyte cycle and received sperm from men in discrepant age groups (group A: <45 years old; group B: ≥45 years old).

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Implantation rate, pregnancy loss rate, pregnancy rate, and live birth rate.

RESULT(S)

The median paternal age was 41 years old for group A and 48 years old for group B. The pregnancy rate was 81% in group A compared with 69% in group B. The live birth rate was 65% in group A compared with 53% in group B. The rate of pregnancy loss was 19% in group A and 23% in group B. The implantation rate was 69% in group A compared with 66% in group B. The adjusted odds of pregnancy were found to be 65% lower for patients in the older partner age group (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13, 0.95). The adjusted odds of live birth rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20, 1.00), implantation rate (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.43, 1.92), and rate of pregnancy loss (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.5, 4.5) favored the younger partner age group; however, these results were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION(S)

In this model that controlled for oocyte quality to the greatest degree possible by using paired recipients from the same donor from the same stimulation cycle, we found that increased paternal age had a negative effect on pregnancy rates.

Ovulatory-Based FET Cycles May Achieve Higher Pregnancy Rates in the General Population and among Anovulatory Women

This study evaluated which endometrial preparation protocol in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles provides the best results for polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients and the general population. This retrospective study of 634 FET cycles was conducted 2016-2018. Cycles were divided into Group A: Artificial endometrial preparations for FET (aFET; n = 348), Group B: Ovulatory cycle (n = 286) to compare two methods of endometrial preparation for FET. Artificial endometrial preparation with exogenous estrogen and progesterone versus natural ovulation cycles, modified natural cycles using hCG for the final triggering and letrozole-induced ovulation with hCG. Anovulatory patients were analyzed separately. Anovulatory PCOS patients had significantly higher pregnancy rates with letrozole treatment compared with aFET cycles (44% vs. 22.5%; p = 0.044). For the entire cohort, ovulatory cycles and aFET were similar in terms of patient characteristics, demographics, infertility causes, treatment protocols and number of embryos transferred. Although the mean ESHRE score of the transferred embryos was higher in the aFET group, we found higher clinical pregnancy rate in the ovulatory cycle FET (41.3% vs. 27.3%, p < 0.0001). A better pregnancy rate was found after ovulatory cycle FET. In the ovulatory cycles, the outcome of letrozole-induced and non-induced cycles were comparable. PCOS patients, as well as the general population, may benefit from ovulation induced FET cycles, with significantly better outcomes in FET in ovulatory cycles.

The clinical relevance of luteal phase progesterone support in true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst stage embryo transfers: a retrospective cohort study

Background

More than 67% of all embryos transferred in the United States involve frozen-thawed embryos. Progesterone supplementation is necessary in medicated cycles to luteinize the endometrium and prepare it for implantation, but little data is available to show if this is beneficial in true natural cycles. We evaluated the use of luteal phase progesterone supplementation for cryopreserved/warmed blastocyst transfers in true natural cycles not using an ovulatory trigger.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study in a single academic medical center. We studied the use of luteal phase progesterone supplementation in patients undergoing true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst embryo transfers. Our primary outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy rate, with other pregnancy outcomes being evaluated (i.e. implantation rate, miscarriage rate, ectopic rate, and multifetal gestation). Categorical data were analyzed utilizing Fisher’s exact test and all binary variables were analyzed using log-binomial regression to produce a risk ratio.

Results

Two hundred twenty-nine patients were included in the analysis with 149 receiving luteal phase progesterone supplementation and 80 receiving no luteal phase support. Patient demographic and cycle characteristics, and embryo quality were similar between the two groups. No difference was seen in ongoing pregnancy rate (49.0% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.8738), clinical pregnancy rate (50.3% vs. 47.5%, p = 0.7483), positive HCG rate (62.4% vs. 57.5%, p = 0.5965), miscarriage/abortion rate (5.4% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.2622), ectopic pregnancy rate (0% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.3493), or multifetal gestations (7.4% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.3166).

Conclusion(s)

The addition of luteal phase progesterone support in true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst embryo transfers did not improve pregnancy outcomes and therefore the routine use in practice cannot be recommended based on this study, but the utilization should not be discouraged without further studies.

Capsule

Progesterone supplementation as luteal phase support in true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst transfers does not improve ongoing pregnancies.

Live birth after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: which endometrial preparation protocol is better?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of modified natural cycle (mNC) and artificial cycle (AC) protocols for frozen embryo transfers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 490 frozen-thawed autologous embryo transfer cycles, performed in a single tertiary IVF center, between January 2015 and September 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 214 cycles were performed after mNC and 276 cycles were performed after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist plus sequential estrogen and progestin priming protocol. The primary outcome was live birth and secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, implantation and miscarriage rates. Multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust covariates on clinical outcome.

RESULTS

The rates of live birth (33.6 % vs. 29.3 %, respectively), clinical pregnancy (40.2 % vs. 36.6 %, respectively), implantation (32.3 % vs. 28.5 %, respectively), and miscarriage (5.1 % vs. 6.9 %, respectively) were not different between the mNC and AC groups. Multivariate analysis also showed that the method for endometrial preparation had no significant effect on clinical pregnancy and live birth. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) of live births and clinical pregnancies were 0.97 (95 % CI 0.64-1.48) and 0.98 (95 % CI 0.65-1.46) for the AC compared to mNC group. However, there was a significant difference between mNC and AC in cycles in which double embryo transfer was performed. The live birth (48 % vs. 31.4 %P= 0.01) and clinical pregnancy rates (53.9 % vs. 38.8 %, P= 0.02) were significantly higher in the mNC group than the AC group for double embryo transfers.

CONCLUSION

The live birth and clinical pregnancy rates are comparable between mNC and AC with GnRH agonists in frozen thawed embryo transfer cycles. In ovulatory patients with planned double embryo transfer, mNC can be considered. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

Blastocyst-stage embryos provide better frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes for young patients with previous fresh embryo transfer failure

Older patients or patients with a reduced ovarian response have a low number of embryos, which limits the opportunity for embryo selection. However, for young patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (ET), it remains unclear whether embryo stage affects pregnancy outcomes. In the present study, a total of 2952 patients undergoing their first frozen-thawed ET were divided into two groups: patients who had experienced one failed fresh ET (Group A) and patients who had not received fresh ET because of the high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (Group B). Our results show that Group B patients had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) than Group A patients. However, Group A patients who underwent blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed ET had a significantly higher CPR and LBR and a lower ectopic pregnancy rate (ePR) than did those who underwent cleavage-stage frozen-thawed ET. In Group B, CPR, ePR, LBR and spontaneous abortion rate (sAR) were similar with blastocyst-stage and cleavage-stage frozen-thawed ET. These results suggest that blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed ET is more appropriate for young patients who had previously undergone one failed fresh ET cycle.

Is Embryo Cryopreservation Causing Macrosomia-and What Else?

The number of embryos transferred during an IVF cycle is directly related to the high incidence of multiple births, which is the culprit of perinatal morbidity. Therefore, single fresh embryo transfer (ET) strategy, or freeze-all, followed by a single frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle, may dramatically reduce the rate of multiple births, without compromising the cumulative live birth rates (LBRs). A literature review was conducted for all available evidences assessing obstetrics and perinatal outcomes associated with FET compared to fresh ET and natural conception. While studies comparing fresh and FET cycles in normal responders have yielded conflicting results for pregnancy rate, FET was associated with lower risk of prematurity and low birth weight and increased risk of large for gestational age (LGA) and/or macrosomic in singletons, when compared with fresh ET. Macrosomic/LGA births have a higher risk of fetal hypoxia, stillbirth, shoulder dystocia, perineal lacerations, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal metabolic disturbances at birth. Nonetheless, it seems that other than higher risk of fetal macrosomia, there are additional obstetric complications associated with FET. The relative risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, as well as perinatal mortality were also demonstrated to be increased in FET compared with singletons from fresh ET and natural conception. Therefore, when considering elective freeze-all policy, in addition to LBR and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, physicians should consider the aforementioned increased FET cycles' pregnancy complications, including LGA/ macrosomia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, as well as perinatal mortality.

Frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in natural cycle increase implantation rates compared artificial cycle

Objective: To analyze global outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer according to endometrial preparation with natural cycle and artificial cycle taking into account the developmental stage of the embryo.Methods: Retrospective cohort study, held in a tertiary-care university hospital with 1265 cycles for frozen-thawed embryo transfer of 860 patients, performed between January 2014 and December 2017. A total of 1097 embryo transfers were performed: 163 transfers in natural cycle (N), 531 in artificial cycle: transdermal estrogens and 403 with oral estrogens.Results: Demographical factors were similar in the three groups studied. When comparing the number of embryos transferred, the quality and the stage of embryos within the three groups there were no differences. Implantation rates were significantly higher in natural cycle. When adjusted depending on the developmental stage, blastocyst embryos transferred in natural cycle preparation had the highest implantation rate. Multiple pregnancies were also higher in natural cycle preparation. There were no significant difference between the groups in the clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriages.Conclusions: Our results suggest that a natural cycle endometrial preparation assessing the disappearance of the dominant follicle by ultrasound increases implantation rates, especially when transferring blastocysts.