1
|
Alon I, Bussod I, Ravitsky V. Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:1153-1171. [PMID: 38512655 PMCID: PMC11143109 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03076-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) has attracted considerable ethical, legal, and social scrutiny, but academic debate often fails to reflect clinical realities. METHODS Addressing this disconnect, a review of 506 articles from 1999 to 2019 across humanities and social sciences was conducted to synthesize the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) of PGT. This review mined PubMed, WoS, and Scopus databases, using both MeSH terms and keywords to map out the research terrain. RESULTS The findings reveal a tenfold increase in global research output on PGT's ELSI from 1999 to 2019, signifying rising interest and concern. Despite heightened theoretical discourse on selecting "optimal" offspring, such practices were scarcely reported in clinical environments. Conversely, critical issues like PGT funding and familial impacts remain underexplored. Notably, 86% of the ELSI literature originates from just 12 countries, pointing to a research concentration. CONCLUSION This review underscores an urgent need for ELSI research to align more closely with clinical practice, promoting collaborations among ethicists, clinicians, policymakers, and economists. Such efforts are essential for grounding debates in practical relevance, ultimately steering PGT towards ethical integrity, societal acceptance, and equitable access, aiming to harmonize PGT research with real-world clinical concerns, enhancing the relevance and impact of future ethical discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ido Alon
- Department of Development Economics, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
- University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khorshid A, Wignarajah A, Zhang J, Alvero R, Lathi RB, Behr B, Murugappan G. Assessment of patients' perceptions towards embryo disposition after donation of embryos to a research biobank. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:153-159. [PMID: 36401676 PMCID: PMC9676815 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02659-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore perceptions towards embryo disposition among patients donating excess embryos to a research biobank. METHODS Cross-sectional study of survey responses collected as part of enrollment in a research biobank. Patients are asked questions regarding the difficulty of their disposition decision, their alternative disposition choice if donation to research was not available, quality of the counseling they received, and if additional counseling throughout their treatment would have been beneficial. Survey responses use 5-point Likert scales, with "1" being lowest/least and "5" being highest/most. RESULTS A total of 157 men and 163 women enrolled in the biobank. Median scores for difficulty of disposition decision were 3 for females and 2 for males, and for quality of counseling, the median scores were 4 for females and 3 for males. Seventy percent of patients would have chosen to discard their excess embryos had donation to research not been an option. Statistical analyses showed no significant difference in responses based on variations in race, religion, sexual orientation, and infertility diagnoses. Concordance of responses within heterosexual couples was tested and found to be poor to moderate. CONCLUSIONS Assessing patients' perceptions towards embryo disposition after donation of their excess embryos to a research biobank affords a unique perspective. The difficulty of the disposition decision, the tendency to discard embryos in the absence of a means for donation to research, and the poor agreement between heterosexual partners highlight the importance of donation to research as an accessible disposition option and the need for a personalized approach to counseling and consenting for embryo disposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arian Khorshid
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University, 453 Quarry Road, Dept of OBGYN MC #5317, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
| | | | - Jiaqi Zhang
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University, 453 Quarry Road, Dept of OBGYN MC #5317, Stanford, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
| | - Ruben Alvero
- Stanford Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Center, Sunnyvale, CA USA
| | - Ruth B. Lathi
- Stanford Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Center, Sunnyvale, CA USA
| | - Barry Behr
- Stanford Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Center, Sunnyvale, CA USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dewanto A, Agung Sentosa IGAN, Ayuandari S, Rosyidah R. The fate of surplus embryos in the setting of assisted reproductive technology: A scoping review. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION 2023. [DOI: 10.4103/2305-0500.365226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
|
4
|
Zhang J, Pastore LM, Sarwana M, Klein S, Lobel M, Rubin LR. Ethical and moral perspectives of individuals who considered/used preimplantation (embryo) genetic testing. J Genet Couns 2021; 31:176-187. [PMID: 34279057 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
This study examined perspectives on the ethical implications of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) among individuals who actually (not hypothetically) used or considered using PGT. Most of the prior patient-centered research on PGT ethics used qualitative designs (9 out of the 11 articles) and focused only on single gene testing. This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online questionnaire; 15 items assessed potential ethical concerns involved in PGT decision-making, including clinical indications for PGT, the greater implications of PGT for society, and unused embryo disposition. N = 207 individuals (mean female/male age 35.7/38.9 years, 21% Hispanic or non-White) who had recently used or considered using PGT for single gene (60%) or for chromosomal testing (40%) completed the questionnaire. Most respondents supported PGT screening for disease conditions with childhood or adult onset that are untreatable (64%-85% across items); most opposed PGT for trait selection (76%-81%). Most respondents agreed that PGT aids in parental decision-making (66%-67%), although some expressed concern over potential unforeseen consequences (25%-30%). Regarding disposition of embryos without known genetic abnormalities, most respondents favored freezing indefinitely (86%) or donating to another family (69%), while for embryos with genetic abnormalities, most respondents favored donating to research (78%) or destroying them (62%). Stratification by religious affiliation revealed several differences, such as less acceptance of PGT for diseases that occur in adulthood and have no treatment options among Protestants (p = .015) and greater willingness to donate surplus embryos to research among participants without a religious affiliation (p < .001). These results are limited by the relatively homogeneous sample of participants (mostly White, married, and predominantly college-educated). In summary, participants who considered/used PGT found PGT acceptable overall for screening for disease conditions; most opposed using PGT for trait selection. Our novel questionnaire provides a structured tool for assessing the ethical perspectives surrounding the use of PGT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahui Zhang
- Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony, Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Lisa M Pastore
- Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Miriam Sarwana
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Samantha Klein
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marci Lobel
- Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Lisa R Rubin
- Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Comparison of Patients' Ethical Perspectives of Preimplantation Embryo Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (PGT-A) vs. Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M). Reprod Sci 2021; 28:3272-3281. [PMID: 34131887 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-021-00644-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
What are the ethical perspectives of preimplantation genetic testing in patients using/considering PGT-A compared to those using/considering PGT-M? A 17-item questionnaire administered online was used to assess ethical perspectives in US patients who recently used/considered PGT-A (n=80) vs. those who used/considered PGT-M (n=72). Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests were conducted with STATA. Most PGT-A and PGT-M users/considerers supported using PGT to screen for diseases fatal in childhood (86-89%) and those causing lifelong disabilities (76-79%) and opposed using PGT to screen for non-medical physical (80-87%) or intellectual traits (74-86%). Both groups agreed that PGT aids in parental decision-making, although some expressed concern over its potential to lead to unforeseen consequences for society and the PGT offspring. More PGT-M than PGT-A users/considerers opposed implanting genetically abnormal embryos when requested by parents (29% PGT-A vs. 56% PGT-M, p = 0.007). For embryo disposition, more PGT-A users/considerers favored freezing (95% PGTA vs. 82% PGT-M, p = 0.018) or donating genetically normal embryos to research (73% PGT-A vs. 57% PGT-M, p = 0.044), while more PGT-M users/considerers supported donating embryos with known genetic abnormalities to research (56% PGT-A vs. 81% PGT-M, p = 0.001). Regardless of the reason for using PGT, users generally agreed on the acceptable and unacceptable uses for it, as well as the potential societal impact. PGT-M users/considerers expressed more opposition than PGT-A users/considerers to implanting embryos with a genetic alteration when requested by the parents.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abreu CWDPA, Abreu MLA, Abreu MMA, Abreu JPA, Silva LFC, Cruzeiro IKDC, Nunes RML. Final destination of surplus cryopreserved embryos. What decision should be made? JBRA Assist Reprod 2021; 25:276-281. [PMID: 33565288 PMCID: PMC8083851 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate what data exists in the literature about the fate of SCE. Methods: This is an integrative review of papers published in the last ten years, in the Medline and PubMed databases on the subject. Results: the studies included in this review demonstrate that the difficulties in defining the fate of surplus cryopreserved embryos are mainly due to the absence of specific legislation in most countries. Sociocultural and demographic factors such as religion, treatment period, ethnicity, income, marital status, economic status and education level are factors that influence the choice of the final destination of ECE. This study demonstrated that in most of the countries evaluated, the law or regulations do not provide clear guidance on the final destination of the surplus cryopreserved embryos, although it is reasonable to consider that the law will treat embryos, after a certain period of time, as abandoned. Accurate information about the desired destination of the surplus cryopreserved embryos is needed from the beginning of the breeding process to minimize future problems. Conclusions: We conclude that this is a controversial issue, involving ethical, legal, moral and financial issues, that lack specific legislation in almost all of the countries evaluated, which contributes to indecision, abandonment, and it hinders the final destination of these embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Wilson Dala Paula Abreu Abreu
- Faculdade de Medicina do Centro Universitário UNIFAMINAS - Muriaé/MG/Brasil.,Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia da Casa de Caridade de Muriaé - Hospital São Paulo - CCMHSP - Muriaé/MG/Brasil.,Programa de Residência Médica em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia da Casa de Caridade de Muriaé.,Hospital São Paulo - CCMHSP - Muriaé/MG/Brasil
| | - Maria Lúcia Andrade Abreu
- Clínica MedCenter de Muriaé - MG/Brasil.,Núcleo de Saúde da Mulher. Faculdade de Medicina do Centro Universitário UNIFAMINAS - Muriaé/MG/Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Ines Katerina Damasceno Cavallo Cruzeiro
- Programa de Residência Médica em Reprodução Assistida da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG/ Brasil.,Laboratório de Reprodução Humana do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG/ Brasil
| | - Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto - FMUP - Porto/Portugal.,Department International Network UNESCO Chair in Bioethics
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Scarica C, Sosa Fernandez L, Rienzi L, Ciriminna R, Minasi MG, Novelli A, De Santis L, Zuccarello D. When embryology meets genetics: the definition of developmentally incompetent preimplantation embryos (DIPE)-the consensus of two Italian scientific societies. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:319-331. [PMID: 33236289 PMCID: PMC7884494 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-02015-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
A clear definition of developmentally incompetent preimplantation embryo (DIPE) in literature is still missing, while several scientific societies are discussing this challenging topic. From both a clinical and scientific perspective, the identification of embryos unfit for reproductive purpose is crucial. This aim should be pursued in light of all diagnostic technologies for embryo evaluation, encompassing also genetic analyses, of recent implementation in IVF. The Italian context is characterized by an unusual scenario: embryos can be discarded only if not viable and cannot be used for research purposes either. Therefore, thousands of embryos, diagnosed as affected and/or aneuploid as resulting from preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and clinically not utilizable, are cryopreserved and stored indefinitely, with important psychological, legal, and financial implications. With the aim of updating the definition of DIPE, also on the basis of the embryo genetic status, the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction and Research (SIERR) and the Italian Society of Human Genetic (SIGU) reviewed the literature on this topic, found a consensus, and produced a list of relevant criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Cimadomo
- GeneraLife IVF centers, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. de Notaris 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy.
| | | | - Catello Scarica
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Casa di Cura Villa Salaria in Partnership with Institut Marques, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Laura Rienzi
- GeneraLife IVF centers, Clinica Valle Giulia, via G. de Notaris 2b, 00197, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Novelli
- Laboratory of Medical Genetics, IRCCS-Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia De Santis
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, IVF Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|