The use of fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on sperm: indications to perform and assisted reproduction technology outcomes

Genetics in reproductive medicine

Thanks to advances in technology, genetic testing is now available to explore the causes of infertility and to assess the risk of a given couple passing on a genetic disorder to their offspring. This allows at-risk couples to make an informed decision when opting for assisted reproduction and allows professionals to offer pre-implantation diagnosis when appropriate. Genetic screening of an infertile couple has thus become standard practice for an appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment. This review aims to highlight the conditions under which genetic screening plays a role in improving reproductive outcomes for infertile couples.

ESHRE good practice recommendations on recurrent implantation failure

STUDY QUESTION

How should recurrent implantation failure (RIF) in patients undergoing ART be defined and managed?

SUMMARY ANSWER

This is the first ESHRE good practice recommendations paper providing a definition for RIF together with recommendations on how to investigate causes and contributing factors, and how to improve the chances of a pregnancy.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

RIF is a challenge in the ART clinic, with a multitude of investigations and interventions offered and applied in clinical practice, often without biological rationale or with unequivocal evidence of benefit.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

This document was developed according to a predefined methodology for ESHRE good practice recommendations. Recommendations are supported by data from the literature, if available, and the results of a previously published survey on clinical practice in RIF and the expertise of the working group. A literature search was performed in PubMed and Cochrane focussing on 'recurrent reproductive failure', 'recurrent implantation failure', and 'repeated implantation failure'.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

The ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure included eight members representing the ESHRE Special Interest Groups for Implantation and Early Pregnancy, Reproductive Endocrinology, and Embryology, with an independent chair and an expert in statistics. The recommendations for clinical practice were formulated based on the expert opinion of the working group, while taking into consideration the published data and results of the survey on uptake in clinical practice. The draft document was then open to ESHRE members for online peer review and was revised in light of the comments received.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The working group recommends considering RIF as a secondary phenomenon of ART, as it can only be observed in patients undergoing IVF, and that the following description of RIF be adopted: 'RIF describes the scenario in which the transfer of embryos considered to be viable has failed to result in a positive pregnancy test sufficiently often in a specific patient to warrant consideration of further investigations and/or interventions'. It was agreed that the recommended threshold for the cumulative predicted chance of implantation to identify RIF for the purposes of initiating further investigation is 60%. When a couple have not had a successful implantation by a certain number of embryo transfers and the cumulative predicted chance of implantation associated with that number is greater than 60%, then they should be counselled on further investigation and/or treatment options. This term defines clinical RIF for which further actions should be considered. Nineteen recommendations were formulated on investigations when RIF is suspected, and 13 on interventions. Recommendations were colour-coded based on whether the investigations/interventions were recommended (green), to be considered (orange), or not recommended, i.e. not to be offered routinely (red).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

While awaiting the results of further studies and trials, the ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure recommends identifying RIF based on the chance of successful implantation for the individual patient or couple and to restrict investigations and treatments to those supported by a clear rationale and data indicating their likely benefit.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This article provides not only good practice advice but also highlights the investigations and interventions that need further research. This research, when well-conducted, will be key to making progress in the clinical management of RIF.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The meetings and technical support for this project were funded by ESHRE. N.M. declared consulting fees from ArtPRED (The Netherlands) and Freya Biosciences (Denmark); Honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, Merck, Abbott, and IBSA; being co-founder of Verso Biosense. He is Co-Chief Editor of Reproductive Biomedicine Online (RBMO). D.C. declared being an Associate Editor of Human Reproduction Update, and declared honoraria for lectures from Merck, Organon, IBSA, and Fairtility; support for attending meetings from Cooper Surgical, Fujifilm Irvine Scientific. G.G. declared that he or his institution received financial or non-financial support for research, lectures, workshops, advisory roles, or travelling from Ferring, Merck, Gedeon-Richter, PregLem, Abbott, Vifor, Organon, MSD, Coopersurgical, ObsEVA, and ReprodWissen. He is an Editor of the journals Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biomedicine Online, and Editor in Chief of Journal Gynäkologische Endokrinologie. He is involved in guideline developments and quality control on national and international level. G.L. declared he or his institution received honoraria for lectures from Merck, Ferring, Vianex/Organon, and MSD. He is an Associate Editor of Human Reproduction Update, immediate past Coordinator of Special Interest Group for Reproductive Endocrinology of ESHRE and has been involved in Guideline Development Groups of ESHRE and national fertility authorities. D.J.M. declared being an Associate Editor for Human Reproduction Open and statistical Advisor for Reproductive Biomedicine Online. B.T. declared being shareholder of Reprognostics and she or her institution received financial or non-financial support for research, clinical trials, lectures, workshops, advisory roles or travelling from support for attending meetings from Ferring, MSD, Exeltis, Merck Serono, Bayer, Teva, Theramex and Novartis, Astropharm, Ferring. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPR) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type. Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.

The relevance of sperm morphology in male infertility

This brief report concerns the role of human sperm morphology assessment in different fields of male infertility: basic research, genetics, assisted reproduction technologies, oxidative stress. One of the best methods in studying sperm morphology is transmission electron microscopy (TEM) that enables defining the concept of sperm pathology and classifying alterations in non-systematic and systematic. Non-systematic sperm defects affect head and tail in variable ratio, whereas the rare systematic defects are characterized by a particular anomaly that marks most sperm of an ejaculate. TEM analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization represent outstanding methods in the study of sperm morphology and cytogenetic in patients with altered karyotype characterizing their semen quality before intracytoplasmic sperm injection. In recent years, the genetic investigations on systematic sperm defects, made extraordinary progress identifying candidate genes whose mutations induce morphological sperm anomalies. The question if sperm morphology has an impact on assisted fertilization outcome is debated. Nowadays, oxidative stress represents one of the most important causes of altered sperm morphology and function and can be analyzed from two points of view: 1) spermatozoa with cytoplasmic residue produce reactive oxygen species, 2) the pathologies with inflammatory/oxidative stress background cause morphological alterations. Finally, sperm morphology is also considered an important endpoint in in vitro experiments where toxic substances, drugs, antioxidants are tested. We think that the field of sperm morphology is far from being exhausted and needs other research. This parameter can be still considered a valuable indicator of sperm dysfunction both in basic and clinical research.

Sperm nullisomy is not associated with routine semen parameters but it negatively impacts on ICSI outcomes

Sperm aneuploidy is a result of mis-segregation during meiosis and correlates with male infertility. Among the types of aneuploidy, nullisomy has been reported to be more prevalent in human spermatozoa than disomy; however, nullisomy is not always assessed by FISH, and its relation with basic semen parameters is almost unknown. To establish an association between nullisomy and semen parameters and pathologies, we evaluated the potential clinical value of semen analysis and assessed the diagnosis of sperm nullisomy. A prospective study including a total of 130 patients and 25 donors aged 30-50 years with a normal karyotype was carried out. Sperm FISH analyses were performed, and basic semen parameters and ART outcome data were collected. There were no associations between sperm nullisomy of chromosomes 13, 15, 18, 21, 22, X and Y and basic semen parameters. The odds of nullisomy of chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, X and Y were not related to semen pathologies. However, sperm nullisomy had a negative impact on ART outcomes, with significant decreases in fertilisation, blastocyst, pregnancy and implantation rates after ICSI. Sperm nullisomy diagnoses are not detected in semen analyses and are a possible cause of idiopathic male infertility and unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.

High three pro-nuclei (3PN) zygotes proportion associated with normal embryo multinucleation at the two-cell stage: two cases report

Objective: Blastomere multinucleation at the two-cell stage (MN2) is a common nuclear abnormality observed in early human embryos and known to decrease the implantation rate. The aim of this study is to explore whether or not there is a link between high 3PN zygotes proportion and MN2 incidence.Methods: For embryo culture in the conventional incubator, the evaluation of nuclear status of two-cell stage is usually not performed. Therefore, the MN2 phenomenon is easily ignored. The time-lapse monitoring system (TLS) offers a promising new method to evaluate embryo development. We reported two cases who had single 2PN zygote and more than four 3PN zygotes in the conventional in-vitro fertilization (c-IVF) cycle.Results: We observed the MN2 incidence in the single normal embryo by TLS which suggested that it might be resulted from high 3PN zygotes proportion incidence. No available embryo was obtained in the first c-IVF cycle and the intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment was performed in the second cycle. In subsequent ICSI cycles, we observed no 3PN zygotes incidence and transferred two day 3 embryos for the patients. Finally, the two couples successfully obtained healthy babies.Conclusions: High 3PN zygotes proportion might be associated with the MN2 incidence.

Sperm chromosome abnormalities in patients with normal karyotype and in translocation carriers: clinical relevance for assisted reproductive technology

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the proportion of chromosomally abnormal spermatozoa in men with a history of reproductive failure, including patients with normal karyotype and carriers of translocations? Should this analysis be included in a clinical setting to define the best treatment options for infertile couples?

DESIGN

Aneuploidy for chromosomes XY, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22 was tested by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) in 1665 samples from couples with normal karyotype having had at least three previous IVF failures, miscarriages, or both (group-A). A FISH test was also carried out in 76 samples from carriers of translocations (group B) to detect the proportion of spermatozoa with unbalanced rearrangement.

RESULTS

In group A, the lowest incidence of aneuploid sperm cells was found in men with normozoospermia (1.3%, range 0.09-6.31%) compared with men with moderate oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (2.1%, range 0.41-16.6%, P < 0.001), severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (4.7%, range 0.53-30.77, P < 0.001), microepididymal sperm aspiration (3.1%, range 1.19-24.24, P < 0.001) and testicular sperm extraction samples (5.8%, range 1.54-33.3, P < 0.001). In group B, the proportion of spermatozoa with unbalanced rearrangement was significantly higher in reciprocal (63%, range 10.0-87.6%) than in Robertsonian translocations (16%, range 4.3-51.0%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with poor prognosis of term pregnancy tend to generate high proportions of chromosomally abnormal spermatozoa, especially in severe male factor cases. Corresponding frequencies occur at wide ranges; therefore, the FISH test is needed to assess the proportion of spermatozoa with altered chromosome condition. A flowchart, which included the FISH test, was designed to assist clinicians guide couples with poor prognosis of pregnancy, on the most indicated treatment options.