Development of a novel next-generation sequencing panel for diagnosis of quantitative spermatogenic impairment

Sperm proteostasis: Can-nabinoids be chaperone's partners?

The male gamete is a highly differentiated cell that aims to fuse with the oocyte in fertilization. Sperm have silenced the transcription and translational processes, maintaining proteostasis to guarantee male reproductive health. Despite the information about the implication of molecular chaperones as orchestrators of protein folding or aggregation, and the handling of body homeostasis by the endocannabinoid system, there is still a lack of basic investigation and random controlled clinical trials that deliver more evidence on the involvement of cannabinoids in reproductive function. Besides, we noticed that the information regarding whether recreational marijuana affects male fertility is controversial and requires further investigation. In other cell models, it has recently been evidenced that chaperones and cannabinoids are intimately intertwined. Through a literature review, we aim to explore the interaction between chaperones and cannabinoid signaling in sperm development and function. To untangle how or whether this dialogue happens within the sperm proteostasis. We discuss the action of chaperones, the endocannabinoid system and phytocannabinoids in sperm proteostasis. Reports of some heat shock and lipid proteins interacting with cannabinoid receptors prove that chaperones and the endocannabinoid system are in an intimate dialogue. Meanwhile, advancing the evidence to decipher these mechanisms for introducing innovative interventions into routine clinical settings becomes crucial. We highlight the potential interaction between chaperones and cannabinoid signaling in regulating proteostasis in male reproductive health.

Whole exome data prioritization unveils the hidden weight of Mendelian causes of male infertility. A report from the first Italian cohort

Almost 40% of infertile men cases are classified as idiopathic when tested negative to the current diagnostic routine based on the screening of karyotype, Y chromosome microdeletions and CFTR mutations in men with azoospermia or oligozoospermia. Rare monogenic forms of infertility are not routinely evaluated. In this study we aim to investigate the unknown potential genetic causes in couples with pure male idiopathic infertility by applying variant prioritization to whole exome sequencing (WES) in a cohort of 99 idiopathic Italian patients. The ad-hoc manually curated gene library prioritizes genes already known to be associated with more common and rare syndromic and non-syndromic male infertility forms. Twelve monogenic cases (12.1%) were identified in the whole cohort of patients. Of these, three patients had variants related to mild androgen insensitivity syndrome, two in genes related to hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and six in genes related to spermatogenic failure, while one patient is mutant in PKD1. These results suggest that NGS combined with our manually curated pipeline for variant prioritization and classification can uncover a considerable number of Mendelian causes of infertility even in a small cohort of patients.

Genetic variants underlying spermatogenic arrests in men with non-obstructive azoospermia

Spermatogenic arrest is a severe form of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), which occurs in 10-15% of infertile men. Interruption in spermatogenic progression at premeiotic, meiotic, or postmeiotic stage can lead to arrest in men with NOA. Recent studies have intensively focused on defining genetic variants underlying these spermatogenic arrests by making genome/exome sequencing. A number of variants were discovered in the genes involving in mitosis, meiosis, germline differentiation and other basic cellular events. Herein, defined variants in NOA cases with spermatogenic arrests and created knockout mouse models for the related genes are comprehensively reviewed. Also, importance of gene panel-based screening for NOA cases was discussed. Screening common variants in these infertile men with spermatogenic arrests may contribute to elucidating the molecular background and designing novel treatment strategies.

Sperm Motility Annotated Genes: Are They Associated with Impaired Fecundity?

Sperm motility is a prerequisite for achieving pregnancy, and alterations in sperm motility, along with sperm count and morphology, are commonly observed in subfertile men. The aim of the study was to determine whether the expression level of genes annotated with the Gene Ontology (GO) term 'sperm motility' differed in sperm collected from healthy men and men diagnosed with oligoasthenozoospermia. Reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR), quantitative mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and enrichment analyses were used to validate a set of 132 genes in 198 men present at an infertility clinic. Out of the 132 studied sperm-motility-associated genes, 114 showed differentially expressed levels in oligoasthenozoospermic men compared to those of normozoospermic controls using an RT-qPCR analysis. Of these, 94 genes showed a significantly lower expression level, and 20 genes showed a significantly higher expression level. An MS analysis of sperm from an independent cohort of healthy and subfertile men identified 692 differentially expressed proteins, of which 512 were significantly lower and 180 were significantly higher in oligoasthenozoospermic men compared to those of the normozoospermic controls. Of the 58 gene products quantified with both techniques, 48 (82.75%) showed concordant regulation. Besides the sperm-motility-associated proteins, the unbiased proteomics approach uncovered several novel proteins whose expression levels were specifically altered in abnormal sperm samples. Among these deregulated proteins, there was a clear overrepresentation of annotation terms related to sperm integrity, the cytoskeleton, and energy-related metabolism, as well as human phenotypes related to spermatogenesis and sperm-related abnormalities. These findings suggest that many of these proteins may serve as diagnostic markers of male infertility. Our study reveals an extended number of sperm-motility-associated genes with altered expression levels in the sperm of men with oligoasthenozoospermia. These genes and/or proteins can be used in the future for better assessments of male factor infertility.

Phenotype and genetic characteristics in 20 Chinese patients with 46,XY disorders of sex development

PURPOSE

46,XY disorders of sex development (DSD) is the most complicated and common type of DSD. To date, more than 30 genes have been identified associated with 46,XY DSD. However, the mutation spectrum of 46,XY DSD is incomplete owing to the high genetic and clinical heterogeneity. This study aims to provide clinical and mutational characteristics of 18 Chinese patients with 46,XY DSD.

METHODS

A total of 20 unrelated individuals with 46,XY DSD were recruited. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) or custom-panel sequencing combined Sanger sequencing were performed to detect the pathogenic mutations. The pathogenicity of the variant was assessed according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidance and technical standards recommended by the ACMG and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen).

RESULTS

Six patients harbored NR5A1 mutations; two patients harbored NR0B1 mutations; six patients harbored SRD5A2 mutations; six patients harbored AR mutations. Six novel genetic variants were identified involved in three genes (NR5A1, NR0B1, and AR).

CONCLUSION

We determined the genetic etiology for all enrolled patients. Our study expanded the mutation spectrum of 46,XY DSD and provided diagnostic evidence for patients with the same mutation in the future.

Mutational screening of androgen receptor gene in 8224 men of infertile couples

CONTEXT

Mutations in Androgen receptor (AR) gene might be associated with infertility mainly because they cause various degree of androgen insensitivity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency and type of AR variants in a large cohort of infertile males.

PATIENTS AND SETTING

8224 males of Italian idiopathic infertile couples referred University Hospital of Padova.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mutational screening of AR, computational and functional analyses.

RESULTS

We found 131 patients (1.6%) harboring 45 variants in AR gene, of which 18 were novel missense AR variants. Patients with AR gene variants had lower sperm count (p = 0.048), higher testosterone concentration (p < 0.0001) and higher androgen sensitivity index (ASI) [LH x testosterone (T), p < 0.001] compared to patients without variants. Statistical analyses found T ≥ 15.38 nmol/l and ASI ≥180 IU × nmol/l2 as threshold values to discriminate with good accuracy patients with AR variants. Patients with oligozoospermia and T ≥ 15.38 nmol/l have a 9-fold increased risk of harboring mutations compared to patients with normal sperm count and T < 15.38 nmol/l (OR 9.29, 95% CI 5.07-17.02). Using computational and functional approaches, we identified two novel variants, L595P and L791I, as potentially pathogenic.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study screening AR gene variants in men of idiopathic infertile couples. We found that the prevalence of variants increased to 3.4% in oligozoospermic subjects with T ≥ 15.38 nmol/l. Conversely, more than 80% of men with AR gene variants had low sperm count and high T levels. Based on our findings, we suggest AR sequencing as a routine genetic test in cases of idiopathic oligozoospermia with T ≥ 15.38 nmol/L.

Genomic testing for copy number and single nucleotide variants in spermatogenic failure

PURPOSE

To identify clinically significant genomic copy number (CNV) and single nucleotide variants (SNV) in males with unexplained spermatogenic failure (SPGF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Peripheral blood DNA from 97/102 study participants diagnosed with oligozoospermia, severe oligozoospermia, or non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) was analyzed for CNVs via array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) and SNVs using whole-exome sequencing (WES).

RESULTS

Of the 2544 CNVs identified in individuals with SPGF, > 90% were small, ranging from 0.6 to 75 kb. Thirty, clinically relevant genomic aberrations, were detected in 28 patients (~ 29%). These included likely diagnostic CNVs in 3/41 NOA patients (~ 7%): 1 hemizygous, intragenic TEX11 deletion, 1 hemizygous DDX53 full gene deletion, and 1 homozygous, intragenic STK11 deletion. High-level mosaicism for X chromosome disomy (~ 10% 46,XY and ~ 90% 47,XXY) was also identified in 3 of 41 NOA patients who previously tested normal with conventional karyotyping. The remaining 24 CNVs detected were heterozygous, autosomal recessive carrier variants. Follow-up WES analysis confirmed 8 of 27 (30%) CNVs (X chromosome disomy excluded). WES analysis additionally identified 13 significant SNVs and/or indels in 9 patients (~ 9%) including X-linked AR, KAL1, and NR0B1 variants.

CONCLUSION

Using a combined genome-wide aCGH/WES approach, we identified pathogenic and likely pathogenic SNVs and CNVs in 15 patients (15%) with unexplained SPGF. This value equals the detection rate of conventional testing for aneuploidies and is considerably higher than the prevalence of Y chromosome microdeletions. Our results underscore the importance of comprehensive genomic analysis in emerging diagnostic testing of complex conditions like male infertility.

Translational aspects of novel findings in genetics of male infertility-status quo 2021

INTRODUCTION

Male factor infertility concerns 7-10% of men and among these 40-60% remain unexplained.

SOURCES OF DATA

This review is based on recent published literature regarding the genetic causes of male infertility.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Screening for karyotype abnormalities, biallelic pathogenic variants in the CFTR gene and Y-chromosomal microdeletions have been routine in andrology practice for >20 years, explaining ~10% of infertility cases. Rare specific conditions, such as congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, disorders of sex development and defects of sperm morphology and motility, are caused by pathogenic variants in recurrently affected genes, which facilitate high diagnostic yield (40-60%) of targeted gene panel-based testing.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Progress in mapping monogenic causes of quantitative spermatogenic failure, the major form of male infertility, has been slower. No 'recurrently' mutated key gene has been identified and worldwide, a few hundred patients in total have been assigned a possible monogenic cause.

GROWING POINTS

Given the high genetic heterogeneity, an optimal approach to screen for heterogenous genetic causes of spermatogenic failure is sequencing exomes or in perspective, genomes. Clinical guidelines developed by multidisciplinary experts are needed for smooth integration of expanded molecular diagnostics in the routine management of infertile men.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Di-/oligogenic causes, structural and common variants implicated in multifactorial inheritance may explain the 'hidden' genetic factors. It is also critical to understand how the recently identified diverse genetic factors of infertility link to general male health concerns across lifespan and how the clinical assessment could benefit from this knowledge.

Targeted next-generation sequencing panel screening of 668 Chinese patients with non-obstructive azoospermia

PURPOSE

We aimed (1) to determine the molecular diagnosis rate and the recurrent causative genes of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel screening and (2) to discuss whether these genes help in the prognosis for microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE).

METHODS

We used NGS panels to screen 668 Chinese men with NOA. Micro-TESE outcomes for six patients with pathogenic mutations were followed up. Functional assays were performed for two NR5A1 variants identified: p.I224V and p.R281C.

RESULTS

Targeted NGS panel sequencing could explain 4/189 (2.1% by panel 1) or 10/479 (2.1% by panel 2) of the patients with NOA after exclusion of karyotype abnormalities and Y chromosome microdeletions. Almost all mutations detected were newly described except for NR5A1 p.R281C and TEX11 p.M156V. Two missense NR5A1 mutations-p.R281C and p.I244V-were proved to be deleterious by in vitro functional assays. Mutations in TEX11, TEX14, and NR5A1 genes are recurrent causes of NOA, but each gene explains only a very small percentage (less than 4/668; 0.6%). Only the patient with NR5A1 mutations produced viable spermatozoa through micro-TESE, but other patients with TEX11 and TEX14 had poor micro-TESE prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

A targeted NGS panel is a feasible diagnostic method for patients with NOA. Because each gene implicated explains only a small proportion of such cases, more genes should be included to further increase the diagnostic rate. Considering previous reports, we suggest that only a few genes that are directly linked to meiosis can indicate poor micro-TESE prognosis, such as TEX11, TEX14, and SYCE1.

Evaluation of a Custom Design Gene Panel as a Diagnostic Tool for Human Non-Syndromic Infertility

Infertility is a global healthcare problem, which affects men and women equally. With the advance of genome-wide analysis, an increasing list of human genes involved in infertility is now available. In order to evaluate the diagnostic interest to analyze these genes, we have designed a gene panel allowing the analysis of 51 genes involved in non-syndromic human infertility. In this initial evaluation study, a cohort of 94 non-syndromic infertility cases with a well-defined infertility phenotype was examined. Five patients with previously known mutations were used as positive controls. With a mean coverage of 457×, and 99.8% of target bases successfully sequenced with a depth coverage over 30×, we prove the robustness and the quality of our panel. In total, we identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variations in eight patients (five male and three female). With a diagnostic yield of 8.5% and the identification of a variety of variants including substitution, insertion, deletion, and copy number variations, our results demonstrate the usefulness of such a strategy, as well as the efficiency and the quality of this diagnostic gene panel.

Infertility: Practical Clinical Issues for Routine Investigation of the Male Partner

About one-fifth of couples has fertility problems in Western countries. Male factors are present in about half of them, either alone or in combination with female causes. Therefore, both partners should be evaluated simultaneously. The fertility status and/or specific conditions of each partner influence the clinical and treatment approach. This article summarizes in a practical way when, how, and why the male partner of an infertile couple should be investigated. The available evidence and international guidelines were used, interpreting, discussing, and expanding them from personal decades-long experience in this field. The aim is to delineate the most appropriate clinical approach for the male partner of infertile couples, considering traditional and emerging technologies and laboratory analyses in the context of their clinical significance. Components of the initial evaluation in men without known risk factors for infertility should include at minimum medical history, physical examination, and semen analysis. Semen microbiological examination, endocrine assessment, scrotal ultrasound, and transrectal ultrasound are suggested in most men and are mandatory when specific risk factors for male infertility are known to be present or when the initial screening demonstrated abnormalities. Full examination, including genetic tests, testicular histology, or additional tests on sperm, is clinically oriented and/or suggested after the results of initial investigations.