In-house genetic counseling increases the detection of abnormal karyotypes-a 26-year experience in prenatal diagnosis in a single tertiary referral hospital in Poland

Prenatal diagnosis of acrania/exencephaly/anencephaly sequence (AEAS): additional structural and genetic anomalies

OBJECTIVES

To analyse additional structural and genetic anomalies in fetuses with acrania/exencephaly/anencephaly sequence (AEAS).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 139 fetuses with AEAS diagnosed between 2006 and 2020 in a single tertiary referral ultrasound department.

RESULTS

The median gestational age at diagnosis decreased from 15 weeks in 2006 to 13 weeks in 2020 (- 0.21 per each year; p = 0.009). In 103 fetuses, the defects were limited to the neural tube (NTD) (74.1%), in 36 fetuses (25.9%), there were additional structural non-NTD anomalies. The most common were ventral body wall defects present in 17.8% (23/139), followed by anomalies of the limbs (7.2%; 10/139), face (6.5%; 9/139) and heart (6.5%; 9/139). Genetic anomalies were diagnosed in 7 of the 74 conclusive results (9.5%; 7/74; trisomy 18, n = 5; triploidy, n = 1; duplication of Xq, n = 1). In univariate logistic regression models, male sex, limb anomalies and ventral body wall defects significantly increased the risk of genetic anomalies (OR 12.3; p = 0.024; OR 16.5; p = 0.002 and OR 10.4; p = 0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of fetuses with AEAS have additional structural non-NTD anomalies, which are mostly consistent with limb body wall complex. Genetic abnormalities are diagnosed in almost 10% of affected fetuses and trisomy 18 is the most common aberration. Factors that significantly increased the odds of genetic anomalies in fetuses with AEAS comprise male sex, limb anomalies and ventral body wall defects.

Implementation of Exome Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnosis and Impact on Genetic Counseling: The Polish Experience

Background: Despite advances in routine prenatal cytogenetic testing, most anomalous fetuses remain without a genetic diagnosis. Exome sequencing (ES) is a molecular technique that identifies sequence variants across protein-coding regions and is now increasingly used in clinical practice. Fetal phenotypes differ from postnatal and, therefore, prenatal ES interpretation requires a large amount of data deriving from prenatal testing. The aim of our study was to present initial results of the implementation of ES to prenatal diagnosis in Polish patients and to discuss its possible clinical impact on genetic counseling. Methods: In this study we performed a retrospective review of all fetal samples referred to our laboratory for ES from cooperating centers between January 2017 and June 2021. Results: During the study period 122 fetuses were subjected to ES at our institution. There were 52 abnormal ES results: 31 in the group of fetuses with a single organ system anomaly and 21 in the group of fetuses with multisystem anomalies. The difference between groups was not statistically significant. There were 57 different pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants reported in 33 different genes. The most common were missense variants. In 17 cases the molecular diagnosis had an actual clinical impact on subsequent pregnancies or other family members. Conclusions: Exome sequencing increases the detection rate in fetuses with structural anomalies and improves genetic counseling for both the affected couple and their relatives.