'Two countries-two labs': the transnational gamete donation (TGD) programme to support egg donation

Establishment of a Unified Register of Donor Sexual Gametes in the Republic of Kazakhstan

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this narrative review paper was to review the state and development of the field of donor gametes in Kazakhstan, compare its legislative and technical capabilities with other countries and identify key steps towards the establishment of a unified register of donor gametes in the Republic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The narrative review paper conducted an analysis of scientific publications and legal documents to examine the implementation of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART), focusing on Donor Sexual Gametes (DSG), globally. It utilized medical publications from 2019 to 2023, legal acts, and recommendations from global health organizations to analyze eligibility criteria, legal regulations, and the social aspects of ART across different regions.

RESULTS

In Kazakhstan, ART is regulated by legislation, with DSG procedures governed by age limits, medical screening, and restrictions on the number of children born from donated gametes. Worldwide, practices vary, but there is growing interest in establishing a unified register of reproductive donor material to enhance transparency and accountability. However, legal gaps and ethical considerations must be addressed.

CONCLUSION

The study identifies gaps in Kazakhstan's legislation compared to Western countries, emphasizing the necessity for enhanced legal rights for donors and recipients, including options for anonymity. Ethical concerns highlight the importance of confidentiality and data security in accessing the donor registry. Overall, implementing such a register promises to enhance transparency, safety, and accountability in reproductive medicine.

Review of human oocyte cryopreservation in ART programs: Current challenges and opportunities

Oocyte cryopreservation has notably increased in recent times, to become an essential part of clinical infertility treatment. Since the 1980s, many improvements in oocyte cryopreservation (OC) have been adopted, including the great advance with the application of vitrification. The commonly used vitrification protocol applies different cryoprotectants (Ethylene glycol and/or DMSO and/or PROH and sucrose and/or Trehalose) and two different steps: firstly, exposure in equilibration solution for 5-15 min, followed by a vitrification solution for 60-90 s at room temperature. The warming method includes a first step for 1 min at 37 °C and 3 subsequent steps at room temperature to remove the cryoprotectant for a total of 9-12 min. In addition, biosafety is a critical aspect to mention, and it is related to devices used during the vitrification, mainly in terms of whether the biological vitrified material comes in direct contact with liquid nitrogen (open vitrification) or not (closed vitrification), where LN2 may contain potentially contaminating viruses or pathogens. Furthermore, during early development major waves of epigenetic reprogramming take place. Recent literature suggests that epigenetic and transcriptomic profiles are sensitive to the stress induced by vitrification, including osmotic shock, temperature, rapid changes of pH and toxicity of cryoprotectants. It is, therefore, important to better understand the potential perturbations of epigenetic modifications that may be associated with the globally used vitrification methods. Therefore, we here discuss the benefits and efficiency of human oocyte vitrification; we also review the evidence surrounding oocyte cryopreservation-related epigenetic modifications and potential epigenetic dysregulations, together with long-term consequences for offspring health.

Egg donation in the age of vitrification: A study of egg providers' perceptions and experiences in the UK, Belgium and Spain

IVF treatment involving donated eggs increases yearly. Numerous technical and commercial transformations have reshaped how eggs are retrieved, stored and managed. A key transformation is vitrification; a 'fast freezing' method that allows efficient preservation of eggs, and therefore more flexibility in use, giving rise to new commercial possibilities. There has been limited focus on egg providers' experiences in the context of vitrification and related commercialisation. We report findings from a study in the UK, Spain and Belgium, where we interviewed 75 egg providers. Comparing experiences within different donation 'regimes' allows an exploration of how varying national practices and policies shape information-giving and women's experiences. In the UK, a system of 'informed gift-giving' was described, where egg providers saw their actions as not-for-profit and felt relatively well informed. In Belgium, the system was presented as 'trusted tissue exchange': with less information-giving than in the UK, but clinics were trusted to act responsibly. In Spain, a 'closed-door, market-driven' system was described, whereby egg providers received little information and expressed concerns about generation of excess profit. Our findings extend understandings of how egg donation is managed at the national level and how donation regimes produce specific experiences, expectations and subjectivities amongst tissue providers.

The impact of zygote vitrification timing on pregnancy rate in frozen-thawed IVF/ICSI cycles

Introduction: Cryopreservation of bipronuclear (2PN) stage zygotes is an integral part of IVF laboratory practice in countries with strict embryo culture legislation. Vitrification of zygotes is compatible with several strategies in infertility treatments holding a freeze-all indication and allows for effective workload management in settings with limited resources. Although it yields high survival rates and clinical outcomes, the ideal timing to commence vitrification of zygotes is elusive while it is empirically practiced in the window between 17 and 21 h post-insemination (hpi). We aimed to deduce the association between pregnancy rate and the time interval from insemination (IVF and ICSI) to vitrification to contribute to the standardization ofzygote cryopreservation. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data on vitrification timings and pregnancy outcomes collected between 2011 and 2019 was performed. All included women received an embryo transfer after warming of vitrified zygotes at the 2PN stage. Results: A total of 468 embryo transfers were included of which 182 (38.9%) resulted in pregnancy and 286 (61.1%) not. Vitrification was on average performed 18.74 ±0.63 hpi in the pregnant group and 18.62 ± 0.64 hpi in the non-pregnant group (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01; 1.83, p = 0.045). A multivariate analysis controlling for uterine pathologies, maternal age, AMH, the number of MII oocytes, previous history of pregnancy success, endometriosis, AFC, nicotine intake and male factor infertility showed no predictive value of vitrification timing on pregnancy rate. Three time intervals between insemination and vitrification were defined: 17:00 to 18:00 hpi (Group A), 18:01 to 19:00 hpi (Group B) and 19:01 to 21:00 hpi (Group C). Pregnancy occurred in 40/130 women (30.80%) in Group A, in 115/281 women (40.90%) in Group B and in 27/57 women (47.40%) in Group C. Univariate but not multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher pregnancy rate after the latest time interval between insemination and 2PN vitrification when compared to the earliest (Group C vs. A, OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.07; 3.84, p = 0.031). Discussion: These findings encourage further investigation on the impact of vitrification timing on clinical outcomes and hold the potential to standardize cryopreservation of zygotes from IVF/ICSI cycles to eventually improve the quality of long-term ART outcomes.

Oocyte donation: not all oocyte cryobanks are the same

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is the efficacy of imported vitrified oocyte donation affected by the cryobank of origin?

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study, including 249 completed oocyte warming cycles from 200 recipients (January 2016-July 2020). No severe male factor was included. Vitrified oocytes were provided by three Spanish cryobanks. Primary outcome was cumulative live birth delivery rate (CLBR) per completed oocyte warming cycle.

RESULTS

After warming 1535 oocytes, 1244 survived (81.0%) and 945 fertilized (76.0%); embryo utilization rate was 65.3%. The overall CLBR per completed cycle was 47.0% but was lower in cryobank 1 (31.2%) versus cryobank 2 (56.0%, P = 0.0010) and cryobank 3 (50.8%, P = 0.0241). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified survival of four or more oocytes as the strongest predictor for delivery (P = 0.0282). Only 202 out of 249 oocyte warming cycles had four or more survived oocytes in a proportion that was significantly lower in cryobank 1 versus cryobank 2 (70.1% versus 89.0%, P = 0.0020); comparison with cryobank 3 (81.0%) was not significant. In the 202 oocyte warming cycles, CLBR in cryobank 1 (37.0%) was lower versus cryobank 2 (58.8%, P = 0.0115) and cryobank 3 (60.8%, P = 0.0019), suggesting a reduced viability in oocytes from cryobank 1 that survived warming.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences were found in the efficacy of imported vitrified oocytes in relation to the cryobank of origin. Each centre needs to evaluate the results internally when starting a collaboration with an oocyte cryobank to establish the necessary measures to maximize treatment efficacy.

Oocyte cryopreservation - current scenario and future perspectives: A narrative review

Oocyte cryopreservation is a boon for women undergoing assisted reproductive technology. With the evolution in the technique of cryopreservation over the last three decades, there has been an exponential rise in the number of oocyte cryopreservation cycles for diverse indications. Apart from cancer patients, it has also been promoted as a mode of fertility insurance to overcome the age-related decline in fertility as well as post-surgical decline following endometriosis surgery. The objective of the review is to evaluate its clinical applications, ideal age at freezing, optimal oocyte number, freezing method of choice, efficacy, safety and recent advances. In the last decade, vitrification has surpassed slow freezing for oocyte cryopreservation. Although closed system of vitrification provides the aseptic environment, open vitrification is commonly followed in practice. Early to mid-thirties is a reasonable age group for planned oocyte cryopreservation, although it might be recommended at a younger age, in patients with diminished ovarian reserve. The patients should be motivated to preserve around 14–20 mature oocytes for successful live birth. Various studies have shown comparable fertilisation and pregnancy rates between Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with fresh and frozen-thawed oocytes. The available evidence has shown no increase in the incidence of congenital abnormalities in babies born through vitrified oocytes. In the future, image analysis using artificial intelligence, and spindle visualisation using poloscope may further enhance the outcome of oocyte cryopreservation.