Noninvasive prenatal detection of fetal sex chromosome abnormalities using the semiconductor sequencing platform (SSP) in Southern China

Relationships among maternal monosomy X mosaicism, maternal trisomy, and discordant sex chromosome aneuploidies

OBJECTIVE

To explore the impact of maternal factors on the false-positive fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) results obtained through noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed pregnant women with high-risk SCAs as revealed using NIPS between January 2017 and December 2022. Clinical data such as results of invasive prenatal diagnoses, copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and pregnancy outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Overall, 177 (0.6 %) women with SCA-positive results were collected from 27,941 patients who had undergone NIPS. Among them, 110 (62.2 %) pregnant women chose prenatal diagnosis and 39 (35.5 %) cases were confirmed. For the women with monosomy X false-positive results from the NIPS, 53.1 % (17/32) were found to be maternal mosaicism monosomy X. In cases with 47, XXX false-positive results, 60 % (6/10) of them were maternal 47,XXX (5 cases) or maternal mosaicism 47,XXX (1 case). One (1/6, 16.7 %) case of maternal mosaicism monosomy X was detected in the false positive results of 47, XXY/47, XYY revealed. The incidence rate of maternal sex chromosome abnormalities was positively correlated with the Z-score of ChrX. When the Z-score of ChrX ≥ 15, more than 50 % of pregnant women were found to be maternal sex chromosome abnormalities, and when Z-score ≥ 30, the incidence rate was as high as 100 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal monosomy X mosaicism and trisomy X respectively played an important role in the discordance of 45, X and 47, XXX revealed by NIPS. CNV-seq was recommended for the pregnant women at risk of maternal sex chromosome abnormalities, which could help clinicians to provide more accurate and efficient advice during genetic counseling and to guide appropriate prenatal diagnosis strategy for the next pregnancy.

Clinical evaluation of noninvasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidies in 9,176 Korean pregnant women: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the clinical significance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for detecting fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) in Korean pregnant women.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed NIPT data from 9,176 women with singleton pregnancies referred to the CHA Biotech genome diagnostics center. Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) was extracted from maternal peripheral blood, and high-throughput massively parallel sequencing was conducted. Subsequently, the positive NIPT results for SCA were validated via karyotype and chromosomal microarray analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 46 cases were SCA positive after NIPT, including 20, 12, 8, and 6 for Turner, triple X, Klinefelter, and Jacob syndromes, respectively. Among 37 women with invasive prenatal diagnosis, 19 had true positive NIPT results. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for detecting SCAs was 51.35%. The PPV was 18.75% for Turner, 88.89% for triple X, 71.43% for Klinefelter, and 60.00% for Jacob's syndromes. NIPT accuracy for detecting sex chromosome trisomies was higher than that for sex chromosome monosomy (P = 0.002). No significant correlation was observed between fetal SCA incidence and maternal age (P = 0.914), except for the borderline significance of Jacob's syndrome (P = 0.048). No significant differences were observed when comparing NIPT and karyotyping validation for fetal SCA according to pregnancy characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that NIPT can reliably screen for SCAs, and it performed better in predicting sex chromosome trisomies compared with monosomy X. No correlation was observed between maternal age and fetal SCA incidence, and no association was observed between different pregnancy characteristics. The accuracy of these findings requires improvements; however, our study provides an important reference for clinical genetic counseling and further management. Larger scale studies, considering confounding factors, are required for accurate evaluation.

The accuracy of prenatal cell-free DNA screening for sex chromosome abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although cell-free DNA screening for sex chromosome abnormalities is increasingly used in clinical practice, its diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the performance of cell-free DNA in the detection of sex chromosome abnormalities.

DATA SOURCES

Medline and PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2022 for articles relating to cell-free DNA screening for sex chromosome abnormalities.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Original articles, randomized control trials, conference abstracts, cohort and case-control studies, and case series with more than 10 cases with diagnostic confirmation were considered for inclusion.

METHODS

Quality assessment of each included publication was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The positive predictive value was calculated as the proportion of true positive cases among those who tested positive and underwent diagnostic testing. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled, and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve was produced using bivariate models that included studies that had diagnostic confirmation for high- and low-risk women.

RESULTS

The search identified 7553 results. Of these, 380 proceeded to the full-text screening, of which 94 articles were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 1,531,240 women tested. All studies reported a confirmatory genetic test. The pooled positive predictive value was 49.4% (95% confidence interval, 45.8-53.1). The pooled positive predictive value was 32.0% (95% confidence interval, 27.0%-37.3%) for monosomy X, 67.6% (95% confidence interval, 62.5%-72.5%) for XXY, 57.5% (95% confidence interval, 51.7%-63.1%) for XXX, and 70.9% (95% confidence interval, 63.9%-77.1%) for XYY. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of cell-free DNA for sex chromosome abnormalities were 94.1% (95% confidence interval, 90.8%-96.3%) and 99.5% (95% confidence interval, 99.0%-99.7%), respectively, with an area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.934 (95% confidence interval, 0.907-0.989).

CONCLUSION

Although the sensitivity and specificity of cell-free DNA for sex chromosome abnormalities are high, the positive predictive value was approximately 50%. The positive predictive value was higher for sex chromosome abnormalities with a supernumerary Y chromosome and lower for monosomy X. Clinicians should inform couples about these findings when offering cell-free DNA for sex chromosome abnormalities.

Cell-free DNA screening positive for monosomy X: clinical evaluation and management of suspected maternal or fetal Turner syndrome

Initially provided as an alternative to evaluation of serum analytes and nuchal translucency for the assessment of pregnancies at high risk of trisomy 21, cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy, also referred to as noninvasive prenatal screening, can now also screen for fetal sex chromosome anomalies such as monosomy X as early as 9 to 10 weeks of gestation. Early identification of Turner syndrome, a sex chromosome anomaly resulting from the complete or partial absence of the second X chromosome, allows medical interventions such as optimizing obstetrical outcomes, hormone replacement therapy, fertility preservation and support, and improved neurocognitive outcomes. However, cell-free DNA screening for sex chromosome anomalies and monosomy X in particular is associated with high false-positive rates and low positive predictive value. A cell-free DNA result positive for monosomy X may represent fetal Turner syndrome, maternal Turner syndrome, or confined placental mosaicism. A positive screen for monosomy X with discordant results of diagnostic fetal karyotype presents unique interpretation and management challenges because of potential implications for previously unrecognized maternal Turner syndrome. The current international consensus clinical practice guidelines for the care of individuals with Turner syndrome throughout the lifespan do not specifically address management of individuals with a cell-free DNA screen positive for monosomy X. This study aimed to provide context and expert-driven recommendations for maternal and/or fetal evaluation and management when cell-free DNA screening is positive for monosomy X. We highlight unique challenges of cell-free DNA screening that is incidentally positive for monosomy X, present recommendations for determining if the result is a true-positive, and discuss when diagnosis of Turner syndrome is applicable to the fetus vs the mother. Whereas we defer the subsequent management of confirmed Turner syndrome to the clinical practice guidelines, we highlight unique considerations for individuals initially identified through cell-free DNA screening.

A Critical Evaluation of Validation and Clinical Experience Studies in Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and Monosomy X

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 21, 18, 13 and monosomy X is widely utilized with massively parallel shotgun sequencing (MPSS), digital analysis of selected regions (DANSR), and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analyses being the most widely reported methods. We searched the literature to find all NIPT clinical validation and clinical experience studies between January 2011 and January 2022. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate random-effects and univariate regression models for estimating summary performance measures across studies. Bivariate meta-regression was performed to explore the influence of testing method and study design. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses evaluated factors that may have led to heterogeneity. Based on 55 validation studies, the detection rate (DR) was significantly higher for retrospective studies, while the false positive rate (FPR) was significantly lower for prospective studies. Comparing the performance of NIPT methods for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 combined, the SNP method had a higher DR and lower FPR than other methods, significantly so for MPSS, though not for DANSR. The performance of the different methods in the 84 clinical experience studies was consistent with validation studies. Clinical positive predictive values of all NIPT methods improved over the last decade. We conclude that all NIPT methods are highly effective for fetal aneuploidy screening, with performance differences across methodologies.

Clinical Application of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies in Central China

BACKGROUND

The relatively high incidence and the clinical symptoms of sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) make prenatal screening of SCAs an attractive option for pregnant women. However, limited studies have assessed the clinical performance of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for screening SCAs. This study was performed to evaluate the clinical performance of NIPT for SCAs in singleton pregnancies in central China.

METHODS

Noninvasive prenatal testing was performed using next-generation sequencing. Standard Z-score analysis was used to identify fetal SCAs. NIPT-positive results were confirmed by invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD).

RESULTS

A total of 42,164 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies were recruited in this study. They were divided into the following five groups with different clinical indications: with ultrasound soft index abnormalities (9.23%, 3,892/42,164); with advanced maternal age (22.14%, 9,336/42,164); with high risk for maternal serum screening (MSS) (18.35%, 7,738/42,164); with an intermediate risk for MSS (26.6%, 11,215/42,164); and with low risk (23.68%, 9,983/42,164). In all, 223 women had a high risk for SCAs by NIPT with a positive rate of 0.53%. There was no significant difference associated with the five groups in the positive rate. Of all of the positive results, 89 were 45,X (39.91%), 38 were 47,XXX (17.04%), 31 were 46,XY,del(X) (13.90%), 50 were 47,XXY (22.42%,), and 15 were 47,XYY (6.73%). Finally, 147 participants (65.92%) chose to undergo IPD, and 47 cases were confirmed. The combined positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT for SCA was 31.97% (47/147). PPV was high for 47,XYY (100%, 11/11), moderate for 47,XXX (42.86%, 9/21) and 47,XXY (45.45%, 15/33), but low for 45,X (16.13%, 10/62) and 46,XY,del(X) (10%, 2/20). The termination rates of Turner syndrome and 47,XXY syndrome were higher than 47,XXX and 47,XYY syndromes.

CONCLUSION

In this relatively large cohort, we evaluated the value of NIPT for SCAs. Our data showed that with informed consent and subsequent professional genetical consulting, NIPT can be a useful method to screen SCAs.

Clinical application of noninvasive prenatal testing in the detection of fetal chromosomal diseases

Objective

To assess the detection efficiency of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal autosomal aneuploidy, sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA), other chromosome aneuploidy, copy number variation (CNV), and to provide further data for clinical application of NIPT.

Materials and methods

25,517 pregnant women who underwent NIPT testing in Anhui Province Maternity and Child Health Hospital from September 2019 to September 2020 were selected, and samples with high-risk test results were subjected to karyotype analysis for comparison by using amniotic fluid, with some samples subjected to further validation by chromosomal microarray analysis, and followed up for pregnancy outcome.

Results

A total of 25,517 pregnant women who received NIPT, 25,502 cases were tested successfully, and 294 high-risk samples (1.15%) were detected, there were 96 true positive samples, 117 false positive samples and 81 cases were refused further diagnosis. Samples with high risk of autosomal aneuploidy were detected in 71 cases (0.28%), and 51 cases were confirmed, including: trisomy 21 (T21) in 44 cases, trisomy 18 (T18) in 5 cases, and trisomy 13 (T13) in 2 cases; the positive predictive value (PPV) was 91.67%, 45.45%, and 33.33%, respectively, and the negative predictive value was 100%, the false positive rate (FPR) was 0.02%, 0.02%, and 0.02%, respectively.13 samples with high risk of mosaic trisomies 21, 18, and 13 were detected, and 1 case of T21mos was confirmed with a PPV of 8.33%. Samples with high risk of SCA were detected in 72 cases (0.28%), and the diagnosis was confirmed in 23 cases, with a PPV of 41.07% and a FPR of 0.13%. These included 3 cases of 45,X, 6 cases of 47,XXY, 8 cases of 47,XXX and 6 cases of 47,XYY, with PPVs of 12.00%, 50.00%, 72.73%, and 75.00%, respectively, and false-positive rates of 0.09%, 0.02%, 0.01% and 0.01% respectively. Samples with high risk of CNV were detected in 104 cases (0.41%) and confirmed in 18 cases, with a PPV of 32.14% and a FPR of 0.15%. Samples with high risk of other chromosomal aneuploidy were detected in 34 cases (0.13%), and the diagnosis was confirmed in 3 cases, which were T2, T9, and T16 respectively. The overall PPV for other chromosome aneuploidy was 12.50%, with a FPR of 0.08%.

Conclusion

NIPT is indicated for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 screening, especially for T21. It also has some certain reference value for SCA and CNV, but is not recommended for screening of other chromosomal aneuploidy.