Perimortem and postmortem sperm acquisition: review of clinical data

Posthumous conception in Australia - legal and ethical considerations

Posthumous conception, the ability to conceive a child after the death of one partner, is increasingly prevalent due to advances in Artificial Reproduction Technology (ART). This paper considers the complexities surrounding the practice in Australia, focusing primarily on the ethical and legal dimensions. It observes that state-based regulations in Australia create disparities in accessibility: some states prohibit the procedure without the deceased's written consent, while others permit it based on guidelines or lack explicit prohibitions. Addressing the juxtaposition of Will Theory and Interest Theory, it emphasises the ongoing debate on whether rights, particularly reproductive autonomy, outlive a person's demise. Finally, the paper highlights an evident inconsistency in Australian legislation and promotes a uniform approach across states.

What is the maximal timeframe between sperm acquisition to sperm cryopreservation, in different "culture" conditions?

OBJECTIVE

Most of the literature about postmortem sperm retrieval (PMSR) deals with the controversies surrounding ethical and legal aspects, while the optimal time interval between the death and viable sperm acquisition is indefinite. In an attempt to aid fertility specialists, while counseling whether to pursue and adopt PMSR, we aim to explore the maximal time frame from ejaculated sperm acquisition to sperm cryopreservation in different "culture" conditions, observations that might be extrapolated to PMSR requests.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five healthy men with normal semen analysis were enrolled. The sperm specimen from each man was diluted to 6.5 mL. After extracting 0.5 mL for cryopreservation, the remaining 6 mL were divided into three tubes: one was maintained in room temperature (23-25 °C), the second in an incubator (37 °C), and the third in a refrigerator (4 °C). Thereafter, every day, a 0.5 mL of each sample was extracted, examined, and cryopreserved. A week later, all the cryopreserved samples were thawed and tested for sperm motility and viability.

RESULTS

While at room temperature, frozen/thawed sperm were still motile (6.5%) and viable (9.9%) up to 96 h; those maintained in the refrigerator, following freezing/thawing were immotile already at 48 h in culture, but still viable (6.0%) up to 72 h in culture. Those maintained in the incubator demonstrated the worse results with negligible motility (1.5%) and viability (3.7%) following freezing/thawing, already after 48 h in culture.

CONCLUSIONS

The timeframe cut-off between ejaculated sperm acquisition and cryopreservation should be 72 h, unless sperm was maintained at room temperature, where it might be longer. It would be prudent to check for sperm vitality prior to freezing in cases where only immotile sperms are present.