Effects of polarization induced by non-weak electric fields on the excitability of elongated neurons with active dendrites

Electric Field Effects on Brain Activity: Implications for Epilepsy and Burst Suppression

Electric fields are now considered a major mechanism of epileptiform activity. However, it is not clear if another electrophysiological phenomenon, burst suppression, utilizes the same mechanism for its bursting phase. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the role of ephaptic coupling-the recruitment of neighboring cells via electric fields-in generating bursts in epilepsy and burst suppression. We used local injections of the GABA-antagonist picrotoxin to elicit epileptic activity and a general anesthetic, sevoflurane, to elicit burst suppression in rabbits. Then, we applied an established computational model of pyramidal cells to simulate neuronal activity in a 3-dimensional grid, with an additional parameter to trigger a suppression phase based on extra-cellular calcium dynamics. We discovered that coupling via electric fields was sufficient to produce bursting in scenarios where inhibitory control of excitatory neurons was sufficiently low. Under anesthesia conditions, bursting occurs with lower neuronal recruitment in comparison to seizures. Our model predicts that due to the effect of electric fields, the magnitude of bursts during seizures should be roughly 2-3 times the magnitude of bursts that occur during burst suppression, which is consistent with our in vivo experimental results. The resulting difference in magnitude between bursts during anesthesia and epileptiform bursts reflects the strength of the electric field effect, which suggests that burst suppression and epilepsy share the same ephaptic coupling mechanism.

Regulation of local alternating electric fields on synaptic plasticity in brain tissue

Purpose

External electric fields can regulate the neural network and change the excitability of the in-vivo cerebral cortex. Here, to prove the effect of alternating electric fields on the synaptic plasticity of ex-vivo tissues, the regular changes in the synaptic structure under alternating electric fields were studied.

Methods

This study applied alternating electric fields with a peak voltage of 20 V and frequencies of 5, 20, 50, and 80 Hz to the porcine cerebral cortex. Relying on transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the ultrastructure of synapses was observed, and the curvature radius of post-synaptic density (PSD) and the synaptic gap distance was quantified.

Results

The results indicated that under alternating electric fields, the average synaptic curvature of the PSD decreased by 30-59% with increasing frequency, and the average synaptic gap distance became narrower.

Conclusion

In ex-vivo brain tissue, synaptic plasticity can be regulated by alternating electric fields of different frequencies. This study can provide reference data for the storage and regulation of ex-vivo organs, as well as comparable data for in-vivo studies.

The glutamatergic synapse: a complex machinery for information processing

Being the most abundant synaptic type, the glutamatergic synapse is responsible for the larger part of the brain's information processing. Despite the conceptual simplicity of the basic mechanism of synaptic transmission, the glutamatergic synapse shows a large variation in the response to the presynaptic release of the neurotransmitter. This variability is observed not only among different synapses but also in the same single synapse. The synaptic response variability is due to several mechanisms of control of the information transferred among the neurons and suggests that the glutamatergic synapse is not a simple bridge for the transfer of information but plays an important role in its elaboration and management. The control of the synaptic information is operated at pre, post, and extrasynaptic sites in a sort of cooperation between the pre and postsynaptic neurons which also involves the activity of other neurons. The interaction between the different mechanisms of control is extremely complicated and its complete functionality is far from being fully understood. The present review, although not exhaustively, is intended to outline the most important of these mechanisms and their complexity, the understanding of which will be among the most intriguing challenges of future neuroscience.

Influence of active synaptic pools on the single synaptic event

The activity of the single synapse is the base of information processing and transmission in the brain as well as of important phenomena as the Long Term Potentiation which is the main mechanism for learning and memory. Although usually considered as independent events, the single quantum release gives variable postsynaptic responses which not only depend on the properties of the synapses but can be strongly influenced by the activity of other synapses. In the present paper we show the results of a series of computational experiments where pools of active synapses, in a compatible time window, influence the response of a single synapse of the considered pool. Moreover, our results show that the activity of the pool, by influencing the membrane potential, can be a significant factor in the NMDA unblocking from M g 2 + increasing the contribution of this receptor type to the Excitatory Post Synaptic Current. We consequently suggest that phenomena like the LTP, which depend on NMDA activation, can occur also in subthreshold conditions due to the integration of the dendritic synaptic activity.

Morphology controls how hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neuron responds to uniform electric fields: a biophysical modeling study

Responses of different neurons to electric field (EF) are highly variable, which depends on intrinsic properties of cell type. Here we use multi-compartmental biophysical models to investigate how morphologic features affect EF-induced responses in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. We find that the basic morphologies of neuronal elements, including diameter, length, bend, branch, and axon terminals, are all correlated with somatic depolarization through altering the current sources or sinks created by applied field. Varying them alters the EF threshold for triggering action potentials (APs), and then determines cell sensitivity to suprathreshold field. Introducing excitatory postsynaptic potential increases cell excitability and reduces morphology-dependent EF firing threshold. It is also shown that applying identical subthreshold EF results in distinct polarizations on cell membrane with different realistic morphologies. These findings shed light on the crucial role of morphologies in determining field-induced neural response from the point of view of biophysical models. The predictions are conducive to better understanding the variability in modulatory effects of EF stimulation at the cellular level, which could also aid the interpretations of how applied fields activate central nervous system neurons and affect relevant circuits.