Radiofrequency Modification for Inducible and Suspected Pediatric Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia

Inducibility of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and ectopic atrial tachycardia in children under general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

In children, invasive electrophysiological studies (EPS) and radiofrequency catheter ablations (RFA) of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are often performed under general anesthesia. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) must be inducible during EPS as reliable diagnosis and subsequent therapy are not possible in sinus rhythm. This study aims to assess the problem of noninducible AVNRT and EAT under general anesthesia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Anesthesia protocols of 166 patients undergoing EPS were retrospectively analyzed. 122 AVNRT patients were compared to 22 whose tachycardia was not inducible but probably due to an AVNRT mechanism. Another 16 patients with inducible EAT were compared to 6 whose EAT appeared on surface ECG but not during EPS. Demographic characteristics were similar among all groups. Inducibility did not differ (p = 0.42) between AVNRT patients with inhalational anesthesia (sevoflurane and/or nitrous oxide) and patients with intravenous anesthesia (propofol with/without remifentanil). The EAT group exhibited lower inducibility under intravenous anesthesia (64%) than under inhalational (88%), however without significance (p = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Tachycardia induction succeeds with similar frequency under both inhalational and intravenous general anesthesia in children with AVNRT. In children with EAT, inhalational anesthesia is associated with a trend towards better inducibility. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Empiric slow-pathway ablation results for presumed atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

In pediatric patients with documented narrow QRS tachycardia that is suggestive of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and not inducible in electrophysiological study (EPS), empiric slowpathway ablation (ESPA) may be considered. There is limited data in children about this topic.

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients who underwent cryoablation and/or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for presumed AVNRT between January 2010 and January 2020, with no inducible tachycardia and no other tachycardia mechanisms during EPS, were included in this study.

RESULTS

The age was between 6 and 18 years. All patients had no structural heart disease. Preablation exhibited sustained SP conduction for all patients. In all cases, the ablation end points were prolongation in wenckebach cycle length (WBCL) with loss of cross and/or jump, and/or echo beat. The end points were not achieved in two patients. Overall, the mean basal WBCL increased to 351 ms (240-500 ms) from 301.3 ms (180-420 ms), evident in the non-recurrence group. Nine patients had a transient AV block that improved. We followed the patients without medication for about 46.9 months (8 months to 10 years). Palpitations occurred again in 9 of 77 patients (clinical recurrence rate 9/79 - 11.3%). The documented ECG recurrence rate was 1.2% (1/79). In the non-recurrence group, WBCL prolongation was higher and mean age was lower than in the recurrence group (13.075 vs. 15.33 years).

CONCLUSION

In cases with presumed AVNRT, ESPA seems to be a reasonable and safe way. In our study, we found our procedural success rate as 97.4% and follow-up recurrence rate as 12.6% (9+1/79).

Cryoablation with an 8-mm tip catheter for typical AVNRT in children: a single center 5-year experience

BACKGROUND

In children with typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (tAVNRT), cryoablation is preferred over radiofrequency ablation (RFA) because of its safety profile and acceptable long-term success rates. In this study, we have assessed the utility of 8-mm tip cryocatheters for tAVNRT ablation in our center.

METHODS

All pediatric AVNRT patients who underwent cryoablation with an 8-mm tip cryocatheter in our center between 2013 and 2018 were included. EnSite™ (St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) was used in all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients (64 females, 53%) were included in this study, and the mean age was 13.9 years with a standard deviation of 2.5 years. Eleven patients (9.1%) had structural heart disease, and 12 patients (10%) had additional arrhythmia substrate. The mean number of effective cryolesions was 8 with a standard deviation of 2.3. Fluoroscopy was used in three patients (2.5%). There were minor complications in only four patients (3.3%)-transient first-degree atrioventricular block or transient incomplete right bundle branch block. Acute success rate of cryoablation was 108/120 (90%). In twelve patients, cryoablation was suboptimal, or it failed. The procedure was completed successfully with RFA in the same session in ten patients. Overall acute success rate of ablation (Cryo ± RFA) was 98.5%. During a mean follow-up period of 24.6 months with a standard deviation of 11.3 months, three patients had recurrence (2.5%). Time between the beginning of the effective cryolesion and termination of AVNRT was found associated with acute success of cryoablation (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Cryoablation of AVNRT with an 8-mm tip catheter in children appears to be safe, with an acceptable acute success rate and a low recurrence rate. A faster termination of AVNRT during the cryolesion, slowing down before ending with atrioventricular block, is a good indicator for acute success.

Long-Term Follow-Up After Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Children

Background—

Catheter ablation of the slow conducting pathway (SP) is treatment of choice for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Although there are abundant data on AVNRT ablation in adult patients, little is known about the long-term results ≥3 years after AVNRT ablation in pediatric patients.

Methods and Results—

Follow-up data from 241 patients aged ≤18 years who had undergone successful AVNRT ablation were analyzed. Median age at ablation had been 12.5 years, and median follow-up was 5.9 years. Radiofrequency current had been used in 168 patients (70%), whereas cryoenergy had been used in 73 patients (30%). Procedural end point of AVNRT ablation had been either SP ablation (no residual dual atrioventricular nodal physiology) or SP modulation (residual SP conduction allowing for a maximum of one atrial echo beat). After the initial AVNRT ablation, calculated freedom from AVNRT was 96% at 1 year, 94% at 3 years, 93% at 5 years, and 89% at 8 years. Age, sex, body weight, the choice of ablation energy, and the procedural end point of AVNRT ablation did not impact freedom from AVNRT. Six of 22 AVNRT recurrences (27%) occurred ≥5 years after ablation. No late complications including atrioventricular block were noted.

Conclusions—

Cumulatively, catheter ablation of AVNRT continued to be effective in >90% of our pediatric patients during the long-term course. A significant part of recurrences occurred >5 years post ablation. Body weight, energy source, and the end point of ablation had no impact on long-term results. No adverse sequelae were noted.

Empiric slow pathway ablation in non-inducible supraventricular tachycardia

BACKGROUND

The data supporting the practice of empiric slow pathway ablation (ESPA) in patients with documented supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) who are non-inducible at electrophysiology study (EPS) is limited. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of ESPA in adults.

METHODS

A multi-center cohort study of patients who had ESPA between January 2008 and October 2013 was performed. Patients were identified by screening sequential SVT ablation procedures.

RESULTS

Forty-three (5%) out of 859 SVT ablation procedures were identified as ESPA. The median age was 53 (IQR: 24) years; 63% were female. All patients had pre-EPS documentation of SVT (either strip or ECG). In 23 (53.5%) cases, pre-EPS ECG showed short RP tachycardia. Thirty-two (74.4%) patients had dual atrioventricular nodal physiology (DAVNP) plus echo beats. Junctional rhythm (JR) as procedural endpoint was noted in 39 (90.7%) patients. In 18 (41.9%) patients, the abolishment of DAVNP was achieved. No complications were encountered. A median follow-up of 17 months (range: 6 to 31 months) revealed 83.7% (36 of 43) success rate, defined as the absence of pre-procedural symptoms and any documented sustained arrhythmia. As compared to patients with recurrence (n=7), patients with no recurrence (n=36) had significantly higher prevalence of clinical short RP tachycardia (61.1% vs. 14.3%, p=0.038), and EPS finding of DAVNP plus echo beats (80.6% vs. 42.9%, p=0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

ESPA is a reasonable approach in patients with documented SVT, in particular in short RP tachycardia, who are not inducible at EPS. Larger studies are required to assess this practice.

Recurrences of symptoms after AV node re-entrant tachycardia ablation: a clinical arrhythmia risk score to assess putative underlying cause

PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH

To identify clinical factors associated with the probability for each arrhythmic mechanism causing recurring symptoms after atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation. Slow pathway radiofrequency ablation is used to treat AVNRT. After ablation, recurrence of symptoms due to AVNRT or other arrhythmias can occur.

RESULTS

We studied 835 patients successfully treated with AVNRT ablation. Variables associated with each specific arrhythmia underlying symptom recurrence were studied by logistic regression. During a mean follow-up of 2.2 ± 2 years, 136 (16%) patients had a recurrence of symptoms. Following invasive and non-invasive studies, symptoms were mostly attributed to sinus tachycardia, recurrence of AVNRT and atrial arrhythmias (respectively 4.7%, 5.2% and 6.1%). Older age and history of atrial fibrillation were associated with a markedly increased risk of symptom recurrence due to atrial arrhythmias (OR=15.58, 7.09-35.22, p<0.001) whereas younger age was associated with a higher risk of sinus tachycardia. A simple 3-item clinical score based on age categories and atrial fibrillation history efficiently predicted atrial arrhythmia (C-Index=0.82, 0.75-0.89) and sinus tachycardia (C-Index=0.83, 0.75-0.90). 8.3% of patients with scores=0 had atrial arrhythmias whereas 100% of patients with scores ≥4 had atrial arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

While recurrence of symptoms after successful AVNRT ablation is relatively frequent (16%), true AVNRT recurrence accounts for only 1/3 of these recurrences. A simple clinical score based on age and history of atrial fibrillation enables efficient risk stratification for symptom recurrence attributable to atrial arrhythmias and inappropriate sinus tachycardia.

Approaches to empiric ablation of slow pathway: results from the Canadian EP web survey

AIM

Dual atrioventricular nodal physiology (DAVNP) is a frequent finding in patients with suspected or documented supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Empiric slow pathway ablation (ESPA) is sometimes performed in patients with DAVNP without inducible SVT at the time of electrophysiological study. Evidence to guide this practice in the adult population is limited. This study was aimed to assess the practice of ESPA by adult electrophysiologists in Canada.

METHODS

All Canadian interventional electrophysiologists (n = 81) were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire assessing their practice of ESPA in patients with suspected and documented SVT. Operator experience, reimbursement models, diagnostic, and treatment decisions regarding ESPA were assessed with case scenarios.

RESULTS

Forty-one responses (50 %) were obtained. Ninety-five percent of the responders stated that the evidence for ESPA is lacking or limited. Responders were more likely to perform ESPA in the setting of non-inducible SVT when there was documentation of the clinical arrhythmia (64 vs. 31 % (p = 0.017)). The threshold to perform ESPA was highly variable. Longer time in practice (r = 0.38, p = 0.017) and less perceived complications with ESPA (r = 0.31, p = 0.05) were correlated with the practice of ESPA, whereas length of ablation waiting lists (r = -0.15, p = 0.38), number of procedures performed per day (r = 0.11, p = 0.51) and type of reimbursement (p = 0.24) were not associated with the practice of ESPA. The perceived complication rate with ESPA was <1 %.

CONCLUSION

Variability in the practice of ESPA in cases of non-inducible SVT exists. Documentation of the clinical arrhythmia, operator experience, and perceived low complication rates positively influence this practice.

Documented narrow QRS tachycardia not inducible during electrophysiology study: should we modify the AV node or not

Ablation therapy is the widely accepted definitive therapy for atrioventricular reentry tachycardia. Noninducibility of the tachycardia is the targeted end point of the procedure. We report on 21 patients with documented narrow QRS tachycardia, in whom the clinical tachycardia could not be induced during the electrophysiologic study. After exclusion of an accessory pathway, we could treat them by slow pathway ablation, either with radiofrequency energy or with cryoenergy, successfully.