Catheter selection for ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for treatment of typical atrial flutter

Novel strategies in the ablation of typical atrial flutter: role of intracardiac echocardiography

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) is one of the most frequently performed procedures in electrophysiology. Despite a high success rate, ablation of the CTI can be unusually difficult in some cases. Multiple tools like angiography, 3D mapping, remote navigation and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) have been introduced to facilitate typical flutter ablation. This review article summarizes the clinical value of different strategies and tools used for CTI ablation focusing on the importance of approaches utilizing ICE.

Usefulness of pre-procedure cavotricuspid isthmus imaging by modified transthoracic echocardiography for predicting outcome of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation

BACKGROUND

Anatomic characteristics of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) have been reported to be related to the outcome of atrial flutter ablation therapy. However, preprocedural evaluation of CTI anatomy using modified transthoracic echocardiography to guide atrial flutter ablation has not been well described.

METHODS

Transthoracic echocardiography was prospectively performed before atrial flutter ablation in 42 patients with typical CTI-dependent atrial flutter. A modified apical long-axis view was designed to visualize and evaluate anatomic characteristics of the CTI and Eustachian ridge (ER). A prominent ER, extending from the inferior vena cava to the interatrial septum, is defined as an extensive ER.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients had straightforward ablation procedures, and 14 patients had difficult ablation procedures. Two patients with difficult procedures had unsuccessful ablation. Multivariate analysis (using CTI length, the presence of a pouch or recess, ER morphology, and significant tricuspid regurgitation as variables) showed that the presence of extensive ER was the only independent predictor of a difficult ablation procedure. The ablation time in patients with extensive ER (n = 13) was significantly longer than in those patients with nonextensive ER (n = 29) (1,638.4 ± 1,548.3 vs 413.8 ± 195.5 sec, P = .015). The incidence of difficulty in achieving bidirectional isthmus block was also higher in patients with extensive ER (10 of 13 vs four of 29, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preprocedural transthoracic echocardiography using a modified apical long-axis view is useful to characterize the morphology of the CTI and the ER. An extensive ER is a strong predictor for difficult ablation of CTI-dependent atrial flutter.

Remote Magnetic Catheter Navigation for Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation in Patients With Common-Type Atrial Flutter

Background— Conventional catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter is a widely applied standard therapy. Remote magnetic catheter navigation (RMN) may provide benefits for different ablation procedures, but its efficacy for CTI ablation has not been evaluated in a randomized, controlled trial.

Methods and Results— Ninety patients undergoing de novo ablation of atrial flutter were randomly assigned to conventional manual (n=45) or RMN-guided (n=45) CTI ablation with an 8-mm-tip catheter. Complete bidirectional isthmus block was achieved in 84% (RMN) and 91% (conventional catheter ablation) of the cases ( P =0.52). RMN was associated with shorter fluoroscopy time (median, 10.6 minutes; interquartile range [IQR], 7.6 to 19.9, versus 15.0 minutes; IQR, 11.5 to 23.1; P =0.043) but longer total radiofrequency application (17.1 minutes; IQR, 8.6 to 25, versus 7.5 minutes; IQR, 3.6 to 10.9; P <0.0001), ablation time (55 minutes; IQR, 28 to 76, versus 17 minutes; IQR, 7 to 31; P <0.0001), and procedure duration (114�35 versus 77�24 minutes, P <0.0001). Procedure duration in the RMN group did not decrease significantly with case experience. Long-term procedure success, defined as achievement of complete CTI block and freedom from atrial flutter recurrence during 6 months of follow-up, was lower in the RMN group (73% versus 89%, P =0.063). Right atrial angiography after ablation revealed no significant differences between groups in terms of right atrial diameter or CTI length, morphology, and angulation. Furthermore, none of these parameters was predictive for difficult (ablation time >20 minutes) or unsuccessful ablation.

Conclusions— RMN-guided CTI ablation is associated with reduced radiation exposure but prolonged ablation and procedure times as compared with conventional catheter navigation. Our findings suggest that ablation lesions produced with an RMN-guided 8-mm catheter are less effective irrespective of CTI anatomy.

Trial Registration— clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00560872