Epicardial versus endocardial permanent pacing in adults with congenital heart disease

Updates in Arrhythmia Management in Adult Congenital Heart Disease

Arrhythmias are highly prevalent in adults with congenital heart disease. For the clinician caring for this population, an understanding of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of arrhythmia is essential. Herein we review the latest updates in diagnostics and treatment of tachyarrhythmias and bradyarrhythmias, all in the context of congenital anatomy, hemodynamics, and standard invasive palliations for congenital heart disease.

Trends in cardiac implantable electronic device utilization in adults with congenital heart disease: a US nationwide analysis

BACKGROUND

Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) have increased risk of arrhythmias warranting implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), which may parallel the observed increase in survival of ACHD patients over the past few decades. We sought to characterize the trends and outcomes of CIED implantation in the inpatient ACHD population across US from 2005 to 2019.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) identified 1,599,519 unique inpatient ACHD admissions (stratified as simple (85.1%), moderate (11.5%), and complex (3.4%)) using the International Classification of Diseases 9/10-CM codes. Hospitalizations for CIED implantation (pacemaker, ICD, CRT-p/CRT-d) were identified and the trends analyzed using regression analysis (2-tailed p < 0.05 was considered significant).

RESULTS

A significant decrease in the hospitalizations for CIED implantation across the study period [3.3 (2.9-3.8)% in 2005 vs 2.4 (2.1-2.6)% in 2019, p < 0.001] was observed across all types of devices and CHD severities. Pacemaker implantation increased with each age decade, whereas ICD implantation rates decreased over 70 years of age. Complex ACHD patients receiving CIED were younger with a lower prevalence of age-related comorbidities, however, had a greater prevalence of atrial/ventricular tachyarrhythmias and complete heart block. The observed inpatient mortality rate was 1.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationwide analysis, we report a significant decline in CIED implantation between 2005 and 2019 in ACHD patients. This may either be due to a greater proportion of hospitalizations resulting from other complications of ACHD or reflect a declining need for CIED due to advances in medical/surgical therapies. Future prospective studies are needed to elucidate this trend further.

Lead Management in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease

Pediatric patients with congenital heart disease present unique challenges when it comes to cardiac implantable electronic devices. Pacing strategy is often determined by patient size/weight and operator experience. Anatomic considerations, including residual shunts, anatomic obstructions and barriers, and abnormalities in the native conduction system, will affect the type of CIED implanted. Given the young age of patients, it is important to have an "eye on the future" when making pacemaker/defibrillator decisions, as one can expect several generator changes, lead revisions, and potential lead extractions during their lifetime.

Lead management in patients undergoing percutaneous tricuspid valve replacement or repair: a 'heart team' approach

Clinically significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has historically been managed with either medical therapy or surgical interventions. More recently, percutaneous trans-catheter tricuspid valve (TV) replacement and tricuspid trans-catheter edge-to-edge repair have emerged as alternative treatment modalities. Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have an increased incidence of TR. Severe TR in this population can occur for multiple reasons but most often results from the interactions between the CIED lead and the TV apparatus. Management decisions in patients with CIED leads and clinically significant TR, who are undergoing evaluation for a percutaneous TV intervention, need careful consideration as a trans-venous lead extraction (TLE) may both worsen and improve TR severity. Furthermore, given the potential risks of 'jailing' a CIED lead at the time of a percutaneous TV intervention (lead fracture and risk of subsequent infections), consideration should be given to performing a TLE prior to a percutaneous TV intervention. The purpose of this 'state-of-the-art' review is to provide an overview of the causes of TR in patients with CIEDs, discuss the available therapeutic options for patients with TR and CIED leads, and advocate for including a lead management specialist as a member of the 'heart team' when making treatment decisions in patients TR and CIED leads.

Transvenous lead extraction in children with bidirectional rotational dissection sheaths

Objectives

Due to the limited longevity of endovascular leads, children require thoughtful lifetime lead management strategies including conservation of access vessel patency. Consequently, there is an increasing interest in transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in children, however, data on TLE and the use of powered mechanical dissection sheaths is limited.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing all children <18 years that underwent TLE in our institution from 2015 to 2022. Procedural complexity, results and complications were defined as recommended by recent consensus statements.

Results

Twenty-eight children [median age 12.8 (interquartile range 11.3-14.6) years] were included. Forty-one leads were extracted [median dwell time 85 (interquartile range 52-102) months]. Extractions of 31 leads (76%) in 22 patients (79%) were complex, requiring advanced extraction tools including powered bidirectional rotational dissection sheaths in 14 children. There were no major complications. Complete procedural success was achieved in 18 (64%) and clinical success in 27 patients (96%), respectively. Procedural success and complexity varied between lead types. The Medtronic SelectSecure™ lead was associated with increased odds of extraction by simple traction (p = 0.006) and complete procedural success (p < 0.001) while the Boston Scientific Fineline™ II lead family had increased odds of partial procedural failure (p = 0.017).

Conclusions

TLE with the use of mechanical powered rotational dissection sheaths is feasible and safe in pediatric patients. In light of rare complications and excellent overall clinical success, TLE should be considered an important cornerstone in lifetime lead management in children. Particular lead types might be more challenging and less successful to extract.

Endocardial pacing in a single-ventricle patient with tricuspid atresia-a case report

Key Clinical Message

The use of endocardial pacing in patients with univentricular hearts and intracardiac shunts is limited, primarily due to the increased risk of thromboembolism. However, when accompanied by proper long-term anticoagulation therapy, it may be safer than epicardial interventions in selected patients at high risk for surgery.

Abstract

We report transvenous endocardial pacing through the atrial septal defect in a patient with tricuspid atresia, transposition of the great arteries, severe pulmonary hypertension, and complete heart block. This study is among the first reported cases using this pacing method in a patient with a univentricular heart and intracardiac shunt.

A survival analysis of bipolar steroid-eluting and unipolar nonsteroid-eluting epicardial leads

INTRODUCTION

Epicardial pacemakers are known as an alternative for endocardial pacemakers in some cases such as heart block, and complex congenital heart diseases. Considering recent advances and improvement of epicardial lead subtypes, it is essential to investigate the long-term function of them. In this study, we aimed to assess the sensing and pacing characteristics, and survival of bipolar steroid-eluting and unipolar nonsteroid-eluting epicardial pacemakers.

METHODS

We conducted an entirely concentrated search on the documents of all patients who had undergone epicardial lead implantation in the Shaheed Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical & Research Center during 2015-2018. Implant, and follow-up data were extracted. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Weibull regression hazards model were applied for the survival analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine leads were implanted for 77 patients. Of the total leads, 52.81%, 53.93%, and 47.19% were implanted in children (under 18-year-old), females, and patients with congenital heart diseases, respectively. Bipolar steroid-eluting leads comprised 33.71% of 89 leads. The pacing threshold of unipolar nonsteroid-eluting leads that were implanted on the left ventricle and right atrium increased significantly during the follow-up to greater records than bipolar steroid-eluting leads. Survival analysis also revealed that bipolar steroid-eluting leads are significantly better in 48-month survival (Weibull hazard ratio [HR]: 0.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.99), p = .049). Age, ventricular location of the lead, and acute pacing characteristics were not associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar steroid-eluting epicardial leads have an acceptable survival compared with unipolar nonsteroid-eluting, without a significant difference regarding patients age. Therefore, they could be an excellent alternative for endocardial ones.

Micra pacemaker in adult congenital heart disease patients: a case series

INTRODUCTION

implantation of transvenous endocardial or epicardial pacemakers presents specific challenges in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients. Micra leadless pacemaker (Micra PPM) may overcome some of these difficulties.

METHODS

15 ACHD patients who underwent Micra PPM insertion were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

males 53.3%. Mean age at study: 37.5±10.7 years. Mean age at Micra PPM insertion: 35.5±11.0 years. Mean follow-up so far: 2.0±0.3 years. Concerning the ACHD patients, 6.7% had a simple defect, 66.6% had a moderately complex defect, 26.7% were complex. Four patients (26.7%) had a previous PPM implantation. Three patients (20%) had a systemic right ventricle. Two patients (13.3%) had a single ventricle physiology. Five (33.3%) had Trisomy 21. The most commonly used Micra PPM modality was VVI (73.3%). Mean threshold post implantation was 0.48 V [range: 0.25-1.13 V], while mean threshold at 6 months control was 0.60 V [range: 0.38-1.13 V] (p=ns). Mean R wave post implantation was 10.3 V [range: 3.25-19.4 V], whilst mean R wave at 6 months follow-up was 10.1 V [range:3.5-19.0 V] (p=ns). No major peri and post-procedural complications were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

since ACHD patients are living longer and surviving into adulthood, the incidence of conduction disorders continues to increase, as part of the natural history of some lesions or as early or late complication of surgery. The Micra leadless PPM can be successfully implanted in ACHD patients and have significant theoretical advantages. They should be considered when transvenous and epicardial pacing are either contraindicated or represent an otherwise suboptimal approach. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Ebstein Anomaly: Management and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in patients with Ebstein anomaly during tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is unknown. Thus, we aimed to characterize CIED management/outcomes in patients with Ebstein anomaly undergoing TV surgery.

METHODS

Patients at the Mayo Clinic from 1987 to 2020 with Ebstein anomaly and CIED procedure were reviewed for procedural details, complications, echocardiogram, and lead parameters. Five-year cumulative incidence of CIED complications were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were included; 51 were female, and mean age was 40.7±17.5 years. A new CIED was implanted in 45 patients at the time of TV surgery with the majority receiving an epicardial (n=37) CIED. Among 34 patients who had preexisting CIED (11 epicardial, 23 transvenous) at time of TV surgery, 20 had a transvenous right ventricular lead managed by externalizing the lead to the TV (n=15) or extracting the transvenous lead with epicardial lead implantation (n=5). Fourteen patients underwent CIED implantation (4 epicardial, 10 transvenous) without concurrent surgery. Placement of lead across the TV was avoided in 85% of patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CIED complications was 24% with no significant difference between epicardial and transvenous CIEDs (26% versus 23%, P=0.96). Performance of lead parameters was similar in epicardial and transvenous leads during median (interquartile range) follow-up of 44.5 (61.1) months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with Ebstein anomaly undergoing TV surgery, the use of epicardial leads and externalization of transvenous leads to the TV can avoid lead placement across the valve leaflets. Lead performance and CIED complications was similar between epicardial and transvenous CIEDs.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in the Fontan Patient

As a result of remarkable progress in operative techniques and cardiology care during childhood, Fontan patients continue to age and require team-based multidisciplinary expertise to manage complications encountered in adulthood. They face particular challenges in terms of altered hemodynamic stressors, cardiac and hepatic failure, and arrhythmias. Arrhythmias in Fontan patients are highly prevalent and associated with underlying anatomy, surgical technique, and postoperative sequelae. Diagnostic tools, treatments, and device strategies for arrhythmias in Fontan patients should be adapted to the specific anatomy, type of surgical repair, and clinical status. Great strides in our understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms, options and techniques to obtain access to relevant cardiac structures, and application of both old and new technologies have contributed to improving cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) therapies for this unique population. In this state-of-the-art review, we discuss the various arrhythmias encountered in Fontan patients, their diagnosis, and options for treatment and prevention, with a focus on CIEDs. Throughout, access challenges particular to the Fontan circulation are considered. Recently developed technologies, such as the sub-cutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator carry the potential to be transformative but require awareness of Fontan-specific issues. Moreover, new leadless pacing technology represents a promising strategy that may soon become applicable to Fontan patients with sinus node dysfunction. CIEDs are essential tools in managing Fontan patients but the complex clinical scenarios that arise in this patient population are among the most challenging for the congenital electrophysiologist.

The long-term outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic devices implanted via the femoral route

Background

Conventional superior access for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is not always possible and femoral CIEDs (F‐CIED) are an alternative option when leadless systems are not suitable. The long‐term outcomes and extraction experiences with F‐CIEDs, in particular complex F‐CIED (ICD/CRT devices), remain poorly understood.

Methods

Patients referred for F‐CIEDs implantation between 2002 and 2019 at two tertiary centers were included. Early complications were defined as ≤30 days following implant and late complications >30 days.

Results

Thirty‐one patients (66% male; age 56 ± 20 years; 35% [11] patients with congenital heart disease) were implanted with F‐CIEDs (10 ICD/CRT and 21 pacemakers). Early complications were observed in 6.5% of patients: two lead displacements. Late complications at 6.8 ± 4.4 years occurred in 29.0% of patients. This was higher with complex F‐CIED compared to simple F‐CIED (60.0% vs. 14.3%, p = .02). Late complications were predominantly generator site related (n = 8, 25.8%) including seven infections/erosions and one generator migration. Eight femoral generators and 14 leads (median duration in situ seven [range 6–11] years) were extracted without complication.

Conclusions

Procedural success with F‐CIEDs is high with clinically acceptable early complication rates. There is a notable risk of late complications, particularly involving the generator site of complex devices following repeat femoral procedures. Extraction of chronic F‐CIED in experienced centers is feasible and safe.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Hemodialysis and Chronic Kidney Disease Patients-An Experience-Based Narrative Review

Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are a standard therapy utilized for different cardiac conditions. They are implanted in a growing number of patients, including those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure and malignant arrhythmia, remain the leading cause of mortality among CKD patients, especially in ESKD. CIED implantation procedures are considered minor surgery, typically with transvenous leads inserted via upper central veins, followed by an impulse generator introduced subcutaneously. A decision regarding optimal hemodialysis (HD) modality and the choice of permanent vascular access (VA) could be particularly challenging in CIED recipients. The potential consequences of arteriovenous access on the CIED side are related to (1) venous hypertension from lead-related central vein stenosis and (2) the risk of systemic infection. Therefore, when creating permanent vascular access, the clinical scenario may be complicated by the CIED presence on one side and the lack of suitable vessels for arteriovenous fistula on the contralateral arm. These factors suggest the need for an individualized approach according to different clinical situations: (1) CIED in a CKD patient; (2) CIED in a patient on hemodialysis CIED; and (3) VA in a patient with CIED. This complex clinical conundrum creates the necessity for close cooperation between cardiologists and nephrologists.

Original Article--Outcomes of Pacing in Egyptian Pediatric Population

Objectives

Permanent pacemakers are widely used in the pediatric population due to congenital and surgically acquired rhythm disturbances. The diversity and complexity of congenital heart diseases make device management a highly individualized procedure in pediatric pacing. We are also faced with special problems in pediatric age group as growth, children’s activity and infection susceptibility. This study aimed to present our institute’s experience in pediatric and adolescent pacemaker implantation and long-term outcomes.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study included 100 pediatric patients who visited our outpatient clinics at Ain Shams University Hospitals for regular follow up of their previously implanted permanent pacemakers. All patients were subjected to history taking, clinical examination, ECG recording, echocardiography and elaborate device programming. Data about device types, device components’ longevity, subsequent procedures, complications were collected, with comparison between epicardial and endocardial pacemakers.

Results

Our study population ranged in age from 8 months to 18 years (mean 13.12 ± 5.04 years), 51 were males and 53 patients had congenital heart disease. Epicardial pacing represented 26% of our total population using only VVIR pacemakers, while endocardial pacing represented 74% of our population with 58.1% of them being VVIR pacemakers. First battery longevity was higher in endocardial batteries (108 months vs. 60 months, p value: 0.007). First lead longevity was also higher in endocardial leads (105 moths vs. 58 months, p value: 0.006). Complication rate was 25%; 8 patients had early complications (one insulation break in endocardial group). Late complications occurred in 17 patients (10 patients had lead fracture; 9 of them were endocardial, 2 insulation breaks in endocardial leads, 3 patients from epicardial group had lead failure of capture). In total, 16 patients had lead-related complications. There was no statistically significant difference between different lead models regarding lead-related complications.

Conclusion

Pacemakers in children are generally safe, but still having high rates of lead-related complications. Lead failure of capture was more common in epicardial leads. These complications had no relation to the model of the leads. Endocardial pacemakers showed higher first lead and first battery longevity compared to epicardial pacemakers.

Patient with an implantable cardiac electrical stimulation device. What should the anesthesiologist know?

Patients with implantable electric stimulation devices are challenging to the anesthesiologist since these cases demand a comprehensive knowledge about how the device operates, the indications for the implant and the implications that must be addressed during the perioperative period . This article is intended to provide the reader with clear and structured information so that the anesthesiologist will be able to safely deal with the situation of a patient with an implantable cardiac stimulation device, who has been programmed for emergent surgery. A search for the scientific evidence available was conducted in Pubmed / Medline, ScienceDirect, OVID, SciELO), for a non-systematic review. The incidence of the use of cardiac electric stimulation devices has been growing. Their operation is increasingly complex, and demands being constantly updated on the knowledge in the area.

Performance of pacemaker leads in alternative lead positions after tricuspid valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Bradycardic arrhythmias requiring pacemaker (PM) implantation are still common in patients in need of tricuspid valve replacement (TVR). Leaving an existing PM lead in an extravalvular position may represent a helpful alternative in special situations like the implantation of a mechanical TV. This study aimed to examine the short- to mid-term outcome of paravalvular leads concerning lead survival and prosthesis dysfunction in patients after TVR.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study of patients with TVR and ventricular pacing was conducted. Patients from the database of the Leipzig Heart Center were included. Data of the paravalvular lead group (PVG) and coronary sinus lead group (CSG) were compared to a control group with conventional transvalvular leads (TVG).

RESULTS

Eighty patients with TVR and cardiac PM (TVG [n = 13], PVG [n = 40], and CSG [n = 27]) were included. The mean follow-up was 2.8 years. The rate of lead revisions (TVG 15.4%, PVG 2.5%, and CSG 7.5%) was lower in PVG but without significance (P = .286). The CSG demonstrated significantly higher pacing thresholds (1.4 V/0.8 ms) than TVG (0.5 V/0.4 ms), P = .004. However, the deterioration of threshold amplitudes during follow-up was similar in CSG (7.4%) and PVG (7.5%) compared with controls (7.7%). Function of TV prosthesis regarding development of stenosis or regurgitation showed a similarity between the groups (regurgitation PVG P = .692, CSG P = 1; stenosis PVG P = .586, CSG P = 0.69).

CONCLUSION

Paravalvular positioning of PM leads seems to represent a reasonable alternative to the conventional transvalvular lead positioning concerning the lead and Tricuspid Valve prosthesis's function and durability in selected patients.

Cardiac implantable device outcomes and lead survival in adult congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are ill-defined in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD).

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes of transvenous (TV) and epicardial (EPI) CIEDs in ACHD.

METHODS

A retrospective review of CIEDs implanted in patients >18 yrs. followed at the Ahmanson/UCLA ACHD Center was performed. Patients were grouped by implant approach. Primary outcomes included time to CIED dysfunction, lead dysfunction and unplanned CIED reintervention.

RESULTS

Over a 27-year period, 283 CIEDs (208 TV, 75 EPI) were implanted in 260 ACHD patients. Dysfunction developed in 77 CIEDs (50 TV, 27 EPI) for which 62 underwent unplanned reintervention (47 TV, 15 EPI). Time to CIED dysfunction and unplanned reintervention did not differ by implant approach; however lead dysfunction was greater for EPI vs TV (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2, p = 0.01). Independent predictors of lead failure included cyanosis (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.3; p = 0.03), implant indication other than bradycardia (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.6-6.5; p < 0.01), right-sided Maze operation (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-5.0; p = 0.01), and unipolar lead design (HR 4.5, 95% CI 1.8-11.5; p < 0.01). Importantly, EPI vs TV approach was not associated with lead dysfunction after adjusting for baseline covariates (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.6-4.3; p = 0.3).

CONCLUSION

Overall CIED system dysfunction and reinterventions are similar, whereas lead dysfunction is greater among EPI than TV devices. Patient and procedural differences, rather than EPI vs TV implant approach alone, appear to drive CIED lead outcomes in the ACHD population.

Thinking inside the box: Custom pacemaker improves device longevity in a congenital heart patient

Patients with congenital heart disease have unique pacing challenges and often require epicardial systems. High pacing threshold is one of the major factors that decrease these systems' durability. Sometimes surgical reintervention or lead replacement is difficult or prohibitive in these patients due to repeated surgeries and extensive epicardial scar. We present a case report of a patient with Fontan physiology and chronically high epicardial lead pacing thresholds requiring frequent generator changes and a unique solution focusing on improving generator longevity.

Permanent His-bundle Pacing in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease

Permanent His-bundle pacing has been gaining popularity in the adult population requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy. Initial procedural challenges are being overcome, and this method of pacing has been shown to improve left ventricular function and heart failure symptoms secondary to ventricular dyssynchrony. Though the etiologies of ventricular dyssynchrony may differ in children and those with congenital heart disease than in adults with structurally normal hearts, His-bundle pacing may also be a preferred option in these groups to restore more physiologic electric conduction and improve ventricular function. We present a review of the current literature and suggested directions involving deploying permanent His-bundle pacing in the pediatric and congenital heart disease population.

Cardiac resynchronization and implantable defibrillators in adults with congenital heart disease

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are well-established therapies for adult patients with heart failure that have been shown to improve morbidity and mortality. However, the benefits and indications for use in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) are less defined with no significant large prospective studies in this population. There are, however, multiple retrospective studies that demonstrate the efficacy of these devices in the ACHD population. These indicate a role for both CRT and ICDs in select patients with ACHD. The clinician and patient must balance the risks and benefits, summarized in complex evidence that reflects the heterogeneity of the ACHD patient group, and apply them in a patient-specific manner to optimize the utility of CRT and ICDs.

Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of Transvenous Cardiac Pacing Device Implantation in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease

Background: Little is known about the acute/long-term outcomes of implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) using a transvenous approach for patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods and Results: We retrospectively investigated the acute/long-term results and complications associated with transvenous CIED implantation in 140 patients with CHD. We implanted 77 pacemakers, 51 implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), and 12 cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. Although we successfully implanted pacemakers and ICD in all patients, we could not place a coronary sinus (CS) lead in 25% of the patients requiring CRT devices due to coronary vein anomalies associated with corrected transposition of the great arteries (cTGA). Overall complication rate, lead failure rate, and incidence of device infection were 16%, 9%, and 0.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall complication rates between the simple (n=22) and complex CHD (n=118) groups (14% vs. 16%). The 10-year lead survival for the ICD leads (77%) was significantly lower than for the pacemaker leads (91%, P=0.0065). Conclusions: The outcomes of transvenous CIED in patients with CHD seemed acceptable, although there was a relatively high incidence of complications. CS lead placement for cTGA may be hindered by coronary vein anomalies. Lead survival tended to be lower for ICD than for pacemakers in these patients.

Single- and dual-site ventricular pacing entirely through the coronary sinus for patients with prior tricuspid valve surgery

PURPOSE

Transvenous right ventricular pacing has traditionally been avoided after surgical tricuspid valve repair or replacement because of possible valvular dysfunction. Epicardial pacing has been used but it requires surgical thoracotomy and has higher lead failure rates when compared to transvenous pacing. We evaluated the lead stability and clinical outcomes in patients with isolated coronary sinus (CS) lead due to relative contraindication to transvenous pacing from prior tricuspid valve (TV) surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined a single-center cohort of 34 patients with TV disease and/or surgery who underwent permanent pacemaker implantation with a left ventricular CS lead as the only ventricular pacing lead (to avoid crossing the TV). The clinical outcome, echocardiographic data, and pacing thresholds were evaluated at follow-up.

RESULTS

We implanted 19 patients with a single-CS lead and 15 patients with dual-CS leads. The average left ventricular ejection fraction was 56 ± 13% prior to lead implantation and remained stable at 2-year follow-up. The tricuspid regurgitation remained mild at follow-up. The average lead pacing threshold was 1.2 ± 0.6 V × ms at implant and 1.1 ± 0.4 V × ms at 2-year follow-up (P = 0.39). For patients with dual-CS leads, the pacing threshold was 1.2 ± 0.7 V × ms at implant and 1.1 ± 0.5 V × ms at 2-year follow-up (P = 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ventricular pacing entirely through the CS is an effective and minimally invasive method that provides stable pacing for patients with prior TV surgery in whom transvenous lead placement either is not possible or is relatively contraindicated.

Recurrent, late-onset pleural effusions in elderly patients receiving pacemaker therapy

Late-onset pacemaker-related pleural effusions (PEs) are rare and are often misdiagnosed with other entities. Our study aimed to detail the clinical features and management of PEs long after pacemaker insertion.We conducted a review of 6 consecutive elderly patients with PEs, who had undergone a new pacemaker insertion from September 2014 to January 2017. Also, the clinical characteristics and therapeutic courses of PEs were summarized.Two cases involved fluids after the first implantations, with pacing durations of 3 and 7 months. Two other cases developed PEs 3 or 4 months after the first replacement, with pacing durations of 6 and 11 years. Another 2 cases developed PEs 3 or 5 months following the second replacement, with total pacing durations of 16 and 18 years, respectively. The average interval was 4.17 months for the 6 cases from the time of the new pacemaker insertion to the occurrence of PEs. During the course, they had to be hospitalized repeatedly for thoracenteses because conventional treatments had only short-term effects. After the pacing settings were adjusted, PEs in all cases disappeared gradually. No patients were readmitted for PEs during the median follow-up period of 13 months.For elderly patients following implantation of a new pacemaker, PEs should be considered due to improper pacing settings, and corresponding adjustments to the device should be made.

Longitudinal Outcomes of Epicardial and Endocardial Pacemaker Leads in the Adult Fontan Patient

Placement of an epicardial pacemaker system is often preferred over an endocardial system in patients who have undergone a Fontan operation, but data are limited on how these two systems perform over time in patients with Fontan palliation. We performed a retrospective review of adults with Fontan palliation who had pacemaker implantation and interrogation data at Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2014. Lead parameters, pacing mode, and polarity were collected at the earliest device interrogation report. Clinic notes and device interrogation reports were reviewed at implantation, 6 months, and yearly after implantation to determine impedance, capture threshold (CT), and energy threshold (ET). There were 87 patients with 168 leads in the study cohort. The mean follow-up time was 7.7 years (6 months-19 years). There were 143 epicardial leads (57 atrial and 86 ventricular) and 25 endocardial leads (20 atrial and 5 ventricular). There was no difference in the baseline lead parameters between epicardial and endocardial leads for impedance (610 ± 259 versus 583 ± 156 Ω, p = 0.93), CT (2.0 ± 1.3 versus 1.8 ± 1.3 V, p = 0.28), or ET (7.1 ± 12.5 versus 6.8 ± 18.1 µJ, p = 0.29). Compared to endocardial leads, ventricular epicardial leads were associated with temporal decrease in impedance and increase in ET. Regarding clinical outcomes, epicardial leads had higher rates of failure but similar generator longevity in comparison to endocardial leads. Ventricular epicardial leads were associated with temporal decrease in impedance and increase in ET. Epicardial leads had a higher rate of failure but similar generator longevity compared to endocardial leads.

Physiological pacing in young patients with complex congenital heart defects

AIM

Young patients with operated complex congenital heart defects (CHD) often develop sinus node dysfunction (SND) requiring permanent pacing with rate-responsive function. Activity-driven sensors cannot account for nonmovement stress and cannot modulate heart rate physiologically. Closed Loop Stimulation (CLS, Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) is a physiological rate-responsive pacemaker based on the indirect measure of ventricular contractility. No data are available on the effects of such pacing strategy in young patients.

METHODS

We report a series of nine patients with CHD and SND who underwent single-chamber CLS-atrial pacing with endocardial or epicardial lead. During the first 30 days, the pacemaker was programmed in AAI pacing mode and then was switched to CLS-atrial pacing mode. An in-hospital control was scheduled 1-2 months later to evaluate the CLS response to neurovegetative stresses (i.e., nonmovement stress [Stroop color test, handgrip] and exercise stress test) and Holter monitor. CLS pacing was compared with rate-responsive accelerometer-driven pacing (AAIR).

RESULTS

At telemetric interrogation, CLS pacing showed a more physiological pattern of 24-h heart rate trends than accelerometer sensors. The data obtained during nonmovement/exercise stress demonstrated a physiological increase in the pacing rate with CLS, in synergy with spontaneous events. The accelerometer sensor histogram, during nonmovement stress, showed a "nonresponse" behavior (only lower rate events), and during exercise test showed most events in lower rate range. Holter monitoring showed increase of average and maximum heart rate compared with AAIR.

CONCLUSION

In young CHD patients, endocardial/epicardial CLS-atrial pacing demonstrated a physiological response of heart rate to neurovegetative and physical stresses.

Rescue Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in a Pacemaker-Dependent Patient with Congenital Heart Disease and no Alternative Routes for Pacing

Congenital heart disease patients are considered a unique group of patients regarding their high risk of conduction abnormalities , whether de novo or surgically induced , and the challenges in both implantation and management of device related complications. We present a case of a pacemaker-dependent patient with congenital heart disease who experienced complications of both previous epicardial and transvenous pacing which rendered her a non-suitable candidate of both routes.

Outcomes of cardiac pacing in adult patients after a Fontan operation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac pacing can be challenging after a Fontan operation, and limited data exist regarding pacing in adult Fontan patients. The objectives of our study were to determine risk factors for pacing and occurrence of device-related complications (DRCs) and pacemaker reinterventions.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of Fontan patients from 1994 through 2014. We defined DRCs as lead failure, lead recall, cardiac perforation, lead thrombus/vegetation, or device-related infection, and cardiovascular adverse events (CAEs) as venous thrombosis, stroke, death, or heart transplant. Pacemaker reintervention was defined as lead failure or recall.

RESULTS

Of 439 patients, 166 (38%) had pacemakers implanted (79 during childhood; 87, adulthood); 114 patients (69%) received epicardial leads initially, and 52 (31%), endocardial leads. Pacing was initially atrial in 52 patients (31%); ventricular, 30 (18%); or dual chamber, 84 (51%). There were 37 reinterventions (1.9% per year) and 48 DRCs (2.4% per year). Pacemaker implantation during childhood was a risk factor for DRCs (hazard ratio, 2.01 [CI, 1.22-5.63]; P = .03). There were 70 CAEs (venous thrombosis, 5; stroke, 11; transplant, 8; and death, 46), yielding a rate of 3.5% per year. DRCs, CAEs, and reintervention rates were comparable for patients with epicardial or endocardial leads.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one-third of adult Fontan patients referred to Mayo Clinic had pacemaker implantation. Epicardial leads were associated with high rate of pacemaker reinterventions but similar DRC rates in comparison to endocardial leads.

Cardiac Arrhythmias in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: Pacemakers, Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators, and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices

Implanting cardiac rhythm medical devices in adults with congenital heart disease requires training in congenital heart disease. The techniques and indications for device implantation are specific to the anatomic diagnosis and state of disease progression. It often requires a team of physicians and is best performed at a specialized adult congenital heart center.

Lead-Sparing Tricuspid Valve Repair Damaged by Pacemaker Lead

Permanent pacemaker lead may damage the tricuspid valve in various ways, causing severe tricuspid valve regurgitation. The perforation of posterior papillary muscle is an uncommon complication caused by the lead. We describe a lead-sparing tricuspid valve repair in which the lead extraction was not an option. The papillary muscle containing the lead was fully mobilized to release the adherent leaflets. The repair was completed by commissuroplasty as well as ring annuloplasty, leaving the lead inside the implanted ring.

Pacing and Defibrillators in Complex Congenital Heart Disease

Device therapy in the complex congenital heart disease (CHD) population is a challenging field. There is a myriad of devices available, but none designed specifically for the CHD patient group, and a scarcity of prospective studies to guide best practice. Baseline cardiac anatomy, prior surgical and interventional procedures, existing tachyarrhythmias and the requirement for future intervention all play a substantial role in decision making. For both pacing systems and implantable cardioverter defibrillators, numerous factors impact on the merits of system location (endovascular versus non-endovascular), lead positioning, device selection and device programming. For those with Fontan circulation and following the atrial switch procedure there are also very specific considerations regarding access and potential complications. This review discusses the published guidelines, device indications and the best available evidence for guidance of device implantation in the complex CHD population.

Single chamber permanent epicardial pacing for children with congenital heart disease after surgical repair

Background

To analyze the 10-year experience of single chamber permanent epicardial pacemaker placement for children with congenital heart diseases (CHD) after surgical repair.

Methods

Between 2002 and 2014, a total of 35 patients with CHD (age: 26.9 ± 23.2 months, weight: 9.7 ± 5.6 kg) received permanent epicardial pacemaker placement following corrective surgery. Echocardiography and programming information of the pacemaker, as well as major adverse cardiac events (MACE) as heart failure or sudden death, were recorded during follow-up (46.8 ± 33.8 months).

Results

Acute ventricular stimulation threshold was 1.34 ± 0.72 V and no significant increase was observed at the last follow-up as 1.37 ± 0.81 V (p = 0.93). Compared with initial pacemaker implantation, the last follow-up didn’t show significant increases in impedance (p = 0.327) or R wave (p = 0.635). Four patients received pacemaker replacement because of battery depletion. 7/35 (20 %) of patients experienced MACE. Although the age and body weight were similar between patients with and without MACE, the patients with MACE were with complex CHD (100 % vs.55.6 %, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

High-degree iatrogenic atrioventricular block was the primary reason for placement of epicardial pacemaker for patients with CHD after surgical repair. Pacemaker placement with the steroid-eluting leads results in acceptable outcomes, however, the pacemaker type should be optimized for the children with complex CHD.

Percutaneous Epicardial Pacing using a Novel Insulated Multi-electrode Lead

INTRODUCTION

Epicardial cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) permits unrestricted electrode positioning. However, this requires surgical placement of device leads and the risk of unwanted phrenic nerve stimulation. We hypothesized that shielded electrodes can capture myocardium without extracardiac stimulation.

METHODS

In 6 dog and 5 swine experiments, we used a percutaneous approach to access the epicardial surface of the heart, and deploy novel leads housing multiple electrodes with selective insulation. Bipolar pacing thresholds at prespecified sites were tested compare electrode threshold data both facing towards and away from the epicardial surface.

RESULTS

In 151 paired electrode recordings (70 in 6 dogs; 81 in 5 swine), thresholds facing myocardium were lower than facing away (median [IQR] mA: dogs 0.9 [0.4-1.6] vs 4.6 [2.1 to >10], p<0.0001; swine 0.5 [0.2-1] vs 2.5 [0.5-6.8], p<0.0001). Myocardial capture was feasible without extracardiac stimulation at all tested sites, with mean ± SE threshold margin 3.6±0.7 mA at sites of high output extracardiac stimulation (p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Selective electrode insulation confers directional pacing to a multielectrode epicardial pacing lead. This device has the potential for a novel percutaneous epicardial resynchronization therapy that permits placement at an optimal pacing site, irrespective of the anatomy of the coronary veins or phrenic nerves.