Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: the course of electronic parameters, clinical features, and complications during long-term follow-up. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;41:23-29. [PMID: 24928487 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-014-9920-0]

Imaging in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: part 1-imaging before and during device implantation. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC

More than 500 000 cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are implanted in the European Society of Cardiology countries each year. The role of cardiovascular imaging in patients being considered for CIED is distinctly different from imaging in CIED recipients. In the former group, imaging can help identify specific or potentially reversible causes of heart block, the underlying tissue characteristics associated with malignant arrhythmias, and the mechanical consequences of conduction delays and can also aid challenging lead placements. On the other hand, cardiovascular imaging is required in CIED recipients for standard indications and to assess the response to device implantation, to diagnose immediate and delayed complications after implantation, and to guide device optimization. The present clinical consensus statement (Part 1) from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association, provides comprehensive, up-to-date, and evidence-based guidance to cardiologists, cardiac imagers, and pacing specialists regarding the use of imaging in patients undergoing implantation of conventional pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and resynchronization therapy devices. The document summarizes the existing evidence regarding the use of imaging in patient selection and during the implantation procedure and also underlines gaps in evidence in the field. The role of imaging after CIED implantation is discussed in the second document (Part 2).

The Value of Strain Echocardiography in Predicting Electrical Progression in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular (RV) cardiomyopathy is a progressive disease characterized by the replacement of the normal myocardium with fibrofatty tissue. This study aimed to determine the value of echocardiographic RV deformation parameters in predicting electrical progression as assessed by serial changes in RV lead sensing and threshold in patients with arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

The present study recruited 40 patients with a definitive diagnosis of arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy at a mean (SD) age of 38.6 (14.2) years between 2018 and 2020. All patients had received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for the primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The patients underwent 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiographic examinations and RV 2D and 3D strain analyses, comprising free-wall longitudinal strain, global longitudinal strain, and strain rate. They were then followed up for electrical progression.

RESULTS

During a mean (SD) follow-up period of 20 (6) months, the RV lead amplitude decreased from 7.95 (IQR, 4.53-10.25) mV to 5.25 (IQR, 2.88-8.55) mV (P < .001), and the lead threshold increased from 0.75 (IQR, 0.50-0.79) V to 0.75 (IQR, 0.75-1.00) V (P < .001). Right ventricular 2D free-wall (ρ = 0.56, P = .01), RV 2D global (ρ = 0.58, P = .007), and RV 3D free-wall (ρ = 0.65; P = .003) longitudinal strain correlated with electrical progression.

CONCLUSION

Right ventricular 2D and 3D deformation parameters were found to be significant predictors of electrical progression during follow-up of patients with arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy. These findings suggest that echocardiography has a pivotal role in predicting patients at high risk for electrical progression.

Radial and Circumferential CMR-Based RV Strain Predicts Low R Wave Amplitude after ICD Implantation in Patients with Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy

Inadequate R wave amplitude (RWA) after implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) was suspected to relate to right ventricle impairment. However, little data-based evidence was provided to quantify the association. We retrospectively enrolled ACM patients receiving CMR examinations before transvenous ICD implantation from Fuwai Hospital. The RWA was obtained within 24 h and at 2-6-month follow-up after the operation. Structural, functional, as well as tissue characterization of the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV), were analyzed in relation to RWA. Among the 87 ACM patients (median RWA: 8.0 mV), 19 (21.8%) patients were found with low initial RWA (<5 mV) despite attempts in multiple positions. RV end diastolic diameter (RVEDD), (r = -0.44), RV ejection fraction (RVEF, r = 0.43), RV end diastolic volume index (RVEDVi, r = -0.49), RV end systolic volume index (RVESVi, r = -0.53), RV global circumferential (RVGCS, r = -0.64), and radial strain (RVGRS, r = 0.61, all p < 0.001) rather than LV metrics correlated strongly with initial RWA. RVGCS, RVESVi, and RVGRS were decent predictors of low RWA (areas under the curve AUC: 0.814, 0.769, 0.757, respectively) early after implantation and during 2-6-month follow-up. To summarize, low RWA of ICD lead in ACM patients was associated with RV abnormalities. The RVGCS, RVGRS, and RVESVi can be valuable predictors for identifying low RWA prior to ICD implantation.

Complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator treatment in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

AIMS

Treatment with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is a cornerstone for prevention of sudden cardiac death in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). We aimed at describing the complications associated with ICD treatment in a multinational cohort with long-term follow-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Nordic ARVC registry was established in 2010 and encompasses a large multinational cohort of ARVC patients, including their clinical characteristics, treatment, and events during follow-up. We included 299 patients (66% males, median age 41 years). During a median follow-up of 10.6 years, 124 (41%) patients experienced appropriate ICD shock therapy, 28 (9%) experienced inappropriate shocks, 82 (27%) had a complication requiring surgery (mainly lead-related, n = 75), and 99 (33%) patients experienced the combined endpoint of either an inappropriate shock or a surgical complication. The crude rate of first inappropriate shock was 3.4% during the first year after implantation but decreased after the first year and plateaued over time. Contrary, the risk of a complication requiring surgery was 5.5% the first year and remained high throughout the study period. The combined risk of any complication was 7.9% the first year. In multivariate cox regression, presence of atrial fibrillation/flutter was a risk factor for inappropriate shock (P < 0.05), whereas sex, age at implant, and device type were not (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Forty-one percent of ARVC patients treated with ICD experienced potentially life-saving ICD therapy during long-term follow-up. A third of the patients experienced a complication during follow-up with lead-related complications constituting the vast majority.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: A Window Into the Evolution of Conduction Disease in Cardiac Amyloidosis

OBJECTIVES

This study characterized the relationship between conduction disease and cardiac amyloidosis (CA) through longitudinal analysis of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) data.

BACKGROUND

Bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias are commonly reported in CA and may precede a CA diagnosis, although the natural history of conduction disease in CA is not well-described.

METHODS

Patients with CA (transthyretin amyloidosis cardiomyopathy [ATTR-CM] and light-chain amyloidosis [AL-CA]) and a CIED were identified within the Duke University Health System. Patient characteristics at the time of implantation, including demographics and data relevant to CA diagnosis, cardiac imaging, and CIED were recorded. CIED interrogations were analyzed for pacing and atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, activity level, lead parameters, and ventricular arrhythmia incidence and/or therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with CA (7 with AL-CA, 27 with ATTR-CM [78% with wild-type]; 82% men) with median age of 75 years and a mean ejection fraction of 42 ± 13% had a CIED implanted for bradycardia (65%) or prevention of sudden cardiac death (35%). CIED implantation preceded CA diagnosis in 14 patients (41%). Over a mean follow-up of 3.1 ± 4.0 years, right ventricular sensing amplitudes decreased but did not result in device malfunction; lead impedances and capture thresholds remained stable. Between post-implantation years 1 and 5, mean ventricular pacing increased from 56 ± 9% to 96 ± 1% (p = 0.003) and AF burden increased from 2 ± 1.3 to 17 ± 3 h/day (p = 0.0002). Ventricular arrhythmias were common (mean episodes per patient per year: 6.7 ± 2.3 [ATTR-CM] and 5.1 ± 3.2 [AL-CA]) but predominately nonsustained; only 1 patient with AL-CA required implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Longitudinal analysis of CIED data in patients with CA revealed progressive conduction disease, with high AF burden and eventual dependence on ventricular pacing, although lead parameters remained stable. Ventricular arrhythmias were common but predominantly nonsustained, particularly in ATTR-CM.

Long-Term Performance of Right Ventricular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) implanted with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) may show a large decrease in R-wave amplitude during long-term follow-up. However, it is unclear whether this decrease is higher in these patients than in those without structural heart disease. This study investigated ICD-lead intracardiac parameters over a long duration in patients with ARVC and HCM and compared these parameters with those of a control group. We included 50 patients (mean age, 55.2 ± 17.2 years; 26% female) with ICD leads in the right ventricular apex, and compared 7 ARVC and 14 HCM patients with 29 control patients without structural heart disease. ICD-lead parameters, including R-wave amplitude, pacing threshold, and impedance during follow-up, were compared. The difference in these parameters between the time of implantation and year 5 were also compared. There were no significant differences in R-wave amplitude at implantation among the 3 groups. The change in R-wave amplitude between the time of implantation and year 5 was significantly greater in the ARVC group (-3.3 ± 5.4 mV, P = 0.012) in comparison to the control group (1.3 ± 2.8 mV); the HCM group showed no significant difference (-0.4 ± 2.3 mV, P = 0.06). Thus, in the ARVC group, R-wave amplitude at year 5 was significantly lower than that in the control group (5.7 ± 4.8 mV versus 12.5 ± 4.5 mV, P = 0.001). In ARVC patients with ICDs, ventricular sensing is likely to deteriorate during long-term follow-up; however, in HCM patients, sensing may not deteriorate.

Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: A Transatlantic Experience

Background Despite growing use of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S- ICD ), its clinical role in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia ( ARVC /D) patients remains undefined. We aim to elucidate the cardiac phenotype, implant characteristics, and long-term efficacy regarding appropriate therapy and complications in ARVC /D patients with an S- ICD implant. Methods and Results A transatlantic cohort of ARVC /D patients who underwent S- ICD implantation was analyzed for clinical characteristics, S- ICD therapy, and long-term outcome including device-related complications. The cohort included 29 patients (52% male, 76% probands, 59% with ARVC /D-associated mutation, 59% primary prevention [no prior sustained ventricular arrhythmias], and 45% first-generation S- ICD devices). At implant, all inducible patients (27/29) had conversion of induced ventricular fibrillation. Two patients (7%) had superficial infections of the incision site that were treated conservatively. Over a median follow-up of 3.16 years (interquartile range: 2.21-4.51 years), all episodes (6 patients, 4% per year) of sustained ventricular arrhythmias were appropriately detected and treated. Six patients (21%) experienced 39 inappropriate shocks, with 3 requiring device explantation. Oversensing of noncardiac signal (n=4; especially myopotentials) and cardiac signal (n=4) was the most frequent etiology. No lead or device dislodgement, infection, skin erosion, or explantation related to need for antitachycardia pacing was noted. Conclusions S- ICD can effectively treat both induced and spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ARVC /D. The rate of inappropriate shocks, although considerable, is comparable to that in ARVC /D patients treated with transvenous ICD s. When they occurred, inappropriate shocks were primarily due to cardiac and, uniquely, noncardiac oversensing. We suggest potential strategies for minimizing inappropriate therapy.

Trends in implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronisation therapy lead parameters for patients with arrhythmogenic and dilated cardiomyopathies

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead parameters may deteriorate due to right ventricular (RV) disease such as arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), with implications for safe delivery of therapies. We compared ICD and CRT-D (cardiac resynchronisation therapy-defibrillator) lead parameters in patients with ARVC and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM).

METHODS

RV lead sensing (R wave amplitude) and pacing (threshold and amplitude-pulse width product (APWP)), left ventricular (LV) pacing (APWP), and imaging parameter trends were assessed in 18 patients with ARVC and 18 with DCM.

RESULTS

R wave amplitude did not change significantly over time in either group (over 5 years, ARVC -0.4 mV, 95% CI -3.8-3.0 mV; DCM -1.8 mV, 95% CI -5.0-1.3 mV). Within ARVC group, divergent trends were seen according to lead position. DCM patients experienced an increase in RV lead threshold (+1.1 V over 5 years, 95% CI + 0.5 to +1.7 V) and RV APWP (+0.48 Vms over 5 years, 95% CI + 0.24 to +0.71 Vms); ARVC patients had no change. ARVC patients had a higher LVEF at baseline than DCM patients (52 vs 20%, p < 0.001), though LVEF decreased over time for the former, while increasing for the latter. TAPSE did not change over time for ARVC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lead parameters in ARVC patients were stable over medium-term follow up. In DCM patients, RV lead threshold and RV and LV APWP increased over time. These differential responses for DCM and ARVC were not explained by imaging indices, and may reflect distinct patterns of disease progression.

Syncope and the risk of sudden cardiac death: Evaluation, management, and prevention

Syncope is a clinical syndrome defined as a relatively brief self-limited transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) caused by a period of inadequate cerebral nutrient flow. Most often the trigger is an abrupt drop of systemic blood pressure. True syncope must be distinguished from other common non-syncope conditions in which real or apparent TLOC may occur such as seizures, concussions, or accidental falls. The causes of syncope are diverse, but in most instances, are relatively benign (e.g., reflex and orthostatic faints) with the main risks being accidents and/or injury. However, in some instances, syncope may be due to more worrisome conditions (particularly those associated with cardiac structural disease or channelopathies); in such circumstances, syncope may be an indicator of increased morbidity and mortality risk, including sudden cardiac death (SCD). Establishing an accurate basis for the etiology of syncope is crucial in order to initiate effective therapy. In this review, we focus primarily on the causes of syncope that are associated with increased SCD risk (i.e., sudden arrhythmic cardiac death), and the management of these patients. In addition, we discuss the limitations of our understanding of SCD in relation to syncope, and propose future studies that may ultimately address how to improve outcomes of syncope patients and reduce SCD risk.

Anaesthesia for patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is an inherited heart muscle disease. Myocyte apoptosis and fibro-fatty scar tissue predisposes patients to malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Patients may present to variety of surgical procedures with diagnosed ARVD. Surgical insult, catecholamine surge and physiological disturbance can be hazardous on the vulnerable myocardium and may result in life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or sudden cardiac death in the perioperative period. Anaesthetists have particular role in perioperative management of this patient population, meticulous perioperative planning, close haemodynamic monitoring and maintenance of physiological stability throughout helps to avoid devastating perioperative loss.