Myocardial injury during radiofrequency and cryoablation of typical atrial flutter

Evaluation of myocardial injury induced by different ablation approaches (radiofrequency ablation versus cryoablation) in atrial flutter patients: a meta-analysis

Background: To evaluate myocardial injury in Atrial flutter (AFL) patients undergoing Radiofrequency ablation (RF) and cryoablation (CRYO) treatments.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CBM databases. All relevant clinical trials (up to October 2018) on myocardial injury in AFL patients were retrieved and subsequent results analyzed with a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model.

Results: A total of eight clinical trials with a sample size of 644 patients, were identified and incorporated in the present study. The results indicated no significant differences in creatine kinase (CK) levels (mean difference (MD) = 62.74, P=0.46; 4–6 h and MD = 30.73, P=0.49; 12–24 h after ablation), creatine kinase MB(CK-MB) levels (MD = 17.32, P=0.25; 12–24 h post-ablation), troponinI (TnI) levels (MD = 0.12, P=0.08; 6 h after ablation), and troponin T (TnT) levels (MD = 0.30, P=0.08; 4–6 h post-ablation) between the two treatment approaches. However, patients receiving CRYO xhibited higher levels of CK (MD = 179.54, P=0.04; tested immediately after the procedure), CK-MB (MD = 10.08, P=0.004) 4–6 h after ablation, and TnT (MD = 0.19, P=0.002) tested the next morning. Moreover, those patients had a significantly reduced pain perception (odds ratio (OR) = 0.05, P=0.04) compared with those in the RF group.

Conclusion: These results indicate that CRYO in comparison with RF significantly increases myocardial injury in AFL patients. Additionally, it decreases pain perception during the procedure. Further large-sampled studies are needed to support these findings.