His electrogram alternans (Zhang's phenomenon) and a new model of dual pathway atrioventricular node conduction

A jump in the atrioventricular conduction curve is not caused by a switch from fast pathway to slow pathway conduction

Background: A jump in the atrioventricular (AV) conduction curve is the current clinical criterion of dual-pathway electrophysiology. However, the assumption that a jump indicates a switch from fast pathway (FP) to slow pathway (SP) conduction remains unconfirmed. This study was carried out to investigate whether a jump indeed indicates a transition from FP to SP conduction, and if not, what the potential cause is. Methods: Eighty-one experimental records from rabbit AV nodal preparations containing the following data were analyzed: 1) had at least one AV conduction curve and 2) had recording of His electrogram alternans (a validated new index of dual-pathway conduction). Most cases also had intracellular action potential recordings from the AV nodal fibers. Results: Of the 81 preparations, 11 (13%) showed a jump in the AV conduction curve. The jumps always occurred after the FP to SP transition. The FP-SP transition occurred at prematurity at 196 ± 39 ms versus the jump at 114 ± 13 ms (p < 0.001). The beat with a jump showed an SP-FP pattern in seven and an SP-SP pattern in four preparations. The jumps were always associated with and most likely caused by the formation of intranodal/nodal-atrial reentry and its subsequent conduction, rather than a switch from FP to SP conduction. Conclusion: Contrary to what has been assumed, a transition from FP to SP conduction does not produce a jump in the AV conduction curve. A jump in the AV conduction curve is most likely caused by the formation of intranodal/nodal-atrial reentry and its subsequent conduction.

New insights into atrioventricular nodal anatomy, physiology, and immunochemistry: A comprehensive review and a proposed model of the slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia circuit in agreement with direct potential recordings in the Koch's triangle area

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most frequent regular tachycardia in humans. In this review, we describe the most recent discoveries regarding the anatomical, physiological, and molecular biological features of the atrioventricular junction that could underlie the typical slow-fast AVNRT mechanisms, as these insights could lead to the proposal of a new theory concerning the circuit of this arrhythmia. Despite several models have been proposed over the years, the precise anatomical site of the reentrant circuit and the pathway involved in the slow-fast AVNRT have not been conclusively defined. One possible way to evaluate all the hypotheses regarding the nodal tachycardia circuit in humans is to map this circuit. Thus, we tried to identify the slow potential of nodal and inferior extension structures by using automated mapping of atrial activation during both sinus rhythm and typical slow-fast AVNRT. This constitutes a first step toward the definition of nodal area activation in sinus rhythm and during slow-fast AVNRT. Further studies and technical improvements in recording the potentials of the atrioventricular node structures are necessary to confirm our initial results.

Frequent inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy was determined to be dual atrioventricular nodal non-reentrant tachycardia: A case report

RATIONALE

Dual atrioventricular node non-reentrant tachycardia (DAVNNRT) is a rare arrhythmia. We present a case of inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy caused by DAVNNRT. DAVNNRT is easily misdiagnosed as atrial fibrillation and is often identified as ventricular tachycardia (VT) by the supraventricular tachycardia-ventricular tachycardia (SVT-VT) discriminator of the ICD.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 73-year-old man with ischemic heart disease (IHD) presented with palpitations accompanied by dyspnea and syncope. Frequent multifocal premature ventricular beats and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia were observed on ambulatory electrocardiography. The left ventricular ejection fraction decreased to 32%.

DIAGNOSIS

He was diagnosed with IHD, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and VT.

INTERVENTIONS

: Initially, the patient received a single-chamber ICD implantation for secondary prevention of sudden death. He then suffered from inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP)/shock therapy many times after the procedure. DAVNNRT was confirmed in an electrophysiology study (EPS), and radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway successfully terminated this tachycardia.

OUTCOMES

No episode of inappropriate ICD therapy or tachycardia occurred during the follow-up.

LESSONS

In conclusion, it is essential to have a full understanding of DAVNNRT and eliminate slow pathways for patients with DAVNNRT and be prepared to implant an ICD.

Antegrade slow pathway mapping of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia based on direct slow pathway capture

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (tAVNRT) is performed without revealing out the location of antegrade slow pathway (ASp). In this study, we studied a new electrophysiological method of identifying the site of ASp.

METHODS

This study included 19 patients. Repeated series of very high-output single extrastimulations (VhoSESts) were delivered at the anatomical slow pathway region during tAVNRT. Tachycardia cycle length (TCL), coupling interval (CI), and return cycle (RC) were measured and the prematurity of VhoSESts [ΔPM (= TCL - CI)] and the prolongation of RCs [ΔPL (= RC - TCL)] were calculated. Pacing sites were classified into two categories: (i) ASp capture sites [DSPC(+) sites], where two different RCs were shown, and ASp non-capture sites [DSPC(-) sites], where only one RC was shown. RF ablation was performed at DSPC(+) sites and/or sites with catheter-induced mechanical trauma (CIMT) to ASp.

RESULTS

DSPC(+) sites were shown in 13 patients (68%). RF ablation was successful in all patients without any degree of atrioventricular block nor recurrence. Total number of RF applications was 1.8 ± 1.1. Minimal distance between successful ablation sites and DSPC(+)/CIMT sites and His bundle (HB) electrogram recording sites was 1.9 ± 0.8 mm and 19.8 ± 6.1 mm, respectively. ΔPL of more than 92.5 ms, ΔPL/TCL of more than 0.286, and ΔPL/ΔPM of more than 1.565 could identify ASp with sensitivity of 100%, 91.1%, and 88.9% and specificity of 92.9%, 97.0%, and 97.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sites with ASp capture and CIMT were close to successful ablation sites and could be useful indicators of tAVNRT ablation.

Challenges in Narrow QRS Complex Tachycardia Interpretation

Several arrhythmogenic substrates may generate narrow QRS complex tachycardia, frequently encountered in clinical practice. Some narrow QRS complex tachycardias, however, are sustained by an uncommon arrhythmogenic mechanism. Although rare, these forms should be taken into account in the differential diagnosis to avoid misdiagnosis and improper patient management. Dual atrioventricular node physiology can be responsible for different uncommon forms of narrow QRS complex tachycardia, also nonreentrant in mechanism. A ventricular origin also is possible, if the tachycardia site is located in the upper ventricular septum with fast ventricular propagation to the specific conduction system and narrowing of the QRS complex.

Restitution characteristics of His bundle and working myocardium in isolated rabbit hearts

The Purkinje system (PS) and the His bundle have been recently implicated as an important driver of the rapid activation rate after 1-2 minutes of ventricular fibrillation (VF). It is unknown whether activations during VF propagate through the His-Purkinje system to other portions of the the working myocardium (WM). Little is known about restitution characteristic differences between the His bundle and working myocardium at short cycle lengths. In this study, rabbit hearts (n = 9) were isolated, Langendorff-perfused, and electromechanically uncoupled with blebbistatin (10 μM). Pacing pulses were delivered directly to the His bundle. By using standard glass microelectrodes, action potentials duration (APD) from the His bundle and WM were obtained simultaneously over a wide range of stimulation cycle lengths (CL). The global F-test indicated that the two restitution curves of the His bundle and the WM are statistically significantly different (P<0.05). Also, the APD of the His bundle was significantly shorter than that of WM throughout the whole pacing course (P<0.001). The CL at which alternans developed in the His bundle vs. the WM were shorter for the His bundle (134.2±13.1ms vs. 148.3±13.3ms, P<0.01) and 2:1 block developed at a shorter CL in the His bundle than in WM (130.0±10.0 vs. 145.6±14.2ms, P<0.01). The His bundle APD was significantly shorter than that of WM under both slow and rapid pacing rates, which suggest that there may be an excitable gap during VF and that the His bundle may conduct wavefronts from one bundle branch to the other at short cycle lengths and during VF.