1
|
Wörmann J, Duncker D, Althoff T, Heeger C, Tilz R, Estner H, Rillig A, Sommer P, Iden L, Johnson V, Chun KRJ, Jansen H, Maurer T, Busch S, Steven D. [Lead placement in cardiac implantable electronic devices]. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 2024; 35:155-164. [PMID: 38748284 PMCID: PMC11161426 DOI: 10.1007/s00399-024-01019-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
The implantation of electrodes for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) requires profound technical understanding and precise execution. The positioning of electrodes in the right ventricle and atrium has significant implications for patient safety and the effectiveness of CIED therapy. Particular focus is given to the distinction between apical and septal stimulation in ventricular positioning. Based on current data, this article provides a practice-oriented guide that leads implanters through the individual steps of electrode positioning. The implantation of electrodes for physiological stimulation (cardiac resynchronization therapy, CRT, and conduction system pacing, CSP) is not addressed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Wörmann
- Abteilung für Elektrophysiologie, Herzzentrum der Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
| | - David Duncker
- Hannover Herzrhythmus Centrum, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Till Althoff
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Charite - Universitätsmedizin Medizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
- Arrhythmia Section, Cardiovascular Institute (ICCV), CLÍNIC - University Hospital Barcelona, Barcelona, Spanien
| | - Christian Heeger
- Department für Rhythmologie, Abteilung für Kardiologie & Internistische Intensivmedizin, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Deutschland
- Klinik für Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Roland Tilz
- Klinik für Rhythmologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
| | - Heidi Estner
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, LMU Klinikum der Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Rillig
- Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Philipp Sommer
- Med. Klinik für Elektrophysiologie/Rhythmologie, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW , Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Deutschland
| | - Leon Iden
- Klinik für Kardiologie , Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Bad Segeberg, Bad Segeberg, Deutschland
| | - Victoria Johnson
- Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Universitäres Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Frankfurt, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - K R Julian Chun
- Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien - CCB, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Henning Jansen
- Elektrophysiologie Bremen, Herzzentrum Bremen am Klinikum Links der Weser, Bremen, Deutschland
| | - Tilman Maurer
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Asklepios Klinik Nord - Heidberg, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Sonia Busch
- Abteilung für Elektrophysiologie, Herz-Zentrum Bodensee, Konstanz, Deutschland
| | - Daniel Steven
- Abteilung für Elektrophysiologie, Herzzentrum der Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Komatsu T, Okada A, Kuwahara K. Two different right ventricular pacing waveforms. Eur Heart J Case Rep 2024; 8:ytae119. [PMID: 38487590 PMCID: PMC10939170 DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Toshinori Komatsu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi 3-1-1, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Ayako Okada
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi 3-1-1, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Koichiro Kuwahara
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi 3-1-1, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ballantyne BA, Chew DS, Vandenberk B. Paradigm Shifts in Cardiac Pacing: Where Have We Been and What Lies Ahead? J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12082938. [PMID: 37109274 PMCID: PMC10146747 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The history of cardiac pacing dates back to the 1930s with externalized pacing and has evolved to incorporate transvenous, multi-lead, or even leadless devices. Annual implantation rates of cardiac implantable electronic devices have increased since the introduction of the implantable system, likely related to expanding indications, and increasing global life expectancy and aging demographics. Here, we summarize the relevant literature on cardiac pacing to demonstrate the enormous impact it has had within the field of cardiology. Further, we look forward to the future of cardiac pacing, including conduction system pacing and leadless pacing strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brennan A Ballantyne
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Derek S Chew
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Bert Vandenberk
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Qin D, Filippaios A, Murphy J, Berg M, Lampert R, Schloss EJ, Noone M, Mela T. Short- and Long-Term Risk of Lead Dislodgement Events: Real-World Experience From Product Surveillance Registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2022; 15:e011029. [PMID: 35925831 DOI: 10.1161/circep.122.011029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lead dislodgement (LD) has been one of the most common early complications after cardiovascular implantable electronic device implant. However, limited data are available on the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of LD events. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors, clinical significance, and management strategies of LD events after cardiovascular implantable electronic device implant. METHODS This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of 20 683 patients who underwent cardiovascular implantable electronic device implant between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2020 in Medtronic's Product Surveillance Registry, with a mean follow-up time of 3.3±2.5 SD years. The study population was divided into 2 groups: group A with LD events (N=350) and group B without LD events (N=20 333). RESULTS During this period, 350 patients (1.69%) had LD events involving 371 leads (0.95%), among a total of 39 060 leads implanted. Passive fixation type (right atrium pacing lead, P=0.041), lower sensing amplitude (right ventricle defibrillating lead, P=0.020), and lower lead impedance at implant (right atrium pacing lead, P=0.009) were associated with increased LD risk. Multivariate analysis showed female sex (hazard ratio, 1.520, P=0.008) and higher body mass index (hazard ratio, 1.012, P=0.001) were independently associated with increased risk of LD events. LD events were not associated with significant changes in the long-term risks of cardiac and overall mortality. In group A, repositioning the dislodged leads increased the risk of a second LD event compared with implanting new leads (P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS Female sex and higher body mass index were associated with higher risk of LD events in the Product Surveillance Registry. Among patients with dislodged leads, implanting new leads was associated with lower risk of future LD events. Further studies on how to reduce LD risk and to improve management of these events are needed. REGISTRATION URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov; Unique identifier: NCT01524276.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dingxin Qin
- New England Heart and Vascular Institute, Catholic Medical Center, Manchester, NH (D.Q.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Theofanie Mela
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (T.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Luo J, Zhou Z, Chen K, Lin J, Cai C, Zeng Z. Implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker in a patient with dextrocardia and sick sinus syndrome: a case report. J Int Med Res 2022; 50:3000605221088551. [PMID: 35345937 PMCID: PMC8969507 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221088551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Dextrocardia is a congenital abnormal position of the heart in which the main part of the heart is in the right chest, and the long axis of the heart points to the lower right. Cases of a combination of dextrocardia and sick sinus syndrome are rare. A 65-year-old female patient was admitted to hospital with palpitations and dizziness for 1 week. Mirror-image dextrocardia and sick sinus syndrome were diagnosed by an electrocardiogram, echocardiography, Holter monitoring, and X-rays. Finally, we successfully implanted a dual-chamber pacemaker into the patient. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged when her symptoms had greatly improved 1 week later. When dextrocardia is present, using active fixation leads in the atrial and ventricular leads is easier for finding the pacing position with optimal sensing and pacing thresholds, and they reduce the incidence of falling off.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junqian Luo
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zihao Zhou
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Kaicong Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Junyao Lin
- The Second People’s Hospital of Shanwei (Yihui Fund Hospital of Shanwei), Shanwei, Guangdong Province, 516600 China
| | - Chaogeng Cai
- The Second People’s Hospital of Shanwei (Yihui Fund Hospital of Shanwei), Shanwei, Guangdong Province, 516600 China
| | - Zhihuan Zeng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
- Zhihuan Zeng, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, No. 19 Nonglinxia Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, People’s Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Burri H, Starck C, Auricchio A, Biffi M, Burri M, D'Avila A, Deharo JC, Glikson M, Israel C, Lau CP, Leclercq C, Love CJ, Nielsen JC, Vernooy K, Dagres N, Boveda S, Butter C, Marijon E, Braunschweig F, Mairesse GH, Gleva M, Defaye P, Zanon F, Lopez-Cabanillas N, Guerra JM, Vassilikos VP, Martins Oliveira M. EHRA expert consensus statement and practical guide on optimal implantation technique for conventional pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). Europace 2021; 23:983-1008. [PMID: 33878762 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
With the global increase in device implantations, there is a growing need to train physicians to implant pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Although there are international recommendations for device indications and programming, there is no consensus to date regarding implantation technique. This document is founded on a systematic literature search and review, and on consensus from an international task force. It aims to fill the gap by setting standards for device implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haran Burri
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Starck
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center, Berlin, Augustenburger Pl. 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.,German Center of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Steinbeis University Berlin, Institute (STI) of Cardiovascular Perfusion, Berlin, Germany
| | - Angelo Auricchio
- Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, Via Tesserete 48, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mafalda Burri
- Division of Scientific Information, University of Geneva, Rue Michel Servet 1, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Andre D'Avila
- Serviço de Arritmia Cardíaca-Hospital SOS Cardio, 2 Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.,Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Carsten Israel
- Department of Cardiology, Bethel-Clinic Bielefeld, Burgsteig 13, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Chu-Pak Lau
- Division of Cardiology, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong
| | | | - Charles J Love
- Johns Hopkins Hospital and School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jens Cosedis Nielsen
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd. 161, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kevin Vernooy
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, 31076 Toulouse, France
| | - Christian Butter
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Brandenburg, Chefarzt, Abteilung Kardiologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eloi Marijon
- University of Paris, Head of Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, 20 Rue Leblanc, 75908 Paris Cedex 15, France
| | | | - Georges H Mairesse
- Department of Cardiology-Electrophysiology, Cliniques du Sud Luxembourg-Vivalia, rue des Deportes 137, BE-6700 Arlon, Belgium
| | - Marye Gleva
- Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Pascal Defaye
- CHU Grenoble Alpes, Unite de Rythmologie, Service De Cardiologie, CS10135, 38043 Grenoble Cedex 09, France
| | - Francesco Zanon
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, Department of Cardiology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | | | - Jose M Guerra
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, CIBERCV, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vassilios P Vassilikos
- Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,3rd Cardiology Department, Hippokrateio General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Mario Martins Oliveira
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Santa Marta, Rua Santa Marta, 1167-024 Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
DeFilippis EM, Rubin G, Farr MA, Biviano A, Wan EY, Takeda K, Garan H, Topkara VK, Yarmohammadi H. Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Following Heart Transplantation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2020; 6:1028-1042. [PMID: 32819520 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is required in a subset of patients (∼10%) for sinus node dysfunction or atrioventricular block both early and late after heart transplantation. The incidence of PPM implantation has decreased to <5% with the advent of bicaval anastamosis transplantation surgery. Pacing dependence upon follow-up has been variably reported. An even smaller percentage of transplantation recipients (1.5% to 3.4%) undergo implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Rigorous data are lacking for the use of ICDs in the transplantation population and is largely derived from cohort studies and case series. Sudden cardiac death occurs in approximately 10% of transplantation recipients, but multiple nonarrhythmic factors are believed to be responsible, including acute rejection, late graft failure with electromechanical dissociation, and ischemia due to cardiac allograft vasculopathy. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the existing data regarding the role for PPMs and ICDs in this population, including leadless PPMs and subcutaneous ICDs, special considerations, and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ersilia M DeFilippis
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Geoffrey Rubin
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maryjane A Farr
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Angelo Biviano
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elaine Y Wan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Koji Takeda
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hasan Garan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Veli K Topkara
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hirad Yarmohammadi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ziacchi M, Palmisano P, Biffi M, Guerra F, Stabile G, Forleo GB, Zanotto G, D'Onofrio A, Landolina M, De Ponti R, Zoni Berisso M, Ricci RP, Boriani G. Lead choice in cardiac implantable electronic devices: an Italian survey promoted by AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing). Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:821-828. [PMID: 31348864 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1649134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: Few data are available regarding lead preferences of electrophysiologists during cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) implantation. Aim of this survey is to evaluate the leads used, and the reasons behind these choices, in a large population of implanters. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all 314 Italian centers with experience in CIED implantation. Results: 103 operators from 100 centers (32% of centers) responded. For atrium, passive leads represented first choice for pacemakers and defibrillators (71% and 64% of physicians, respectively), mainly for safety. For right ventricle, active fixation was preferred (61% and 93% operators in pacemaker and defibrillator patients), for higher versatility in positioning and lower dislodgement risk. For left ventricular stimulation, quadripolar leads were preferred by more than 80% of respondents, for better phrenic nerve and myocardial threshold management; active-fixation leads represent a second choice, in order to prevent or manage dislodgement (78% and 17% of respondents, respectively), but 44% of operators considered them dangerous. Conclusions: The choice of leads is heterogeneous. Trends are toward active-fixation right ventricular leads and passive-fixation atrial leads (particularly in pacemaker patients, considered frailer). For left ventricular stimulation, operators' majority want to disposition all kind of leads, although quadripolar leads are the favorites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Ziacchi
- Institute of Cardiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | | | - Mauro Biffi
- Institute of Cardiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital , Bologna , Italy
| | - Federico Guerra
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University , Ancona , Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Roberto De Ponti
- Department of Heart and Vessels, Circolo Hospital, University of Insubria , Varese , Italy
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia , Modena , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perforación cardiaca posterior al implante de marcapasos: reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura. CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.circv.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
10
|
Ishizue N, Kishihara J, Niwano S, Ako J. Subacute pneumothorax contralateral to the venous access site associated with atrial lead perforation in a patient who was receiving corticosteroid therapy. J Arrhythm 2017; 33:335-337. [PMID: 28765768 PMCID: PMC5529589 DOI: 10.1016/j.joa.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2016] [Revised: 03/04/2017] [Accepted: 03/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pneumothorax contralateral to the venous access site due to the right atrial lead is an uncommon complication. Concomitant steroid use is known as a risk factor of pacemaker lead perforation. We report a rare case of subacute contralateral pneumothorax due to a screw-in atrial lead perforation that occurred after dual-chamber pacemaker implantation in a patient who was receiving steroid therapy. The pneumothorax disappeared, and no recurrence was observed during follow-up with close observation alone. We report a case of contralateral pneumothorax due to pacemaker implantation. Long-term steroid therapy is a risk factor of lead perforation. The pneumothorax resolved with close observation alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruya Ishizue
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Jun Kishihara
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Shinichi Niwano
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Junya Ako
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hao Y, Li Y, Liao D, Yang L, Liu F. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of active versus passive atrial lead fixation in Chinese patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices: a long term, retrospective, observational, single-center study. Curr Med Res Opin 2017; 33:573-578. [PMID: 28008765 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1275938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data comparing active atrial lead fixation with passive atrial lead fixation in Chinese patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for atrial pacing is limited. Our study evaluated the effectiveness of active fixation versus passive fixation of atrial leads by observing the lead performance parameters. METHODS This retrospective, long-term, single-center study included a cohort of Chinese patients who underwent CIED implantation at the Department of Cardiology of People's Hospital of Yuxi City, China, from 1 March 2010 to 1 March 2015. Efficacy was determined by comparing implantation time, threshold values, incidence of lead dislocation/failure, and lead-related complications between the two groups. RESULTS Of the 1217 patients, active and passive atrial lead fixation were performed in 530 (mean age, 69.37 ± 11.44 years) and 497 (mean age, 68.33 ± 10.96 years). The active fixation group reported significantly lower mean atrial implantation times (P = .0001) and threshold values (P = .044) compared with the passive atrial lead fixation group. In addition, threshold values in the active atrial lead fixation group were stable throughout the observation period. No instances of myocardial perforation, cardiac tamponade, implantation failure, or electrode dislocation/re-fixation were reported in the active atrial lead fixation group. A favorable decrease in patient comfort parameters such as bed rest time (P = .027) and duration of hospital stay (P = .038) were also observed in the active lead fixation group. CONCLUSION Active atrial lead fixation demonstrated greater stability, steady long-term thresholds and minimal lead-related complications compared to passive lead fixation in Chinese patients with CIEDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinglu Hao
- a Department of Cardiology , People's Hospital of Yuxi City , Yuxi , China
| | - Yanping Li
- a Department of Cardiology , People's Hospital of Yuxi City , Yuxi , China
| | - Derong Liao
- a Department of Cardiology , People's Hospital of Yuxi City , Yuxi , China
| | - Ling Yang
- a Department of Cardiology , People's Hospital of Yuxi City , Yuxi , China
| | - Fangyan Liu
- a Department of Cardiology , People's Hospital of Yuxi City , Yuxi , China
| |
Collapse
|