Impact of new X-ray technology on patient dose in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantations

Contactless Electrocatheter Tracing within Human Body via Magnetic Sensing: A Feasibility Study

During surgical procedures, real-time estimation of the current position of a metal lead within the patient's body is obtained by radiographic imaging. The inherent opacity of metal objects allows their visualization using X-ray fluoroscopic devices. Although fluoroscopy uses reduced radiation intensities, the overall X-ray dose delivered during prolonged exposure times poses risks to the safety of patients and physicians. This study proposes a potential alternative to real-time visualization of a lead inside the human body. In principle, by making a weak current flow through the lead and measuring the related magnetic field generated outside the body, it is possible to trace the position of the lead. This hypothesis was verified experimentally via two tests: one carried out on a curved copper wire in air and one carried out on a real pacemaker lead in a saline solution. In the second test, a pacemaker lead and a large return electrode were placed in a tank filled with a saline solution that reproduced the mean resistivity of the human torso. In both tests, a current flowed through the lead, which consisted of square pulses with short duration, to avoid any neuro-muscular stimulation effects in a real scenario. A small coil with a ferrite core was moved along a grid of points over a plastic sheet and placed just above the lead to sample the spatial amplitude distribution of the magnetic induction field produced by the lead. For each measurement point, the main coil axis was oriented along the x and y axes of the plane to estimate the related components of the magnetic induction field. The two matrices of measurements along the x and y axes were further processed to obtain an estimate of lead positioning. The preliminary results of this study support the scientific hypothesis since the positions of the leads were accurately estimated. This encourages to deepen the investigation and overcome some limitations of this feasibility study.

Cardiac catheterization real-time dynamic radiation dose measurement to estimate lifetime attributable risk of cancer

Cardiac catheterization procedure is the gold standard to diagnose and treat cardiovascular disease. However, radiation safety and cancer risk remain major concerns. This study aimed to real-time dynamic radiation dose measurement to estimate lifetime attributable risk (LAR) of cancer incidence and mortality in operators. Coronary angiography (CA) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), CA, and others (radiofrequency ablation, pacemaker and defibrillator implantation) procedures with different beam directions, were undertaken on x-ray angiography system. A real-time electronic personal dosimeter (EPD) system was used to measure the radiation dose of staff during all procedures. We followed the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) VII report to estimate the LAR of all cancer incidence and mortality. Primary operators received radiation dose in CA with PCI, CA, and others procedures were 59.33 ± 95.03 μSv, 39.81 ± 103.85 μSv, and 21.92 ± 37.04 μSv, respectively. As to the assistant operators were 30.03 ± 55.67 μSv, 14.67 ± 14.88 μSv, and 4 μSv, respectively. LAR of all cancer incidences for staffs aged from 18 to 65 are varied from 0.40% for males to 1.50% for females. LAR of all cancer mortality for staffs aged from 18 to 65 are varied from 0.22% for males to 0.83% for females. Our study provided an easy, real-time and dynamic radiation dose measurement to estimate LAR of cancer for staff during the cardiac catheterization procedures. The LAR for all cancer incidence is about twice that for cancer mortality. Although the radiation doses of staff are lower during each procedure, the increased years of service leads to greater radiation risk to the staff.

Radiation exposure during cardiac device implantation: Lessons learned from a multicenter registry

BACKGROUND

Little data are available about radiation exposure during cardiac electrical device implantation, and no dose reference levels have been published. This multicenter, prospective, observational study assesses patient and staff radiation exposure during cardiac device implantations, and aims at defining dose reference levels.

METHODS

Patient demographic, procedural, and radiation data were obtained for 657 procedures from nine institutions. Physician and staff exposure were measured using real-time dosimeters worn beneath and above lead apron. Statistical analysis included fluoroscopy time (FT), dose-area product (DAP), and DAP adjusted for FT and body mass index.

RESULTS

Pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators were implanted in 481 and 176 patients, respectively. Of these, 152 were treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Median FTs were 837s (interquartile range [IQR]: 480-1323), 117s (IQR: 69-209), and 101s (IQR: 58-162), and median DAPs were 1410 (IQR: 807-2601), 150 (IQR: 72-338), and 129 (IQR: 72-332) cGy.cm² for biventricular, dual chamber, and ventricular device implantation, respectively. Dose reference levels correspond to the third quartile values. During CRT, higher exposure was observed with four X-ray systems than with the two newer and customizable ones (adjusted DAP of 0.90 [IQR: 0.26-1.01] and 0.29 [IQR: 0.23-0.39], respectively; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Based on real-life measurements, this multicenter registry provides dose reference levels and may help centers assess radiation exposure. Although biventricular device implantation was responsible for the highest radiation exposure, FT was meaningfully shortened compared to previously reported values. For a same FT, the use of new generators and custom settings has significantly reduced DAP.

Evaluation of a new ultralow-dose radiation protocol for electrophysiological device implantation: A near-zero fluoroscopy approach for device implantation

BACKGROUND

Radiation is one of the main hazards of electrophysiological device implantation, and insertion of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices in particular is associated with high radiation doses.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a new ultralow-dose radiation protocol on radiation doses, success rate, and safety of electrophysiological device implantations.

METHODS

In 2018, we established a new ultralow-dose radiation protocol (reduced pulse width, increased thickness of minimum copper filters, reduced detector entrance dose, reduced pulse rate, optimized image postprocessing settings) for de novo device implantation at our hospital. A total of 1173 patients (11% single-chamber devices, 69% dual-chamber devices, 20% CRT devices) were analyzed. Five hundred twelve patients (44%) in the ultralow-dose group were compared to 661 patients (66%) treated during 2017 with a conventional low-dose protocol.

RESULTS

With the ultralow-dose radiation protocol, effective doses could be reduced by 59% (median 0.25 [interquartile range: 0.11-0.63] vs median 0.10 [interquartile range: 0.03-0.28] mSv; P <.0001) per procedure without a significant change in procedure time (P = .5). This dose reduction could be achieved without decreasing procedure success (P = 1) or increasing complication rate (P = .8). Male gender, higher body mass index, increased procedure and fluoroscopy times, and use of the conventional radiation protocol were independent predictors of higher radiation doses in multivariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

By establishing a new ultralow-dose radiation protocol, we could significantly decrease radiation exposure, reaching the lowest radiation doses for electrophysiological device implantation reported to date.

The effectiveness of additional lead-shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy in protecting staff from scatter radiation during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)

PURPOSE

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) often requires a long fluoroscopic time and protection from scatter radiation. This study reports on scatter radiation levels during CRT, with and without additional shielding, and using standard or low pulse rate fluoroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Additional lead-shielding drape (0.35-mm lead equivalent) was used on the left side of the table and pulsed fluoroscopy was performed at rates of 10 pulses/s (usual rate) and 7.5 pulses/s (low pulse rate). Fluoroscopy scatter radiation was measured for both pulse rates using an acrylic phantom with a radiation survey meter, both with and without the additional lead-shielding drape.

RESULTS

With the additional lead-shielding drape, the fluoroscopy scatter radiation was reduced by 74.3% at 10 pulses/s and 78.6% at 7.5 pulses/s. If the fluoroscopy was changed from 10 pulses/s to 7.5 pulses/s, the scattered radiation at the primary physician's position was reduced by 24.0%. The combined use of additional shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy reduced scatter radiation by over 80%.

CONCLUSION

Additional lead-shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy are effective in reducing the scattered radiation dose to physicians and nurses during CRT.

Image noise reduction technology allows significant reduction of radiation dosage in cardiac device implantation procedures

BACKGROUND

Novel x-ray systems with real-time image noise reduction technology (INRT) to reduce radiation dose during fluoroscopy and cine acquisition have become available. This study evaluated the reduction of radiation dose in device implantation with INRT.

METHODS

Radiation dose data from 132 consecutive new device implantation procedures (102 pacemaker [PM] or implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD] and 30 cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT] devices) performed between January 2015 and December 2015 on an angiography system with INRT (Allura ClarityIQ) were collected. For comparison, radiation dose data from 147 consecutive device implantation procedures (121 PM/ICDs and 26 CRT devices) performed between June 2013 and September 2014 on a C-arm system with continuous and pulsed fluoroscopy option (4 frames/second) were evaluated. Total dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy DAP, and cine DAP were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patient age, gender and body weight, procedure, and fluoroscopy times were similar between systems. In PM/ICD cases, DAP of INRT and C-arm system was similar (423 ± 381 cGycm²  vs 417 ± 517 cGycm) due to pulsed fluoroscopy with the C-arm system (78% of time) and sparse use of cine. In CRT procedures requiring higher image quality (82% use of continuous fluoroscopy with C-arm system), DAP of INRT was significantly lower (1,544 ± 834 cGycm vs 7,252 ± 6,431 cGycm, P < 0.001) due to less fluoroscopy DAP (1,414 ± 757 cGycm vs 5,854 ± 6,767 cGycm) and less cine DAP (130 ± 106 cGycm vs 1,399 ± 1,342 cGycm). Considering all procedures, total DAP was reduced by 60% using INRT.

CONCLUSION

Novel INRT results in a substantial lowering of radiation dose in device implantation, in particular, in complex CRT implantation procedures requiring high image quality.

Patient Exposure during Fluoroscopy-guided Pacemaker Implantation Procedures

A pacemaker, which is used for heart resynchronization with electrical impulses, is used to manage many clinical conditions. Recently, the frequency of pacemaker implantation procedures has increased to more than 50% worldwide. During this procedure, patients can be exposed to excessive radiation exposure. Wide range of doses has been reported in previous studies, suggesting that optimization of this procedure has not been fulfilled yet. The current study evaluated patient radiation exposure during cardiac pacemaker procedures and quantified the patient effective dose. A total of 145 procedures were performed for five pacemaker procedures (VVI, VVIR, VVD, VVDR, and DDDR) at two hospitals. Patient doses were measured using the kerma-area product meter. Effective doses were estimated using software based on Monte Carlo simulation from the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB, now The Health Protection Agency). The effective dose values were used to estimate cancer risk from the pacemaker procedure. Patient demographic data and exposure parameters for fluoroscopy and radiography were quantified. The mean patient doses ± SD per procedure (Gycm²) for VVI, VVIR, VVD, VVDR, and DDDR were 1.52 ± 0.13 (1.43-1.61), 3.28 ± 2.34 (0.29-8.73), 3.04 ± 1.67 (1.57-4.86), 6.04 ± 2.326 3.29-8.58), and 8.8 ± 3.6 (4.5-26.20), respectively. The overall patient effective dose was 1.1mSv per procedure. It is obvious that the DDDR procedure exposed patients to the highest radiation dose. Patient dose variation can be attributed to procedure type, exposure parameter settings, and fluoroscopy time. The results of this study showed that patient doses during different pacemaker procedures are lower compared to previous reported values. Patient risk from pacemaker procedure is low, compared to other cardiac interventional procedures. Patients' exposures were mainly influenced by the type of procedures and the clinical indication.