Implantable loop recorders in the real world: a study of two Canadian centers

Usefulness of last generation insertable cardiac monitors in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope

AIMS

Guidelines recommend insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) in the early phases of the evaluation of unexplained syncope (US) syncope, when an arrhythmic etiology is suspected. We examined the diagnostic yield of the last generation ICM (LG-ICM) to establish the causes of US, by assessing in the clinical practice the incidence of: relevant arrhythmia diagnosis, syncope recurrences and CM-guided cardiac electronic device (CIED) implantation. We investigated also baseline patient characteristics associated to an increased risk of relevant arrhythmias and of syncope recurrence.

METHODS

Data prospectively collected from consecutive patients receiving LG-ICM for investigation of US or presyncope in our institution between November 2020 and January 2023 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients (mean age 64.4 ± 16.1 years, 40.4% women) with US or pre-syncope episodes underwent implantation of the LG-ICM. During a mean follow-up of 11.7 ± 8.1 months, LG-ICM diagnostic yield was 42% . In particular, LG-ICM detected cardiac arrhythmias in 29 (27%) patients (in 6 out of them during a syncope recurrence) and to exclude the arrhythmic origin of the syncope in additional 19 (17%) patients. LG-ICM guided the implantation of a CIED in 16 (15%) US patients, due to the diagnosis of asystole or severe bradycardia. Age ≥ 65 years (p = 0.012) and atrial arrhythmia history (p = 0.004) are significant independent predictors of arrhythmic diagnoses performed by LG-ICM, while CAD is predictor of syncope recurrence (bordering on statistical significance, p = 0.056).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of LG-ICM in US syncope is comparable to those of ILR and previous generation ICM. The advantages of LG-ICM should be sought in lower hospital workload necessary to manage ICM data. Age ≥ 65 years and atrial arrhythmia history are independent predictors of significant ICM-detected arrhythmias.

Diagnostic yield of implantable loop recorders: Results from the Hellenic registry

AIMS

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly being used for long-term cardiac monitoring in different clinical settings. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-world performance of ILRs-including the time to diagnosis- in unselected patients with different ILR indications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this multicenter, observational study, 871 patients with an indication of pre-syncope/syncope (61.9%), unexplained palpitations (10.4%), and atrial fibrillation (AF) detection with a history of cryptogenic stroke (CS) (27.7%) underwent ILR implantation. The median follow-up was 28.8 ± 12.9 months. In the presyncope/syncope group, 167 (31%) received a diagnosis established by the device. Kaplan-Meier estimates indicated that 16.9% of patients had a diagnosis at 6 months, and the proportion increased to 22.5% at 1 year. Of 91 patients with palpitations, 20 (22%) received a diagnosis based on the device. The diagnosis established at 12.2% of patients at 6 months, and the proportion increased to 13.3% at 1 year. Among 241 patients with CS, 47 (19.5%) were diagnosed with AF. The diagnostic yield of the device was 10.4% at 6 months and 12.4% at 1 year. In all cases, oral anticoagulation was initiated. Overall, ILR diagnosis altered the therapeutic strategy in 26.1% in presyncope/syncope group, 2.2% in palpitations group, and 3.7% in CS group in addition to oral anticoagulation initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world patient population, ILR determines diagnosis and initiates a new therapeutic management in nearly one fourth of patients. ILR implantation is valuable in the evaluation of patients with unexplained presyncope/syncope, CS and palpitations.

Long-term outcomes of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and negative programmed ventricular stimulation followed with implantable loop recorders: Impact of delayed-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Programed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is a risk stratification tool in patients at risk for adverse arrhythmia outcomes. Patients with negative PVS may yet be at risk for adverse arrhythmia-related events, particularly in the presence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias (VA).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the long-term outcomes of real-world patients with symptomatic VA without indication for device therapy and negative PVS, and to examine the role of cardiac scaring on arrhythmia recurrence.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic VA, and late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR), and negative PVS testing were included. All patients underwent placement of implantable cardiac monitors (ICM). Survival analysis was performed to investigate the impact of LGE-CMR findings on survival free from adverse arrhythmic events.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included (age 60 ± 14 years, women n = 36 (46%), ejection fraction 57 ± 9%, cardiomyopathy n = 26 (33%), mitral valve prolapse [MVP] n = 9 (12%), positive LGE-CMR scar n = 49 (62%), history of syncope n = 23 (29%)) including patients with primarily premature ventricular contractions (n = 21) or nonsustained VA (n = 57). Patients were followed for 1.6 ± 1.5 years during which 14 patients (18%) experienced VA requiring treatment (n = 14) or syncope due to bradycardia (n = 2). Four/9 patients (44%) with MVP experienced VA (n = 3) or syncope (n = 1). Baseline characteristics between those with and without adverse events were similar (p > 0.05); however, the presence of cardiac scar on LGE-CMR was independently associated with an increased risk of adverse events (hazard ratio: 5.6 95% confidence interval: [1.2-27], p = 0.03, log-rank p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world cohort with long-term follow-up, adverse arrhythmic outcomes occurred in 18% of patients with symptomatic VA despite negative PVS, and this risk was significantly greater in patients with positive DE-CMR scar. Long term-monitoring, including the use of ICM, may be appropriate in these patients.

Implantable loop recorders in patients with atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) provide practitioners with high-quality electrocardiographic data over an extended monitoring period. These data can guide the diagnosis and management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the available evidence and consensus statements supporting the use of ILRs in the detection of AF, as well as monitoring of patients with known AF. Future directions for research are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

ILRs are the gold standard for detecting AF, providing superior diagnostic yield compared to other modes of ambulatory electrocardiography monitoring. Both experimental evidence and consensus statements support the use of ILRs in clinical settings where the diagnosis of AF may significantly change management, or where a high degree of sensitivity is needed. ILRs may also be used to monitor patients following AF ablation. More evidence is needed to better inform how ILR-detected AF should change management.

Clinical applications of heart rhythm monitoring tools in symptomatic patients and for screening in high-risk groups

Recent technological advances have facilitated and diversified the options available for the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias. Ranging from simple resting or exercise electrocardiograms to more sophisticated and expensive smartphones and implantable cardiac monitors. These tests and devices may be used for varying periods of time depending on symptom frequency. The choice of the most appropriate heart rhythm test should be guided by clinical evaluation and optimized following accurate characterization of underlying symptoms, 'red flags', risk factors, and consideration of cost-effectiveness of the different tests. This review provides evidence-based guidance for assessing suspected arrhythmia in patients who present with symptoms or in the context of screening, such as atrial fibrillation or advanced conduction disturbances following transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk groups. This is intended to help clinicians choose the most appropriate diagnostic tool to facilitate the management of patients with suspected arrhythmias.

Monitoring and diagnosis of intermittent arrhythmias: evidence-based guidance and role of novel monitoring strategies

Technological advances have made diagnosis of heart rhythm disturbances much easier, with a wide variety of options, including single-lead portable devices, smartphones/watches to sophisticated implantable cardiac monitors, allowing accurate data to be collected over different time periods depending on symptoms frequency. This review provides an overview of the novel and existing heart rhythm testing options, including a description of the supporting evidence for their use. A description of each of the tests is provided, along with discussion of their advantages and limitations. This is intended to help clinicians towards choosing the most appropriate test, thus improving diagnostic yield management of patients with suspected arrhythmias.

Implantable loop recorder in unexplained palpitations or syncope: A randomised study among young patients with structurally normal heart

Background

The utility of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) in the evaluation of unexplained syncope or palpitations in young patients in the absence of structural heart disease or ventricular dysfunction is limited. To compare the diagnostic yield of ILR with conventional extended Holter evaluation in the detection of arrhythmias among young patients with a structurally normal heart presenting with unexplained palpitations or syncope.

Methods

Open-label randomised control trial was conducted in a tertiary cardiac care centre among young patients with recurrent unexplained palpitations (≥3 episodes/year) or syncope (≥2 episodes) with normal electrocardiogram and echocardiography, after excluding non-cardiac causes. Patients were block randomised to either ILR implantation or conventional extended Holter monitoring.

Results

Fourteen patients in the ILR group and 16 patients in the conventional group completed the study. The mean age of the patients was 31.9 ± 5.5 and 31.2 ± 5.4 years. Males constituted 78.5% and 75% in the two groups, respectively. Diagnosis was established in 10 (71.5%) patients in the ILR group as compared to only 3 (18.7%) in the conventional group (p = 0.01), with an RR of 0.26 (95% CI 0.089-0.76, p = 0.01). The arrhythmias diagnosed with ILR were narrow complex tachycardia (30%), atrial fibrillation (20%), VPCs (20%), severe bradycardia with asystole due to sinus arrest (10%), VPCs with bigeminy (10%), and ventricular tachycardia (10%).

Conclusion

In young patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations, ILR has a higher diagnostic yield in the accurate detection of arrhythmia compared with conventional Holter strategy, resulting in better management.

Subcutaneouscardiac Rhythm Monitors: A Comprehensive Review

Subcutaneous loop recorders (SCRMs) are subcutaneous electronic devices which have revolutionized the field of arrhythmia detection. They have become increasingly appealing due to advances such as miniaturization of device, longer battery life, bluetooth capabilities and relatively simple implantation technique without the need for complex surgical suites. They can be implanted in the office, patient bedside without the need to go to the operating room. One of the most common indications for their implantation is detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) after a cryptogenic stroke. They have also been utilized for assessing the success of rhythm control strategies such post pulmonary venous isolation. More recently studies have assessed the utility of SCRMs for detecting silent AF in at risk populations such as patients with sleep apnea or those on hemodialysis. In this paper, we review the evolution of SCRMs, the clinical studies assessing their value for different indications, their role incurrent clinical practice and future avenues in the era of smart wearable devices like apple watch etc.

Implantable loop recorder monitoring in patients with cryptogenic stroke - Detection and treatment of different clinically relevant arrhythmias

AIMS

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are recommended to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) in cases of cryptogenic stroke. However, real life data besides controlled trials are rare. Aim of the study was the detection of atrial fibrillation with a special focus on other arrhythmias according to criteria defined in earlier clinical trials.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 64 patients with cryptogenic stroke who underwent ILR implantation between 4/2014 and 1/2018. The primary endpoint was the detection of atrial fibrillation, significant bradycardia (<40 bpm) or tachycardia (>150 bpm). ILR interrogation was performed after implantation and 6, 12 and 24 months thereafter.

RESULTS

Mean patients age was 65.4 ± 12 years, 50% were male. Mean follow-up duration was 419.2 ± 309 days. One death occurred during follow-up. 23 patients (35.9%) experienced a symptomatic clinical neurological or cardiac event during follow-up. Overall rate of detected arrhythmias was 35% (23/64). The most frequent arrhythmia was atrial fibrillation which was observed in 16 patients (25%). 6 of 16 patients presenting with atrial fibrillation had no clinical symptoms. Bradycardias requiring subsequent pacemaker implantations were detected in 9.4%. A ventricular tachycardia was observed in one patient (1.6%).

CONCLUSION

In this group of patients with cryptogenic stroke the rate of arrhythmic events was high. Besides a high rate of atrial fibrillation (25%), an unexpectedly high rate of bradyarrhythmias (9.4%) occurred in our patient collective. Since many of those episodes were clinically asymptomatic, the ILR helps to detect and treat those clinically silent arrhythmias.

Real-World Incidence of Pacemaker and Defibrillator Implantation Following Diagnostic Monitoring With an Insertable Cardiac Monitor

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) are used in patients with suspected or known cardiac arrhythmias; the resulting diagnosis can lead to therapeutic interventions such as a pacemaker (PPM) or defibrillator (ICD) implant. We investigated the incidence of these implants in a large, real-world, cohort of ICM patients. The Optum^© EHR de-identified database was used to identify patients with cardiovascular diseases, an ICM implant, ≥180 days of follow-up before and after ICM implant, and no previous history of a PPM or ICD. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) incidence estimates for device implants following an ICM implant were determined. A total of 19,173 patients with an ICM implant were identified. During a mean follow-up of 40 months, either a PPM or ICD was implanted in 21% of patients. A device was implanted in 25% of patients with history of syncope compared with 15% in patients with another indication for ICM implant (p <0.001). There was a significantly greater number of PPM implants following an ICM in patients with history of syncope compared with another indication for ICM implant (23% vs 13% p <0.001); in contrast, there was no difference in ICD implants between the 2 groups (3% in both groups, p = 0.84). In conclusion, a PPM or ICD was ultimately implanted in 21% of ICM patients. Pacemaker implant rates varied significantly with indication for ICM implant, whereas ICD implants rates were similar. In particular, patients with history of syncope had the greatest likelihood of needing a PPM during follow-up.

Advanced Cardiac Signal Recording

Implantable loop recorders allow prolonged and continuous single-lead electrocardiogram recording, with the pivotal addition of remote monitoring. They have significantly shortened time to electrocardiographic diagnosis and appropriate therapy of many bradyarrhythmias/tachyarrhythmias and proved helpful in arrhythmia burden definition, offering invaluable information in the diagnostic workup for syncope and atrial fibrillation. Advanced cardiac signal recording is also possible by transesophageal catheters. They have been used to orient diagnosis during wide and narrow QRS complex tachycardias and also to perform minimally invasive pacing. Intracardiac electrophysiologic study remains, however, essential for diagnosis of several arrhythmias in the perspective of curative catheter ablation.

Atrial fibrillation in elderly patients with implantable loop recorders for unexplained syncope

BACKGROUND

An implantable loop recorder (ILR) assists in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope and atrial fibrillation (AF). Both become prevalent with age. Limited data exist describing the incidence of AF as the diagnostic rhythm underlying syncope in the elderly. This study aims to report the incidence of AF in older adults with ILRs for unexplained syncope and identify clinical characteristics associated with AF in this population.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study on patients with unexplained syncope seen in syncope clinics from two Canadian centers. Participants were ≥65 years old, without a history of AF, and received an ILR for unexplained syncope. Data were collected from patient's clinic charts. Arrhythmia diagnosis was based on ILR electrocardiogram reading during syncope (symptom-rhythm correlation). Fisher's exact test and the Student's t test were used to compare participants with and without AF.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 222 patients, 124 were females and 98 were males. Mean age at implant was 80 ± 8 years. Arrhythmia was diagnosed in 98 patients (44.1%). Median time to diagnosis was 18 months. AF was diagnosed in 17 (7.7%) participants. There were fewer males in the AF group than the no AF group (11.8%, 46.8%, p = 0.01). Age, baseline EKG, and prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, stroke, or ischemic heart disease were not statistically different between patients with AF and without AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Atrial fibrillation was a common diagnostic rhythm in this cohort of adults, aged 65 and older, with ILRs for unexplained syncope. It was observed more frequently in females.

A single center experience on the clinical utility evaluation of an insertable cardiac monitor

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) has been largely on the device performance and safety with only limited studies on the clinical utility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of ICM in patients with a variety of clinical presentations.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study on the clinical utility, as measured by both expected and unexpected clinical useful ICM findings and the initiation of therapeutic interventions, was conducted.

RESULTS

Ninety-five consecutive patients (median age 68 years) received ICM Reveal LINQ™ for clinical indications of unexplained syncope (53), cryptogenic stroke (19), unexplained infrequent palpitations (14) and AF management (9). During a median follow-up of 414 days, the causes for unexplained syncope were arrhythmia-related (11.3%), arrhythmia-unrelated (32%) and undetermined (56.6%). Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke was detected in 31.6% (6/19). The clinical utility occurrence was 48.4% with the expected and incidental (unexpected) clinical utility of 41% and 7.4% patients respectively. Of these, therapeutic interventions based on ICM diagnoses were initiated in 18.9% (18/95) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ICM (Reveal LINQ™) offers substantial expected and unexpected clinical utility in patients with a variety of clinical presentations. The causes of nearly one third of patients receiving ICM for unexplained syncope were unrelated to cardiac arrhythmia. Nearly one fifth of patients with newly diagnosed arrhythmia from ICM received therapeutic interventions.

[Indications for loop recorder implantation for syncope]

Implantable loop recorder with discontinuous ECG recording enables monitoring of heart rhythm over several years. Consequently, in patients with recurrent syncope it is possible to record an ECG during the next syncopal event to obtain symptom-ECG correlations. In patients with recurrent syncope of unknown origin, the implantation of a loop recorder leads to an earlier diagnosis and an asystole is more often detected as the cause of the recurrent syncope. In addition, the loop recorder identifies patients who will benefit from pacemaker implantation. An established indication for early implantation of a loop recorder is given in patients with recurrent syncope and no high-risk marker, e. g., reduced left ventricular function, valve disease, history of myocardial infarction or ECG findings such as bifascicular block, pre-excitation, long QT syndrome or an epsilon wave. These patients should receive a complete cardiological work-up with the aim of detecting the underlying heart disease. Patients with no conclusive findings should also receive a loop recorder. A relative indication is given for patients with recurrent syncope and injuries in order to predict the effect of pacemaker implantation. Possible indication is given for patients with transient loss of consciousness to rule out an arrhythmogenic origin.