Transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava in a tertiary center

A Novel Technique of Placing Desfibrillator Leads in Patients with Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava

Persistent left superior vena cava is the most common thoracic venous anomaly. It is usually asymptomatic, but it can make implanting intracardiac devices difficult.We present a novel technique to facilitate desfibrillator lead implantation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava and the absence of the right superior vena cava. We used a fixed-curve Selectra 3D 65-42 cm sheath (Biotronik), orienting it toward the tricuspid valve (TV) by rotating it counter-clockwise. During follow-up, the electrodes remained stable.Our technique was safe, simple, and feasible for patients with this complex venous anatomy.

Analysis of six cancer patients with persistent left superior vena cava identified during central venous access device placement via an intracavitary electrocardiogram

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a rare congenital anomaly. PLSVC can be associated with clinically significant atrial septal defect (ASD) or ventricular septal defect (VSD). It is usually asymptomatic and accidentally detected during invasive procedures or imaging examinations. However, whether central venous access device (CVAD) can be placed and used in patients with PLSVC is controversial. A total of six patients were diagnosed with PLSVC and confirmed by chest CT among 3391 cancer patients who underwent CVAD placement via intracavitary electrocardiogram (IC-EKG) at the Venous Access Center (VAC) from May 2019 to December 2020. The CVADs (peripherally inserted central catheter in four patients and Ports in two patients) of these six patients were left in PLSVC. We analyzed changes in the P-wave in the IC-EKG during CVAD placement and the characteristics of the body surface electrocardiogram in these patients and discussed the catheter tip position in PLSVC. All six patients showed negative P-waves in lead II via IC-EKG from the beginning of catheterization: four patients showed negative P-waves and two showed biphasic P-waves in the body surface electrocardiogram (lead III) before catheterization. CVAD function was normal and no obvious complications were observed during the treatment of these patients. The total retention time of CVADs was 1537 days. For patients with a negative P-wave in lead II via IC-EKG during catheterization, especially in those with a negative or biphasic P-wave in lead III of the body surface electrocardiogram, PLSVC should be considered. CVAD insertion in patients with type I PLSVC is safe under certain conditions, with the proper tip position in the middle to lower part of PLSVC.

Implantation of a Dual-Chamber Automatic Cardioverter Defibrillator in a Patient with Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava: Case Report and Brief Literature Review

Persistence of the left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a congenital anomaly reported in 0.3–0.5% of patients. Due to the multiple and complex anatomical variations, transvenous lead placement can become challenging. We report the case of a 47-year-old patient diagnosed with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF—27%), who was referred to our clinic for implantation of a dual-chamber cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. During the procedure we encountered an abnormal guidewire trajectory and after venographic examination we established the diagnosis of persistent left superior vena cava. After difficult implantation of a 7F defibrillation lead through the coronary sinus, we managed to place the atrial lead through a narrow brachiocephalic vein into the right atrial appendage. In this paper, we aim to illustrate the medical and technical implications of implanting a cardioverter defibrillator in patients with PLSVC, highlighting the benefit of identifying and utilizing both the innominate vein, and the left superior vena cava and coronary sinus for placement of multiple leads, which would otherwise have been impossible.

Clinical and procedural implications of congenital vena cava anomalies in adults: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although congenital vena cava (CVC) anomalies in adults have implications for surgical and radiological interventions, the literature is scare and disparate. The aim of this systematic review was to assess cardiovascular clinical and procedural implications of CVC anomalies in adults without congenital heart disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched PubMed and EMBASE from database conception through October 2018 for English-language studies describing the epidemiology of CVC anomalies or their clinical or procedural implications in humans. Two independent reviewers screened 7093 records and identified 16 relevant studies. We found two major implications of CVC anomalies: 1) congenital inferior vena cava (CIVC) anomalies are associated with a 50-100-fold higher risk of deep venous thrombosis, particularly among younger patients, and 2) persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is associated with a 2-3-fold higher risk of supraventricular arrhythmias. PLSVC also poses technical challenges to cardiovascular electronic device implantation, requiring alterations in surgical approach and lengthening procedure and X-ray exposure times. Due to the large disparity in reported prevalence rates of CIVC anomalies, we performed a meta-analysis of CIVC anomaly prevalence including 8 studies, which showed a weighted prevalence of 6.8% (95% CI, 4.5-9.2%).

CONCLUSION

These findings challenge the notion that CVC anomalies are rare and asymptomatic in adults. Rather, the literature indicates that CVC anomalies are not uncommon and have important clinical and procedural implications. To further understand the prevalence and implications of CVC anomalies, a robust US population-based study and nationwide registry is warranted in the current era of venous interventions.