New-onset atrial fibrillation following percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Recurrent ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack after patent foramen ovale closure: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been associated with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Guidelines recommend PFO closure for stroke prevention in selected patients, but the risk of recurrent stroke remains high compared to the background population. We aimed to evaluate the causes of recurrent stroke/TIA and post-interventional complications in patients after PFO closure.

METHODS

Patients from the Central Denmark Region who underwent PFO closure at Aarhus University Hospital between November 5, 2018, and May 12, 2023, following an ischemic stroke, TIA, amaurosis fugax, or retinal emboli were included. Data on patient demographics, risk factors, procedural details, post-interventional complications, and recurrent stroke/TIA were collected from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

PFO closure was performed in 310 patients (median age: 49 years). During a median follow-up of 2.6 years (interquartile range: 1.5-3.6, 814 total patient-years), recurrent stroke/TIA was observed in 8 patients (2.6%), or 0.98 recurrent strokes per 100 patient-years. Recurrent stroke/TIA was more frequent in patients with hypertension (50.0% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.039). Recurrent stroke/TIA was related to thrombophilia or hematologic conditions entailing hypercoagulability in 62.5% of patients. New-onset atrial fibrillation was observed in 9.4% of patients within 45 days after the procedure. None of these patients subsequently developed an ischemic event. Other adverse outcomes were uncommon.

CONCLUSION

Rates of recurrent ischemic stroke/TIA after PFO closure were comparable to findings in previous trials. Pre-existing vascular risk factors (hypertension), and a hypercoagulable state were associated with recurrent ischemic stroke/TIA.

Feasibility and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation and closing patent foramen ovale without implantation: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) affects 20%-34% of adults and is associated with strokes and other disorders. The conventional treatment of PFO-related strokes is a closure procedure. The metal device is associated with some adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PFO closure using cryoablation without implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS

We divided the 22 patients with both PFO and AF who underwent PVI via cryoablation into 2 groups: standard PVI + atrial septal (AS) cryoablation group (group 1, n = 11) and standard PVI group (group 2, n = 11). The guidewire accesses the left atrium through the PFO without AS puncture during the procedure. Standard PVI via cryoablation was performed. The cryoballoon was retracted to the right atrium and inflated against the AS post-PVI. Patients in group 1 had cryoablation for 120-150 seconds, whereas patients in group 2 received sham ablation. The co-primary end points were the PFO closure rate and a composite of AF recurrence and stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) events.

RESULTS

There were no differences in procedure-related adverse events between the 2 groups. Neither group had an ischemic stroke report at 1-year follow-up. The PFO closure rate at 6 months in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (7 [63.6%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P = .002). AF recurrence post ablation was comparable in both groups at 3 months (3 [27.3%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P = .269), 6 months (0 vs 0), and 12 months (2 [18.2%%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P = .534) of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Cryoablation is a safe and effective approach to close PFO in patients with AF undergoing PVI in a single procedure.

Sex-Based Differences in Long-Term Outcomes Following Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Cryptogenic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Evidence from trials suggests that patent foramen ovale closure is superior to medical therapy alone in reducing stroke recurrence in men but not in women. Evidence from real-world data on the impact of sex on outcomes after patent foramen ovale closure, however, remains scarce. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess sex-based differences in long-term outcomes after transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolling patients who underwent transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure to prevent recurrent cerebrovascular events. Detailed information from medical charts was entered into a clinical registry, which has been linked to population-based administrative health databases in Ontario. Procedural, short, and long-term outcomes have been compared by sex.

RESULTS

Of the 783 patients included in the sample, 349 (44.5%) were women and 434 (55.5%) were men. Women were younger and had a higher rate of migraine, while men had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. No differences were observed in procedural and 30-day outcomes by sex. At a median follow-up of 14 years, the event rates of recurrent cerebrovascular events, survival, and new-onset atrial fibrillation were not different by sex. In adjusted analysis, men experienced higher rates of pacemaker implantation (hazard ratio, 5.62 [95% CI, 1.57-20.1]).

CONCLUSIONS

No sex-based differences in recurrent cerebrovascular events, survival, or new-onset atrial fibrillation were observed in this study, suggesting equal benefits for both sexes. Future studies should report outcomes by sex to enhance the reproducibility of our findings and help support guideline development.

Atrial Fibrillation After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Incidence, Pathophysiology, and Management

This comprehensive review explores the incidence, pathophysiology, and management of atrial fibrillation (AF) following percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO). Although AF is considered a common adverse event post PFO closure, its incidence, estimated at <5%, varies based on monitoring methods. The review delves into the challenging task of precisely estimating AF incidence, given subclinical AF and diverse diagnostic approaches. Notably, a temporal pattern emerges, with peak incidence around the 14th day after closure and a subsequent decline after the 45th day, mimicking general population AF trends. The pathophysiological mechanisms behind post PFO closure AF remain elusive, with proposed factors including local irritation, device-related interference, tissue stretch, and nickel hypersensitivity. Management considerations encompass rhythm control, with flecainide showing promise, and anticoagulation tailored to individual risk profiles. The authors advocate for a personalized approach, weighing factors like age, comorbidities, and device characteristics. Notably, postclosure AF is generally considered benign, often resolving spontaneously within 45 days, minimizing thromboembolic risks. Further studies are required to refine understanding and provide evidence-based guidelines.

Cardiovascular Outcomes and Readmissions of Atrial Fibrillation Among Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder Device Recipients: A Propensity Matched National Readmission Study

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder devices are increasingly utilized in minimally invasive procedures used to treat cryptogenic stroke. Data on the impact of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) among PFO occluder device recipients are limited. The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried between 2016 and 2019 to identify PFO patients with and without AF. The 2 groups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate regression models. The outcomes included in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), Mechanical circulatory support use (MCS), Cardiogenic shock (CS), acute ischemic stroke, bleeding, and other cardiovascular outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v. 17. Out of 6508 Weighted hospitalizations for PFO occluder device procedure over the study period, 877 (13.4%) had AF compared to 5631 (86.6%) who did not. On adjusted analysis, PFO with AF group had higher rates of MCS (PSM, 4.5% vs 2.2 %, P value = 0.011) and SCA (PSM, 7.6% vs 4.6 %, P value = 0.015) compared to PFO with no AF. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of in-hospital mortality (PSM, 5.4% vs 6.4 %, P value = 0.39), CS (PSM, 8.3% vs 5.9 %, P value = 0.075), AKI (PSM, 32.4% vs 32.3 %, P value = 0.96), bleeding (PSM, 2.08% vs 1.3%, P value = 0.235) or the readmission rates among both cohorts. Additionally, AF was associated with higher hospital length of stay (9.5 ± 13.2 vs 8.2 ± 24.3 days, P-value = 0.012) and total cost ($66,513 ± $80,922 vs $52,013±$125,136, 0.025, P-value = 0.025) compared to PFO without AF. AF among PFO occluder device recipients is associated with increased adverse outcomes, including MCS use and SCA, with no difference in mortality and readmission rates among both cohorts. Long-term follow-up needs further studies.

A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of results from REDUCE and RESPECT-two randomized trials on patent foramen ovale closure devices to prevent recurrent cryptogenic stroke

AIMS

Two randomized clinical trials, REDUCE and RESPECT, demonstrated that patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in combination with antithrombotic therapy was more effective for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke compared with antithrombotic therapy alone. The aim of this study was to determine the relative efficacy and safety of the PFO closure devices used in REDUCE (HELEX and CARDIOFORM Septal Occluders) compared with the device used in RESPECT (Amplatzer PFO Occluder).

METHODS

An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of the PFO closure arms of the REDUCE and RESPECT trials was performed using patient-level data from REDUCE weighted to match baseline characteristics from RESPECT. Comparisons of the following outcomes were made between the devices assessed in the trials: risk of recurrent ischemic stroke; recurrent ischemic stroke one year after randomization; any serious adverse event (SAE) related to the procedure or device; and atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter as an SAE related to the procedure or device.

RESULTS

After conducting the MAIC, baseline characteristics were well-matched between the two trials. Compared to RESPECT, PFO closure using the devices from REDUCE resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-1.43; p = 0.17) for the risk of recurrent stroke. For the recurrence of stroke after one year, SAE related to the procedure or device, and atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter as SAE related to the procedure or device, the MAIC resulted in a rate difference of -0.68 (95%CI -2.06 to 0.70; p = .34), -1.29 (95%CI -3.82 to 1.25; p = .32), and -0.19 (95%CI -1.16 to 0.78; p = .71), respectively. These findings were consistent across scenario analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This MAIC analysis found no statistically significant differences in efficacy and safety outcomes between PFO closure with the HELEX and CARDIOFORM Septal Occluders versus the Amplatzer PFO Occluder, as used in the REDUCE and RESPECT trials.

New-onset atrial fibrillation after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The exact incidence and predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to find post-procedural AF incidence rates and differences due to different screening strategies and devices.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE and EMBASE. Controlled trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included into this meta-analysis. The incidence of new-onset AF was the primary outcome. Further parameters were surveillance strategy, device type, AF treatment and neurological events. New AF was determined as early onset within one month after implantation and late thereafter.

RESULTS

8 controlled trials and 16 cohort studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. 7643 patients received percutaneous PFO closure after cryptogenic stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 117 with other indications, whereas 1792 patients formed the control group. Meta-analysis of controlled trials showed an AF incidence of 5.1% in the interventional and 1.6% in the conservative arm, respectively (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.46-6.86, P = 0.03, I2 = 55%). 4.7% received high-quality surveillance strategy with Holter-ECG or Loop recorder whereby AF incidence was overall higher compared to the low-quality group with 12-lead ECG only (3.3-15% vs. 0.2-4.3%). Heterogeneous results on time of AF onset were found, limited by different follow-up strategies. CardioSEAL and Starflex seemed to have higher AF incidences in early and late onset with 4.5% and 4.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous PFO closure led to higher AF post-procedural incidence compared to the conservative strategy. Heterogeneity in surveillance and follow-up strategy limited the generalizability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022359945).

Incidence of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale closure: protocol for the prospective, observational PFO-AF study

INTRODUCTION

After closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) due to stroke, atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in up to one in five patients. However, data are sparse regarding the possible pre-existence of AF in these patients prior to PFO closure, and about recurrence of AF in the long term after the procedure. No prospective study to date has investigated these topics in patients with implanted cardiac monitor (ICM). The PFO-AF study (registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT04926142) will investigate the incidence of AF occurring within 2 months after percutaneous closure of PFO in patients with prior stroke. AF will be identified using systematic ICM. Secondary objectives are to assess incidence and burden of AF in the 2 months prior to, and up to 2 years after PFO closure.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Prospective, multicentre, observational study including 250 patients with an indication for PFO closure after stroke, as decided by interdisciplinary meetings with cardiologists and neurologists. Patients will undergo implantation of a Reveal Linq device (Medtronic). Percutaneous PFO closure will be performed 2 months after device implantation. Follow-up will include consultation, ECG and reading of ICM data at 2, 12 and 24 months after PFO closure. The primary endpoint is occurrence of AF at 2 months, defined as an episode of AF or atrial tachycardia/flutter lasting at least 30 s, and recorded by the ICM and/or any AF or atrial tachycardia/flutter documented on ECG during the first 2 months of follow-up.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee 'Comité de Protection des Personnes (CPP) Sud-Méditerranéen III' on 2 June 2021 and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04926142). Findings will be presented in national and international congresses and peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04926142.

Outcomes of Patent Foramen Ovale Transcatheter Closure: Should a Short Aortic Rim Preclude Closure?

Background

The risk of erosion of an atrial septal closure device, in particular the Amplatzer Septal Occluder, has been described as higher in patients with a short aortic rim. Similar concern has been applied to patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure devices, but there are only rare reported cases of erosion. It may be that smaller devices are chosen due to fear of device erosion in PFO patients when this is not necessarily an issue.

Objectives

The authors aimed to assess outcomes after PFO closure with the Amplatzer PFO device in patients with a short (<9 mm) aortic rim.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of PFO closure for any indication, between 2006 and 2017 at a quaternary center. Preprocedural transesophageal echocardiographic parameters including the aortic rim were remeasured. Long-term outcomes were obtained by linkage to provincial administrative databases.

Results

Over the study period, 324 patients underwent PFO closure with the Amplatzer PFO device, with a mean age of 49.8 years; 61% had a short aortic rim (<9 mm). The most common indication was cryptogenic stroke (72%); those with longer aortic distance were more likely to have a non-stroke indication for closure, diabetes (15% vs 6.5%, P = 0.04), and heart failure (15.7% vs 4%, P < 0.001). Over a median 7 years of follow-up, there were no cases of device erosion or embolization requiring cardiac surgery.

Conclusions

In a large cohort with long-term administrative follow-up (1,394 patient-years), implantation of an Amplatzer PFO device was performed safely even in patients with a short aortic rim.

Real world long-term outcomes among adults undergoing transcatheter patent foramen closure with amplatzer PFO occluder

BACKGROUND

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a congenital heart defect associated with an increased risk of cryptogenic stroke. We aimed to evaluate real-world outcomes of adult patients undergoing transcatheter PFO closure with the Amplatzer PFO Occluder.

METHODS

In this single centre, retrospective cohort study, we linked a detailed clinical registry with provincial administrative databases to obtain short and long-term outcomes. Validated algorithms were used to established baseline comorbidities and adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Between 1999 and 2017, 479 patients had PFO closure with an Amplatzer PFO Occluder. The average age of the patients was 47.3 years (standard deviation (SD) = 12.4), and 54.7% were males. The procedural success was 100%, and 96% of patients were discharged on the same day. Any in-hospital complication was observed in 2.5% (n = 12) of patients. At 30 days post-discharge, 18% of patients had an ED visit and 5% a hospitalization. Over a mean follow-up of 9.1 (SD = 3.8) years, 4% experienced TIA, 1.5% stroke, and 7.6% atrial fibrillation. The composite outcome of stroke/TIA/death was observed in 10.9% of patients (1.22 events per 100 person-years). Patients >60 years old experienced higher rates of adverse events than younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large real-world cohort of patients with cryptogenic stroke, we observed excellent safety and effectiveness outcomes for PFO closure conducted with Amplatzer PFO Occluder, similar to randomized controlled trials or other long-term cohort studies. New onset atrial fibrillation was one of the most commonly adverse events. Future studies should investigate early post-discharge management of patients to prevent readmissions.

Supraventricular Arrhythmia Following Patent Foramen Ovale Percutaneous Closure

BACKGROUND

Randomized studies have reported low rates of atrial fibrillation (AF) after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure (<6%) but have relied on patient-reported symptomatic episodes, so the true incidence and timing of AF after PFO closure remain unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to prospectively determine the incidence, timing, and determinants of supraventricular arrhythmia following PFO closure on the basis of loop recorder monitoring.

METHODS

Cardiac monitoring was proposed to all patients after PFO closure from June 2018 to October 2021 at a single center by means of implantable loop recorder monitoring in patients considered at higher risk for AF (age ≥ 55 years, associated cardiovascular risk factors, prior palpitations, or documented supraventricular ectopic activity) or 4-week external loop recorder monitoring in other patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AF, atrial flutter, or supraventricular tachycardia lasting >30 seconds within 28 days of the procedure. Determinants of the primary endpoint were assessed using a stepwise logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients were included. The primary endpoint occurred in 47 patients (20.9%), including 13 (9.9%) and 24 (28.9%) among patients monitored with external loop recorders and implantable loop recorders, respectively. Overall, the median delay from procedure to arrhythmia was 14.0 days (IQR: 6.5-19.0 days), and one-half of these patients reported symptomatic episodes. Determinants of the primary endpoint were older age (adjusted OR: 1.67 per 10-year increase; 95% CI: 1.18-2.36), device left disc diameter ≥25 mm (adjusted OR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.19-5.98) and male sex (adjusted OR: 4.78; 95% CI: 1.96-11.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Using loop recorder monitoring for ≥28 days, supraventricular arrhythmia was diagnosed in 1 in 5 patients, with a median delay of 14 days, suggesting that this postprocedural event has so far been underestimated.

Atrial fibrillation screening on systematic ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring after percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure: A prospective study

•

Incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) following patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is low (<5%)

•

AF occurs early following PFO closure and is not associated with an increased risk of embolic complications.

•

Symptomatic atrial ectopic beats are frequent following PFO closure and not associated with AF.

Background

Increased risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure was observed in randomized trials without however systematic AF screening. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of AF within 6-month following PFO closure with serial 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram (AECG) monitoring.

Methods

All patients undergoing PFO closure were prospectively included in 2 centers. AF was defined as irregular rhythm without discernible P waves > 30 s on AECG at day 0, 1-month and 6-month follow-up. Primary endpoint was the incidence of AF within the study period. Secondary endpoints evaluated clinical outcomes within 6-month follow-up.

Results

Between February 2018 and March 2019, 62 patients underwent PFO closure including 40 male (64.5%) with a mean age of 48 ± 9.5. Atrial septal aneurysm was observed in 37 patients (64.9%), 57 patients (91.9%) received an Amplatzer Occluder device (Abbott Vascular) and 5 (8.1%) an Occlutech device (Occlutech). After a mean follow-up of 7.7 ± 2.8 months, new-onset AF occurred in 3 patients (4.8%), all within the first month following PFO closure, including one per-procedural, all were asymptomatic and paroxysmal. Two patients with AF (3.2%) required chronic oral anticoagulant therapy. No adverse outcomes occurred at follow-up. No predictive factors of AF were highlighted. A total of 16 patients (25.8%) reported palpitations without AF on the AECGs.

Conclusion

In highly selected patients, incidence of AF, evaluated with 3 systematic 24-hour AECG within 6-month following PFO closure, was low (<5%). Always paroxysmal, AF occurred within the first month after the procedure and was not associated with adverse outcomes.

Atrial fibrillation after closure of patent foramen ovale in the REDUCE clinical study

OBJECTIVES

To describe the occurrence of postprocedural atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients with cryptogenic stroke undergoing patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in the REDUCE clinical study and analyze for potential risk factors for the development of postprocedural AF.

BACKGROUND

AF is an adverse event that might potentially counterbalance the stroke prevention benefit from PFO closure. Data on AF after transcatheter PFO closure are sparse.

METHODS

We evaluated data from patients having PFO closure (Gore HELEX or Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder) in the REDUCE clinical trial (n = 408) in at post hoc explorative analysis. Median follow-up was 5.0 years.

RESULTS

AF occurred in 30 patients (7.4%) after PFO closure with a total of 34 AF events. Most were reported as non-serious (68%), detected within 45 days post-procedure (79%), and resolved within 2 weeks of onset (63%). One subject with AF had recurrent stroke. Postprocedural AF occurred more frequently among subjects with higher age and large device sizes. Male sex was the only independent predictor of postprocedural AF. We found no association between the type of occluder (HELEX or Gore Cardioform Septal Occluder) or PFO anatomical characteristics and post-procedural AF.

CONCLUSION

In the REDUCE clinical study, postprocedural atrial fibrillation was mostly early onset, transient and with no later recurrence. Postprocedural AF occurred more frequently among patients with higher age and larger devices. Male sex was the only independent predictor of postprocedural AF.

Stroke Prevention in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is widely prevalent and studies have suggested an association with ischemic stroke. In this review, we aim to highlight current management of patients with ischemic stroke in the setting of PFO and discuss some areas of controversy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Upon reviewing the literature, we have found that the evidence regarding the management of patients with cryptogenic stroke and PFO has come a long way in the past several years, and many uncertainties remain in clinical practice. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) score helps to predict the probability of a pathogenic PFO, and recent trial data confirms the benefit of closure in carefully selected patients. The benefit of closure in older patients and in patients with alternate, competing mechanisms is still uncertain, and the long-term risks of closure are not known. Finally, the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this patient population as compared to other medical therapy or mechanical closure has not yet been investigated. Randomized data is needed to help answer these questions. PFO closure is a safe and effective strategy in reducing stroke risk in carefully selected patients with cryptogenic stroke in the setting of a PFO. More studies are needed to test optimal medical treatment strategies and the safety and efficacy of PFO closure in patient subgroups not included in prior PFO closure trials.

Uncertainties and Controversies in the Management of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of patent foramen ovale closure over medical therapy alone for patients who have had a stroke that has been attributed to the patent foramen ovale. Nevertheless, there are many areas of uncertainty and controversy related to patient selection, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. We summarize the available data on these challenging topics and attempt to provide some clarity and future directions for clinicians and investigators.