Mei J, Brunton SL, Kutz JN. Mobile Sensor Path Planning for Kalman Filter Spatiotemporal Estimation.
SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024;
24:3727. [PMID:
38931510 PMCID:
PMC11207737 DOI:
10.3390/s24123727]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
The estimation of spatiotemporal data from limited sensor measurements is a required task across many scientific disciplines. In this paper, we consider the use of mobile sensors for estimating spatiotemporal data via Kalman filtering. The sensor selection problem, which aims to optimize the placement of sensors, leverages innovations in greedy algorithms and low-rank subspace projection to provide model-free, data-driven estimates. Alternatively, Kalman filter estimation balances model-based information and sparsely observed measurements to collectively make better estimation with limited sensors. It is especially important with mobile sensors to utilize historical measurements. We show that mobile sensing along dynamic trajectories can achieve the equivalent performance of a larger number of stationary sensors, with performance gains related to three distinct timescales: (i) the timescale of the spatiotemporal dynamics, (ii) the velocity of the sensors, and (iii) the rate of sampling. Taken together, these timescales strongly influence how well-conditioned the estimation task is. We draw connections between the Kalman filter performance and the observability of the state space model and propose a greedy path planning algorithm based on minimizing the condition number of the observability matrix. This approach has better scalability and computational efficiency compared to previous works. Through a series of examples of increasing complexity, we show that mobile sensing along our paths improves Kalman filter performance in terms of better limiting estimation and faster convergence. Moreover, it is particularly effective for spatiotemporal data that contain spatially localized structures, whose features are captured along dynamic trajectories.
Collapse