The effect of ZrO2 and TiO 2 on solubility and strength of apatite-mullite glass-ceramics for dental applications

Effects of ZnO/TiO2 nanoparticle and TiO2 nanotube additions to dense polycrystalline hydroxyapatite bioceramic from bovine bones

OBJECTIVES

A bovine dense hydroxyapatite ceramic (HA) was produced as new biomaterial, however, the production of a material with consistently high flexural strength remains challenging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of ZnO nanoparticles, TiO₂ nanoparticles, and TiO₂ nanotubes (1%, 2%, and 5% by weight) on the microstructure and flexural strength of a bovine dense hydroxyapatite ceramic (HA).

METHODS

Discs (Ø=12.5mm; thickness=1.3mm) were prepared and subjected to X-ray diffraction (XRD), and observation with a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), biaxial flexural strength (BFS) testing, and Vickers hardness (VH) testing. The BFS and VH data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (α=0.05) and Weibull analysis.

RESULTS

The XRD showed that the addition of nanomaterials caused the formation of a secondary phase when 5% of the ZnO nanoparticles was used, or when all percentages of the TiO₂ nanoparticles/nanotubes were used, and the HA crystallographic planes were maintained. Differences were not observed between the higher BFS values obtained with pure HA and those obtained with the 5% addition of TiO₂ nanoparticles. However, the results were different compared with the other groups (α=0.05). The results obtained by Weibull analysis revealed that the 1%, 2%, and 5% addition of TiO₂ nanotubes, and the 1% and 2% addition of TiO₂ nanoparticles decreased the HA characteristic strength (σ₀), while the Weibull modulus (m) increased when 5% of TiO₂ nanoparticles, 1% and 2% of ZnO nanoparticles, and 2% of TiO₂ nanoparticles were added, but with no statistical difference from the pure HA. The 5% addition of ZnO₂ nanoparticles decreased the σ₀ without changing m. Moreover, the 5% addition of TiO₂ nanoparticles resulted in an m closest to that of pure HA. Regarding the VH results, the blend of HA with 1% and 2% addition of TiO₂ nanoparticles exhibited the higher values, which were similar between the different addition ratios (p=0.102). Moreover, the addition of 5% TiO₂ nanoparticles resulted in higher value compared with pure HA.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study demonstrated that the HA blend with 5% of TiO₂ nanoparticles has the greatest potential as a bovine HA dense bioceramic reinforcement.

Evaluation of reproducibility of the chemical solubility of dental ceramics using ISO 6872:2015

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The current chemical solubility method in the International Standards Organization (ISO) 6872 (2015) specifies only the total surface area of specimens for testing (≥30 cm²) but does not describe the morphology or geometry. This could impact the reproducibility of the test outcomes.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the factors influencing the reliability of the ISO 6872:2015 "Dentistry-Ceramic materials" test for chemical solubility.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Chemical solubility analysis of a range of materials and specimen geometries was performed in accordance with ISO 6872:2015. Yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP), VITABLOCS Mark II, IPS e.max Press, and IPS e.max ZirPress materials were formed into a range of cubic and spherical geometries to comply with the 30-cm² minimum surface area requirement. The surface microstructure of the specimens was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) was used to analyze the solutes, and surface hardness of the specimens was measured by using a Vickers hardness tester before and after testing. An optimized solubility test was devised, which eliminated specimen handling once the specimens had been ground and polished. This modified test was performed on VITABLOCS Mark II and Y-TZP.

RESULTS

The results of the original chemical solubility method of ISO 6872:2015 showed significantly variable findings for each tested material, with a predictable relationship between geometry and chemical solubility. The hardness values decreased significantly after the solubility testing. The optimized method showed significantly improved reproducibility of the chemical solubility measurement compared with the original ISO 6872:2015 test.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current chemical solubility standard method can be manipulated while still complying with the ISO 6872:2015 standard.