Structural and phase characterization of bioceramics prepared from tetracalcium phosphate-monetite cement and in vitro osteoblast response

Calcium Orthophosphate (CaPO4)-Based Bioceramics: Preparation, Properties, and Applications

Various types of materials have been traditionally used to restore damaged bones. In the late 1960s, a strong interest was raised in studying ceramics as potential bone grafts due to their biomechanical properties. A short time later, such synthetic biomaterials were called bioceramics. Bioceramics can be prepared from diverse inorganic substances, but this review is limited to calcium orthophosphate (CaPO4)-based formulations only, due to its chemical similarity to mammalian bones and teeth. During the past 50 years, there have been a number of important achievements in this field. Namely, after the initial development of bioceramics that was just tolerated in the physiological environment, an emphasis was shifted towards the formulations able to form direct chemical bonds with the adjacent bones. Afterwards, by the structural and compositional controls, it became possible to choose whether the CaPO4-based implants would remain biologically stable once incorporated into the skeletal structure or whether they would be resorbed over time. At the turn of the millennium, a new concept of regenerative bioceramics was developed, and such formulations became an integrated part of the tissue engineering approach. Now, CaPO4-based scaffolds are designed to induce bone formation and vascularization. These scaffolds are usually porous and harbor various biomolecules and/or cells. Therefore, current biomedical applications of CaPO4-based bioceramics include artificial bone grafts, bone augmentations, maxillofacial reconstruction, spinal fusion, and periodontal disease repairs, as well as bone fillers after tumor surgery. Prospective future applications comprise drug delivery and tissue engineering purposes because CaPO4 appear to be promising carriers of growth factors, bioactive peptides, and various types of cells.

A specific affinity cyclic peptide enhances the adhesion, expansion and proliferation of rat bone mesenchymal stem cells on β‑tricalcium phosphate scaffolds

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a common osteological disease. Treatment of ONFH prior to the collapse of the femoral head is critical for increasing therapeutic efficiency. Tissue engineering therapy using bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) combined with a scaffold is a promising strategy. However, it is currently unclear how to improve the efficiency of BMSC recruitment under such conditions. In the present study, a specific cyclic peptide for Sprague-Dawley rat BMSCs, CTTNPFSLC (known as C7), was used, which was identified via phage display technology. Its high affinity for BMSCs was demonstrated using flow cytometry and fluorescence staining. Subsequently, the cyclic peptide was placed on β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) scaffolds using absorption and freeze-drying processes. Adhesion, expansion and proliferation of BMSCs was investigated in vitro on the C7-treated β-TCP scaffolds and compared with pure β-TCP scaffolds. The results revealed that C7 had a promoting effect on the adhesion, expansion and proliferation of BMSCs on β-TCP scaffolds. Therefore, C7 may be effective in future tissue engineering therapy for ONFH.

Degradability, cytocompatibility, and osteogenesis of porous scaffolds of nanobredigite and PCL-PEG-PCL composite

Biocomposite scaffolds were fabricated by incorporation of nanobredigite (n-BD) into the polymer of poly(ε-caprolactone)-poly(ethyleneglycol)-poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL-PEG-PCL). The results revealed that the addition of n-BD into PCL-PEG-PCL significantly improved water absorption, compressive strength, and degradability of the scaffolds of n-BD/PCL-PEG-PCL composite (n-BPC) compared with PCL-PEG-PCL scaffolds alone. In addition, the proliferation and alkaline phosphatase activity of MG63 cells cultured on n-BPC scaffolds were obviously higher than that cultured on PCL-PEG-PCL scaffolds. Moreover, the results of the histological evaluation from the animal model revealed that the n-BPC scaffolds significantly improved new bone formation compared with the PCL-PEG-PCL scaffolds, indicating good osteogenesis. The n-BPC scaffolds with good biocompatibility could stimulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and bone tissue regeneration and would be an excellent candidate for bone defect repair.