Technology and vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA)-lessons learned from the first bilateral pediatric hand transplant

Spatial Fidelity of Microvascular Perforating Vessels as Perceived by Augmented Reality Virtual Projections

BACKGROUND

Autologous breast reconstruction yields improved long-term aesthetic results but requires increased resources of practitioners and hospital systems. Innovations in radiographic imaging have been increasingly used to improve the efficiency and success of free flap harvest. Augmented reality affords the opportunity to superimpose relevant imaging on a surgeon's native field of view, potentially facilitating dissection of anatomically variable structures. To validate the spatial fidelity of augmented reality projections of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap-relevant anatomy, comparisons of three-dimensional (3D) models and their virtual renderings were performed by four independent observers. Measured discrepancies between the real and holographic models were evaluated.

METHODS

The 3D-printed models of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap-relevant anatomy were fabricated from computed tomographic angiography data from 19 de-identified patients. The corresponding computed tomographic angiography data were similarly formatted for the Microsoft HoloLens to generate corresponding projections. Anatomic points were initially measured on 3D models, after which the corresponding points were measured on the HoloLens projections from two separate vantage points (V1 and V2). Statistical analyses, including generalized linear modeling, were performed to characterize spatial fidelity regarding translation, rotation, and scale of holographic projections.

RESULTS

Among all participants, the median translational displacement at corresponding points was 9.0 mm between the real-3D model and V1, 12.1 mm between the 3D model and V2, and 13.5 mm between V1 and V2.

CONCLUSION

Corresponding points, including topography of perforating vessels, for the purposes of breast reconstruction can be identified within millimeters, but there remain multiple independent contributors of error, most notably the participant and location at which the projection is perceived.

What is needed to ensure long-term sustainability for the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation?

The field of vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has demonstrated remarkable advances since its inception with some excellent long-term results in a variety of graft types. However, unlike solid organ transplantation, it has yet to become mainstream. We therefore discuss strategies on ensuring long-term sustainability by addressing continued clinical developments of VCA to improve the risk-to-benefit balance, importance of public support, improved policy and financial support, and need for a bridge to the future of transplant surgery. There has been headway on all fronts and collaboration among the VCA centers for centralization of data and incorporation of patient voices will be essential for continued progress.

Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation of the Hand: A Systematic Review of Eligibility Criteria

BACKGROUND

Hand transplantation (HT) has emerged as an intervention of last resort for those who endured amputation or irreparable loss of upper extremity function. However, because of the considerable effort required for allograft management and the risks of lifelong immunosuppression, patient eligibility is critical to treatment success. Thus, the objective of this article is to investigate the reported eligibility criteria of HT centers globally.

METHODS

A systematic review of the HT literature was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid/Medline, and Scopus. Program Web sites and clinicaltrials.gov entries were included where available.

RESULTS

A total of 354 articles were reviewed, 101 of which met inclusion criteria. Furthermore, 10 patient-facing Web sites and 11 clinical trials were included. The most reported criteria related to the capacity to manage the allograft posttransplantation, including access to follow-up, insurance coverage, psychological stability, and history of medical compliance. Other factors related to the impact of immunosuppression, such as active pregnancy and patient immune status, were less emphasized.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the novelty of the field, eligibility criteria continue to evolve. While there is consensus on certain eligibility factors, other criteria diverge between programs, and very few factors were considered absolute contraindications. As the popularity of the field continues to grow, we encourage the development of consensus evidence-based eligibility criteria.

Surgical Science and the Evolution of Critical Care Medicine

Surgical science has driven innovation and inquiry across adult and pediatric disciplines that provide critical care regardless of location. Surgically originated but broadly applicable knowledge has been globally shared within the pages Critical Care Medicine over the last 50 years.

Addressing common orthopaedic calamities with microsurgical solutions

Reconstructive microsurgery has been an essential aspect of orthopaedic surgery and extremity reconstruction since the introduction of the operating microscope in the mid-20^th century. The reconstructive ladder ranges from simple healing by secondary intention to complex procedures such as free tissue transfer and vascularized composite allotransplantation. As orthopaedic surgery has evolved over the past 60 years, so too have the reconstructive microsurgical skills that are often needed to address common orthopaedic surgery problems. In this article, we will discuss a variety of complex orthopaedic surgery scenarios ranging from trauma to infection to tumor resection as well as the spectrum of microsurgical solutions that can aid in their management.

Designing and utilizing 3D-printed skin incision guides during the first Dutch bilateral hand-arm transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To preoperatively plan skin incision in the case of the first Dutch bilateral hand-arm transplantation.

BACKGROUND

A bilateral hand-arm transplantation has been performed for the first time in the Netherlands in 2019. In the context of preparation for this surgical procedure, the optimal patient-specific skin flap was determined. Skin flaps should be properly matched between donor and recipient to ensure sufficient tissue for the approximation of skin over the tendon anastomosis, adequate distal tip perfusion, and esthetics.

METHODS

Preoperatively, stereophotogrammetry was obtained from the upper extremities of the patient and a volunteer with similar body physique. Skin flap dimensions were determined for each extremity, which resulted in patient-specific incision patterns. Combining this digital information yielded practical skin incision guides for both the donor and acceptor arms. Finally, the computer-aided designs were 3D printed.

RESULTS

The 3D prints were convenient to utilize in both shaping the donor flaps as in preparing the acceptor extremities, taking only a few seconds during precious ischemia time. There was sufficient skin flap perfusion, and the wound-healing followed an uncomplicated course. No corrections were made to the initial skin incisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional printed templates were successfully utilized in the first Dutch bilateral hand-arm transplantation. We believe its usage increased time efficiency, improved the match of skin flaps in donor and recipient arms, and allowed us to control the amount of skin surplus without skin flap tip necrosis. In these procedures where time is of the essence, we believe preoperative planning is imperative for its success.

Three-dimensional printing in medicine: a systematic review of pediatric applications

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional printing (3DP) addresses distinct clinical challenges in pediatric care including: congenital variants, compact anatomy, high procedural risk, and growth over time. We hypothesized that patient-specific applications of 3DP in pediatrics could be categorized into concise, discrete categories of use.

METHODS

Terms related to "three-dimensional printing" and "pediatrics" were searched on PubMed, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science. Initial search yielded 2122 unique articles; 139 articles characterizing 508 patients met full inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Four categories of patient-specific 3DP applications were identified: Teaching of families and medical staff (9.3%); Developing intervention strategies (33.9%); Procedural applications, including subtypes: contour models, guides, splints, and implants (43.0%); and Material manufacturing of shaping devices or prosthetics (14.0%). Procedural comparative studies found 3DP devices to be equivalent or better than conventional methods, with less operating time and fewer complications.

CONCLUSION

Patient-specific applications of Three-Dimensional Printing in Medicine can be elegantly classified into four major categories: Teaching, Developing, Procedures, and Materials, sharing the same TDPM acronym. Understanding this schema is important because it promotes further innovation and increased implementation of these devices to improve pediatric care.

IMPACT

This article classifies the pediatric applications of patient-specific three-dimensional printing. This is a first comprehensive review of patient-specific three-dimensional printing in both pediatric medical and surgical disciplines, incorporating previously described classification schema to create one unifying paradigm. Understanding these applications is important since three-dimensional printing addresses challenges that are uniquely pediatric including compact anatomy, unique congenital variants, greater procedural risk, and growth over time. We identified four classifications of patient-specific use: teaching, developing, procedural, and material uses. By classifying these applications, this review promotes understanding and incorporation of this expanding technology to improve the pediatric care.

Does pediatric hand transplantation undermine a child's right to an open future?

To date, pediatric hand transplantations have only been performed twice. The ethical issue most often discussed in the literature on this surgery concerns the risks of immunosuppression. While these risks are significant, they can be at least partially mitigated by selecting for patients who are already immunocompromised. Nevertheless, as we will argue, pediatric hand transplantation raises ethical issues that go beyond the risks of immunosuppression. In this paper, we focus on three additional ethical issues: the fact that pediatric hand transplantation aims to improve, rather than save life; the fact that it is an experimental surgery; and the fact that it will be performed on non-autonomous patients whose 'right to an open future' may potentially be undermined by the surgery. Taken together, we think that these considerations suggest that transplantation should be postponed until a child is mature enough to make their own decision about it.

Building a Hand and Upper Extremity Transplantation Program: Lessons Learned From the First 20 Years of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Background: Upper extremity transplantation is a quality-of-life enhancing treatment for select patients with upper extremity loss. This article reviews the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative challenges in the upper extremity transplantation process and the lessons learned from the first 2 decades of hand transplantation. Methods: Key components of the author's hand transplantation protocol including patient selection, donor screening, surgical rehearsal, donor procurement, transplantation, immunosuppression, and patient outcome reporting/follow-up are reported to assist other teams who wish to establish a hand transplantation program. Results: There have been many advancements in the first 20 years of hand transplantation including better patient selection criteria, the recent addition of pediatric patients, improved surgical techniques such as the use of virtual surgical planning, and improved immunosuppression protocols. Improvement has also taken place in the tracking and reporting of hand transplant outcomes, but more work is clearly needed to fully define the benefits of transplantation, especially for pediatric patients. Conclusions: Over the past 20 years, significant progress has been made in upper extremity transplantation although a number of challenges remain including how to best document and share outcome measures, optimize immunosuppression, and diagnose/treat rejection. The authors encourage upper extremity transplant programs to report their experience and protocols to advance hand transplantation as standard of care for properly selected individuals.

Upper extremity and craniofacial vascularized composite allotransplantation: ethics and immunosuppression

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is the name most often used to refer to the transplantation of anatomical units composed of multiple tissue types (skin, bone, muscle, tendon, nerves, vessels, etc.) when such transplants do not have the primary purpose of extending life, as is the case in the more familiar field of solid organ transplantation (SOT). A serious interest in VCA developed in the late twentieth century following advances in immunosuppression which had led to significant improvements in short and medium-term survival among SOT recipients. Several ethical concerns have been raised about VCA, with many being connected in one way or another to the limitations, burdens, and risks associated with immunosuppression. This article will focus on upper extremity and craniofacial VCA, beginning with a brief review of the history of VCA including reported outcomes, followed by a discussion of the range of ethical concerns, before exploring in greater detail how immunological issues inform and shape several of the ethical concerns.

Achievements and Challenges in Facial Transplantation

: The first facial transplantation in 2005 ushered in a new era in reconstructive surgery, offering new possibilities for the repair of severe disfigurements previously limited by conventional techniques. Advances in allograft design, computerized preoperative planning, surgical technique, and postoperative revisions have helped push the boundaries in this new frontier of vascularized composite allotransplantation. Over the past 12 years, 40 of these procedures have been performed across the world, offering the field the opportunity to reflect on current outcomes. Successes achieved in the brief history of facial transplantation have resulted in a new set of obstacles the field must now overcome. In this review, we aim to highlight the achievements, major challenges, and future directions of this rapidly evolving field.

Prosthetic Rehabilitation and Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation following Upper Limb Loss

BACKGROUND

Upper limb loss is a devastating condition with dramatic physical, psychological, financial, and social consequences. Improvements in the fields of prosthetics and vascularized composite allotransplantation have opened exciting new frontiers for treatment and rehabilitation following upper limb loss. Each modality offers a unique set of advantages and limitations with regard to the restoration of hand function following amputation.

METHODS

Presented in this article is a discussion outlining the complex considerations and decisions encountered when determining patient appropriateness for either prosthetic rehabilitation or vascularized composite allotransplantation following upper limb loss. In this review, the authors examine how psychosocial factors, nature of injury, rehabilitation course, functional outcomes, and risks and benefits may affect overall patient selection for either rehabilitative approach.

RESULTS

This review summarizes the current state of the literature. Advancements in both prosthetic and biological strategies demonstrate promise with regard to facilitating rehabilitation following upper limb loss. However, there remains a dearth of research directly comparing outcomes in prosthetic rehabilitation to that following upper extremity transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies have performed a direct comparison between patients undergoing vascularized composite allotransplantation and those undergoing prosthetic rehabilitation. Upper extremity transplantation and prosthetic reconstruction should not be viewed as competing options, but rather as two treatment modalities with different risk-to-benefit profiles and indications.

Transplants for non-lethal conditions: a case against hand transplantation in minors

Human allografts for life-threatening organ failure have been demonstrated to be lifesaving and are now considered to be standard of care for many conditions. Transplantation of non-vital anatomic body parts has also been accomplished. Hand transplantation after limb loss in adults has been shown to offer some promising benefits in both functional and psychological measures in preliminary studies. It has been suggested to expand eligibility criteria to include minors, with one such operation having already been performed. With this in mind, we examine the current state of hand transplantation research in the context of available alternatives. We examine the ethics of carrying out these operations in minors, including under the protections of clinical research. We argue that children should not be considered for this surgery due to the substantial risks of immunosuppressive medication, the likelihood that the graft will need to be replaced during the patient's lifetime and the lack of significant compensatory advantages over modern prosthetics.

Partial Hand Transplant: Lessons Learned From Cadaveric Dissection Studies

As the field of vascularized composite allotransplantation continues to expand, new upper extremity transplant candidates are being considered. We recently evaluated a bilateral amputee who had a mid-forearm amputation and a contralateral metacarpal hand amputation. In the latter limb, a "partial" hand transplant that preserved the majority of the patient's existing hand, including a partially severed thumb with intact thenar muscle function, was proposed. The feasibility of this partial hand transplant was studied in fresh-frozen cadaver limbs. This report details the proposed approach, the cadaveric dissections, and the lessons learned from these dissections. Issues of osteosynthesis, microvascular planning, and intrinsic muscle recovery are discussed, all of which are critical considerations for partial hand transplant candidates. Ultimately, the partial hand approach was felt to be inferior to a more conventional distal forearm transplant in this particular candidate. Practical, functional, and ethical implications of such decision are presented.