Stress analysis of the implants in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under static and vibration loadings: a comparison between pedicle screw fixation system with rigid and flexible rods

A comparison of traditional and net structured intersomatic cages in the lombosacral region: A biomechanical analysis for enhancing discopathy treatment

The vertebral column represents an essential element for support, mobility, and the protection of the central nervous system. Various pathologies can compromise these vital functions, leading to pain and a decrease in the quality of life. Within the scope of this study, a novel redesign of the Intersomatic Cage, traditionally used in the presence of discopathy, was proposed. The adoption of additive manufacturing technology allowed for the creation of highly complex geometries, focusing on the lumbosacral tract, particularly on the L4-L5 and L5-S1 intervertebral discs. In addition to the tensile analysis carried out using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in static simulations, a parallel study on the range of motion (ROM) of the aforementioned vertebral pairs was conducted. The ROM represents the relative movement range between various vertebral pairs. The introduction of the intersomatic cage between the vertebrae, replacing the pulpy nucleus of the intervertebral disc, could influence the ROM, thus having significant clinical implications. For the analysis, the ligaments were modelled using a 1D approach. Their constraint reaction and deformability upon load application were analysed to better understand the potential biomechanical implications arising from the adoption of the cages. During the FEA simulations, two types of cages were analysed: LLIF for L4-L5 and ALIF for L5-S1, subjecting them to four different loading conditions. The results indicate that the stresses exhibited by cages with a NET structure are generally lower compared to those of traditional cages. This stress reduction in cages with NET structure suggests a more optimal load distribution, but it is essential to assess potential repercussions on the surrounding bone structure.

Biomechanical evaluation of the hybrid pedicle screw-cortical bone trajectory technique in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion to adjacent segment degeneration-finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is an effective surgical treatment of intervertebral disk herniation. However, its clinical efficacy for adjacent segment disk degeneration (ASDD) after hybrid bilateral pedicle screw - bilateral cortical screw (pedicle screw at L4 and cortical bone trajectory screw at L5) and hybrid bilateral cortical screw - bilateral pedicle screw (bilateral cortical screw at L4 and bilateral pedicle screw at L5) remains undiscovered. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the hybrid bilateral pedicle screw - bilateral cortical screw and hybrid bilateral cortical screw - bilateral pedicle screw on the adjacent segment via a 3-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) analysis.

METHODS

Four human cadaveric lumbar spine specimens were provided by the anatomy teaching and research department of Xinjiang Medical University. Four finite element models of L1-S1 lumbar spine segment were generated. For each of these, four lumbar transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion models at L4-L5 segment with the following instruments were created: hybrid bilateral pedicle screw - bilateral cortical screw, bilateral cortical screw - bilateral cortical screw (bilateral cortical screw at both L4 and L5 segments), bilateral pedicle screw - bilateral pedicle screw (bilateral pedicle screw at both L4 and L5 segments), and hybrid bilateral cortical screw - bilateral pedicle screw. A 400-N compressive load with 7.5 Nm moments was applied for the simulation of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation. The range of motion of L3-L4 and L5-S1 segments and von Mises stress of the intervertebral disc at the adjacent segment were compared.

RESULTS

Hybrid bilateral pedicle screw - bilateral cortical screw has the lowest range of motion at L3-L4 segment in flexion, extension, and lateral bending, and the highest disc stress in all motions, while the range of motion at L5-S1 segment and disc stress was lower than bilateral pedicle screw - bilateral pedicle screw in flexion, extension, and lateral bending, and higher than bilateral cortical screw - bilateral cortical screw in all motions. The range of motion of hybrid bilateral cortical screw - bilateral pedicle screw at L3-L4 segment was lower than bilateral pedicle screw - bilateral pedicle screw and higher than bilateral cortical screw - bilateral cortical screw in flexion, extension, and lateral bending, and the range of motion at L5-S1 segment was higher than bilateral pedicle screw - bilateral pedicle screw in flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The disc stress at L3-L4 segment was lowest and more dispersed in all motions, and the disc stress at L5-S1 segment was higher than bilateral pedicle screw - bilateral pedicle screw in lateral bending and axial rotation, but more dispersed.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid bilateral cortical screw - bilateral pedicle screw decreases the impact on adjacent segments after spinal fusion, reduces the iatrogenic injury to the paravertebral tissues, and provides throughout decompression of the lateral recess.

Fixation-induced surgical segment's high stiffness and the damage of posterior structures together trigger a higher risk of adjacent segment disease in patients with lumbar interbody fusion operations

BACKGROUND

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a commonly reported complication after lumbar interbody fusion (LIF); changes in the mechanical environment play an essential role in the generation of ASD. Traditionally, fixation-induced high stiffness in the surgical segment was the main reason for ASD. However, with more attention paid to the biomechanical significance of posterior bony and soft structures, surgeons hypothesize that this factor may also play an important role in ASD.

METHODS

Oblique and posterior LIF operations have been simulated in this study. The stand-alone OLIF and OLIF fixed by bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) system have been simulated. The spinal process (the attachment point of cranial ligamentum complex) was excised in the PLIF model; the BPS system has also been used in the PLIF model. Stress values related to ASD have been computed under physiological body positions, including flexion, extension, bending, and axial rotations.

RESULTS

Compared to the stand-alone OLIF model, the OLIF model with BPS fixation suffers higher stress values under extension body position. However, there are no apparent differences under other loading conditions. Moreover, significant increases in stress values can be recorded in flexion and extension loading conditions in the PLIF model with posterior structures damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixation-induced surgical segment's high stiffness and the damage of posterior soft tissues together trigger a higher risk of ASD in patients with LIF operations. Optimizing BPS fixation methods and pedicle screw designs and reducing the range of posterior structures excision may be an effective method to reduce the risk of ASD.

Hybrid pedicle screw and modified cortical bone trajectory technique in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5 segment: finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Investigate the biomechanical properties of the hybrid fixation technique with bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) and bilateral modified cortical bone trajectory screw (BMCS) in L4-L5 transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

METHODS

 Three finite element (FE) models of the L1-S1 lumbar spine were established according to the three human cadaveric lumbar specimens. BPS-BMCS (BPS at L4 and BMCS at L5), BMCS-BPS (BMCS at L4 and BPS at L5), BPS-BPS (BPS at L4 and L5), and BMCS-BMCS (BMCS at L4 and L5) were implanted into the L4-L5 segment of each FE model. The range of motion (ROM) of the L4-L5 segment, von Mises stress of the fixation, intervertebral cage, and rod were compared under a 400-N compressive load with 7.5 Nm moments in flexion, extension, bending, and rotation.

RESULTS

 BPS-BMCS technique has the lowest ROM in extension and rotation, and BMCS-BMCS technique has the lowest ROM in flexion and lateral bending. The BMCS-BMCS technique showed maximal cage stress in flexion and lateral bending, and the BPS-BPS technique in extension and rotation. Compared to the BPS-BPS and BMCS-BMCS technique, BPS-BMCS technique presented a lower risk of screw breakage and BMCS-BPS technique presented a lower risk of rod breakage.

CONCLUSION

 The results of this study support that the use of the BPS-BMCS and BMCS-BPS techniques in TLIF surgery for offering the superior stability and a lower risk of cage subsidence and instrument-related complication.

Patterns of Vertebral Bone Marrow Edema in the Normal Healing Process of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Baseline Data for Diagnosis of Pathological Events

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective investigation using a prospectively collected database.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the appearance and characteristics of vertebral bone marrow edema (BME) in the normal healing of lumbar interbody fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although BME in pathological spinal conditions has been well-documented, the patterns and characteristics of BME in the normal healing process of spinal fusion remains unexplored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed imaging from 225 patients with normal healing following posterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. BME was identified on magnetic resonance imaging at the third postoperative week and categorized with respect to its appearance, including assessment of area and extension within the relevant vertebrae.

RESULTS

Three hundred eighty-nine of the 450 instrumented vertebrae (86.4%) displayed evidence BME. All instances of BME were associated with the area of contact with the endplate. The average extent of BME was 32.7±1.0%. BME within normal healing following interbody fusion could be categorized into four types: no edema (13.6%), anterior corner (36.6%), around-the-cage focal (48.0%), and diffuse (1.8%). Anterior corner BME was significantly associated with instances of single cage placement than in dual cages (42.6% vs. 24.7%, P =0.0002). Single cages had a significantly higher rate of BME than dual cages (92.0% vs. 75.3%, P <0.0001). The extent of BME was significantly greater in the single cage cohort (36.9% vs. 24.2% in dual cages, P <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This serves as the first study demonstrating the patterns of BME associated with normal healing following lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Anterior corner BME and around-the-cage focal BME were the most common patterns encountered, with diffuse BME a relatively rare pattern. These findings might contribute to the better differentiation of postoperative pathological events from normal healing following lumbar interbody fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Effect of Interbody Implants on the Biomechanical Behavior of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study

Porous titanium interbody scaffolds are growing in popularity due to their appealing advantages for bone ingrowth. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical effects of scaffold materials in both normal and osteoporotic lumbar spines using a finite element (FE) model. Four scaffold materials were compared: Ti6Al4V (Ti), PEEK, porous titanium of 65% porosity (P65), and porous titanium of 80% porosity (P80). In addition, the range of motion (ROM), endplate stress, scaffold stress, and pedicle screw stress were calculated and compared. The results showed that the ROM decreased by more than 96% after surgery, and the solid Ti scaffold provided the lowest ROM (1.2-3.4% of the intact case) at the surgical segment among all models. Compared to solid Ti, PEEK decreased the scaffold stress by 53-66 and the endplate stress by 0-33%, while porous Ti decreased the scaffold stress by 20-32% and the endplate stress by 0-32%. Further, compared with P65, P80 slightly increased the ROM (<0.03°) and pedicle screw stress (<4%) and decreased the endplate stress by 0-13% and scaffold stress by approximately 18%. Moreover, the osteoporotic lumbar spine provided higher ROMs, endplate stresses, scaffold stresses, and pedicle screw stresses in all motion modes. The porous Ti scaffolds may offer an alternative for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Modified pedicle screw fixation under guidance of stress analysis for cervicothoracic junction: Surgical technique and outcomes

BACKGROUND

In cervicothoracic junction, the use of strong fixation device such as pedicle screw placement is often needed.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement using stress conduction analysis in the clinical application.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected patients who underwent pedicle screw internal fixation in cervicothoracic junction. Patients were divided into conventional nail placement (Group A) and modified pedicle screw implantation under guidance of stress analysis (Group B) according to the methods of pedicle screw placement. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was assessed by computed tomography (CT) examination, and the success rate was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients who underwent pedicle screw internal fixation in cervicothoracic junction were included. There were no obvious differences in baseline characteristics between two groups. The success rate of total screw placement, cervical spine screw placement and upper thoracic spine screw placement in Group B was higher than those in Group A (P< 0.001, P= 0.005, P= 0.008). Additionally, Heary Grade I in the Group B was higher than Group A (P= 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Stress analysis-guided technique can increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Importantly, it meets the requirements of internal fixation of the cervicothoracic junction.

Recent advancement in finite element analysis of spinal interbody cages: A review

Finite element analysis (FEA) is a widely used tool in a variety of industries and research endeavors. With its application to spine biomechanics, FEA has contributed to a better understanding of the spine, its components, and its behavior in physiological and pathological conditions, as well as assisting in the design and application of spinal instrumentation, particularly spinal interbody cages (ICs). IC is a highly effective instrumentation for achieving spinal fusion that has been used to treat a variety of spinal disorders, including degenerative disc disease, trauma, tumor reconstruction, and scoliosis. The application of FEA lets new designs be thoroughly "tested" before a cage is even manufactured, allowing bio-mechanical responses and spinal fusion processes that cannot easily be experimented upon in vivo to be examined and "diagnosis" to be performed, which is an important addition to clinical and in vitro experimental studies. This paper reviews the recent progress of FEA in spinal ICs over the last six years. It demonstrates how modeling can aid in evaluating the biomechanical response of cage materials, cage design, and fixation devices, understanding bone formation mechanisms, comparing the benefits of various fusion techniques, and investigating the impact of pathological structures. It also summarizes the various limitations brought about by modeling simplification and looks forward to the significant advancement of spine FEA research as computing efficiency and software capabilities increase. In conclusion, in such a fast-paced field, the FEA is critical for spinal IC studies. It helps in quantitatively and visually demonstrating the cage characteristics after implanting, lowering surgeons' learning costs for new cage products, and probably assisting them in determining the best IC for patients.

Biomechanical studies of different numbers and positions of cage implantation on minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

The position and number of cages in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) are mainly determined by surgeons based on their individual experience. Therefore, it is important to investigate the optimal number and position of cages in MIS-TLIF.

METHODS

The lumbar model was created based on a 24-year-old volunteer's computed tomography data and then tested using three different cage implantation methods: single transverse cage implantation (model A), single oblique 45° cage implantation (model B), and double vertical cage implantation (model C). A preload of 500 N and a moment of 10 Nm were applied to the models to simulate lumbar motion, and the models' range of motion (ROM), ROM ratio, peak stress of the internal fixation system, and cage were assessed.

RESULTS

The ROM ratios of models A, B, and C were significantly reduced by >71% compared with the intact model under all motions. Although there were subtle differences in the ROM ratio for models A, B, and C, the trends were similar. The peak stress of the internal fixation system appeared in model B of 136.05 MPa (right lateral bending), which was 2.07 times that of model A and 1.62 times that of model C under the same condition. Model C had the lowest cage stress, which was superior to that of the single-cage model.

CONCLUSION

In MIS-TLIF, single long-cage transversal implantation is a promising standard implantation method, and double short-cage implantation is recommended for patients with severe osteoporosis.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Coflex-F and Pedicle Screw Fixation: Finite Element Analysis of Static and Vibration Conditions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the biomechanics of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with interspinous process device (IPD) or pedicle screw fixation under both static and vibration conditions by the finite element (FE) method.

METHOD

A validated FE model of the L1-5 lumbar spine was used in this study. This FE model derived from computed tomography images of a healthy female adult volunteer of appropriate age. Then the model was modified to simulate L3-4 TLIF. Four conditions were compared: (i) intact; (ii) TLIF combined with bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF); (iii) TLIF combined with U-shaped IPD Coflex-F (CF); and (iv) TLIF combined with unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF). The intact and surgical FE models were analyzed under static and vibration loading conditions respectively. For static loading conditions, four motion modes (flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation) were simulated. For vibration loading conditions, the dynamic responses of lumbar spine under sinusoidal vertical load were simulated.

RESULT

Under static loading conditions, compared with intact case, BPSF decreased range of motion (ROM) by 92%, 95%, 89% and 92% in flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, respectively. While CF decreased ROM by 87%, 90%, 69% and 80%, and UPSF decreased ROM by 84%, 89%, 66% and 82%, respectively. Compared with CF, UPSF increased the endplate stress by 5%-8% in flexion, 7%-10% in extension, 2%-4% in lateral bending, and decreased the endplate stress by 16%-19% in axial rotation. Compared with CF, UPSF increased the cage stress by 9% in flexion, 10% in extension, and decreased the cage stress by 3% in lateral bending, and 13% in axial rotation. BPSF decreased the stress responses of endplates and cage compared with CF and UPSF. Compared BPSF, CF decreased the facet joint force (FJF) by 6%-13%, and UPSF decreased the FJF by 4%-12%. During vibration loading conditions, compared with BPSF, CF reduced maximum values of the FJF by 16%-32%, and vibration amplitudes by 22%-35%, while UPSF reduced maximum values by 20%-40%, and vibration amplitudes by 31%-45%.

CONCLUSION

Compared with other surgical models, BPSF increased the stability of lumbar spine, and also showed advantages in cage stress and endplate stress. CF showed advantages in IDP and FJF especially during vertical vibration, which may lead to lower risk of adjacent segment degeneration. CF may be an effective alternative to pedicle screw fixation in TLIF procedures.

Posterior stabilization with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with titanium rods for single-level lumbar spine degenerative disease in patients above 70 years of age

BACKGROUND

Given the lack of guidelines regarding the operative management of elderly patients needing lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disease, it is often difficult to balance between invasiveness respecting the fragile spine and geriatric comorbidities.

AIM

To compare reoperation rates and clinical outcome in patients above 70 years of age undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) with titanium rods or posterior stabilization with Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods for the treatment of one-level lumbar spine degenerative disease.

METHODS

Retrospective review of baseline characteristics, reoperation rates as well as the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients, older than 70 years, undergoing posterolateral fusion with PEEK rods (n = 76, PEEK group) or TLIF with titanium rods (n = 67, TLIF group) for a single-level lumbar degenerative disease from 2014 to 2020. Additional subanalysis on the patients above 80 years of age was performed.

RESULTS

Our results showed similar reoperation rates and outcomes in the TLIF and PEEK groups. However, intraoperative blood loss, administration of tranexamic acid, and operation time were significantly higher in the TLIF group. In patients older than 80 years, reoperation rates at first follow-up were significantly higher in the TLIF group, too.

CONCLUSION

According to our results, posterior stabilization with PEEK rods is less invasive and was associated with significantly lower blood loss, administration of blood products and shorter operation time. Moreover, in patients above 80 years of age reoperations rates were lower with PEEK rods, as well. Nevertheless, the benefits of PEEK rods for foraminal stenosis still have to be investigated.

Effects of Revision Rod Position on Spinal Construct Stability in Lumbar Revision Surgery: A Finite Element Study

Revision surgery (RS) is a necessary surgical intervention in clinical practice to treat spinal instrumentation–related symptomatic complications. Three constructs with different configurations have been applied in RS. One distinguishing characteristic of these configurations is that the revision rods connecting previous segments and revision segments are placed alongside, outside, or inside the previous rods at the level of facetectomy. Whether the position of the revision rod could generate mechanical disparities in revision constructs is unknown. The objective of this study was to assess the influence of the revision rod position on the construct after RS. A validated spinal finite element (FE) model was developed to simulate RS after previous instrumented fusion using a modified dual-rod construct (DRCm), satellite-rod construct (SRC), and cortical bone trajectory construct (CBTC). Thereafter, maximum von Mises stress (VMS) on the annulus fibrosus and cages and the ligament force of the interspinous ligament, supraspinous ligament, and ligamentum flavum under a pure moment load and a follower load in six directions were applied to assess the influence of the revision rod position on the revision construct. An approximately identical overall reducing tendency of VMS was observed among the three constructs. The changing tendency of the maximum VMS on the cages placed at L4-L5 was nearly equal among the three constructs. However, the changing tendency of the maximum VMS on the cage placed at L2-L3 was notable, especially in the CBTC under right bending and left axial rotation. The overall changing tendency of the ligament force in the DRCm, SRC, and CBTC was also approximately equal, while the ligament force of the CBTC was found to be significantly greater than that of the DRCm and SRC at L1-L2. The results indicated that the stiffness associated with the CBTC might be lower than that associated with the DRCm and SRC in RS. The results of the present study indicated that the DRCm, SRC, and CBTC could provide sufficient stabilization in RS. The CBTC was a less rigid construct. Rather than the revision rod position, the method of constructing spinal instrumentation played a role in influencing the biomechanics of revision.

Biomechanical Investigation of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Supplemented with Topping-off Instrumentation Using Different Dynamic Stabilization Devices

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical comparison study using finite element method.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate effects of different dynamic stabilization devices, including pedicle-based dynamic stabilization system (PBDSS) and interspinous process spacer (ISP), used for topping-off implants on biomechanical responses of human spine after lumbar interbody fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Topping-off stabilization technique has been proposed to prevent adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. PBDSS and ISP are the most used dynamic stabilizers for topping-off instrumentation. However, biomechanical differences between them still remain unclear.

METHODS

A validated, normal FE model of human lumbosacral spine was employed. Based on this model, rigid fusion at L4-L5 and moderately disc degeneration at L3-L4 were simulated and used as a comparison baseline. Subsequently, Bioflex and DIAM systems were instrumented at L3-L4 segment to construct PBDSS-based and ISP-based topping-off models. Biomechanical responses of the models to bending moments and vertical vibrational excitation were computed using FE static and random response analyses, respectively.

RESULTS

Results from static analysis showed that at L3-L4, the response parameters including annulus stress and range of motion were decreased by 41.6% to 85.2% for PBDSS-based model and by 6.3% to 67% for ISP-based model compared with rigid fusion model. At L2-L3, these parameters were lower in ISP-based model than in PBDSS-based model. Results from random response analysis showed that topping-off instrumentation increased resonant frequency of spine system but decreased dynamic response of annulus stress at L3-L4. PBDSS-based model generated lower dynamic stress than ISP-based model at L3-L4, but the dynamic stress was higher at L2-L3 for PBDSSbased model.

CONCLUSION

Under static and vibration loadings, the PBDSSbased topping-off device (Bioflex) provided a better protection for transition segment, and likelihood of degeneration of supraadjacent segment might be relatively lower when using the ISPbased topping-off device (DIAM).Level of Evidence: 5.

Biomechanical investigation of topping-off technique using an interspinous process device following lumbar interbody fusion under vibration loading

Topping-off technique has been proposed to prevent adjacent-segment degeneration/disease following spine fusion surgery. Nevertheless, few studies have investigated biomechanics of the fusion surgery with topping-off device under whole-body vibration (WBV). This biomechanical study aimed to investigate the vibration characteristics of human lumbar spine after topping-off surgery, and also to evaluate the effect of bony fusion on spine biomechanics. Based on a healthy finite-element model of lumbosacral spine (L1-sacrum), the models of topping-off surgery before and after bony fusion were developed. The simulated surgical procedures consisted of interbody fusion with rigid stabilizer at L4-L5 segment (rigid fusion) and dynamic stabilizer at degenerated L3-L4 segment. An interspinous implant, Device for Intervertebral Assisted Motion (DIAM, Medtronic Inc., Minnesota, USA), was used as the dynamic stabilizer. The stress responses of spine segments and implants under a vertical cyclic load were calculated and analyzed. The results showed that compared with rigid fusion alone, the topping-off technique significantly decreased disc stress at transition segment (L3-L4) as expected, and resulted in a slight increase in disc stress at its supra-adjacent segment (L2-L3). It indicated that the topping-off stabilization using DIAM might provide a good tradeoff between protection of transition segment and deterioration of its supra-adjacent segment during WBV. Also, it was found that bony fusion decreased stress in L4 inferior endplate and rigid stabilizer but had nearly no effect on stress in DIAM and L3-L4 disc, which was helpful to determine the biomechanical differences before and after bony fusion.

Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems

PURPOSE

Biomechanical comparison between rigid and non-rigid posterior stabilization systems following lumbar interbody fusion has been conducted in several studies. However, most of these previous studies mainly focused on investigating biomechanics of adjacent spinal segments or spine stability. The objective of the present study was to compare biomechanical responses of the fusion devices when using different posterior instrumentations.

METHODS

Finite-element model of the intact human lumbar spine (L1-sacrum) was modified to simulate implantation of the fusion cage at L4-L5 level supplemented with different posterior stabilization systems including (i) pedicle screw-based fixation using rigid connecting rods (titanium rods), (ii) pedicle screw-based fixation using flexible connecting rods (PEEK rods) and (iii) dynamic interspinous spacer (DIAM). Stress responses were compared among these various models under bending moments.

RESULTS

The highest and lowest stresses in endplate, fusion cage and bone graft were found at the fused L4-L5 level with DIAM and titanium rod stabilization systems, respectively. When using PEEK rod for the pedicle screw fixation, peak stress in the pedicle screw was lower but the ratio of peak stress in the rods to yield stress of the rod material was higher than using titanium rod.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional rigid posterior stabilization system, the use of non-rigid stabilization system (i.e., the PEEK rod system and DIAM system) following lumbar interbody fusion might increase the risks of cage subsidence and cage damage, but promote bony fusion due to higher stress in the bone graft. For the pedicle screw-based rod stabilization system, using PEEK rod might reduce the risk of screw breakage but increased breakage risk of the rod itself.

Biomechanical evaluation of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with various fixation options: Finite element analysis of static and vibration conditions

BACKGROUND

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with supplementary fixation has been widely used to treat lumbar diseases. However, few studies have investigated the influence of fixation options on facet joint force and cage subsidence. The aim of this study was to explore the biomechanical performance of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with various fixation options under both static and vertical vibration loading conditions.

METHODS

A previously validated finite element model of the intact L1-5 lumbar spine was employed to compare five conditions: (1) Intact; (2) Fusion alone; (3) Fusion combined with anterior lumbar plate; (4) Fusion combined with Coflex-F fixation; (5) Fusion combined with bilateral pedicle screw fixation. The models were analyzed under static and vertical vibration loading conditions respectively.

FINDINGS

Bilateral pedicle screws provided highest stability at surgical level. Applying supplementary fixation diminished the dynamic responses of lumbar spine. Compared with anterior lumbar plate and Coflex-F device, bilateral pedicle screws decreased the stress responses of the endplates and cage under both static and vibration conditions, while increased the facet joint force at adjacent levels. As for comparison between Coflex-F device and anterior lumbar plate, results showed a similarity in biomechanical performance under static loading, and a slightly higher dynamic response of the latter under vertical vibration.

INTERPRETATION

The biomechanical performance of lumbar spine was significantly influenced by the variation of fixations under both static and vibration conditions. Bilateral pedicle screws showed advantages in stabilizing surgical segment and relieving cage subsidence, but may increase the facet joint force at adjacent levels.

Biomechanical Evaluation and the Assisted 3D Printed Model in the Patient-Specific Preoperative Planning for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis: A Finite Element Analysis

Posterior fixation is superior to anterior fixation in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability for the treatment of thoracic spinal tuberculosis. However, the process of selecting the appropriate spinal fixation method remains controversial, and preoperative biomechanical evaluation has not yet been investigated. In this study, we aimed to analyze the application of the assisted finite element analysis (FEA) and the three-dimensional (3D) printed model for the patient-specific preoperative planning of thoracic spinal tuberculosis. An adult patient with thoracic spinal tuberculosis was included. A finite element model of the T7−T11 thoracic spine segments was reconstructed to analyze the biomechanical effect of four different operative constructs. The von Mises stress values of the implants in the vertical axial load and flexion and extension conditions under a 400-N vertical axial pre-load and a 10-N⋅m moment were calculated and compared. A 3D printed model was used to describe and elucidate the patient’s condition and simulate the optimal surgical design. According to the biomechanical evaluation, the patient-specific preoperative surgical design was prepared for implementation. The anterior column, which was reconstructed with titanium alloy mesh and a bone graft with posterior fixation using seven pedicle screws (M+P) and performed at the T7–T11 level, decreased the von Mises stress placed on the right rod, T7 pedicle screw, and T11 pedicle. Moreover, the M+P evaded the left T9 screw without load bearing. The 3D printed model and preoperative surgical simulation enhanced the understanding of the patient’s condition and facilitated patient-specific preoperative planning. Good clinical results, including no complication of implants, negligible loss of the Cobb angle, and good bone fusion, were achieved using the M+P surgical design. In conclusion, M+P was recommended as the optimal method for preoperative planning since it enabled the preservation of the normal vertebra and prevented unnecessary internal fixation. Our study indicated that FEA and the assisted 3D printed model are tools that could be extremely useful and effective in the patient-specific preoperative planning for thoracic spinal tuberculosis, which can facilitate preoperative surgical simulation and biomechanical evaluation, as well as improve the understanding of the patient’s condition.