1
|
A Novel Inhibitor INF 39 Promotes Osteogenesis via Blocking the NLRP3/IL-1β Axis. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:7250578. [PMID: 35872849 PMCID: PMC9300331 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7250578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose. A balance between osteoblasts and osteoclasts is essential to maintain skeletal integrity, regulating bone metabolism and bone remodeling. The nucleotide binding oligomerization domain, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin domain containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is known as a cytosolic complex involved in producing proinflammatory cytokines consisting of interleukin- (IL-) 1β, which accelerates the occurrence of osteoporosis. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of a novel NLRP3 inhibitor INF 39 on bone formation and bone resorption. Material and Methods. Cell viability of INF 39-treated osteoclasts and calvarial osteoblasts was tested by CCK-8 assays. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to evaluate gene expression level during osteoblast and osteoclast formation. Western blot analysis was used to determine the effect of INF 39 on osteogenic and osteoclast-related proteins. Result. It was shown that INF 39 promotes osteoblast differentiation via inhibiting NLRP3, thereby reducing the production of IL-1β dependent on NLRP3 in vitro. However, RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation is not influenced by INF 39 in vitro. Conclusion. Our study suggests that NLRP3 could be a new target and INF 39 may be a potential option for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.
Collapse
|
2
|
Fast NMR method to probe solvent accessibility and disordered regions in proteins. Sci Rep 2019; 9:1647. [PMID: 30733478 PMCID: PMC6367444 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37599-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding protein structure and dynamics, which govern key cellular processes, is crucial for basic and applied research. Intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) regions display multifunctionality via alternative transient conformations, being key players in disease mechanisms. IDP regions are abundant, namely in small viruses, allowing a large number of functions out of a small proteome. The relation between protein function and structure is thus now seen from a different perspective: as IDP regions enable transient structural arrangements, each conformer can play different roles within the cell. However, as IDP regions are hard and time-consuming to study via classical techniques (optimized for globular proteins with unique conformations), new methods are required. Here, employing the dengue virus (DENV) capsid (C) protein and the immunoglobulin-binding domain of streptococcal protein G, we describe a straightforward NMR method to differentiate the solvent accessibility of single amino acid N-H groups in structured and IDP regions. We also gain insights into DENV C flexible fold region biological activity. The method, based on minimal pH changes, uses the well-established 1H-15N HSQC pulse sequence and is easily implementable in current protein NMR routines. The data generated are simple to interpret, with this rapid approach being an useful first-choice IDPs characterization method.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoch JC. Beyond Fourier. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE (SAN DIEGO, CALIF. : 1997) 2017; 283:117-123. [PMID: 28385517 PMCID: PMC5730986 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/25/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Non-Fourier methods of spectrum analysis are gaining traction in NMR spectroscopy, driven by their utility for processing nonuniformly sampled data. These methods afford new opportunities for optimizing experiment time, resolution, and sensitivity of multidimensional NMR experiments, but they also pose significant challenges not encountered with the discrete Fourier transform. A brief history of non-Fourier methods in NMR serves to place different approaches in context. Non-Fourier methods reflect broader trends in the growing importance of computation in NMR, and offer insights for future software development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey C Hoch
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UConn Health, 263 Farmington Ave., Farmington, CT 06030-3305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maciejewski MW, Schuyler AD, Gryk MR, Moraru II, Romero PR, Ulrich EL, Eghbalnia HR, Livny M, Delaglio F, Hoch JC. NMRbox: A Resource for Biomolecular NMR Computation. Biophys J 2017; 112:1529-1534. [PMID: 28445744 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 319] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Revised: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in computation have been enabling many recent advances in biomolecular applications of NMR. Due to the wide diversity of applications of NMR, the number and variety of software packages for processing and analyzing NMR data is quite large, with labs relying on dozens, if not hundreds of software packages. Discovery, acquisition, installation, and maintenance of all these packages is a burdensome task. Because the majority of software packages originate in academic labs, persistence of the software is compromised when developers graduate, funding ceases, or investigators turn to other projects. To simplify access to and use of biomolecular NMR software, foster persistence, and enhance reproducibility of computational workflows, we have developed NMRbox, a shared resource for NMR software and computation. NMRbox employs virtualization to provide a comprehensive software environment preconfigured with hundreds of software packages, available as a downloadable virtual machine or as a Platform-as-a-Service supported by a dedicated compute cloud. Ongoing development includes a metadata harvester to regularize, annotate, and preserve workflows and facilitate and enhance data depositions to BioMagResBank, and tools for Bayesian inference to enhance the robustness and extensibility of computational analyses. In addition to facilitating use and preservation of the rich and dynamic software environment for biomolecular NMR, NMRbox fosters the development and deployment of a new class of metasoftware packages. NMRbox is freely available to not-for-profit users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark W Maciejewski
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Adam D Schuyler
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Michael R Gryk
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Ion I Moraru
- Department of Cell Biology, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut
| | - Pedro R Romero
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Eldon L Ulrich
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Hamid R Eghbalnia
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Miron Livny
- Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Frank Delaglio
- Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology and the University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey C Hoch
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Simkovic F, Ovchinnikov S, Baker D, Rigden DJ. Applications of contact predictions to structural biology. IUCRJ 2017; 4:291-300. [PMID: 28512576 PMCID: PMC5414403 DOI: 10.1107/s2052252517005115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Evolutionary pressure on residue interactions, intramolecular or intermolecular, that are important for protein structure or function can lead to covariance between the two positions. Recent methodological advances allow much more accurate contact predictions to be derived from this evolutionary covariance signal. The practical application of contact predictions has largely been confined to structural bioinformatics, yet, as this work seeks to demonstrate, the data can be of enormous value to the structural biologist working in X-ray crystallo-graphy, cryo-EM or NMR. Integrative structural bioinformatics packages such as Rosetta can already exploit contact predictions in a variety of ways. The contribution of contact predictions begins at construct design, where structural domains may need to be expressed separately and contact predictions can help to predict domain limits. Structure solution by molecular replacement (MR) benefits from contact predictions in diverse ways: in difficult cases, more accurate search models can be constructed using ab initio modelling when predictions are available, while intermolecular contact predictions can allow the construction of larger, oligomeric search models. Furthermore, MR using supersecondary motifs or large-scale screens against the PDB can exploit information, such as the parallel or antiparallel nature of any β-strand pairing in the target, that can be inferred from contact predictions. Contact information will be particularly valuable in the determination of lower resolution structures by helping to assign sequence register. In large complexes, contact information may allow the identity of a protein responsible for a certain region of density to be determined and then assist in the orientation of an available model within that density. In NMR, predicted contacts can provide long-range information to extend the upper size limit of the technique in a manner analogous but complementary to experimental methods. Finally, predicted contacts can distinguish between biologically relevant interfaces and mere lattice contacts in a final crystal structure, and have potential in the identification of functionally important regions and in foreseeing the consequences of mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Simkovic
- Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, England
| | - Sergey Ovchinnikov
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Box 357370, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - David Baker
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Washington, Box 357370, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Daniel J. Rigden
- Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, England
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sala D, Giachetti A, Luchinat C, Rosato A. A protocol for the refinement of NMR structures using simultaneously pseudocontact shift restraints from multiple lanthanide ions. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2016; 66:175-185. [PMID: 27771862 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-016-0065-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/29/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The binding of paramagnetic metal ions to proteins produces a number of different effects on the NMR spectra of the system. In particular, when the magnetic susceptibility of the metal ion is anisotropic, pseudocontact shifts (PCSs) arise and can be easily measured. They constitute very useful restraints for the solution structure determination of metal-binding proteins. In this context, there has been great interest in the use of lanthanide(III) ions to induce PCSs in diamagnetic proteins, e.g. through the replacement native calcium(II) ions. By preparing multiple samples in each of which a different ion of the lanthanide series is introduced, it is possible to obtain multiple independent PCS datasets that can be used synergistically to generate protein structure ensembles (typically called bundles). For typical NMR-based determination of protein structure, it is necessary to perform an energetic refinement of such initial bundles to obtain final structures whose geometric quality is suitable for deposition in the PDB. This can be conveniently done by using restrained molecular dynamics simulations (rMD) in explicit solvent. However, there are no available protocols for rMD using multiple PCS datasets as part of the restraints. In this work, we extended the PCS module of the AMBER MD package to handle multiple datasets and tuned a previously developed protocol for NMR structure refinement to achieve consistent convergence with PCS restraints. Test calculations with real experimental data show that this new implementation delivers the expected improvement of protein geometry, resulting in final structures that are of suitable quality for deposition. Furthermore, we observe that also initial structures generated only with traditional restraints can be successfully refined using traditional and PCS restraints simultaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Sala
- Magnetic Resonance Center (CERM), University of Florence, Via Luigi Sacconi 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Andrea Giachetti
- Magnetic Resonance Center (CERM), University of Florence, Via Luigi Sacconi 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Claudio Luchinat
- Magnetic Resonance Center (CERM), University of Florence, Via Luigi Sacconi 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
- Department of Chemistry, University of Florence, Via della Lastruccia 3, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
| | - Antonio Rosato
- Magnetic Resonance Center (CERM), University of Florence, Via Luigi Sacconi 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
- Department of Chemistry, University of Florence, Via della Lastruccia 3, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kmiecik S, Gront D, Kolinski M, Wieteska L, Dawid AE, Kolinski A. Coarse-Grained Protein Models and Their Applications. Chem Rev 2016; 116:7898-936. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 555] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Kmiecik
- Faculty
of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dominik Gront
- Faculty
of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michal Kolinski
- Bioinformatics
Laboratory, Mossakowski Medical Research Center of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawinskiego 5, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lukasz Wieteska
- Faculty
of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland
- Department
of Medical Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, Mazowiecka 6/8, 92-215 Lodz, Poland
| | | | - Andrzej Kolinski
- Faculty
of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rosato A, Vranken W, Fogh RH, Ragan TJ, Tejero R, Pederson K, Lee HW, Prestegard JH, Yee A, Wu B, Lemak A, Houliston S, Arrowsmith CH, Kennedy M, Acton TB, Xiao R, Liu G, Montelione GT, Vuister GW. The second round of Critical Assessment of Automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR: CASD-NMR-2013. JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR NMR 2015; 62:413-24. [PMID: 26071966 PMCID: PMC4569658 DOI: 10.1007/s10858-015-9953-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2015] [Accepted: 05/28/2015] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The second round of the community-wide initiative Critical Assessment of automated Structure Determination of Proteins by NMR (CASD-NMR-2013) comprised ten blind target datasets, consisting of unprocessed spectral data, assigned chemical shift lists and unassigned NOESY peak and RDC lists, that were made available in both curated (i.e. manually refined) or un-curated (i.e. automatically generated) form. Ten structure calculation programs, using fully automated protocols only, generated a total of 164 three-dimensional structures (entries) for the ten targets, sometimes using both curated and un-curated lists to generate multiple entries for a single target. The accuracy of the entries could be established by comparing them to the corresponding manually solved structure of each target, which was not available at the time the data were provided. Across the entire data set, 71 % of all entries submitted achieved an accuracy relative to the reference NMR structure better than 1.5 Å. Methods based on NOESY peak lists achieved even better results with up to 100% of the entries within the 1.5 Å threshold for some programs. However, some methods did not converge for some targets using un-curated NOESY peak lists. Over 90% of the entries achieved an accuracy better than the more relaxed threshold of 2.5 Å that was used in the previous CASD-NMR-2010 round. Comparisons between entries generated with un-curated versus curated peaks show only marginal improvements for the latter in those cases where both calculations converged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Rosato
- Department of Chemistry and Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Florence, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Wim Vranken
- Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
- (IB)2 Interuniversity Institute of Bioinformatics in Brussels, ULB-VUB, Triomflaan, 1050, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rasmus H Fogh
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Henry Wellcome Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | - Timothy J Ragan
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Henry Wellcome Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | - Roberto Tejero
- Departamento de Química Física, Universidad de Valencia, Avda. Dr. Moliner 50, 46100, Burjassot (Valencia), Spain
| | - Kari Pederson
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Hsiau-Wei Lee
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - James H Prestegard
- Complex Carbohydrate Research Center and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Adelinda Yee
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Bin Wu
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Alexander Lemak
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Scott Houliston
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Cheryl H Arrowsmith
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, Ontario Cancer Institute, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Michael Kennedy
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Miami University, Oxford, OH, 45056, USA
| | - Thomas B Acton
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Rong Xiao
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Gaohua Liu
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Gaetano T Montelione
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
| | - Geerten W Vuister
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Henry Wellcome Building, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|