NMR solution structure of the N-terminal domain of subunit E (E1–52) of A1AO ATP synthase from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii

Structural elements of the C-terminal domain of subunit E (E₁₃₃₋₂₂₂) from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae V₁V₀ ATPase determined by solution NMR spectroscopy

Subunit E of the vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase) contains an N-terminal extended α helix (Rishikesan et al. J Bioenerg Biomembr 43:187-193, 2011) and a globular C-terminal part that is predicted to consist of a mixture of α-helices and β-sheets (Grüber et al. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 298:383-391, 2002). Here we describe the production, purification and 2D structure of the C-terminal segment E₁₃₃₋₂₂₂ of subunit E from Saccharamyces cerevisiae V-ATPase in solution based on the secondary structure calculation from NMR spectroscopy studies. E₁₃₃₋₂₂₂ consists of four β-strands, formed by the amino acids from K136-V139, E170-V173, G186-V189, D195-E198 and two α-helices, composed of the residues from R144-A164 and T202-I218. The sheets and helices are arranged as β1:α1:β2:β3:β4:α2, which are connected by flexible loop regions. These new structural details of subunit E are discussed in the light of the structural arrangements of this subunit inside the V₁- and V₁V₀ ATPase.

Binding of subunit E into the A-B interface of the A(1)A(O) ATP synthase

Two of the distinct diversities of the engines A(1)A(O) ATP synthase and F(1)F(O) ATP synthase are the existence of two peripheral stalks and the 24kDa stalk subunit E inside the A(1)A(O) ATP synthase. Crystallographic structures of subunit E have been determined recently, but the epitope(s) and the strength to which this subunit does bind in the enzyme complex are still a puzzle. Using the recombinant A(3)B(3)D complex and the major subunits A and B of the methanogenic A(1)A(O) ATP synthase in combination with fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) we demonstrate, that the stalk subunit E does bind to the catalytic headpiece formed by the A(3)B(3) hexamer with an affinity (K(d)) of 6.1±0.2μM. FCS experiments with single A and B, respectively, demonstrated unequivocally that subunit E binds stronger to subunit B (K(d)=18.9±3.7μM) than to the catalytic A subunit (K(d)=53.1±4.4). Based on the crystallographic structures of the three subunits A, B and E available, the arrangement of the peripheral stalk subunit E in the A-B interface has been modeled, shining light into the A-B-E assembly of this enzyme.