Effects of Body Mass and Age on the Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous or Hyaluronidase-facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin G in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases

Immunoglobulin therapies for primary immunodeficiency diseases (part 1): understanding the pharmacokinetics

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) therapies have been used for decades as standard treatment for patients with primary antibody deficiencies. Monitoring the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IgG is a key component in guiding treatment regimens. Despite the wealth of clinical experience, substantial gaps exist in our understanding of the true nature of IgGs and their disposition in humans. Furthermore, intrinsic and extrinsic factors may alter the PK of IgG, necessitating an individualized approach for patients. A comprehensive literature review was performed in order to summarize the PK of IgGs, examine the mechanisms of IgG disposition (including catabolism), outline considerations for special patient populations and discuss knowledge gaps and future perspectives for improving our understanding of IgG PK in relation to the individualized treatment paradigm.

Immunoglobulin therapies for primary immunodeficiency diseases (part 2): considerations for dosing strategies

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) dosing in treating primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) is individualized, which often involves regular monitoring of IgG levels, and considers patient experiences with immunoglobulin therapies, their clinical status and physician judgment. The frequency and dose(s) of intravenously (IVIG) and subcutaneously (SCIG) administered IgGs (including hyaluronidase-facilitated SCIG) require rigorous evaluation to maximize therapeutic benefits. Monitoring serum IgG levels represents an integral part of diagnosing primary immunodeficiency diseases and determining or adjusting IgG dosing strategies to meet individual patient needs, but cannot be conducted in isolation. This review discusses the current state and future perspectives on dosing strategies for different types of IgG therapies, as well as dosing considerations for specific patient populations, immunoglobulin-naive patients and patients switching between IVIG and SCIG.

Population pharmacokinetics of immunoglobulin G after intravenous, subcutaneous, or hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous administration in immunoglobulin-naive patients with primary immunodeficiencies

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement therapy is the standard of care for patients with primary immunodeficiencies with antibody deficiencies. Intravenous (IVIG), subcutaneous (SCIG), and hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) therapies differ in their pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, administration routes, and dosing regimens. Information on use of subcutaneous therapy in IgG treatment-naive patients is limited. This study used population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model-based simulations to characterize IgG PKs in IgG-naive patients with varying disease severity across several IVIG, SCIG, and fSCIG dosing regimens. An integrated popPK model, developed and validated using data from eight clinical trials, was utilized to simulate scenarios that varied by therapy, loading regimen, maintenance dose (equivalent to 400, 600, or 800 mg/kg every 4 weeks [Q4W]), and baseline endogenous total IgG concentration (1.5 or 4.0 g/L). Simulations were performed for age groups of 2-<6, 6-<12, 12-<18, and ≥18 years. Steady-state serum trough IgG concentrations (Cmin,ss), proportion of patients achieving Cmin,ss ≥ 7 g/L, and days taken to reach this threshold were summarized. SCIG provided greater mean Cmin,ss values than IVIG and fSCIG for any scenario. Across all therapies, Cmin,ss tended to increase with age, dose, and endogenous concentration. Although the findings are model-based and not a summarization of real-world observations, doses ≥ 800 mg/kg Q4W with corresponding loading regimens are likely to be clinically appropriate for achieving target IgG concentrations in treatment-naive patients in a timely manner, especially at low endogenous starting concentrations. Therapy-specific dose adjustment based on baseline endogenous IgG concentration, clinical status, and patient characteristics may be warranted.