1
|
Bonnin P, Constans B, Duhamel A, Kyheng M, Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Estevez MG, Tavernier B, Gaudet A. Accuracy and trending ability of finger plethysmographic cardiac output monitoring in late pregnancy. Can J Anaesth 2022; 69:1340-1348. [PMID: 35927539 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02297-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Individuals in late pregnancy are at risk of significant hemodynamic variations, especially during Cesarean delivery. Although non-invasive monitoring might enable the early detection of variations in cardiac output (CO), clinical validation is lacking. METHODS In a prospective, single-center study, we measured CO simultaneously with finger plethysmography and transthoracic echocardiography in 100 third-trimester pregnant individuals in the supine and left lateral decubitus (LLD) positions. RESULTS A Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean (standard deviation) bias of 1.36 (1.04) L·min-1 in the supine position (95% limits of agreement, -0.68 to 3.4 L·min-1; percent error, 26.6%), indicating overestimation by finger plethysmography. The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.51). Regarding the changes in CO induced by the supine-to-LLD transition, the concordance rate in a four-quadrant plot was 98.3% (95% CI, 91.1 to 99.9%). CONCLUSION Our study showed a poor reliability of finger plethysmography for static measurement of CO. Nevertheless, finger plethysmography had a reasonably high concordance rate for the detection of CO changes secondary to positional changes in late-pregnant individuals. STUDY REGISTRATION DATE: www. CLINICALTRIALS gov (NCT03735043); registered 8 November 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Bonnin
- CHU Lille, Pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
| | - Benjamin Constans
- CHU Lille, Pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
- Centre Hospitalier de Seclin-Carvin, Service d'Anesthésie, Seclin, France
| | - Alain Duhamel
- Université de Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 METRICS- Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Lille, France
- CHU Lille, Unité de Méthodologie, Biostatistiques et Data Management, Lille, France
| | - Maéva Kyheng
- Université de Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 METRICS- Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Lille, France
- CHU Lille, Unité de Méthodologie, Biostatistiques et Data Management, Lille, France
| | | | | | - Benoit Tavernier
- CHU Lille, Pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France
- Université de Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 METRICS- Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, Lille, France
| | - Alexandre Gaudet
- CHU Lille, Pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Lille, France.
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Critical Care Centre, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
- Université de Lille, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019-UMR9017-CIIL-Centre d'Infection et d'Immunité de Lille, Lille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society published guidelines for bariatric surgery reviewing the evidence and providing specific care recommendations. These guidelines emphasize preoperative nutrition, multimodal analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, anesthetic technique, nutrition, and mobilization. Several studies have since evaluated these pathways, showing them to be safe and effective at decreasing hospital length of stay and postoperative nausea and vomiting. This article emphasizes anesthetic management in the perioperative period and outlines future directions, including the application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery principles in patients with extreme obesity, diabetes, and metabolic disease and standardization of the pathways to decrease heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa L Riley
- Fellow, Surgical Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Penn Medicine, 6 Dulles, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Anesthesiologist & Intensivist, Department of Anesthesiology, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haren AP, Nair S, Pace MC, Sansone P. Intraoperative Monitoring of the Obese Patient Undergoing Surgery: A Narrative Review. Adv Ther 2021; 38:3622-3651. [PMID: 34091873 PMCID: PMC8179704 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01774-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
With the increasing prevalence of obesity in the population, anaesthetists must confidently manage both the pathophysiological and technical challenges presented in bariatric and non-bariatric surgery. The intraoperative period represents an important opportunity to optimise and mitigate risk. However, there is little formal guidance on what intraoperative monitoring techniques should be used in this population. This narrative review collates the existing evidence for intraoperative monitoring devices in the obese patients. Although a number of non-invasive blood pressure monitors have been tested, an invasive arterial line remains the most reliable monitor if accurate, continuous monitoring is required. Goal-directed fluid therapy is recommended by clinical practice guidelines, but the methods tested to assess this had guarded applicability to the obese population. Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (CO2) monitoring may offer additional benefit to standard capnography in this population. Individually titrated positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres improved intraoperative mechanics but yielded no benefit in the immediate postoperative period. Depth of anaesthesia monitoring appears to be beneficial in the perioperative period regarding recovery times and complications. Objective confirmation of reversal of neuromuscular blockade continues to be a central tenet of anaesthesia practice, particularly relevant to this group who have been characterised as an "at risk" extubation group. Where deep neuromuscular blockade is used, continuous neuromuscular blockade is suggested. Both obesity and the intraoperative context represent somewhat unstable search terms, as the clinical implications of the obesity phenotype are not uniform, and the type and urgency of surgery have significant impact on the intraoperative setting. This renders the generation of summary conclusions around what intraoperative monitoring techniques are suitable in this population highly challenging.
Collapse
|
4
|
Lorenzen U, Pohlmann M, Hansen J, Klose P, Gruenewald M, Renner J, Elke G. Perioperative non-invasive versus semi-invasive cardiac index monitoring in patients with bariatric surgery - a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2020; 20:196. [PMID: 32778047 PMCID: PMC7419223 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01110-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery, the combination of obesity-related comorbidities, pneumoperitoneum and extreme posture changes constitutes a high risk of perioperative hemodynamic complications. Thus, an advanced hemodynamic monitoring including continuous cardiac index (CI) assessment is desirable. While invasive catheterization may bear technical difficulties, transesophageal echocardiography is contraindicated due to the surgical procedure. Evidence on the clinical reliability of alternative semi- or non-invasive cardiac monitoring devices is limited. The aim was to compare the non-invasive vascular unloading to a semi-invasive pulse contour analysis reference technique for continuous CI measurements in bariatric surgical patients. Methods This prospective observational study included adult patients scheduled for elective, laparoscopic bariatric surgery after obtained institutional ethics approval and written informed consent. CI measurements were performed using the vascular unloading technique (Nexfin®) and semi-invasive reference method (FloTrac™). At 10 defined measurement time points, the influence of clinically indicated body posture changes, passive leg raising, fluid bolus administration and pneumoperitoneum was evaluated pre- and intraoperatively. Correlation, Bland-Altman and concordance analyses were performed. Results Sixty patients (mean BMI 49.2 kg/m2) were enrolled into the study and data from 54 patients could be entered in the final analysis. Baseline CI was 3.2 ± 0.9 and 3.3 ± 0.8 l/min/m2, respectively. Pooled absolute CI values showed a positive correlation (rs = 0.76, P < 0.001) and mean bias of of − 0.16 l/min/m2 (limits of agreement: − 1.48 to 1.15 l/min/m2) between the two methods. Pooled percentage error was 56.51%, missing the criteria of interchangeability (< 30%). Preoperatively, bias ranged from − 0.33 to 0.08 l/min/m2 with wide limits of agreement. Correlation of CI was best (rs = 0.82, P < 0.001) and percentage error lowest (46.34%) during anesthesia and after fluid bolus administration. Intraoperatively, bias ranged from − 0.34 to − 0.03 l/min/m2 with wide limits of agreement. CI measurements correlated best during pneumoperitoneum and after fluid bolus administration (rs = 0.77, P < 0.001; percentage error 35.95%). Trending ability for all 10 measurement points showed a concordance rate of 85.12%, not reaching the predefined Critchley criterion (> 92%). Conclusion Non-invasive as compared to semi-invasive CI measurements did not reach criteria of interchangeability for monitoring absolute and trending values of CI in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Trial registration The study was registered retrospectively on June 12, 2017 with the registration number NCT03184272.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulf Lorenzen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Markus Pohlmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jonathan Hansen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Phil Klose
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Matthias Gruenewald
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Jochen Renner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Helios Kliniken Schwerin, 19055, Schwerin, Germany
| | - Gunnar Elke
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3 Haus R3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fischer MO, Joosten A, Desebbe O, Boutros M, Debroczi S, Broch O, Malbrain ML, Ameloot K, Hofer CK, Bubenek-Turconi ŞI, Monnet X, Diouf M, Lorne E. Interchangeability of cardiac output measurements between non-invasive photoplethysmography and bolus thermodilution: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2020; 39:75-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|
6
|
Saugel B, Flick M, Bendjelid K, Critchley LAH, Vistisen ST, Scheeren TWL. Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management. J Clin Monit Comput 2019; 33:211-222. [PMID: 30847738 PMCID: PMC6420447 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00297-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Hemodynamic management is a mainstay of patient care in the operating room and intensive care unit (ICU). In order to optimize patient treatment, researchers investigate monitoring technologies, cardiovascular (patho-) physiology, and hemodynamic treatment strategies. The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (JCMC) is a well-established and recognized platform for publishing research in this field. In this review, we highlight recent advancements and summarize selected papers published in the JCMC in 2018 related to hemodynamic monitoring and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernd Saugel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Centre of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Moritz Flick
- Department of Anesthesiology, Centre of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg- Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karim Bendjelid
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lester A H Critchley
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shantin, N.T., Hong Kong.,The Belford Hospital, Fort William, The Highlands, Scotland, UK
| | - Simon T Vistisen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Thomas W L Scheeren
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|