Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management

Influence of different intraoperative fluid management on postoperative outcome after abdominal tumours resection

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative fluid management is a crucial aspect of cancer surgery, including colorectal surgery and pancreatoduodenectomy. The study tests if intraoperative multimodal monitoring reduces postoperative morbidity and duration of hospitalisation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery treated by the same anaesthetic protocols with epidural analgesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in 2 parallel groups. High-risk surgical patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were randomly selected in the control group (CG), where standard monitoring was applied (44 patients), and the protocol group (PG), where cerebral oxygenation and extended hemodynamic monitoring were used with the protocol for intraoperative interventions (44 patients).

RESULTS

There were no differences in the median length of hospital stay, CG 9 days (interquartile range [IQR] 8 days), PG 9 (5.5), p = 0.851. There was no difference in postoperative renal of cardiac impairment. Procalcitonin was significantly higher (highest postoperative value in the first 3 days) in CG, 0.75 mcg/L (IQR 3.19 mcg/L), than in PG, 0.3 mcg/L (0.88 mcg/L), p = 0.001. PG patients received a larger volume of intraoperative fluid; median intraoperative fluid balance +1300 ml (IQR 1063 ml) than CG; +375 ml (IQR 438 ml), p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences in intraoperative fluid management and vasopressor use. The median postoperative value of procalcitonin was significantly higher in CG, suggesting differences in immune response to tissue trauma in different intraoperative fluid status, but there was no difference in postoperative morbidity or hospital stay.

The Prediction of Surgery Outcomes in Abdominal Tumor Patients with Sepsis by Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2

Background

To determine whether Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 combined with Pcv-aCO2 could predict the outcomes in patients complicated with abdominal infection and sepsis after abdominal tumor operation.

Methods

Total 92 patients admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to December 2020 who underwent abdominal tumor operation were enrolled. Blood gas analysis of artery and central vein, various laboratory indexes, SOFA score, hemodynamic parameters at different time points and treatment outcome were recorded.

Results

ROC curve analysis showed that hemodynamic parameter alone could not predict ICU treatment outcome and mortality of patients, but 72-hour SOFA score could predict treatment outcome of patients (AUC = 0.930, 95% CI: 0.803–1.000, p = 0.019). The significant hemodynamic parameter for evaluating treatment outcome and prognosis of patients was Pcv-aCO2 + Ratio of T3. Kaplan–Meier univariate survival curve and Log-rank suggested that patients who had higher combined predictive parameter of T3 Ratio + T3 Pcv-aCO2 still had ischemia and hypoxia of tissues and organs after standard fluid resuscitation, and treatment outcome was not good. In subgroup analysis, patients with higher Ratio had higher lactate, higher T72 SOFA score, and poor treatment outcome.

Conclusion

The combination of Ratio and Pcv-aCO2 could evaluate clinical treatment outcome of patients complicated with abdominal infection and sepsis after abdominal tumor operation.

Contemporary Review of Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critical Care Setting

Hemodynamic assessment remains the most valuable adjunct to physical examination and laboratory assessment in the diagnosis and management of shock. Through the years, multiple modalities to measure and trend hemodynamic indices have evolved with varying degrees of invasiveness. Pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has long been considered the gold standard of hemodynamic assessment in critically ill patients and in recent years has been shown to improve clinical outcomes among patients in cardiogenic shock. The invasive nature of PAC is often cited as its major limitation and has encouraged development of less invasive technologies. In this review, the authors summarize the literature on the mechanism and validation of several minimally invasive and noninvasive modalities available in the contemporary intensive care unit. They also provide an update on the use of focused bedside echocardiography.

Ultrasound and Other Advanced Hemodynamic Monitoring Techniques in the Intensive Care Unit

The ideal device for hemodynamic monitoring of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) or the operating room has not yet been developed. This would need to be affordable, consistent, have a very low margin of error (<30%), be minimally or noninvasive, and allow the clinician to make a reasonable therapeutic decision that consistently led to better outcomes. Such a device does not yet exist. This article will describe the distinct options we, as critical care physicians, currently possess for this Herculean endeavor.

Volumetric and End-Tidal Capnography for the Detection of Cardiac Output Changes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Early after Open Heart Surgery

Background

Exhaled carbon dioxide (CO₂) reflects cardiac output (CO) provided stable ventilation and metabolism. Detecting CO changes may help distinguish hypovolemia or cardiac dysfunction from other causes of haemodynamic instability. We investigated whether CO₂ measured as end-tidal concentration (EtCO₂) and eliminated volume per breath (VtCO₂) reflect sudden changes in cardiac output (CO).

Methods

We measured changes in CO, VtCO₂, and EtCO₂ during right ventricular pacing and passive leg raise in 33 ventilated patients after open heart surgery. CO was measured with oesophageal Doppler.

Results

During right ventricular pacing, CO was reduced by 21% (CI 18–24; p < 0.001), VtCO₂ by 11% (CI 7.9–13; p < 0.001), and EtCO₂ by 4.9% (CI 3.6–6.1; p < 0.001). During passive leg raise, CO increased by 21% (CI 17–24; p < 0.001), VtCO₂ by 10% (CI 7.8–12; p < 0.001), and EtCO₂ by 4.2% (CI 3.2–5.1; p < 0.001). Changes in VtCO₂ were significantly larger than changes in EtCO₂ (ventricular pacing: 11% vs. 4.9% (p < 0.001); passive leg raise: 10% vs. 4.2% (p < 0.001)). Relative changes in CO correlated with changes in VtCO₂ (ρ=0.53; p=0.002) and EtCO₂ (ρ=0.47; p=0.006) only during reductions in CO. When dichotomising CO changes at 15%, only EtCO₂ detected a CO change as judged by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Conclusion

VtCO₂ and EtCO₂ reflected reductions in cardiac output, although correlations were modest. The changes in VtCO₂ were larger than the changes in EtCO₂, but only EtCO₂ detected CO reduction as judged by receiver operating characteristic curves. The predictive ability of EtCO₂ in this setting was fair. This trial is registered with NCT02070861.