Simple calculation of the optimal insertion depth of esophageal temperature probes in children

Temperature measurements of a wearable and wireless axillary sensor iThermonitor but not a bladder probe represents the core temperature during laparoscopic rectal surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the temperature recorded by an iThermonitor has better concordance with the core temperature than the bladder temperature recorded by a Foley catheter sensor in laparoscopic rectal surgery.

METHODS

Eighty-two adults undergoing laparoscopic rectal surgery were enrolled. Temperatures were continuously measured by a distal oesophageal probe (the reference core temperature), axillary iThermonitor and Foley catheter sensor (bladder temperature) in each patient during surgery. Pairs of axillary and core temperatures or pairs of bladder temperature and core temperatures were compared and summarized using linear regression and the repeated-measured Bland-Altman method during the whole surgical period and pneumoperitoneum period.

RESULTS

There were 3303 pairs of temperature measurements during the whole surgical period. The mean difference between iThermonitor and oesophageal was 0.05 °C ; the limits of agreement were - 0.48 to 0.56 °C. The mean difference between the oesophagus and bladder was 0.28 °C; the limits of agreement were - 0.39 to 0.94 °C (P < 0.001, F-test vs. iThermonitor). Ninety -five% of all iThermonitor values were within 0.5 °C of oesophageal temperature, whereas the proportion for oesophageal and bladder differences within 0.5 °C was only 84% (95% confidence interval 80-88%). Lin's CCC for the iThermonitor and bladder measurements were 0.842 (95%CI: 0.831-0.851) and 0.688 (95%CI: 0.673-0.703) respectively. Similar results were found during the pneumoperitoneum period.

CONCLUSIONS

The temperature recorded by iThermonitor has better concordance with the core temperature than the bladder temperature recorded by Foley catheter sensor in laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Target insertion depth of nasopharyngeal temperature probes in children: A prospective observational study analyzing magnetic resonance images

BACKGROUND

Core temperature monitoring is indispensable to prevent children from perioperative thermal perturbations. Although nasopharyngeal measurements are commonly used in anesthesia and considered to reflect core temperature accurately, standardized target depths for probe insertion are unknown in children.

AIMS

Our primary goal was to determine a target depth of nasopharyngeal temperature probe insertion in children by measuring distances on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Secondary aims were to correlate these measurements with biometric variables and facial landmark-distances to derive formulas estimating target depth.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study in children ≤12 years undergoing cranial MRI with anesthesia. We documented patient characteristics and measured the landmark-distances nostril-mandible, nostril-tragus, and philtrum-tragus on patient's faces. On MRI, the target point for the probe tip was considered to be the site of the nasopharyngeal mucosa with the closest proximity to the internal carotid artery. After its determination in the transverse axis and triangulation to the sagittal axis, we measured the distance to the nostril. This distance, defined as target insertion depth, was correlated with the patient characteristics and used for univariate and multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty children with a mean age of 4.5 years were included. The target insertion depth ranged from 61.8 mm in infants to 89.8 mm in 12-year-old children. Height correlated best (ρ = 0.685, 95%-CI: [0.57-0.77]). The best-fit estimation in millimeters, "40.8 + height [cm] × 0.32,″ would lead to a placement in the target position in 67% of cases. A simplified approach by categories of 50-80, 80-110, 110-130, and >130 cm height with target insertion depths of 60, 70, 80, and 85 mm, respectively, achieved similar probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Height-based formulas could be a valuable proxy for the insertion depth of nasopharyngeal temperature probes. Further clinical trials are necessary to investigate their measurement accuracy.

Prospective comparative analysis of noninvasive body temperature monitoring using zero heat flux technology (SpotOn sensor) compared with esophageal temperature monitoring during pediatric surgery

Maintaining body temperature in pediatric patients is critical, but it is often difficult to use currently accepted core temperature measurement methods. Several studies have validated the use of the SpotOn sensor for measuring core temperature in adults, but studies on pediatric patients are still lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the SpotOn sensor compared with that of esophageal temperature measurement in pediatric patients intraoperatively. Children aged 1–8 years with American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Condition Classification I or II scheduled to undergo elective ear surgery for at least 30 min under general anesthesia were enrolled. Body core temperature was measured every 15 min after induction till the end of anesthesia with an esophageal probe, axillary probe, and SpotOn sensor. We included 49 patients, providing a total 466 paired measurements. Analysis of Pearson rank correlation between SpotOn and esophageal pairs showed a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–0.94). Analysis of Pearson rank correlation between esophageal and axillary pairs gave a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.87–0.91). Between the SpotOn and esophageal groups, Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias (SD, 95% limits of agreement) of -0.07 (0.17 [-0.41–0.28]). Between the esophageal and axillary groups, Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias (SD, 95% limits of agreement) of 0.45 (0.22 [0–0.89]). In pediatric patients during surgery, the SpotOn sensor showed high correlation and agreement with the esophageal probe, which is a representative core temperature measurement method.

The Accuracy of a Wireless Axillary Thermometer for Core Temperature Monitoring in Pediatric Patients Having Noncardiac Surgery: An Observational Study

PURPOSE

A wireless and wearable axillary thermometer (iThermonitor) has been validated for perioperative core temperature monitoring in adults. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its accuracy in pediatrics having non-cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2019, 70 children aged younger than 14 years undergoing surgery in a tertiary hospital were selected. Pairs of esophageal temperatures (T_Eso), rectal temperatures (T_Rec), and axillary temperatures monitored by the iThermonitor (T_iTh) were collected every 5 min during surgery. Taking T_Eso as reference, the bias between T_Eso and T_iTh and the proportion of bias within ±0.5°C were calculated. Bland-Altman method was used to analyze the 95% of limits of agreement (LOA) between T_iTh and T_Eso. The same analyses were done for T_Rec. FINDINGS: A total of 2232 pairs of temperatures were collected. The bias (mean ± SD) between T_iTh and T_Eso was -0.07 °C ± 0.25°C, and 95% LOA was -0.07°C ± 0.50°C. The proportion of bias within ±0.5°C accounted for 96% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 92-98%). Higher bias and 95% LOA, and lower proportion of bias within ± 0.5°C were found between T_Rec and T_Eso than those between T_iTh and T_Eso.

CONCLUSION

During pediatric non-cardiac surgery, axillary temperature derived from iThermonitor is in good agreement with esophageal temperature and can be used as an alternative to core temperature.

Perioperative Hypothermia in Children

Background: First described by paediatric anaesthesiologists, perioperative hypothermia is one of the earliest reported side effects of general anaesthesia. Deviations from normothermia are associated with numerous complications and adverse outcomes, with infants and small children at the highest risk. Nowadays, maintenance of normothermia is an important quality metric in paediatric anaesthesia. Methods: This review is based on our collection of publications regarding perioperative hypothermia and was supplemented with pertinent publications from a MEDLINE literature search. Results: We provide an overview on perioperative hypothermia in the paediatric patient, including definition, history, incidence, development, monitoring, risk factors, and adverse events, and provide management recommendations for its prevention. We also summarize the side effects and complications of perioperative temperature management. Conclusions: Perioperative hypothermia is still common in paediatric patients and may be attributed to their vulnerable physiology, but also may result from insufficient perioperative warming. An effective perioperative warming strategy incorporates the maintenance of normothermia during transportation, active warming before induction of anaesthesia, active warming during anaesthesia and surgery, and accurate measurement of core temperature. Perioperative temperature management must also prevent hyperthermia in children.

Intraoperative zero-heat-flux thermometry overestimates esophageal temperature by 0.26 °C: an observational study in 100 infants and young children

In pediatric anesthesia, deviations from normothermia can lead to many complications, with infants and young children at the highest risk. A measurement method for core temperature must be clinically accurate, precise and should be minimally invasive. Zero-heat-flux (ZHF) temperature measurements have been evaluated in several studies in adults. We assessed the agreement between the 3M Bair Hugger^™ temperature measurement sensor (T_ZHF) and esophageal temperature (T_Eso) in children up to and including 6 years undergoing surgery with general anesthesia. Data were recorded in 5 min-intervals. We investigated the accuracy of the ZHF sensor overall and in subgroups of different age, ASA classification, and temperature ranges by Bland–Altman comparisons of differences with multiple measurements. Change over time was assessed by a linear mixed model regression. Data were collected in 100 children with a median (1st–3rd quartile) age of 1.7 (1–3.9) years resulting in 1254 data pairs. Compared to T_Eso (range from 35.3 to 39.3 °C; median 37.2 °C), T_ZHF resulted in a mean bias of +0.26 °C (95% confidence interval +0.22 to +0.29 °C; 95% limits of agreement −0.11 to +0.62 °C). Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was 0.89. There was no significant or relevant change of temperature over time (0.006 °C per hour measurement interval, p = 0.199) and no relevant differences in the subgroups. Due to the mean bias of +0.26 °C in T_ZHF, the risk of hypothermia may be underestimated, while the risk of hyperthermia may be overestimated. Nevertheless, because of its high precision, we consider ZHF valuable for intraoperative temperature monitoring in children and infants.