Detection of gastric inflation using transesophageal echocardiography after different level of pressure-controlled mask ventilation: a prospective randomized trial

Effect of paratracheal pressure on the effectiveness of mask ventilation in obese anesthetized patients: a randomized, cross-over study

Paratracheal pressure has been recently suggested to compress and occlude the upper esophagus at the lower left paratracheal region to prevent gastric regurgitation alternative to cricoid pressure. It also prevents gastric insufflation. The aim of this randomized cross-over study was to investigate the effectiveness of paratracheal pressure on mask ventilation in obese anesthetized paralyzed patients. After the induction of anesthesia, two-handed mask ventilation was initiated in a volume-controlled mode with a tidal volume of 8 mL kg‒1 based on ideal body weight (IBW), a respiratory rate of 12 breaths min- 1, and positive end-expiratory pressure of 10 cmH2O. Expiratory tidal volume and peak inspiratory pressure were recorded alternately with or without the application of 30 Newtons (approximately 3.06 kg) paratracheal pressure during a total of 16 successive breaths over 80 s. Association of patient characteristics with the effectiveness of paratracheal pressure on mask ventilation, defined as the difference in expiratory tidal volume between the presence or absence of paratracheal pressure were evaluated. In 48 obese anesthetized paralyzed patients, expiratory tidal volume was significantly higher with the application of paratracheal pressure than without paratracheal pressure [496.8 (74.1) mL kg- 1 of IBW vs. 403.8 (58.4) mL kg- 1 of IBW, respectively; P < 0.001]. Peak inspiratory pressure was also significantly higher with the application of paratracheal pressure compared to that with no paratracheal pressure [21.4 (1.2) cmH2O vs. 18.9 (1.6) cmH2O, respectively; P < 0.001]. No significant association was observed between patient characteristics and the effectiveness of paratracheal pressure on mask ventilation. Hypoxemia did not occur in any of the patients during mask ventilation with or without paratracheal pressure. The application of paratracheal pressure significantly increased both the expiratory tidal volume and peak inspiratory pressure during face-mask ventilation with a volume-controlled mode in obese anesthetized paralyzed patients. Gastric insufflation was not evaluated in this study during mask ventilation with or without paratracheal pressure.

Effect of stomach inflation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Gastric inflation caused by excessive ventilation is a common complication of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Gastric inflation may further compromise ventilation via increases in intrathoracic pressure, leading to decreased venous return and cardiac output, which may impair out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes. The purpose of this study was to measure the gastric volume of OHCA patients using computed tomography (CT) scan images and evaluate the effect of gastric inflation on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective, observational study, CT scan was conducted after ROSC or immediately after death. Total gastric volume was measured. Primary outcome was ROSC. Achievement of ROSC was compared in the gastric distention group and the no gastric distention group; gastric distension was defined as total gastric volume in the ≥75th percentile. Additionally, factors associated with gastric distention were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 446 cases were enrolled in the study; 120 cases (27%) achieved ROSC. The median gastric volume was 400 ml for all OHCA subjects; 1068 ml in gastric distention group vs. 287 ml in no gastric distention group. There was no difference in ROSC between the groups (27/112 [24.1%] vs. 93/334 [27.8%], p = 0.440). Gastric distention did not have a significant impact, even after adjustments (adjusted odds ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval [0.42-1.29]). Increased gastric volume was associated with longer emergency medical service activity time.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a median gastric volume of 400 ml in patients after OHCA resuscitation. In our setting, gastric distention did not prevent ROSC.

Effect of facemask oxygenation with and without positive pressure ventilation on gastric volume during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or partial hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Studies focusing on the relationship between gastric volume and facemask oxygenation without ventilation during apnea in anesthesia induction are scarce. This study compared the change in gastric volume during apnea in anesthesia induction using facemask ventilation and facemask oxygenation without ventilation in adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 70 adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia were divided into two groups to receive facemask oxygenation with and without ventilation for 60 seconds after loss of consciousness. Before anesthesia induction and after endotracheal intubation, the gastric antral cross-sectional area was measured with ultrasound imaging. Arterial blood gases were tested at baseline (T1), after preoxygenation (T2), after loss of consciousness (T3), and before and after endotracheal intubation (T4 and T5, respectively).

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (ventilation n = 30; non ventilation n = 30, 10 patients were excluded). The median [IQR] change of gastric antral cross-sectional area in ventilation group was significantly higher than in non ventilation group (0.83 [0.20 to 1.54] vs. 0.10 [- 0.11 to 0.56] cm₂, P = 0.001). At T4 and T5, the PaO₂ in ventilation group was significantly higher than in non ventilation group (T4: 391.83 ± 61.53 vs. 336.23 ± 74.99 mmHg, P < 0.01; T5: 364.00 ± 58.65 vs. 297.13 ± 86.95 mmHg, P < 0.01), while the PaCO₂ in non ventilation group was significantly higher (T4: 46.57 ± 5.78 vs. 37.27 ± 6.10 mmHg, P < 0.01; T5: 48.77 ± 6.59 vs. 42.63 ± 6.03 mmHg, P < 0.01) and the pH value in non ventilation group was significantly lower (T4: 7.35 ± 0.029 vs 7.42 ± 0.047, P < 0.01; T5: 7.34 ± 0.033 vs 7.39 ± 0.044, P < 0.01). At T4, the HCO₃^- in non ventilation group was significantly higher (25.79 ± 2.36 vs. 23.98 ± 2.18 mmol l^- 1, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

During apnoea, the increase in gastric volume was milder in patients undergoing facemask oxygenation without ventilation than with positive pressure ventilation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2100054193, 10/12/2021, Title: "Effect of positive pressure and non-positive pressure ventilation on gastric volume during induction of general anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial". Website: https://www.chictr.ogr.cn .