Intra-abdominal hypertension in cardiac surgery patients: a multicenter observational sub-study of the Accuryn registry

Optimization of kidney function in cardiac surgery patients with intra-abdominal hypertension: expert opinion

Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) affects up to 42% of cardiac surgery patients. CSA-AKI is multifactorial, with low abdominal perfusion pressure often overlooked. Abdominal perfusion pressure is calculated as mean arterial pressure minus intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). IAH decreases cardiac output and compresses the renal vasculature and renal parenchyma. Recent studies have highlighted the frequent occurrence of IAH in cardiac surgery patients and have linked the role of low perfusion pressure to the occurrence of AKI. This review and expert opinion illustrate current evidence on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and therapy of IAH and ACS in the context of AKI.

Urine output is an early and strong predictor of acute kidney injury and associated mortality: a systematic literature review of 50 clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Although the present diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) involves measurement of acute increases in serum creatinine (SC) and reduced urine output (UO), measurement of UO is underutilized for diagnosis of AKI in clinical practice. The purpose of this investigation was to conduct a systematic literature review of published studies that evaluate both UO and SC in the detection of AKI to better understand incidence, healthcare resource use, and mortality in relation to these diagnostic measures and how these outcomes may vary by population subtype.

METHODS

The systematic literature review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Data were extracted from comparative studies focused on the diagnostic accuracy of UO and SC, relevant clinical outcomes, and resource usage. Quality and validity were assessed using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) single technology appraisal quality checklist for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for observational studies.

RESULTS

A total of 1729 publications were screened, with 50 studies eligible for inclusion. A majority of studies (76%) used the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria to classify AKI and focused on the comparison of UO alone versus SC alone, while few studies analyzed a diagnosis of AKI based on the presence of both UO and SC, or the presence of at least one of UO or SC indicators. Of the included studies, 33% analyzed patients treated for cardiovascular diseases and 30% analyzed patients treated in a general intensive care unit. The use of UO criteria was more often associated with increased incidence of AKI (36%), than was the application of SC criteria (21%), which was consistent across the subgroup analyses performed. Furthermore, the use of UO criteria was associated with an earlier diagnosis of AKI (2.4-46.0 h). Both diagnostic modalities accurately predicted risk of AKI-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence suggests that the inclusion of UO criteria provides substantial diagnostic and prognostic value to the detection of AKI.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support & enhancing recovery after cardiac surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights the integration of enhanced recovery principles with temporary mechanical circulatory support associated with adult cardiac surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Enhanced recovery elements and efforts have been associated with improvements in quality and value. Temporary mechanical circulatory support technologies have been successfully employed, improved, and the value of their proactive use to maintain hemodynamic goals and preserve long-term myocardial function is accruing.

SUMMARY

Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices promise to enhance recovery by mitigating the risk of complications, such as postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, organ dysfunction, and death, associated with adult cardiac surgery.

Evaluation of the TraumaGuard Balloon-in-Balloon Catheter Design for Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Insights from Pig and Human Cadaver Studies

Introduction: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) monitoring is crucial for the detection and prevention of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). In the 1970s, air-filled catheters (AFCs) for urodynamic studies were introduced as a solution to overcome the limitations of water-perfused catheters. Recent studies have shown that for correct IAP measurement with traditional AFC, the bladder needs to be primed with 25 mL of saline solution to allow pressure wave transmission to the transducer outside of the body, which limits continuous IAP monitoring. Methods: In this study, a novel triple balloon, air-filled TraumaGuard (TG) catheter system from Sentinel Medical Technologies (Jacksonville, FL, USA) with a unique balloon-in-balloon design was evaluated in a porcine and cadaver model of IAH via laparoscopy (IAPgold). Results: In total, 27 and 86 paired IAP measurements were performed in two pigs and one human cadaver, respectively. The mean IAPTG was 20.7 ± 10.7 mmHg compared to IAPgold of 20.3 ± 10.3 mmHg in the porcine study. In the cadaver investigation, the mean IAPTG was 15.6 ± 10.8 mmHg compared to IAPgold of 14.4 ± 10.4 mmHg. The correlation, concordance, bias, precision, limits of agreement, and percentage error were all in accordance with the WSACS (Abdominal Compartment Society) recommendations and guidelines for research. Conclusions: These findings support the use of the TG catheter for continuous IAP monitoring, providing early detection of elevated IAP, thus enabling the potential for prevention of IAH and ACS. Confirmation studies with the TraumaGuard system in critically ill patients are warranted to further validate these findings.

A Decrease in Effective Renal Perfusion Pressure Is Associated With Increased Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), renal perfusion indices, and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in cardiac patients.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort study conducted at a single academic institution, we collected data from adult patients undergoing open-heart operations with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at our institution from February 2022 to April 2022 using the Accuryn SmartFoley system® (Potrero Medical, Hayward, CA). Patients on mechanical support devices, pregnant patients, and patients on hemodialysis were excluded. Demographics, hemodynamics, and mean airway pressure (mAir) were measured at the beginning of the cardiac operations and during the first four hours of ICU. Renal perfusion indices were then calculated (mean perfusion pressure (MPP) = mean arterial pressure (MAP) - central venous pressure (CVP); abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) = MAP - IAP; and effective renal perfusion pressure (eRPP) = MAP - (CVP + mAir + IAP)). Length of stay (LOS) was measured from the day of surgery to ICU discharge (ICU LOS) and hospital discharge (hospital LOS).

RESULTS

During the first four hours of ICU stay, the non-AKI group had lower IAP and higher renal perfusion indices (MPP, APP, and eRPP). Logistic regression showed high perfusion pressures correlated with lower postoperative AKI (all OR <1, p<0.05). The postoperative AKI group also had significantly longer ICU LOS (7.33 vs. 4.57 days) and hospital LOS (17.0 vs. 10.2 days).

CONCLUSION

Renal perfusion indices are a promising tool to predict postoperative AKI in cardiac surgery patients.

Intraoperative arterial pressure management: knowns and unknowns

Preventing postoperative organ dysfunction is integral to the practice of anaesthesia. Although intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative end organ dysfunction, there remains ambiguity with regards to its definition, targets, thresholds for initiating treatment, and ideal treatment modalities.

Is it feasible to measure intra-abdominal pressure using a balloon-tipped rectal catheter? Results of a validation study

The gold standard to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is intra-vesical measurement via the urinary bladder. However, this technique is restricted in ambulatory settings because of the risk of iatrogenic urinary tract infections. Rectal IAP measurements (IAP_rect) may overcome these limitations, but requires validation. This validation study compares the IAP_rect technique against gold standard intra-vesical IAP measurements (IAP_ves). IAP_rect using an air-filled balloon catheter and IAP_ves using Foley Manometer Low Volume were measured simultaneously in sedated and ventilated patients. Measurements were performed twice in different positions (supine and HOB 45° elevated head of bed) and with an external abdominal pressure belt. Sixteen patients were included. Seven were not eligible for analysis due to unreliable IAP_rect values. IAP_rect was significantly higher than IAP_ves for all body positions (p < 0.01) and the correlation between IAP_ves and IAP_rect was poor and not significant in each position (p ≥ 0.25, R² < 0.6, Lin's CCC < 0.8, bias - 8.1 mmHg and precision of 5.6 mmHg with large limits of agreement between - 19 to 2.9 mmHg, high percentage error 67.3%, and low concordance 86.2%). Repeatability of IAP_rect was not reliable (R = 0.539, p = 0.315). For both techniques, measurements with the external abdominal pressure belt were significantly higher compared to those without (p < 0.03). IAP_rect has important shortcomings making IAP estimation using a rectal catheter unfeasible because the numbers cannot be trusted nor validated.

Assessment of Intra-Abdominal Pressure with a Novel Continuous Bladder Pressure Monitor-A Clinical Validation Study

INTRODUCTION

Intra-abdominal hypertension and the resulting abdominal compartment syndrome are serious complications of severely ill patients. Diagnosis requires an intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement, which is currently cumbersome and underused. We aimed to test the accuracy of a novel continuous IAP monitor.

METHODS

Adults having laparoscopic surgery and requiring urinary catheter intra-operatively were recruited to this single-arm validation study. IAP measurements using the novel monitor and a gold-standard foley manometer were compared. After anesthesia induction, a pneumoperitoneum was induced through a laparoscopic insufflator, and five randomly pre-defined pressures (between 5 and 25 mmHg) were achieved and simultaneously measured via both methods in each participant. Measurements were compared using Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 29 participants completed the study and provided 144 distinct pairs of pressure measurements that were analyzed. A positive correlation between the two methods was found (R² = 0.93). There was good agreement between the methods, with a mean bias (95% CI) of -0.4 (-0.6, -0.1) mmHg and a standard deviation of 1.3 mmHg, which was statistically significant but of no clinical importance. The limits of agreement (where 95% of the differences are expected to fall) were -2.9 and 2.2 mmHg. The proportional error was statistically insignificant (p = 0.85), suggesting a constant agreement between the methods across the range of values tested. The percentage error was 10.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous IAP measurements using the novel monitor performed well in the clinical setup of controlled intra-abdominal hypertension across the evaluated range of pressures. Further studies should expand the range to more pathological values.

A Retrospective, Observational Study of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Events Post-Implementation of a Novel Urinary Catheter System with Active Drain Line Clearance and Automated Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring

Objective: A quality improvement study to assess catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) rate post-implementation of a bladder catheter with integrated active drain line urine clearance and automated intra-abdominal pressure monitoring in a burn intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Eight-year retrospective before and after study (2015−2022). Setting: A single American Burn Association-verified Burn Center with 14 inpatient beds. Patients: Patients meeting criteria for admission to a Burn Center. Methods: Retrospective cohort study following the implementation of a novel urine output monitoring system with integrated drain line and urine clearance. Data from a 48-month (from January 2015−December 2018) historical control (period 1) were compared to data from a 28-month (from January 2020 to April 2022) post-implementation period (period 2). Pre- and post-implementation CAUTI event incidences were compared. Patients were transferred from outside hospitals with gravity bladder. A distinction in the chart between catheter types was impossible. Charts were reviewed to characterize patients with CAUTI events. Results: A total of 42 CAUTIs in 2243 patients were identified using the National Health and Safety Network (NHSN) definition during the analyzed period. There were 40 CAUTI events in period 1 and two CAUTIs in period 2. The incidence of CAUTI events pre-implementation was 0.030 (mean of 10 CAUTI events per year) compared to 0.002 (mean of 1 CAUTI event per year) post-implementation of an automatic drain line clearing UO monitoring system showing a significant reduction in CAUTI events (p < 0.01, risk ratio novel vs. gravity bladder catheter 0.071, 95% confidence interval: 0.017−0.294). Conclusions: CAUTIs were reduced in the period following the implementation of a novel urinary catheter system with an integrated active drain line and urine clearance in burn patients.

Pre-Clinical Validation of A Novel Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurement Equipment (SERENNO)

Introduction: Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) has an important impact on morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. The SERENNO Sentinel system (Serenno Medical, Yokne’am Illit, Israel) is a novel device that allows automatic and continuous IAP measurements. Aims: Pre-clinical validation in a bench model study comparing the new device with the gold standard method and two other continuous IAP measurement devices. Methods: IAP measurement with the novel SERENNO device (IAP_SER) was compared with the gold standard IAP_H2O (water column height) and two other automatic and continuous IAP measurement devices: IAP_CiM measured via the CiMON device (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany) and IAP_SPIE measured using the Spiegelberg device (Spiegelberg, Hamburg, Germany), which previously received the CE mark for clinical applications. The IAP measurement was performed six times (n = 6) at each pressure value (between 0 and 35 mmHg) with different methods and the height of the water column in a bench-top phantom was used as the reference IAP for further interpretations. In addition to the quadruple comparisons, intra- and inter-observer variability of IAP measurements were also calculated. Correlation studies and Bland and Altman’s analyses were performed in addition to the concordance study. Results: The CiMON and Spiegelberg devices showed a greater dynamic range and standard deviation when recording IAP_CiM and IAP_SPIE compared with IAP_SER. In general, the maximum and minimum values of IAP recorded with each device (at each level of IAP_H2O) were significantly different from each other. However, the average values were in very good agreement. The highest correlation was observed between IAP_SER and IAP_H2O, and IAP_SER and IAP_SPIE (R = 0.99, p = 0.001 for both comparisons and intra- and inter-observer measurements). Although the CiMON and SERENNO systems were in very good agreement with each other, a slightly smaller correlation coefficient was found between them (R = 0.95, p = 0.001, and R = 0.96, p = 0.001 for intra- and inter-observer measurements, respectively). When compared to the gold standard (IAP_H2O), Bland and Altman’s analysis showed a mean difference of +0.44, −0.25, and −0.04 mmHg for the intra-observer measurements and +0.18, −0.75, and −0.58 mmHg for the inter-observer measurements for IAP_SER, IAP_CiM, and IAP_SPIE, respectively. IAP_SER showed a small positive bias (overestimation), while IAP_CiM and IAP_SPIE showed a negative bias (underestimation) when compared to IAP_H2O. Further statistical analysis showed a concordance coefficient of 100% with an excellent ability of the SERENNO system in tracking IAP_H2O changes. Conclusions: Pre-clinical validation of a new IAP monitoring device (SERENNO) showed very promising results when compared with the gold standard and other continuous techniques; however, clinical trials should be followed as the next stage of the validation process. Based on the actual research guidelines, the SERENNO system can be used interchangeably with the gold standard.

Massive Ascites Causing Presumed Abdominal Compartment Syndrome During Open Heart Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is a potentially fatal condition and a known cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. It can be primary, due to abdominal trauma and/or surgical procedures, or secondary, due to excessive abdominal fluid and/or bowel edema. Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is defined as intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) greater than 12 mm Hg. ACS occurs when increased IAP results in organ dysfunction. Although IAPs are known to increase in cardiac surgery, ACS is uncommon, and reports are limited in the literature. We describe a fatal case of presumed ACS during an aortic valve and root replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).